Latest topics
» POOFness for JUNE 17: A FATHER'S LOVE FROM GHOULKOWSKI THE INTERNET CON-ARTIST
Today at 10:22 pm by RamblerNash

» Should we draw a conclusion ?
Today at 9:38 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Fundraiser by Kalia Gregory - CBD skin care
Today at 9:18 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Our goal, when it comes to Jerzy Babkowski, a.k.a. ZAP
Today at 8:37 pm by PurpleSkyz

» State of Emergency Declared In Papua New Guinea, Rioters Torch Plane
Today at 7:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» New Copyright Law Could Make Current and Future Internet Memes Illegal to Share
Today at 7:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Daytime fireball SOARS through sky on radar - 8+ inches of rain coming - Strange seismos
Today at 7:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Guess Who Is Building A New Base In Antarctica?!
Today at 7:24 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Leaked Image of Barack Obama Dressed as Satan Goes Viral??
Today at 7:18 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The GoldFish Report No. 236 WEEK 74 POTUS REPORT W/ THE FETZ-MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX STILL EXIST
Today at 4:24 pm by PurpleSkyz

» 12 Clinton Whistleblowers Found ‘Hanging From Doorknobs’
Today at 3:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» 22 People Shot During a Mass Shooting Sunday, But it Doesn’t Fit the Narrative, So Media is Ignoring It
Today at 3:00 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Activist Speak Out; Deborah Tavares, John Knox, Jamie Lee, Peter Valentino and more
Today at 2:48 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Metamaterial that bends, shapes and focuses sound waves
Today at 1:55 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The occult archetype called vaccination By Jon Rappoport
Today at 1:52 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Freight Train Derails & Explodes In Indiana Causing Evacuation, Huge Fireball
Today at 1:46 pm by PurpleSkyz

» 19 Things That Can Help With A Spontaneous Awakening
Today at 1:44 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Uruguay: First Nation To Legalize Marijuana Can’t Keep Up With Demand
Today at 1:42 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Flattening the Hot Air Claim that Britain Owns Us By Anna Von Reitz
Today at 12:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Stan Romanek Story - Messages - Full UFO Contact Documentary
Today at 11:00 am by PurpleSkyz

» New Linda Moulton Howe Shocking Revelation - You Need to Hear This!!
Today at 10:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» How Fast Does Cannabis Oil Work For Parkinson's Disease?
Today at 10:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» Japan earthquake kills at least three and injures hundreds
Today at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» BREAKING NEWS: All leave voters are thick!
Today at 10:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» TOP Astronomical Event, June Solstice 2018
Today at 10:53 am by PurpleSkyz

» Reno, Nevada Holistic Animal Care (local & Long distance)
Today at 10:44 am by Consciousness Of Economic

» The HAARP Conspiracy: Weather as a WEAPON
Today at 10:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» Benjamin Fulford 6-18-18
Today at 10:37 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Origins Of ISIS - David Icke Talks To The Lancashire Post
Today at 10:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Did A Family See A TR3B UFO Over Mills River North Carolina? plus MORE
Today at 10:33 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ JawDropping-Planet X System from Three Continents plus MORE
Today at 10:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» Ken O'Keefe 'Question Time with KOK #1' - Ask KOK a Question
Today at 10:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Delusion Land: Anna Von Reitz & The Arrest Warrant - UPDATE: Owner and Operator of “Virgo Triad” YouTube Channel accused of attempted murder! WTF?
Today at 12:33 am by PurpleSkyz


You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » U.S. Supreme Court Declares Warrantless GPS Use by Police Unconstitutional

U.S. Supreme Court Declares Warrantless GPS Use by Police Unconstitutional

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

AJAnderson

avatar
Victory: In 9-0 Ruling in US v. Jones, U.S. Supreme Court Declares Warrantless GPS Use by Police Unconstitutional

January 23, 2012


WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a unanimous ruling in United States v. Jones, the U.S. Supreme Court has declared that police must get a search warrant before using GPS technology to track criminal suspects. Insisting that individuals have a reasonable expectation that they will not be subject to constant monitoring by the government, and that escalating secretive technological surveillance violates an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy, The Rutherford Institute had filed an amicus curiae brief in the case.

The Rutherford Institute’s brief in United States v. Jones is available here.

“We have entered a new and frightening age when advancing technology is erasing the Fourth Amendment,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute. “Thankfully, in recognizing that the placement of a GPS device on Antoine Jones's Jeep violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure, the U.S. Supreme Court has sent a resounding message to government officials—especially law enforcement officials—that there are limits to their powers.”

In September 2005, without Antoine Jones’s knowledge or consent, police placed a GPS device on the undercarriage of Jones’ Jeep vehicle while it was parked in a public lot in Maryland. GPS devices use orbiting satellites to produce accurate and continuous records of their position and of any person or object carrying the devices. Consequently, over the course of four weeks, police were able to monitor Jones’ movements and actions as he drove his vehicle. Based upon the detailed information obtained about Jones’ movements, police arrested and charged Jones with conspiracy to distribute drugs. Prior to trial, Jones moved to suppress the evidence obtained using the GPS monitoring, arguing that because the police had violated the terms of a court order allowing the placement of the GPS device on his vehicle, the evidence was obtained without a warrant in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The trial court rejected Jones’ motion to suppress.

However, on appeal, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that the use of the GPS device to track Jones and the evidence obtained constituted an illegal search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Additionally, the Court of Appeals rejected the government’s claim that no violation of Jones’ privacy had taken place because the evidence pertained to Jones’ movements while he was in public. In asking the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm the Court of Appeals’ ruling, Rutherford Institute attorneys pointed to numerous surveillance technologies available to the government, such as GPS, drones, and facial recognition, that threaten the right of citizens to be free from government monitoring. “While this technology can serve a useful purpose in apprehending criminals,” the brief argued, “the essence of the Fourth Amendment dictates that law enforcement officials not be permitted free reign to conduct high-tech surveillance absent judicial oversight through the warranting process.”

http://www.asset-protection-101.com

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum