Latest topics
» UFO News ~ Beautiful UFO Disk Visits ISS and MORE
Today at 9:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Melting Arctic Ice Reveals UFO Underwater Base
Today at 9:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Nibiru Monitoring Rocket Sabotaged plus MORE
Today at 9:04 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Hillary humor
Today at 5:46 pm by Serena1

» Dr. Steven Greer : The All-Seeing Eye
Today at 4:55 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Obama Commutes Bulk of Chelsea Manning’s Sentence
Today at 4:45 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Petition The Vatican To Return Valuable Art, Books, Treasures, & Sacred Knowledge To Humanity
Today at 3:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» #NoDapl Action On 1806 Bridge
Today at 2:48 pm by PurpleSkyz

» LIVE: Donald Trump Accuser Press Conference - Gloria Allred Files LAWSUIT on Behalf of Summer Zervos
Today at 1:48 pm by PurpleSkyz

» POOFness for JAN 16: GET HAPPY (and throw some more donations my way)
Today at 12:56 pm by EL_O_EL

» How Primal Trauma Resurfaces Throughout Our Lives
Today at 12:33 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Anna von Reitz - Words and Terms, Or, Stop Being Stupid Part 19
Today at 9:55 am by PurpleSkyz

» BREAKING - SHOTS FIRED! #NODAPL BACKWATER BRIDGE STANDING ROCK
Today at 9:52 am by PurpleSkyz

» This Weeks RV/CGR News 2017:1/15-1/21
Today at 9:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» Something REALLY WEIRD Happened At Denver Airport!
Today at 9:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» Beer Company Makes Edible Six-Pack Rings That Feed, Rather Than Kill Marine Life
Today at 4:46 am by NanneeRose

» 7 Reasons to Start Drinking Cannabis Tea
Today at 4:44 am by NanneeRose

» The Best Sources of Protein - You'll Never Guess The Three Items Not On This List
Today at 4:43 am by NanneeRose

» Anonymous Jan 20 - May Have Riots, Civil Unrest, and Chaos in America
Yesterday at 10:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense & Flem Ath - Antarctica the Lost Continent of Atlantis
Yesterday at 10:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Dave Schmidt Live Stream, Jan. 4th
Yesterday at 10:19 pm by Red Panda

» Massive Crack In The Earth Opens Up In Northern Cape, South Africa
Yesterday at 9:49 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “A Monolithic and Ruthless Conspiracy”
Yesterday at 9:40 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Effect of Aluminum in Vaccines on Humans
Yesterday at 9:35 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Message for the 1st Wave: Phase 2
Yesterday at 9:28 pm by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » TRUTH IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES » CONSPIRACY & FALSE FLAG EVENTS: PAST & PRESENT » New Studies: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Are Saner

New Studies: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Are Saner

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz


Admin
New Studies: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Are Saner


Posted by Deus Nexus on July 12, 2013


Reposted from: PressTV.
Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.
The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.
Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”
In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.
Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”
Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”
In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.
DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.
Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.
In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.
The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled“Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:

“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”

But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones.
No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.
RELATED POSTS:
Role of Conspiracy Theories in Personal Transformation
Surprising Number Of Americans Believe In Conspiracy Theories

 
Thanks to: http://deusnexus.wordpress.com




 “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. 
H
ate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.”
 Martin Luther King Jr


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum