Latest topics
» Schumann WARNING ++ Super Strange Chems Germany
Today at 12:15 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Antarctica's mysteries SOLVED Expert lifts lid on 'UFOs and Nazi bases' on Google Earth
Today at 11:53 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cave Mysteries of the Nephilim. Are there Civilizations Underground ?
Today at 11:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» We've Been Waiting For Something Like This! 2018
Today at 11:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» Kim Dotcom: The Deep State, WikiLeaks and Seth Rich
Today at 10:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» 2018 IS STRANGE Part 3 - MARCH
Today at 10:39 am by PurpleSkyz

Today at 10:13 am by WilliaminUSA

» Anna Tells it Like it Is to Kim (the RV Guru Scamtastic) Possible
Today at 9:57 am by topspin2

» American SwissIndo aka Cindy Kay Currier back at it
Today at 9:16 am by topspin2

» In But Not Of?
Today at 9:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense Jim Keith The Real Men In Black
Today at 9:13 am by PurpleSkyz

» March equinox: All you need to know
Today at 9:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ House size UFO startles eyewitness in Ocala, Florida plus MORE
Today at 8:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» Capricorn and the astrological wheel: santos bonacci
Today at 8:45 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cluster of "unknown objects" visible from ISS HIGH above the Earth - A close look at them
Today at 8:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Shame on You PX Researchers!!! SHAME plus MORE
Today at 8:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» Wildlife on the Brink! Biodiversity is in Crisis
Today at 8:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» Linda Moulton Howe & Daniel Liszt Part One & Two
Yesterday at 11:35 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Mullti color mysterious bright UFOs orbs in the skies of Mexico plus MORE
Yesterday at 10:35 pm by Serena1

» GCI006 Hluhluwe, South Africa | Schumann Resonance Spike
Yesterday at 7:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The White House - Recent Amendments May Telegraph Military Tribunals in the Near Future
Yesterday at 6:38 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Gifts from the Stars
Yesterday at 6:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

Yesterday at 6:12 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Will Governor Jerry Brown Be Arrested, Prosecuted and Imprisoned…
Yesterday at 6:08 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Stonehenge is a fraud?
Yesterday at 6:01 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Karmic New Moon in Pisces — the most Powerful Healing Moon of 2018!
Yesterday at 3:24 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Anonymous - Something Thought to be Impossible is Happening...
Yesterday at 3:17 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Lisa Transcendence Brown: Current Photonic Energies Increase
Yesterday at 2:19 pm by PurpleSkyz

» According to a Recent Study, Smudging Destroys ‘Killer Germs.’
Yesterday at 2:17 pm by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » NY Times Releases Latest on NSA Spying re Social Connections in Print Edition

NY Times Releases Latest on NSA Spying re Social Connections in Print Edition

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]


NY Times Releases Latest on NSA Spying re Social Connections in Print Edition [video]

I’m not liking what I’m hearing at all. They have created profiles of everyone, everything we do, everywhere, with whom, and when. And I mean ‘US’—not criminals or terrorism suspects. Everyday, average, honest citizens of the USA. Completely unconstitutional—but of course all in the name of ‘national security’. It sounds like much of the data is compliments of the beloved cell phone and smart phone. Too smart for our own good.

N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens
WASHINGTON — Since 2010, the National Security Agency has been exploiting its huge collections of data to create sophisticated graphs of some Americans’ social connections that can identify their associates, their locations at certain times, their traveling companions and other personal information, according to newly disclosed documents and interviews with officials.
Carolyn Kaster/Associated Press
Gen. Keith Alexander, the director of the National Security Agency
testified on Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Enlarge This Image

This slide from an N.S.A. PowerPoint presentation shows one of the ways the agency uses e-mail and phone data to analyze the relationships of foreign intelligence targets.
The spy agency began allowing the analysis of phone call and e-mail logs in November 2010 to examine Americans’ networks of associations for foreign intelligence purposes after N.S.A. officials lifted restrictions on the practice, according to documents provided by Edward J. Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor.
The policy shift was intended to help the agency “discover and track” connections between intelligence targets overseas and people in the United States, according to an N.S.A. memorandum from January 2011. The agency was authorized to conduct “large-scale graph analysis on very large sets of communications metadata without having to check foreignness” of every e-mail address, phone number or other identifier, the document said. Because of concerns about infringing on the privacy of American citizens, the computer analysis of such data had previously been permitted only for foreigners.
The agency can augment the communications data with material from public, commercial and other sources, including bank codes, insurance information, Facebook profiles, passenger manifests, voter registration rolls and GPS location information, as well as property records and unspecified tax data, according to the documents. They do not indicate any restrictions on the use of such “enrichment” data, and several former senior Obama administration officials said the agency drew on it for both Americans and foreigners.
N.S.A. officials declined to say how many Americans have been caught up in the effort, including people involved in no wrongdoing. The documents do not describe what has resulted from the scrutiny, which links phone numbers and e-mails in a “contact chain” tied directly or indirectly to a person or organization overseas that is of foreign intelligence interest.
The new disclosures add to the growing body of knowledge in recent months about the N.S.A.’s access to and use of private information concerning Americans, prompting lawmakers in Washington to call for reining in the agency and President Obama to order an examination of its surveillance policies. Almost everything about the agency’s operations is hidden, and the decision to revise the limits concerning Americans was made in secret, without review by the nation’s intelligence court or any public debate. As far back as 2006, a Justice Department memo warned of the potential for the “misuse” of such information without adequate safeguards.
An agency spokeswoman, asked about the analyses of Americans’ data, said, “All data queries must include a foreign intelligence justification, period.”
“All of N.S.A.’s work has a foreign intelligence purpose,” the spokeswoman added. “Our activities are centered on counterterrorism, counterproliferation and cybersecurity.”
The legal underpinning of the policy change, she said, was a 1979 Supreme Court ruling that Americans could have no expectation of privacy about what numbers they had called. Based on that ruling, the Justice Department and the Pentagon decided that it was permissible to create contact chains using Americans’ “metadata,” which includes the timing, location and other details of calls and e-mails, but not their content. The agency is not required to seek warrants for the analyses from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
N.S.A. officials declined to identify which phone and e-mail databases are used to create the social network diagrams, and the documents provided by Mr. Snowden do not specify them. The agency did say that the large database of Americans’ domestic phone call records, which was revealed by Mr. Snowden in June and caused bipartisan alarm in Washington, was excluded. (N.S.A. officials have previously acknowledged that the agency has done limited analysis in that database, collected under provisions of the Patriot Act, exclusively for people who might be linked to terrorism suspects.)
But the agency has multiple collection programs and databases, the former officials said, adding that the social networking analyses relied on both domestic and international metadata. They spoke only on the condition of anonymity because the information was classified.

Thanks to:


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum