Latest topics
» GCI006 Hluhluwe, South Africa | Schumann Resonance Spike
Today at 7:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The White House - Recent Amendments May Telegraph Military Tribunals in the Near Future
Today at 6:38 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Gifts from the Stars
Today at 6:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Anna Tells it Like it Is to Kim (the RV Guru Scamtastic) Possible
Today at 6:23 pm by PurpleSkyz

Today at 6:12 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Will Governor Jerry Brown Be Arrested, Prosecuted and Imprisoned…
Today at 6:08 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Stonehenge is a fraud?
Today at 6:01 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Linda Moulton Howe & Daniel Liszt Part One
Today at 5:57 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Karmic New Moon in Pisces — the most Powerful Healing Moon of 2018!
Today at 3:24 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Anonymous - Something Thought to be Impossible is Happening...
Today at 3:17 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Lisa Transcendence Brown: Current Photonic Energies Increase
Today at 2:19 pm by PurpleSkyz

» According to a Recent Study, Smudging Destroys ‘Killer Germs.’
Today at 2:17 pm by PurpleSkyz

» TR 3B Aurora Secret Plane | Top-Secret US Air Force Black Triangle
Today at 11:05 am by PurpleSkyz

» Grandfather Cures His Cancer With Homemade Cannabis Oil
Today at 10:20 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense & Jay Weidner - 3 Fingered ET Mummy Found In Peru
Today at 10:12 am by PurpleSkyz

» Atlantis: New Discovery Could Change Everything!
Today at 9:24 am by PurpleSkyz

Today at 9:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» There Are 12 Types Of Lightworkers That Transform The Human Spirit!
Today at 9:19 am by PurpleSkyz

» 4 Powerful Crystals for Empaths and Sensitive Souls
Today at 9:16 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Bright halo to the side of the Sun plus MORE
Today at 9:09 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Mullti color mysterious bright UFOs orbs in the skies of Mexico plus MORE
Today at 8:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» "Day Zero" Wrangell Alaska has declared a water emergency
Today at 8:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» Charlie Munger on the Dangers of Ideology and How to Form Intelligent Opinions
Today at 8:52 am by PurpleSkyz

» America’s War on Religious and Conscientious Objections to Mandatory Vaccines
Today at 8:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Our Sun responds to signal coming from huge flashing space object
Today at 8:38 am by PurpleSkyz

» Two Faces to Every Coin, Two Sides to Every Issue, Two Choices on Every Path
Today at 8:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» The deep state uncovered
Today at 1:23 am by Serena1

» New Q Crumbs for March 15, 2018 & Connecting the Booms [video]
Today at 1:22 am by Serena1

» Fundamentals 1 -- Your Ship of State From Anna Von Reitz plus more
Yesterday at 9:37 pm by MartyM

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » The United States of Genocide: Putting the US on Trial

The United States of Genocide: Putting the US on Trial

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]


The United States of Genocide: Putting the US on Trial

Tuesday, 1 October 2013
By Kieran Kelly
The United States of America was built on a foundation of genocide against the Indigenous peoples of North America. In fact, all successful settler colonial societies are founded in genocide. The process is one of dispossession – the erasure of one group identity and the imposition of another on the people and/or on the land. But genocide is not merely the foundation of the US nation state, it is also the foundation of the US empire. The US habit of genocide has not died, but has transformed. The US has become a serial perpetrator of genocide with the blood of many millions of innocents spilled in pursuit of imperial hegemony.
There is a fight going on for the very meaning of the term “genocide”. Western powers assert their right to accuse enemies of committing genocide using the broadest possible definitions whilst also touting a twisted undefined sense of “genocide” which can never, ever be applied to their own actions. Aotearoa (New Zealand) Prime Minister John Key, apparently taking his cue from the US, is currently pushing for reform of the UN Security Council such that the veto power would be unavailable. The UNSC is a political body and “genocide” will simply become a political term cited by powerful states to rationalise aggression against the weak. Key notoriously said that his country was “missing in action” because it did not invade Iraq in 2003, reminding Kiwis that “blood is thicker than water”. If his desired reforms existed now, the US would probably have a UN Security Council resolution authorising the use of force against Syria on the grounds of “genocide”.
All of those who oppose Western aggression justified as humanitarian intervention under the “responsibility to protect” must stop burying their heads in the sand over this matter. This is a very real fight for the future of humanity. We can either learn and propagate the understanding that US imperial interventions are, by nature, genocidal. Or we can just pretend the word has no meaning; indulge our childish moral impulses and the lazy fatuousness of our scholars and pundits and let Western mass-murderers use this Orwellian buzzword (for that is what “genocide” currently is) to commit heinous acts of horrific violence which ensure the continued domination of the world’s masses by a tiny imperialist elite.
(An aside: apparently people like a pragmatic focus to accompany a call to action. So, am I making the most obvious appeal – that US officials be tried for committing genocide? No I am not. They can be tried for war crimes if people really think that “holding people accountable” is more important than preventing suffering and protecting the vulnerable. But it has been a terrible mistake to construct genocide as being an aggravated crime against humanity, as if it were simply a vicious felony writ large. This has played completely into the hands of those propagandists for whom every new enemy of the West is the new Hitler. The means by which genocides are perpetrated are the crimes of individuals – war crimes, for example – but genocide itself is the crime of a state or para-state regime. That is the proper target of inquisition and censure. Though the attempt was tragically abortive, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal recently began hearing charges of genocide against Israel. We need this sort of process to hear charges of genocide against the US. I fully support such efforts, but my real call to action is a call for thought, for clarity, and for self-discipline. People are drawn to using woolly thinking over genocide, wishing to use it as the ultimate condemnation of mass violence without reference to any actual meaning of the term. We must not tolerate it in ourselves or others. We are a hair’s breadth away from the point where “genocide prevention” will be used by major Western powers to justify genocidal mass violence.)
US “Wars” are Actually Genocides
Every major military action by the US since World War II has first and foremost been an act of genocide. I do not state this as a moral condemnation. If I were seeking to condemn I would try to convey the enormous scale of suffering, death, loss and misery caused by US mass violence. My purpose instead is to correct a terrible misconception of US actions – their nature, their meaning and their strategic utility. This understanding which I am trying to convey is a very dangerous notion with an inescapable moral dimension because the US has always maintained that the suffering, death and destruction it causes are incidental to military purposes – they are instances of “collateral damage”. But, with all due respect to the fact that US personnel may face real dangers, these are not real wars. These are genocides and it is the military aspect that is incidental. In fact, it is straining credulity to continue believing in a string of military defeats being sustained by the most powerful military in the history of the world at the hands of impoverished Third World combatants. The US hasn’t really been defeated in any real sense. They committed genocide in Indochina, increasing the level of killing as much as possible right through to the clearly foreseen inevitable conclusion which was a cessation of direct mass violence, not a defeat. The US signed a peace agreement which they completely ignored. The Vietnamese did not occupy US territory and force the US to disarm and pay crippling reparations.
There is no question that the US has committed actions which fit the description of genocide. Genocide does not mean the successful extermination of a defined group (there is no such thing as “attempted genocide”). It was never conceived that way, but rather as any systematic attack on “a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.” Those who deny US genocides usually only deny that there is any intent to commit genocide. The UN definition of genocide (recognised by 142 states) is:
… any of the following acts committed with intent to destroyin whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
The US has committed these acts many times and in many different countries. Some people object that this is some watered down version of genocide that risks diluting the significance of this “ultimate crime”. However, bear in mind that the victims of US armed violence are not usually combatants and are not engaged in some sort of contested combat that gives them some ability to defend themselves or to kill or be killed. They are helpless as they die of incineration, asphyxiation, dismemberment, cancer, starvation, disease. People of all ages die in terror unable to protect themselves from the machinery of death. Make no mistake, that is what it is: a large complex co-ordinated machinery of mass killing. There is nothing watered down about the horrors of the genocides committed by the US, and their victims number many millions. The violence is mostly impersonal, implacable, arbitrary and industrial.
There are at least three specific times at which US mass violence has taken lives in the millions through direct killing: the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the wars and sanctions against Iraq in combination with the occupation of Iraq. I refer to them as the Korea Genocide (which was against both South and North Koreans), the Indochina Genocide (against Laotians, Cambodians, and Vietnamese), and the Iraq Genocide (which took place over at least a 20 year period).
There are many ways to show that the US committed genocides in these cases. On one level the case is straightforward. For example, if the US commits acts of “strategic bombing” which systematically kills civilians by the hundreds of thousands, and it turns out that not only is there no rational proportionate military reason, but that US military and intelligence analysis is clear that these are in fact militarily counter-productive acts of gratuitous mass-murder, then by any reasonable definition these must be acts of genocide. The logic is simple and inescapable. I have written lengthy pieces showing in detail that these were large scale systematic and intentional genocides which you can read.1
For a long time I have tried to think of ways to condense this in a readable form. The problem in many respects lies with the necessity of overcoming misapprehensions. Genocide is an emotive topic; people are very reluctant to read that those who rule in their name (with whom they sometimes actively identify) are in the moral vicinity of the Nazi leaders of Germany. Permeating every level of the discourse is the constant position (whether as the unspoken assumption or as the active assertion) that the US has never acted with genocidal intent. Intentionality is a topic in its own right, but to be brief I will point out that intent does not require that “genocide” be its own motive. If I kill someone because I want their watch, I can’t turn around and say it isn’t murder because I didn’t intend to kill them because I was really just intending to take their watch. It may seem a ridiculous example, but the discourse of genocide is so twisted that it is the norm even amongst genocide scholars. Primed by our political leaders and various media, we keep looking for the people, the bloodthirsty psychopathic monsters, who kill people just for the fun of it and grab their watch afterwards as an afterthought. Unsurprisingly, most Westerners find those people among the leaders of those countries who oppose Western political power. Now our leaders are trying to persuade us that that includes Syria’s Bashar al-Assad (though many are becoming skeptical of this “Hitler-of-the-month” propaganda).
The best way of demonstrating US intentionality is to demonstrate the consistency of their approach in different times and places. However, this is a necessarily exhaustive approach, so I have decided to take a different tack here. I wish to sketch a fragment of autobiography here – an outline of the process by which I came to my current understanding of the topic. I didn’t seek these conclusions out, but had it made clear to me, by rather comfortably embedded scholars, that they think that I am being provocative out of ambition. It is a testament to the self-satisfaction of such people that they somehow think that being provocative is some advantage. Academia thrives on the journal-filling peer-reviewed “controversies” of rival schools and scholars, but they aren’t really keen on anything that might actually be of any interest to anyone else. The fact is that I didn’t seek this out and it certainly has not endeared me to anyone that I can think of. On the other hand, I have had people act as if I had smeared my own faeces all over myself for using the g-word with respect to Iraq, and I have had many metaphorical doors slammed in my face. As I hope the following will indicate, at least partially, I cannot but characterise US genocides as such and I cannot but view the subject of absolute urgent fundamental importance....
Read more: Global Research


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum