HomeSearchLog inRegister
Latest topics
» POOFness for MAY 24: THE FINALIZATION OF EVERYTHING ON THE PLATE (Or... SEND ME MORE MONEY!!!)
Today at 11:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» What Is The Name of The Crime? –Unlawful Conversion
Today at 7:14 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Anonymous - The world we currently live in... (2017-2018)
Today at 7:12 pm by PurpleSkyz

» David Icke - Its time to Walk the Talk...
Today at 7:08 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Cindy Kay Currier - Statements of Clarification
Today at 7:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The GoldFish Report No. 96 Week 18 POTUS Update with Kent Dunn
Today at 7:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Ariana Grande and the Illuminati Beta Kittens of Pop Culture
Today at 7:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Former Clinton Staffer Arrested By The FBI.
Today at 9:04 am by PurpleSkyz

» High Voltage at CERN Particle Accelerator Today 5/24/2017
Today at 8:53 am by PurpleSkyz

» Chris Cornell Was Murdered, Says Close Friend
Today at 8:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» Experts: Baltic Sea Anomaly ‘UFO’ contains metals nature CANNOT reproduce
Today at 8:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Keshe Foundation Update - Building a Space Port in Ghana
Today at 8:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» This Weeks RV/CGR News - 2017: 5/21-5/27
Today at 7:55 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Mysterious Force That Makes Crystals Align Measured by Scientists for the First Time
Today at 7:50 am by PurpleSkyz

» A Tale of Two Earths and Two Realities
Today at 7:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» *BREAKING NEWS* Kim Dotcom EVIDENCE BOMBSHELL: #SETHRICH WAS A HERO
Today at 7:39 am by PurpleSkyz

» Karen Hudes - Network of Global Corporate Control 5 24 17
Today at 7:37 am by PurpleSkyz

» IS THE BIGGEST SECRET OF ALL TIME ACTUALLY HIDDEN UNDER THE ANTARCTIC ICE?
Today at 7:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ NIBIRU 2 Planets Clearly beside sun plus MORE
Today at 7:24 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ UFOs on NASA images in the near-solar space plus MORE
Today at 7:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» 11 11 Meaning: Do You Keep Seeing This Unusual and Powerful Number?
Today at 7:04 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Why they use numbers like 22, the Master Builder #Manchester
Today at 6:51 am by PurpleSkyz

» "15 Characteristics of Destructive Cults" = One Who Knows/Richard McKim, Jr. 5/19/17
Today at 4:16 am by RamblerNash

» Losers, losing and Lost in a World of Madness
Today at 12:50 am by MartyM

» FOR THOSE UNSURE OF WHATS GOING ON
Yesterday at 11:45 pm by MartyM

» UPDATES: MANCHESTER: UK Ariana Grande Concert
Yesterday at 11:34 pm by MartyM

» What are Higher Entities?
Yesterday at 8:21 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Big Pharma Shill/Pediatrician Exposed: On Camera Admits Vaccines Cause Autism!
Yesterday at 8:09 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Signs of Spiritual Awakening
Yesterday at 7:49 pm by PurpleSkyz

Who is online?

Share | 
 

 Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
PurpleSkyz
Admin
avatar

Posts : 59634
Join date : 2012-01-04
Location : Woodstock Nation

PostSubject: Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer   Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:21 am

Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer
April 22, 2014

Oopart (out of place artifact) is a term applied to dozens of prehistoric objects found in various places around the world that seem to show a level of technological advancement incongruous with the times in which they were made. Ooparts often frustrate conventional scientists, delight adventurous investigators open to alternative theories, and spark debate.
A hammer was found in London, Texas, in 1934 encased in stone that had formed around it. The rock surrounding the hammer is said to be more than 100 million years old, suggesting the hammer was made well before humans who could have made such an object are thought to have existed.

Much mystery surrounds the so-called “London Hammer.”
Carl Baugh, who is in possession of the artifact, announced that it was tested by Battelle Laboratory in Columbus, Ohio, a lab that has tested moon rocks for NASA. The tests found the hammer to have unusual metallurgy—96.6 percent iron, 2.6 percent chlorine, 0.74 percent sulfur, and no carbon.
Carbon is usually what strengthens brittle iron, so it is strange that carbon is absent. Chlorine is not usually found in iron. The iron shows a high degree of craftsmanship without bubbles in the metal. Furthermore, it is said to be coated in an iron oxide that would not readily form under natural conditions and which prevents rust.

Glen J. Kuban, a vocal skeptic of Baugh’s hammer claims, wrote in a 1997 paper titled “The London Hammer: An Alleged Out-of-Place Artifact,” that the tests may have been conducted privately rather than at Battelle Laboratory. He cites a 1985 issue of the magazine Creation Ex Nihilo. Epoch Times contacted Battelle Laboratory to verify. A spokeswoman said she had not heard of the hammer in her 15 years at the lab, but she would check into it.

Kuban said the stone may contain materials that are more than 100 million years old, but that doesn’t mean the rock formed around the hammer so long ago. Some limestone has formed around artifacts known to be from the 20th century, so rocks can sometimes form fairly quickly.
Baugh’s website says, however, that the fossils in the stone surrounding the hammer “retain fine detail, indicating that they were not reworked, but [are] part of the original formation.” This would suggest the fossils and the hammer are from the same time period, that the fossils did not just get mixed up in materials that formed rock around the hammer at a later date.

Carbon dating performed in the late 1990s “showed inconclusive dates ranging from the present to 700 years ago,” Baugh supporter David Lines reported at the time. According to Kuban, Lines said the test had been contaminated by more recent organic substances. Such contamination is one of the reasons Baugh is said to have delayed having the artifact carbon dated (skeptics say he delayed because he feared being proven wrong). Dating is often called into question on both sides—by skeptics and proponents—for various reasons when it comes to ooparts.
The object was found by a hiker, and it seems it was not found embedded in the original layer of rock, which would have made a stronger case for an ancient origin. It was a chunk of rock found resting on a ledge, perhaps having tumbled there from within a larger formation.







As evidence of the hammer’s age, Baugh said part of the wooden handle had turned to coal. The photos of the hammer show a black part of the hammer that looks like it could be coal.
The debate surrounding the hammer’s origin has become bound up with the creationism versus evolutionism debate. Baugh is a creationist. Kuban is a creationist-turned-skeptic (or a much more moderate creationist). Various creationist organizations take different stances on this artifact, and many evolutionists dismiss it as a creationist hoax. But the object remains a fascinating one apart from its role in this controversy.
SOURCE


Thanks to: http://missiongalacticfreedom.wordpress.com


  

Back to top Go down
 
Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Out Of Mind :: GALACTIC AWARENESS :: HISTORIES MYSTERIES-
Jump to: