Latest topics
» 2,000 Year-Old Mummies, Artifacts Discovered at Major Egyptian Tomb
Today at 8:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Massive Explosion Levels Building In UK
Today at 8:13 pm by bs4ever

» Twitter, YouTube scrubbing all content and banning all users who question the official (false) narrative on the Florida school shooting
Today at 7:46 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Teacher At Parkland, Shooter In Swat Gear!
Today at 4:05 pm by PurpleSkyz

» #Qanon - LadyDragon brings u Q latest post 807-827, Twitter CENSORSHIP LAWSUIT @potus
Today at 3:45 pm by LadyDragon

» Very large M7.6 Earthquake strikes West Pacific / Papua New Guinea
Today at 2:26 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NEIL KEENAN UPDATE | The Asian Insider Returns
Today at 2:10 pm by MartyM

» EX NASA Enployee Is Actively Debunking UFO Sightings And Called Conspiracy Theorists INSANE
Today at 1:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Planet X Spotted In Canada plus MORE
Today at 12:32 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Strange Blue Rays of Light in the Sky over Hawaii
Today at 12:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» 7 Feeling Lonely Quotes That Give a True Definition of Loneliness
Today at 12:17 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Persistent Questions By Anna Von Reitz
Today at 12:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Mad World... Hello teacher tell me what's my lesson
Today at 11:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jerzy's Template Email - Who Could Of Guessed!
Today at 11:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Critically Dangerous Fission Fears At Fukushima
Today at 11:04 am by PurpleSkyz

» What’s wrong with alternative facts? Absolutely nothing!
Today at 11:00 am by PurpleSkyz

» The City That Remembers Everything
Today at 10:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» An Introduction to the Rodin Coil and Vortex Based Mathematics
Today at 10:36 am by PurpleSkyz

» We Are Being Sprayed W/ Lithium! Are You? Do You Have Lithium Symptoms?
Today at 10:32 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ UFO Sightings – Submissions Compilation plus MORE
Today at 10:16 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Rerum® A miracle Cancer Drug
Today at 9:46 am by topspin2

» This TRUTH Actually Aired in 1981
Today at 9:27 am by topspin2

» POOFness for FEB 21: MIDWEEK BY ZAP THE LYING INTERNET PANHANDLER CON JOB
Today at 1:27 am by RamblerNash

» Jerzy/ZAP And The Saga Concerning "Mary" - FOUND!
Today at 12:57 am by RamblerNash

» Ol' SnaggleTooth Jerzy Bit The Big One Again!
Today at 12:38 am by RamblerNash

» POOFness for FEB 22: A TOOTH AND A SMILE from the Toothless Ghoulish Barber of Calgary
Today at 12:30 am by RamblerNash

» ZAP —— a few remarks...
Today at 12:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Church of the Almighty Smart Phone is Making Us Really, Really Sad (And Maybe Even Kind of Stupid)
Yesterday at 8:47 pm by WilliaminUSA

» The Archetypal Path to Getting Your Shit Together
Yesterday at 7:56 pm by PurpleSkyz


You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » GALACTIC AWARENESS » HISTORIES MYSTERIES » Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer

Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer on Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:21 am

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin
Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer
April 22, 2014

Oopart (out of place artifact) is a term applied to dozens of prehistoric objects found in various places around the world that seem to show a level of technological advancement incongruous with the times in which they were made. Ooparts often frustrate conventional scientists, delight adventurous investigators open to alternative theories, and spark debate.
A hammer was found in London, Texas, in 1934 encased in stone that had formed around it. The rock surrounding the hammer is said to be more than 100 million years old, suggesting the hammer was made well before humans who could have made such an object are thought to have existed.

Much mystery surrounds the so-called “London Hammer.”
Carl Baugh, who is in possession of the artifact, announced that it was tested by Battelle Laboratory in Columbus, Ohio, a lab that has tested moon rocks for NASA. The tests found the hammer to have unusual metallurgy—96.6 percent iron, 2.6 percent chlorine, 0.74 percent sulfur, and no carbon.
Carbon is usually what strengthens brittle iron, so it is strange that carbon is absent. Chlorine is not usually found in iron. The iron shows a high degree of craftsmanship without bubbles in the metal. Furthermore, it is said to be coated in an iron oxide that would not readily form under natural conditions and which prevents rust.

Glen J. Kuban, a vocal skeptic of Baugh’s hammer claims, wrote in a 1997 paper titled “The London Hammer: An Alleged Out-of-Place Artifact,” that the tests may have been conducted privately rather than at Battelle Laboratory. He cites a 1985 issue of the magazine Creation Ex Nihilo. Epoch Times contacted Battelle Laboratory to verify. A spokeswoman said she had not heard of the hammer in her 15 years at the lab, but she would check into it.

Kuban said the stone may contain materials that are more than 100 million years old, but that doesn’t mean the rock formed around the hammer so long ago. Some limestone has formed around artifacts known to be from the 20th century, so rocks can sometimes form fairly quickly.
Baugh’s website says, however, that the fossils in the stone surrounding the hammer “retain fine detail, indicating that they were not reworked, but [are] part of the original formation.” This would suggest the fossils and the hammer are from the same time period, that the fossils did not just get mixed up in materials that formed rock around the hammer at a later date.

Carbon dating performed in the late 1990s “showed inconclusive dates ranging from the present to 700 years ago,” Baugh supporter David Lines reported at the time. According to Kuban, Lines said the test had been contaminated by more recent organic substances. Such contamination is one of the reasons Baugh is said to have delayed having the artifact carbon dated (skeptics say he delayed because he feared being proven wrong). Dating is often called into question on both sides—by skeptics and proponents—for various reasons when it comes to ooparts.
The object was found by a hiker, and it seems it was not found embedded in the original layer of rock, which would have made a stronger case for an ancient origin. It was a chunk of rock found resting on a ledge, perhaps having tumbled there from within a larger formation.







As evidence of the hammer’s age, Baugh said part of the wooden handle had turned to coal. The photos of the hammer show a black part of the hammer that looks like it could be coal.
The debate surrounding the hammer’s origin has become bound up with the creationism versus evolutionism debate. Baugh is a creationist. Kuban is a creationist-turned-skeptic (or a much more moderate creationist). Various creationist organizations take different stances on this artifact, and many evolutionists dismiss it as a creationist hoax. But the object remains a fascinating one apart from its role in this controversy.
SOURCE


Thanks to: http://missiongalacticfreedom.wordpress.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum