Latest topics
» Church of England Admits it ‘Colluded’ to Cover-Up Decades of Child Abuse
Today at 7:58 am by Avebury

» An Encouraging Look Forward By Foster Gamble
Today at 7:57 am by Avebury

» What the heck?? ~ Bizarre luminous giant sphere in Russia
Today at 12:28 am by PurpleSkyz

» Nicole Kidman: ‘Stanley Kubrick Said Pedophiles Run The World’
Today at 12:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Journey…
Yesterday at 11:40 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Scientists Find New Evidence That Our Solar System May Have TWO Suns - Nibiru/ Nemesis
Yesterday at 11:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Corey Goode, Project Blue Beam, MK Ultra and the Luciferian Agenda.
Yesterday at 10:35 pm by PurpleSkyz

» This Weeks Scamtastic RV/GCR News: 6/24-6/30
Yesterday at 8:49 pm by WilliaminUSA

» Personal Out-of-this-World Technology Coming Soon!
Yesterday at 6:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Interesting Plasma UFO Slovakia plus MORE
Yesterday at 6:32 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Aug Tellez - Major Update For Public Release
Yesterday at 6:23 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Senate Bill 1241, “Combating Money Laundering, ”
Yesterday at 5:23 pm by bs4ever

» A Life Predicted by Time
Yesterday at 3:36 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» A call for help from "The Office of Poofness" - EMERGENCY (SCAM DONATION REQUEST ALERT!!)
Yesterday at 2:36 pm by WilliaminUSA

» The lie of NASA about the observation of Venus and Mercury in May - June 2017
Yesterday at 1:21 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ NIBIRU !!Acapulco plus MORE
Yesterday at 1:19 pm by PurpleSkyz

» International Commercial Obligation Lien status
Yesterday at 11:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cindy Kay Currier - We've made contact
Yesterday at 10:49 am by PurpleSkyz

» FADE to BLACK w/ Jon Rappoport
Yesterday at 10:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» British X-Files | Boeing 737 Close Encounters
Yesterday at 10:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» Max Igan - 5G - The Elephant in Your Living Room
Yesterday at 10:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» EVP Planet X Breaking the Grid Peggy Kane 2 of 2 YouTube
Yesterday at 10:34 am by Consciousness Of Economic

Who is online?

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » GALACTIC AWARENESS » HISTORIES MYSTERIES » Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer

Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer on Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:21 am

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin
Mystery Of The 100-million-year Old Hammer
April 22, 2014

Oopart (out of place artifact) is a term applied to dozens of prehistoric objects found in various places around the world that seem to show a level of technological advancement incongruous with the times in which they were made. Ooparts often frustrate conventional scientists, delight adventurous investigators open to alternative theories, and spark debate.
A hammer was found in London, Texas, in 1934 encased in stone that had formed around it. The rock surrounding the hammer is said to be more than 100 million years old, suggesting the hammer was made well before humans who could have made such an object are thought to have existed.

Much mystery surrounds the so-called “London Hammer.”
Carl Baugh, who is in possession of the artifact, announced that it was tested by Battelle Laboratory in Columbus, Ohio, a lab that has tested moon rocks for NASA. The tests found the hammer to have unusual metallurgy—96.6 percent iron, 2.6 percent chlorine, 0.74 percent sulfur, and no carbon.
Carbon is usually what strengthens brittle iron, so it is strange that carbon is absent. Chlorine is not usually found in iron. The iron shows a high degree of craftsmanship without bubbles in the metal. Furthermore, it is said to be coated in an iron oxide that would not readily form under natural conditions and which prevents rust.

Glen J. Kuban, a vocal skeptic of Baugh’s hammer claims, wrote in a 1997 paper titled “The London Hammer: An Alleged Out-of-Place Artifact,” that the tests may have been conducted privately rather than at Battelle Laboratory. He cites a 1985 issue of the magazine Creation Ex Nihilo. Epoch Times contacted Battelle Laboratory to verify. A spokeswoman said she had not heard of the hammer in her 15 years at the lab, but she would check into it.

Kuban said the stone may contain materials that are more than 100 million years old, but that doesn’t mean the rock formed around the hammer so long ago. Some limestone has formed around artifacts known to be from the 20th century, so rocks can sometimes form fairly quickly.
Baugh’s website says, however, that the fossils in the stone surrounding the hammer “retain fine detail, indicating that they were not reworked, but [are] part of the original formation.” This would suggest the fossils and the hammer are from the same time period, that the fossils did not just get mixed up in materials that formed rock around the hammer at a later date.

Carbon dating performed in the late 1990s “showed inconclusive dates ranging from the present to 700 years ago,” Baugh supporter David Lines reported at the time. According to Kuban, Lines said the test had been contaminated by more recent organic substances. Such contamination is one of the reasons Baugh is said to have delayed having the artifact carbon dated (skeptics say he delayed because he feared being proven wrong). Dating is often called into question on both sides—by skeptics and proponents—for various reasons when it comes to ooparts.
The object was found by a hiker, and it seems it was not found embedded in the original layer of rock, which would have made a stronger case for an ancient origin. It was a chunk of rock found resting on a ledge, perhaps having tumbled there from within a larger formation.







As evidence of the hammer’s age, Baugh said part of the wooden handle had turned to coal. The photos of the hammer show a black part of the hammer that looks like it could be coal.
The debate surrounding the hammer’s origin has become bound up with the creationism versus evolutionism debate. Baugh is a creationist. Kuban is a creationist-turned-skeptic (or a much more moderate creationist). Various creationist organizations take different stances on this artifact, and many evolutionists dismiss it as a creationist hoax. But the object remains a fascinating one apart from its role in this controversy.
SOURCE


Thanks to: http://missiongalacticfreedom.wordpress.com



  

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum