Latest topics
» Highlands, New Jersey- An Active Shooter Drill has been scheduled for some time in April 2018 for Henry Hudson Regional High School
Today at 9:52 pm by WilliaminUSA

» RH- Blood Type ~ Why Johnny Depp, Paul McCartney And Leonardo DiCaprio Can Not Be Cloned
Today at 9:21 pm by PurpleSkyz

» "INTERROGATING ZUCKERBERG" — A Bad Lip Reading
Today at 9:15 pm by PurpleSkyz

» POOFness for APR 25: MIDWEEK BY ZAP the CONMAN PANHANDLING GHOUL BARBER of CALGARY
Today at 8:47 pm by robert18

» The Ego - Friend or Obstacle?
Today at 7:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Answer to "Virgo Triad" By Anna Von Reitz plus more
Today at 5:42 pm by WilliaminUSA

» "Judge" Anna Von Reitz Exposed
Today at 3:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Out Of Mind Viewer Poll ~ "What Will Jerzy/ZAP Beg For This Week?" ~ Guests welcome to vote
Today at 3:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» A Summary Of Hoaxes By Deborah Tavares by snoop4truth
Today at 3:10 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “We can build these models, but we don’t know how they work.”
Today at 2:21 pm by topspin2

» The Most Honest Three Minutes In Television History
Today at 2:13 pm by LadyDragon

» Reel Thyme
Today at 1:45 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» BLISSPEDIA is a SCAM
Today at 12:56 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Doctor Confirms Worldwide Chem-Lung Disease; Daily Chemtrail Spraying is Relentless Now
Today at 11:52 am by Consciousness Of Economic

» Graham Hancock the Mystery of Ancient Human Origins Has Finally Been Solved
Today at 10:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» Q #ENDGAME: MSMHate, Red Cross, PP, Climate GENOCIDE
Today at 10:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» David Icke live on the Regina Meredith Show (Part One)
Today at 9:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» Merck Fighting Fraud Lawsuits in U.S. Courts on MMR and Gardasil Vaccines
Today at 9:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO Found In The Apollo Archives?
Today at 9:55 am by PurpleSkyz

» 1200 Ton Unfinished Obelisk At Aswan Egypt: What Caused Work To Suddenly Stop?
Today at 9:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Clear VIEW NIBIRU System In California sunrise plus MORE
Today at 9:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Giant Glowing Worm flys Through Sky To Enter UFO, Chile plus MORE
Today at 9:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cloning and Immortality
Today at 8:09 am by topspin2

» Divers Trying To Save Drowning Whale Are Blindsided By Its Unexpected Response
Today at 1:44 am by MartyM

» POOFness for APR 23: LIFE AND OXYGEN MORE BS FROM THE GHOUL BARBER OF CALGARY
Today at 1:21 am by RamblerNash

» Ancient Astronaut Found In Serbia?
Today at 12:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Karen Hudes ~ Network of Global Corporate Control 4 24 18
Today at 12:10 am by PurpleSkyz

» Yellowstone Incident: Bright Sphere Explodes, Strange Dead Body, UFO Descends!
Today at 12:08 am by PurpleSkyz

» UNSEALED: HRC, Uranium 1, Comey, BUNDY Ranch, M_rder #CASE1:16-cv-01490-LEK-DJS
Today at 12:05 am by PurpleSkyz

» E-mail from ZAP: A TREE WITH NO PARTRIDGE (Wait until you get a load of what they are shoveling now!)
Yesterday at 11:35 pm by RamblerNash

» UPDATE - #89 in Holistic Doctor Series Shot 5 Times In Front of Family (World Famous Healer)
Yesterday at 10:58 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Wildlife Acting Even More Strange!
Yesterday at 9:09 pm by PurpleSkyz

» WISCONSIN TO USE NATIONAL GUARD IN “LONG TERM POWER OUTAGE” DRILL (Door-to-Door Wellness Checks!)
Yesterday at 8:39 pm by PurpleSkyz

CURRENT MOON

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » VOICES CARRY ~ QUESTION EVERYTHING » ANNA VON REITZ » Quo Warranto.PDF: Big Trouble For Every Federal Judge & All 9 US Supreme Court Justices (Video)

Quo Warranto.PDF: Big Trouble For Every Federal Judge & All 9 US Supreme Court Justices (Video)

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

Big Trouble For de fracto!

Posted on November 14, 2014 by arnierosner
http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2014/11/quo-warranto-pdf-big-trouble-for-every-federal-judge-all-9-us-supreme-court-justices-video-2664604.html
Quo Warranto.PDF: Big Trouble For Every Federal Judge & All 9 US Supreme Court Justices (Video)
Thursday, November 13, 2014 19:38
(Before It’s News)

By Josey Wales
We the people have the ability to take charge of our government through the use of Quo warranto , this was given to us by our founding fathers for the purpose of removing a power holding office who we deem harmful to our country.
The Line in the Sand – Breaking News November 10, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury in every State files writ_quo_warranto.pdf   in every Federal District Court, United States Supreme Court and served upon every Federal Judge and all 9 US Supreme Court Justices. Information in the nature of a quo warranto. A proceeding against the usurper of a franchise or office. Jarman v. Mason, 102 Okl. 278, 229 P. 459, 460.; An extraordinary proceeding, prerogative in nature, addressed to preventing a continued exercise of authority unlawfully asserted. Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co., N.Y., 53 S.Ct. 721, 289 U.S. 479, 77 L.Ed. 1331.
The video below walks you through the process step by step. It addresses the threat to the constitution, foreign armies on American soil and many more crimes committed against the American people.
Often times we hear people say, “I wish I knew what I could do to take our country back. This is it, this is the process to follow to take America back. Please spread this information far and wide, it’s time we take America back!
[url=http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://Its A legal proceeding during which an individual%E2%80%99s right to hold an office or governmental privilege is challenged]Its A legal proceeding during which an individual’s right to hold an office or governmental privilege is challenged[/url]
Quo warranto  (Medieval Latin for “by what warrant?“) is a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority they have for exercising some right or power (or “franchise”) they claim to hold.
Writ Quo Warranto
The prerogative writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment, which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. Here are a few writings on the subject.
Revival of the writs must be combined with reviving standing for private prosecution of public rights, subverted by the “cases and controversies” doctrine and the decision in Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), which is discussed in an article by Steve Winter, The Metaphor of Standing and the Problem of Self-Governance.
Although some of these writings are copyrighted, we are assured that all the chapters of all the ones still copyrighted have been attached to pleadings in various cases, and thus made part of the public record, thereby putting them into the public domain.

A writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a demandant, to a respondant claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondant to the court, to present proof of his authority to execute his claimed powers. If the court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondant must cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office, he must vacate the office.
The writ is unlike a petition or motion to show cause, because the burden of proof is on the respondant, not on the demandant.
By itself, the writ does not seek the support of the court to order the respondant to cease the exercise or vacate the office. That would be an accompanying writ of prohibito or a writ of mandamus. All such writs contemplate enforcement by the people as militia, although that could include the sheriff or constable as commander of militia. The right involved is that of the respondant to present his evidence.
These writs are called prerogative writs because they are supposed to be docketed ahead of all other cases except other prerogative writs. The demandant represents the sovereign, the people, and anyone may appear in that capacity, even without a personal stake in the decision.
A writ of habeas corpus may be regarded as a subset of quo warranto, for cases where the claimed power is to hold a prisoner, but with the addition of a requirement to produce the prisoner in court, not just appear to present evidence of authority.
The prerogative writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment, which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.
Currently the former procedure has been replaced by an information in the nature of a quo warranto, an extraordinary remedy by which a prosecuting attorney, who represents the public at large, challenges someone whohas usurped a public office or someone who, through abuse or neglect, has forfeited an office to which she was entitled. In spite of the fact that the remedy of quo warranto is pursued by a prosecuting attorney in a majorityof jurisdictions, it is ordinarily regarded as a civil rather than criminal action. Quo warranto is often the only proper legal remedy; however, the legislature can enact legislation or provide other forms of relief.
Statutes describing quo warranto usually indicate where it is appropriate. Ordinarily it is proper to try the issue of whether a public office or authority is being abused. For example, it might be used to challenge the Unauthorized Practice of a profession, such as law or medicine. In such situations, the challenge is an assertion that the defendant is not qualified to hold the position she claims—a medical doctor, for example.
In some quo warranto proceedings, the issue is whether the defendant is entitled to hold the office he claims, or to exercise the authority he presumes to have from the government. In addition, proceedings have challengedthe right to the position of county commissioner, treasurer, school board member, district attorney, judge, or tax commissioner. In certain jurisdictions, quo warranto is a proper proceeding to challenge individuals who areacting as officers or directors of business corporations.
A prosecuting attorney ordinarily commences quo warranto proceedings; however, a statute may authorize a private person to do so without the consent of the prosecutor. Unless otherwise provided by statute, a court permits the filing of an information in the nature of quo warranto after an exercise of sound discretion, since quo warranto is an extraordinary exercise of power and is not to be invoked lightly. Quo warranto is not a right available merely because the appropriate legal documents are filed. Valid reason must be indicated to justify governmental interference with the individual holding the challenged office, privilege, or license.
Quo warranto is a Master Stroke against the CABAL… Many more are to come…… It’s a Great beginning even though late.. better late then NEVER!
Critical Reads: More News Mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!



Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum