Latest topics
» NEW STUDY: Aluminum In Vaccines Unsafe
Today at 9:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» ‘King Kong’: Watch a 10-year-old blind pianist play Frank Zappa’s concert showstopper
Today at 9:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Aug Tellez ~ Stargate to the Cosmos ~ Hosts Janet Dr Sasha REUPLOAD
Today at 9:05 am by PurpleSkyz

» Part 2: HRC Common Law Indictment: When Pigs FLY #LAWOFTHELAND
Today at 9:04 am by PurpleSkyz

» FDA Declares Homeopathic Remedies ‘Illegal’
Today at 9:02 am by PurpleSkyz

» Kanye West Joins Trump Train
Today at 8:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» Gaia’s 2nd data release: 1.7 billion stars!
Today at 8:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» Generation X and the Tranny Transition
Today at 8:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» David Icke live in Maastricht - Programmed Perception and World Events as They Really Are
Today at 8:37 am by PurpleSkyz

» Falling UFO Recorded on Video During a UK Storm
Today at 8:23 am by PurpleSkyz

» Second Broward County Sheriff’s deputy dead, at 53
Today at 8:16 am by PurpleSkyz

» Elon Musk Launches New Project: I’m building a cyborg dragon’
Today at 8:14 am by PurpleSkyz

» We are having a spiritual experience
Today at 8:10 am by PurpleSkyz

» Yahweh The Man Who Summons UFOs In Public Directly
Today at 8:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ UFO with impossible speed and agility over Area 51 filmed from plane plus MORE
Today at 7:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» FULL Benjamin Fulford 4-23-18
Today at 7:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Q Anon Update April 25 - Iran Next
Today at 2:09 am by Serena1

» POOFness for APR 25: MIDWEEK BY ZAP the CONMAN PANHANDLING GHOUL BARBER of CALGARY
Today at 1:38 am by 4-truth

» BLISSPEDIA is a SCAM
Yesterday at 11:01 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Plastic Free Boy
Yesterday at 10:36 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Something UNEXPLAINABLE is going on... Birds falling from the sky for starters
Yesterday at 10:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» THIS HAPPENED ON OUR EARTH, 23-25 April 2018
Yesterday at 10:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Highlands, New Jersey- An Active Shooter Drill has been scheduled for some time in April 2018 for Henry Hudson Regional High School
Yesterday at 9:52 pm by WilliaminUSA

» RH- Blood Type ~ Why Johnny Depp, Paul McCartney And Leonardo DiCaprio Can Not Be Cloned
Yesterday at 9:21 pm by PurpleSkyz

» "INTERROGATING ZUCKERBERG" — A Bad Lip Reading
Yesterday at 9:15 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Ego - Friend or Obstacle?
Yesterday at 7:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Answer to "Virgo Triad" By Anna Von Reitz plus more
Yesterday at 5:42 pm by WilliaminUSA

» "Judge" Anna Von Reitz Exposed
Yesterday at 3:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Out Of Mind Viewer Poll ~ "What Will Jerzy/ZAP Beg For This Week?" ~ Guests welcome to vote
Yesterday at 3:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» A Summary Of Hoaxes By Deborah Tavares by snoop4truth
Yesterday at 3:10 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “We can build these models, but we don’t know how they work.”
Yesterday at 2:21 pm by topspin2

» The Most Honest Three Minutes In Television History
Yesterday at 2:13 pm by LadyDragon

» Reel Thyme
Yesterday at 1:45 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

CURRENT MOON

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » CABAL AGENDA & WORLD DOMINATION » Richard III DNA shows British Royal family may not have royal bloodline

Richard III DNA shows British Royal family may not have royal bloodline

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin
Richard III DNA shows British Royal family may not have royal bloodline

Richard III DNA shows British Royal family may not have royal bloodline
The University of Leicester has studied the DNA of Richard III and found that there could be a break in the royal bloodline

When the body of Richard III was discovered in a car park in Leicester in 2012 archaeologists knew it was a momentous find.
But little did they realise that it might expose the skeletons in the cupboard of the British aristocracy, and even call into question the bloodline of the Royal family.
In order to prove that the skeleton really was Richard III, scientists needed to take a DNA sample and match it to his descendants.
Genetic testing through his maternal DNA proved conclusively that the body was the King. However, when they checked the male line they discovered something odd. The DNA did not match showing that at some point in history an adulterous affair had broken the paternal chain.
Although it is impossible to say when the affair happened, if it occurred around the time of Edward III (1312- 1377) it could call into question whether kings like Henry VI, Henry VII and Henry VIII had royal blood, and therefore the right to rule.
Without his claim to royalty, Henry VII is unlikely to have been able to raise an army for the Battle of Bosworth Field, in which Richard III was killed, and the history of England could have been very different.
And it has implications for our own Royal Family who also share a direct bloodline to the Tudors.
Kevin Schurer, Professor of English Local History, at the University of Leicester said: “The first thing we need to get out of the way is that we are not indicating that Her Majesty should not be on the throne.
“There are 19 links where the chain could have been broken so it is statistically more probable that it happened at a time where it didn’t matter. However there are parts of the chain which if broken could hypothetically affect royalty.”
Because Richard III was childless, scientists looked at the descendants of Edward III, his great great grandfather.
Genetically, fathers pass on a copy of their Y chromosome to their sons, so Richard and Edward should carry the same DNA. Likewise, any descendent of Edward’s would share the same Y chromosome as Richard, and a match would prove his royal descent.
However scientists were intrigued to find that the DNA did not match, suggesting a ‘non-paternity event’ somewhere between Edward III and his descendants. In other words, someone was unknowingly illegitimate.
If the illegitimate baby was Edward’s son John of Gaunt (1340 - 1399) or his son Henry IV (1366 - 1413) then the royal blood line would be lost.
Prof Schurer added: “If there is one particular link that has more significance than any other it has to be the link between Edward III and his son John of Gaunt.
“John of Gaunt was the father of Henry IV, so if John of Gaunt was not actually the child of Edward III, arguably Henry IV had no legitimate right to the throne and therefore neither did Henry V, Henry VI and indirectly, the Tudors.
“Likewise if the break is in the part of Richard III this would also ask questions about legitimacy of the claims of Richard and his brother Edward.
“However you are never going to get an answer without exhuming a dead person.”
Henry VII (1457 – 1509) claimed a right to the throne through his wife Elizabeth of York, who was the daughter of Edward IV (1422 - 1483). Her royal line also came through Edward III, via Edmund, Duke of York, the brother of John of Gaunt.
Henry also had a royal bloodline through Margaret Beaufort, his mother, who was the great great great great granddaughter of Edward I (1239 - 1307), but the Beauforts were banned by statute from ruling by Henry IV.
Tudor historian and author Elizabeth Norton said the research could have wide implications for British history.
“This is a very interesting finding. There are huge arguments about whether Elizabeth of York was legitimate,” said Ms Norton, “This might suggest that she did not have a royal blood line and if so then the Tudors did not either.”
However she believes that the break is unlike to have happened with John of Gaunt.
“John of Gaunt and his wife are really a love story,” she said, “He married her and legitimised the children he had with her. So it’s unlikely that the link was broken there.”
The DNA results also revealed new details about the appearance of Richard III. It proves he is likely to have had blue eyes and blond hair, which may have darkened over time.
Experts say a portrait of Richard which hangs in the Society of Antiquities in London is the closest representation of the former King.
The portrait of Richard from The Society of Antiquities
Dr Turi King, of the department of genetics at the University of Leicester added: “There are no contemporary portraits of Richard. They all post-date his death by about 25-30 years onwards.
“So what I was interested in doing was looking at what the DNA evidence could tell us about what his hard an eye colour was predicted to be and see which portrait that most closely matches.
“The DNA evidence indicates that he has a high probability of having blue eye colour and blond hair. That would be a childhood hair colour, and hair can darken with age.”
Dr King is currently attempting to sequence the entire genome of Richard III to look for diseases and health issues that the King might have suffered.
The Royal Household said it did not wish to comment on the research, whihc is published in the journal Nature Communications and funded by the Wellcome Trust.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11268218/Rich...


Thanks to: http://extraterrestrials.ning.com



  

bs4ever

avatar



"आप सिर्फ यह है आप नहीं था क्या मतलब है यह देखने के लिए किया था"

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum