Latest topics
» The Smithsonian's Authentic Crystal Skull
Today at 10:33 pm by PurpleSkyz

» AUG 23: The Mid Week by ZAP
Today at 10:20 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Former MK Ultra Victim Cathy O’Brien: MonuMental Deep State Semantics
Today at 9:59 pm by Avebury

» Why People Believe in Conspiracy Theories – And How to Change Their Minds lol
Today at 5:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The System-wide Quantum Collapse
Today at 4:58 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Fake Eclipse Hoax: Another Psyop?
Today at 4:52 pm by PurpleSkyz

» TDA News ~ COURT IS TRYING TO TRAP HEATHER plus more
Today at 4:49 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Anonymous Listen Learn REMEMBER!
Today at 4:45 pm by PurpleSkyz

» POOFness for AUG 21: THE SACRIFICIAL CAR
Today at 3:40 pm by robert18

» This Weeks Scamtastic RV/GCR News: 8/19-8/25
Today at 1:44 pm by mefireball7

» UFO News ~ Mystery Object near Sun filmed during Solar Eclipse 2017 plus MORE
Today at 12:18 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Natural phenomenon or Planet X? plus MORE
Today at 11:39 am by PurpleSkyz

» Walter Bosley: Nazca Mummy Hoax! SSP Corey Goode/David Wilcock/Jimmy Church Fiasco!
Today at 11:04 am by PurpleSkyz

» Corey Goode August 23, 2017 - THE SECRET SPACE PROGRAM REVELATIONS - David Wilcock 2017
Today at 10:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cindy Kay Currier ~ Law of the Land moving into concrete, physical reality
Today at 10:19 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Graham Hancock: Back from the Gates of Death (Recovering From A Stroke)
Today at 9:50 am by PurpleSkyz

» James Gilliland ~ As You Wish Talk Radio 8 19 2017
Today at 9:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» Dave Schmidt Compromised, Under Mind Control
Today at 9:17 am by PurpleSkyz

» Critical Review on Steven Greer Disclosure Project Sirius
Today at 9:10 am by PurpleSkyz

» Karen Hudes - Network of Global Corporate Control 8 22 17
Today at 8:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» Pandora's reflection
Today at 8:45 am by PurpleSkyz

» Red Ink Wet Signatures Required For UCC/Trust Documents?
Yesterday at 7:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

Who is online?

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » PEOPLE MAKING AN IMPACT ON THE LEGAL STATUS QUO » ANNA VON REITZ » AFFIDAVIT – The “Credit River Decision”

AFFIDAVIT – The “Credit River Decision”

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 AFFIDAVIT – The “Credit River Decision” on Wed Dec 31, 2014 4:25 pm

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

AFFIDAVIT – The “Credit River Decision”

Posted on December 31, 2014 by David Robinson
AFFIDAVIT
The “Credit River Decision”
STATE OF MAINE         )
) ss.
County of Cumberland  )
COMES NOW, David Robinson, the natural living flesh and blood man, a peaceful American National on the land, under oath, who states that the following information is of his own personal knowledge and belief.
Almost 50 years ago, in 1968, in Credit River Township, Minnesota, the finding commonly referred to as the “Credit River Decision” of the landmark court case, First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, vs. Jerome Daly, held the Federal Reserve Act to be unconstitutional and void. This decision, which is legally sound, declared in effect, that all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by Federal Reserve National and State Banks to be null and void.
This amounts to the emancipation of all Americans from personal, national and state debt, purportedly owed to the Federal Reserve Bank. Every American owes it to himself, his country, and to the people of the world, to study and understand this decision, for upon this decision hangs the question of freedom or slavery for the world.
On May 8, 1964, Mr. Jerome Daly executed a Note and Mortgage to the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, which is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Both banks are privately owned and are a part of the Federal Reserve Banking System.
In the spring of 1967, Mr. Jerome Daly was in arrears $476.00 in the payments on this Note and Mortgage. The Note was secured by a Mortgage on real property in Spring Lake Township in Scott County, Minnesota. The Bank foreclosed by advertisement and bought the property at a Sheriff’s Sale held on June 26, 1967. Mr. Jerome Daly made no further payments after June 26, 1967 and did not redeem within the 12 month period of time alloted by law after the Sheriff’s Sale.
The bank brought an action to recover possession of the property to the Justice of the Peace Court at Savage, Minnesota. The first 2 Justices were disqualified by Affidavit of Prejudice; the first by Mr. Daly, the second by the bank, and a third judge refused to handle the case. It was then sent, pursuant to law, to Martin V. Mahoney, Justice of the peace, Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, who presided at a Jury trial on December 7, 1968.
The Jury found the Note and Mortgage to be void for failure to give any validity to the Sheriff’s Sale. The Verdict was for Mr. Daly with costs in the amount of $75.00.
The acting President of the Bank, Mr. Lawrence V. Morgan, admitted that the Bank created the money and credit upon its books by which it acquired or gave as consideration for the Note; that this was standard banking practice; that the credit first came into existence when they created it; that he knew of no United States Statute which gave them the right to do this, and that this is the universal practice of these banks.
Mr. Lawrence V. Morgan appeared at the trial on December 7, 1968 and was perceived to be candid, open, direct, experienced, and truthful. He testified to 20 years of experience with the Bank of America in Los Angeles, the Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, and as the Plaintiff in this case. He seemed to be familiar with the operations of the Federal Reserve System.
The banker testified about the mortgage loan given to Mr. Jerome Daly, and then Mr. Jerome Daly cross examined the banker about the creating of money “out of thin air”.
Mr. Jerome Daly asked the Bank President, “If you were just opening up your bank and no one had yet made a deposit, and I came into your bank and wanted to take out a loan of $18,000.00, could you loan me that money?”
When the Bank President said, “Yes”, Mr. Jerome Daly then asked, “Does this mean that you can create money out of thin air?” And the Bank President said, “Yes, we can create money out of thin air.”
He freely admitted that his Bank created all of the Money or Credit upon its books with which it acquired the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964.
The credit first came into existence when the Bank created it upon its books by ledger entry. Further, he freely admitted that no United States Law gave the bank the authority to do this. There was obviously no lawful consideration for the Note. The Bank parted with absolutely nothing except paper and a bit of ink.
Justice Martin V. Mahoney then said, “IT SOUNDS LIKE FRAUD TO ME” and everybody in the court room nodded their heads indicating that they agreed with Justice Martin V. Mahoney.
No complaint was made by the banker that the bank did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Lawrence V. Morgan, the path of duty was clearly made and very direct and clear for the jury. Their verdict could not reasonably have been otherwise.
Justice was rendered completely, and without denial, promptly, and without delay, freely, and without purchase, comfortable to the laws in this Court on December 7, 1968.
This was the first time the question has been passed upon in the United States. This decision is one of the great documents of American history. It is a huge cornerstone wrenched from the temple of Imperialism — one of the solid foundation stones of Liberty.
The “Credit River Decision”, as it is known, was and still is the most important legal decision ever decided by a Trial Jury of 12 women and men!
“All Rights Reserved
/s/____David Everett Robinson_____
David Everett Robinson, Affiant, Authorized
Representative, Attorney-In-Fact in behalf of
DAVID EVERETT ROBINSON, Ens legis
3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine 04011
drobin88@comcast.net
Subscribed To And Sworn To Before God [Titus 1:2] this 17th day of December 2014.




Thanks to:http://mainerepublicemailalert.com



  

MartyM

avatar
I'm not sure I see the point of this... beyond the obvious, that all mortgages are fraudulent, what did this document serve to do ??
   Has anyone successfully used this as a defense in a foreclosure suite ?


I can see how it could be used, but knowing our injustice system and how that works, I don't see this making much of a difference...
   Though I truly wish I'm wrong about that.





'Tis better to be thought a fool,than to speak and remove all doubt.
     Love,Laughter & Prosperity...  :Santa 3: 

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum