Federal Register ~ Solicitation of Written Comments on the Draft National Adult Immunization PlanPosted February 25, 2015 by laurabruno in Uncategorized . Tagged: mandatory vaccines , NAIP , vaccines . 24 Comments
Thanks to Joe for this disturbing news/action item. In case anyone thought we were being paranoid that all this measles and Ebola hoopla has really been about gaining public demand/consent for mandatory adult vaccinations, here comes the first step of that roll out. The Department of Health and Human Services is accepting comments until March 9, 2015. I cannot advise you what to say, but if we don’t say something, we’re offering tacit permission for this to go forward.
You can read the 52-page NAIP draft here at http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_draft.pdf
From the table of contents and the emphasis on vaccine friendly propaganda aimed at individuals, and tribal and religious groups, it’s clear the NAIP is setting the stage for the “informed” (only by pharmaceutical companies and their government pals) public to demand every adult in their community be vaccinated. Lather, rinse, repeat. Do it enough, and you’ll have a squeaky clean, brainwashed society who has forgotten all educated opposition to the jab. Once complete, create a lovely little biological warfare action/distraction or even just extra media hysteria and then boom! We’ve entered dangerous territory for health and health freedom — especially since the BigPharma companies are now immune from any punishment for “adverse reactions” to vaccines, up to and including death. Based on the proposed strategy, we can also expect healthcare providers and even church pastors to begin pushing the full spectrum of adult vaccines, not just the yearly flu vaccine.
If we move towards a complete national healthcare program, will anyone enrolled in it (i.e. everyone) then be required to follow a doctor “recommendation”? Already we see movements in Congress to remove the right to any exemptions based on any reasons — religious, health or other concerns. Already we see far increased cases of medical kidnapping in which CPS takes children from their parents because the parents simply asked for a second opinion. We’re not approaching medical fascism; we’re already living in it. The question remains, how far will we let this continue before we say “Enough is enough!”?
For the record, I’m not opposed to strengthening the immune system. I think it’s a fabulous idea. Nowhere does this draft include tips outside of vaccines for doing that, and as long as we have relatively free internet, it doesn’t take much effort for a non-brainwashed person to find studies of how vaccines actually decrease natural immunity in many people. Some vaccines like the MMR continue to shed live viruses for weeks after the injection, thereby circulating the very diseases the vaccine aims to prevent.
In addition to all the myriad vaccines to which babies and young children are exposed, the NAIP Objective 4.1 suggests developing even more vaccines. The US Department of Defense owns a patent on the Ebola virus, and Monsanto invested in TEKMIRA, an Ebola treatment manufacturer. What could possibly go wrong with a bioweapon in which ethical, non-profit driven, agent of transparency and good will toward humanity Monsanto is funding the “cure” for a pandemic? I remind you of the strong rumors even in mainstream Sierra Leone newspapers that the initial Ebola outbreak was found only in those who had been “vaccinated against it.” At best, vaccines are an inexact science. At worst, they offer a fabulous opportunity for plausible deniability of intentional mass genocide.
Conspiracy theorists have long warned of nanotechnology or NANO chips that could be injected via vaccine. Sounds pretty sci-fi, but Objective 4.2 is: “Encourage new technologies to improve the distribution, storage, and delivery of adult vaccines.” We already know that the FDA gives a free pass to Monsanto, et. al. in the areas of GMO foods and that the FDA is hugely biased towards BigPharma profits. Objective 4.1.2 wants to encourage increased “technologies (i.e. genome sequencing, bio informatics, and systems biology tools)” for the creation of ever more and ever more “effective” vaccines.
They also want to increase and create new adjuvants, which currently include dead or live viruses that have nothing to do with the label of the vaccine. Adjuvants purposely irritate the immune system so that it “responds” to the vaccine. When I spoke at a Lyme Disease conference in January 2011, some of the top Lyme Literate M.D.’s acknowledged that many of their patients had contracted Lyme, Epstein Barre and/or HIV from vaccines. I personally have a friend who collects government disability because he contracted HIV from a vaccine. He had the blood work before and after to prove it. This happened years prior to the more recent legislation that protects pharmaceutical companies from adverse reactions. In addition to other viruses, neurotoxic aluminum is another common adjuvant.
In addition to increasing adjuvants, the NAIP calls for increasing storage capacity. Thimerisol — also known as mercury, a known immuno-suppressor and neurotoxin — is a common vaccine preservative. Will we see more of it? Or will we just not know, since vaccine manufacturers are now permitted to alter their approved formulas without acknowledging they’ve done so?
Informed people can currently obtain exemptions; however, the NAID plan wants to increase pressure from all quarters for demands that all adults become vaccinated as their civic duty. I’m sorry, but when one’s “civic duty” includes allowing the BigPharmafia and Monsanto to inject whatever they deem “necessary” directly into my bloodstream with the possible addition of nano- or other technology, we’re living in a fascist nightmare in which we no longer own our own bodies. Yes, I know corporations have already patented body parts and human genes, and yes, the State has asserted that it, not the parents, owns the children. But again, how far are we going to allow this to proceed?
No big government collusion with big industry would be complete without vastly increasing the size of government. Well, fear not, the NAIP has plans for that! Enter: Adult Interagency Task Force (AITF). Enter increased monitoring of “progress, challenges and opportunities — all of which provide transparency to policymakers and the public.” Would that be the same kind of “transparency” we’ve had from the Obama Administration? The same kind of “transparency” we’ve seen from GMO manufacturers so eager to label their creations? The same kind of “transparency” we’ve seen in the 2,500 page Affordable Care Act inclusions? Would “challenges” include the need to criminalize people who have researched vaccines and want to opt out? Would “opportunities” include false flags or media staged “outbreaks”? Just curious.
Looking at “Goal 3: Increase Community Demand for Vaccinations,” reveals its leader in this area — the CDC (which has been caught seriously misrepresenting disease statistics). Goal 4 lists an unnamed “Biotechnology Industry Organization.” Does “transparency” include knowing which companies have the most crossover within the CDC, Congress and the Supreme Court? Does it include full public transparency of which Biotechnology Industry Organizations have direct origins in Nazi Germany? Again, just curious. We already know about IG Farben and Bayer; will the proposed “transparency” and “education” include more in-depth history? I didn’t think so. Such connections, combined with the Department of Defense’s involvement might make people nervous about getting poked by war criminals and eugenicists. That would counteract Goal 3.
You can find the current Adult Immunization Schedules at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/adult.html , but again, the NAIP wants to increase the number of “recommended” or required adult vaccines. If you’re comfortable with this development, then move along, nothing to see here. If, instead, you take issue with any or all of the things I’ve shared here, I encourage you to read the plan for yourself in its 52 page entirety: http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_draft.pdf
Comments are open through 5:00 p.m. Eastern US time on March 9, 2015.
(2) Electronic responses are preferred and may be addressed to: Rebecca.Fish@hhs.gov.
(3) Written responses should be addressed to: National Vaccine Program Office, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Room 733G, Washington, DC 20201. Attn: HHS Adult Immunization c/o Rebecca Fish.
Personally, I intend to provide both an electronic and a written response. Let’s have Rebecca Fish swimming in comments that take more effort to eliminate than simply hitting a delete key.
Thanks to: https://laurabruno.wordpress.com