“Shadow Corporations,” believed to be money-laundering Ponzi scams and swindling leeches.Posted on May 2, 2015 by arnierosner
On May 2, 2015, at 12:19 PM, William Stoller
Dear ARIZONA U.S. REP. KYRSTEN SINEMA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH, and select Insiders:
As always, these are opinions based on known credible facts and circumstances.
Hope you’re having a pleasant weekend.
We respectfully request that you investigate this information, because we believe that you have reasonable/probable cause. Thanks.
Here are some of the State of Arizona’s illegal and unconstitutional “Shadow Corporations,” believed to be money-laundering Ponzi scams and swindling leeches.
As you learned in “Business Law 101,” corporate/LLC names cannot be deceptively similar to government entities and existing businesses.
You can search using “City of Phoenix, ” City of Tucson,” “County of Maricopa,” etc. in the left search box, with the subject city/town/village or county seat in the right hand box.
After exhausting our administrative remedies, we will sue these lowlives for RICO (racketeering), FRAUD, COMMON LAW CONSPIRACY, CONVERSION, CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS (due process, equal protection), STATUTORY VIOLATIONS, and TITLE 42 CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIMS.
Thank you for your assistance.
Bill Stoller, and colleagues
Here’s a letter sent to the CT BAR EXAMINING COMMITTEE, an (alleged) illegal and unconstitutional privately-held shadow corporate entity, as is the CT JUDICIARY, and the “State of Connecticut.” ALL AMERICAN STATES, COUNTIES, and CITIES/TOWNS/VILLAGES are allegedly being run illegally by SHADOW CORPORATE CROOKS.
April 25, 2015
Jessica F. Kallipolites
Connecticut Bar Examining Committee
100 Washington Street, 1st Floor
Hartford, CT 06106
USA (860) 706-5135
Re: Alleged illegal denial of permission to sit for CT Bar Exam or to be admitted outright, based on equivalent/superior qualifications; pending Demand / Notice of Intent to Sue .
Dear Ms. Kallipolites:
These are opinions based on known facts.
Please note that I am incorporating by reference any and all E-mail communications and evidence/documentation that has been sent to you previously, by Email or otherwise.
Sadly, and due to your refusal to reasonably negotiate in good faith, this matter must now proceed to court, where it should have been a long time ago. I am also considering filing a class-action as a lawful class representative speaking for a very large class of severely injured plaintiffs who have been unlawfully denied their right to sit for the CT BAR EXAM, and/or to be admitted to the CT BAR.
By the way, the CONNECTICUT JUDICIARY and BAR EXAMINING COMMITTEE are being run by PRIVATE “Shadow Corporations” behind the scenes, as clearly shown by the reputable business source www.MANTA.com , at
You are duty-bound as an attorney to investigate these credible facts and allegations.
Part of the forthcoming arguments to the CT SUPERIOR COURT and CT SUPREME COURT will be that you are acting illegally as an agent of a PRIVATELY-HELD ENTITY, and
have NO AUTHORITY to either LICENSE ATTORNEYS or DENY THEM ADMISSION TO THE BAR.
I’m also giving you NOTICE that I and others will file a FEDERAL TITLE 42 CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION, if necessary.
A FORMAL DEMAND LETTER / NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE will be forthcoming; you can MITIGATE YOUR DAMAGES by simply allowing me to sit for the CT BAR EXAM, which you know I’m well-qualified to sit for, based on the documentation sent and cited in previous communications.
Your response is welcome, and your willingness to negotiate will be noted.
Bill Stoller, and colleagues
Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com