OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Is it possible to apply positive + in favor Newton III Motion Law as a dynamic system in a motor engine
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo

» Meta 1 Coin Scam Update - Robert Dunlop Arrested
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 12:14 am by RamblerNash

» As We Navigate Debs Passing
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Jan 08, 2024 6:18 pm by Ponee

» 10/7 — Much More Dangerous & Diabolical Than Anyone Knows
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyThu Nov 02, 2023 8:30 pm by KennyL

» Sundays and Deb.....
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptySun Oct 01, 2023 9:11 pm by NanneeRose

» African Official Exposes Bill Gates’ Depopulation Agenda: ‘My Country Is Not Your Laboratory’
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyThu Sep 21, 2023 4:39 am by NanneeRose

» DEBS HEALTH
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptySun Sep 03, 2023 10:23 am by ANENRO

» Attorney Reveals the “Exculpatory” Evidence Jack Smith Possesses that Exonerates President Trump
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:48 am by ANENRO

» Update From Site Owner to Members & Guests
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:47 am by ANENRO

» New global internet censorship began today
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 21, 2023 9:25 am by NanneeRose

» Alienated from reality
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why does Russia now believe that Covid-19 was a US-created bioweapon?
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Man reports history of interaction with seemingly intelligent orbs
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Western reactions to the controversial Benin Bronzes
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» India unveils first images from Moon mission
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Scientists achieve nuclear fusion net energy gain for second time
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Putin Signals 5G Ban
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “Texas Student Dies in Car Accident — Discovers Life after Death”
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:05 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The hidden history taught by secret societies
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Vaccines and SIDS (Crib Death)
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:00 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Sun blasts out highest-energy radiation ever recorded, raising questions for solar physics
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 2:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why you should be eating more porcini mushrooms
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptySun Aug 06, 2023 10:38 am by PurpleSkyz


You are not connected. Please login or register

1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report


1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  11a9e04d65dd6081c46442bd606b87de



Viking 2 Lander photo of Martian surface in 1976
NASA

1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  11021cfc2254d0243bccf714bd4a673c
by Michael Salla



A team of scientists and mathematicians analyzing data from the 1976 Viking Mission have concluded that life on Mars was detected in one of the four experiments conducted by the two robotic landers. Their report, “Complexity Analysis of the Viking Labeled Release Experiments,” released last week in the International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences has resurrected a controversy over the results of the Viking Mission’s “Labeled Released experiment” designed by Dr Gilbert Levin. The Viking mission was the only Mars mission so far that was designed by NASA to detect life. Dr Levin was confident that the experiment had detected microbial life on Mars, but his NASA colleagues disagreed and his startling finding was forgotten in the Martian sands of time. This new scientific investigation has concluded that Levin was right all along.

Wikipedia summarizes NASA’s official position on the “Labeled Released experiment” and the position taken by Levin’s colleagues back in 1976:

In the [Labeled Release] LR experiment, a sample of Martian soil was inoculated with a drop of very dilute aqueous nutrient solution. The nutrients (7 molecules that were Miller-Urey products) were tagged with radioactive 14C. The air above the soil was monitored for the evolution of radioactive 14CO2 gas as evidence that microorganisms in the soil had metabolized one or more of the nutrients.…. The result was quite a surprise following the negative results of the first two tests, with a steady stream of radioactive gases being given off by the soil immediately following the first injection. The experiment was done by both Viking probes the first using a sample from the surface exposed to sunlight and the second probe taking the sample from underneath a rock both initial injections came back positive. Subsequent injections a week later did not, however, elicit the same reaction, and the result remains inconclusive.

Here is how Irene Klotz from Discovery News described the novel approach taken by scientists in the newly released report:

Researchers crunched raw data collected during runs of the Labeled Release experiment, which looked for signs of microbial metabolism in soil samples scooped up and processed by the two Viking landers. General consensus of scientists has been that the experiment found geological, not biological, activity.
The new study took a different approach. Researchers distilled the Viking Labeled Release data, provided as hard copies by the original researchers, into sets of numbers and analyzed the results for complexity. Since living systems are more complicated than non-biological processes, the idea was to look at the experiment results from a purely numerical perspective. They found close correlations between the Viking experiment results' complexity and those of terrestrial biological data sets. They say the high degree of order is more characteristic of biological, rather than purely physical processes.


The team of scientists are very conclusive in their 2012 report:

The only extraterrestrial life detection experiments ever conducted were the three which were components of the 1976 Viking Mission to Mars. Of these, only the Labeled Release experiment obtained a clearly positive response…. We have applied complexity analysis to the Viking LR data….We conclude that the complexity pattern seen in active experiments strongly suggests biology while the different pattern in the control responses is more likely to be non-biological….These analyses support the interpretation that the Viking LR experiment did detect extant microbial life on Mars.

One of the scientists, Dr Joseph Miller a neuropharmacologist and biologist with the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, was interviewed by Discovery News and said: "On the basis of what we've done so far, I'd say I'm 99 percent sure there's life there."

So are the results from this new scientific investigation of the Viking data conclusive, was life discovered on Mars? A 99 % degree of certainty is very high, and while critics might argue is not conclusive, it would at the very least, have required follow up life detection experiments by NASA over the last three decades. NASA however has not designed such experiments ever since the 1976 Viking Mission. Why not?

According to NASA critic, Richard Hoagload, author of Dark Mission: NASA Secret History, NASA is not interested in discovering whether life exists or has existed on Mars. Such a discovery would be too disturbing for human civilization as we know it, as starkly revealed in the 1961 NASA Brookings Report presented to the US Congress that Hoagland helped bring to public attention back in 1993. NASA’s real mission appears to be one of merely justifying funding for future space missions that do nothing to disturb the scientific consensus that we are alone in the universe. NASA data pointing to evidence of life in our solar system is systematically ignored, censored or simply disappears. Scientists challenging this policy are silenced, discredited, and/or fired. NASA’s next robotic mission, Mars Science Laboratory (aka Curiosity) again does not have any life detection experiments on board. It’s hard not to disagree with Hoagland’s conclusion that NASA’s real mission is a dark one after all – don’t do anything to prove that life exists elsewhere in our solar system. Thankfully, more and more scientists do not agree, as reevaluation of the 1976 Viking Mission data clearly shows.

© Copyright 2012. Michael E. Salla. Exopolitics.org


From Exopolitics Examiner @ http://www.examiner.com/article/1976-life-on-mars-controversy-resurrected-new-scientific-report?cid=PROD-redesign-right-next



Life on Mars? Data From 1976 Viking Mission Re-examined
(1:07) @ https://youtu.be/esTj25tRigg



Viking robots found life on Mars in 1976?
(3:21) @ https://youtu.be/-ECi71DRRrA

For more information about Martian life see [url=http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/life on mars]http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/life%20on%20mars[/url]


Thanks to: http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum