Latest topics
» We've Been Waiting For Something Like This! 2018
Today at 11:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» Kim Dotcom: The Deep State, WikiLeaks and Seth Rich
Today at 10:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» 2018 IS STRANGE Part 3 - MARCH
Today at 10:39 am by PurpleSkyz

Today at 10:13 am by WilliaminUSA

» Anna Tells it Like it Is to Kim (the RV Guru Scamtastic) Possible
Today at 9:57 am by topspin2

» American SwissIndo aka Cindy Kay Currier back at it
Today at 9:16 am by topspin2

» In But Not Of?
Today at 9:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense Jim Keith The Real Men In Black
Today at 9:13 am by PurpleSkyz

» March equinox: All you need to know
Today at 9:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ House size UFO startles eyewitness in Ocala, Florida plus MORE
Today at 8:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» Capricorn and the astrological wheel: santos bonacci
Today at 8:45 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cluster of "unknown objects" visible from ISS HIGH above the Earth - A close look at them
Today at 8:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Shame on You PX Researchers!!! SHAME plus MORE
Today at 8:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» Wildlife on the Brink! Biodiversity is in Crisis
Today at 8:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» Linda Moulton Howe & Daniel Liszt Part One & Two
Yesterday at 11:35 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Mullti color mysterious bright UFOs orbs in the skies of Mexico plus MORE
Yesterday at 10:35 pm by Serena1

» GCI006 Hluhluwe, South Africa | Schumann Resonance Spike
Yesterday at 7:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The White House - Recent Amendments May Telegraph Military Tribunals in the Near Future
Yesterday at 6:38 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Gifts from the Stars
Yesterday at 6:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

Yesterday at 6:12 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Will Governor Jerry Brown Be Arrested, Prosecuted and Imprisoned…
Yesterday at 6:08 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Stonehenge is a fraud?
Yesterday at 6:01 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Karmic New Moon in Pisces — the most Powerful Healing Moon of 2018!
Yesterday at 3:24 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Anonymous - Something Thought to be Impossible is Happening...
Yesterday at 3:17 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Lisa Transcendence Brown: Current Photonic Energies Increase
Yesterday at 2:19 pm by PurpleSkyz

» According to a Recent Study, Smudging Destroys ‘Killer Germs.’
Yesterday at 2:17 pm by PurpleSkyz

» TR 3B Aurora Secret Plane | Top-Secret US Air Force Black Triangle
Yesterday at 11:05 am by PurpleSkyz

» Grandfather Cures His Cancer With Homemade Cannabis Oil
Yesterday at 10:20 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense & Jay Weidner - 3 Fingered ET Mummy Found In Peru
Yesterday at 10:12 am by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters

How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters on Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:34 am


How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters

by Elle - Jun 27, 2015
0 2

Photo Illustration by Emil Lendof/The Daily Beast
Dick Gillespie
The Daily Beast, the website I edit, was recently commanded by the feds to provide information on a few commenters and not discuss it. Here’s why we’re speaking out.
Is there anything more likely to make you shit your pants out of a mix of fear and anger than getting a federal subpoena out of the blue?
Well, yes, there is: getting a gag order that prohibits you from speaking publicly about that subpoena and even the gag order itself. Talk about feeling isolated and cast adrift in the home of the free. You can’t even respond honestly when someone asks, “Are you under a court order not to speak?”
Far more important: talk about realizing that open expression and press freedom are far more tenuous than even the most cynical of us can imagine! Even when you have done nothing wrong and aren’t the target of an investigation, you can be commanded, at serious financial cost and disruption of your business, to dance to a tune called by the long arm of the law.
This all just happened to my colleagues and me at, the libertarian website I edit. On May 31, I blogged about the life sentence given to Ross Ulbricht, the creator of the “dark web” site Silk Road, by Judge Katherine Forrest. In the comments section, a half-dozen commenters unloaded on Forrest, suggesting that, among other things, she should burn in hell, “be taken out back and shot,” and, in a well-worn Internet homage to the Coen Brothers movie Fargo, be fed “feet first” into a woodchipper.
The comments betrayed a naive belief in an afterlife and karma, were grammatically and spelling-challenged, hyperbolic, and… completely within the realm of acceptable Internet discourse, especially for an unmoderated comments section. (Like other websites, Reason is not legally responsible for what goes on in our comments section; we read the comments sometimes but don’t actively curate them.)
But the U.S. attorney for U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkthought differently and on June 2 issued a grand jury subpoena to Reason for all identifying information we had on the offending commenters—things such as IP addresses, names, emails, and other information. At first, the feds requested that we “voluntarily” refrain from disclosing the subpoena to anybody. Out of sense of fairness and principle, we notified the targeted commenters, who could have moved to quash the subpoena. Then came the gag order on June 4, barring us from talking about the whole business with anyone outside our organization besides our lawyers.
You can read a detailed account of how events, including the lifting of the gag order, played out here. As the legal blogger Ken White of Popehat has argued, the episode is plainly a huge abuse of power.
To the extent that the feds actually thought these were serious plans to do real harm, why the hell would they respond with a slow-moving subpoena whose deadline was days away?
I’ll leave the detailed legal arguments to White, who confesses that once upon a time he was “an entitled, arrogant little douchesquirt when [he] was a federal prosecutor.” I’ve got my own reasons for seeing this episode as outrageous and something that all of us who read and write online—whether as bylined authors or anonymous commenters—should be worried about.
For starters, the subpoena was unnecessary because the comments obviously weren’t real threats. One of the commenters scooped up in this had written, “I hope there is a special place in hell reserved for that horrible woman” while another opined, “I’d prefer a hellish place on Earth be reserved for her as well.” What kind of country are we living in where you get in hot water for such tepid blaspheming? Even the more outrageous comments—“Its (sic) judges like these that should be taken out back and shot” —wouldn’t exactly stir fear in the heart of anyone who has accessed the Web since AOL stopped charging by the hour.
As White writes, “True threat analysis always examines context. Here, the context strongly weighs in favor of hyperbole. The comments are on the Internet, a wretched hive of scum, villainy, and gaseous smack talk. They are on a political blog, about a judicial-political story; such stories are widely known to draw such bluster. They are specifically at, a site with excellent content but cursed with a group of commenters who think such trash talk is amusing.”
But here’s the thing we non-lawyers might think of first: To the extent that the feds actually thought these were serious plans to do real harm, why the hell would they respond with a slow-moving subpoena whose deadline was days away? By spending five minutes doing the laziest, George Jetson-style online “research” (read: Google and site searches), they would have found publicly available info on some of the commenters. I’m talking things like websites and Google+ pages. One of the commenters had literally posted thousands of comments at, from which it is clear that he (assuming it is a he) is not exactly a threat to anyone other than common decency.
But that’s your tax dollars at work, costing a reputable, award-winning website—albeit one that is sharply critical of government when it comes to snooping in the boardroom and the bedroom—time and money to comply with a subpoena for non-threatening readers. Even worse, the feds are doing the same to readers who may or may not have any resources to help them comply with legal proceedings that can go very wrong very quickly.
More Here>>
[hat tip: Michael]

Thanks to:


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum