Saturday, August 15, 2015
Clearing The Disinfo Haze: There Are NO Predictions For Disclosure This Fall, Humanity Is Freeing Itself, NOT The Sphere Alliance | Corey GoodETxSG
Corey has been active the past few days. He is taking a 10 day vacation with his family, but he did release some intel in relation to Gonzales and his recent activities 'up there.'
Corey also categorically addressed a huge number of points related to the unfounded claims of detractors. If you are on the fence about timelines, predictions, AI pysop scares or in what capacity the Sphere Beings are assisting humanity - you'll want to read and share this update.
My commentary will be in [green brackets] with Corey's text in black.
If you do not already have a GaiamTV subscription, and want to support Corey, use this link here: blueavians.com.
For other updates by Corey GoodETxSG click here. To support Corey and his work click here.
- Justin Comment on blog post about Kerry Cassidy and the "Blue Avian Psyop" (Stasis Being Videos, 'Avian' Style Crop Circles, Addressing Detractors: Ruiner, Project Camelot and Project Avalon | Corey GoodETxSG):
A question to anyone who knows. Cassidy and a few others who have come out against Corey have been adamant that the Blue Avians are AI - but I don't recall hearing that from Corey or David. I haven't seen all of the Gaiam interviews so it's possible I missed that part...? It doesn't seem accurate so could someone please clarify for me? Thanking you in advance! My response:
Justin Deschamps Great question to ask. Corey has actually a great deal of information discussing the A.I. infiltration on Earth. Here is a few links you may want to review:
http://goodetxsg-secretspaceprogram.blogspot.com/2014/12/concerning-various-secret-space.html Corey's Response:
SphereBeing Alliance Cassidy is a whole other story and there is more than just her UFO Religious Beliefs and Agenda to protect in this situation. All of the skypes/emails I have between her and I when we first communicated were so bizarre that there is another component at work. If someone is being mentally triggered, manipulated or made reactionary is has not been myself. I have been thinking how to respond to much of this. I was looking over the communications with her (Including the ones where I had to get Google/YouTube Security involved because she outed my full name, used it without permission and after I had repeatedly told her I was to remain anonymous. After I politely refused an on camera interview (All she is really interested in) the 3rd time she decided she would out my name because "The cabal know who you are already". Is this what potential whistleblowers want to face when coming out?
Do they want to possibly have a researcher make a judgement call and decide that the whistleblowers security measures are silly so they might as well provide all of the data publicly? A person was put in place to split up Camelot in recent years and both parties have been living off of a legacy of some good work
. Now that legacy is being risked by tossing around labels that will silence many of the future whistleblowers that may have come forward. Back "in the day" when their legacy was strong they would not have acted so cavalierly. Researchers often make the mistake of moving from covering a great story to feeling the need to write themselves into the narrative. This is seen with all of the detractors. We also see that they are also quoting information that is fragmented, taken out of context (Mis-Information) or in some cases have even conspired in communications to put forth information that they know is untrue to further their agenda
. That is dis-information pure and simple.
[I can not speak to the intentions of detractors, but when reviewing their commentary, in nearly all cases there is not a clear articulation of the 'facts'. The facts in this case are what Corey has actually said, whether or not these things are actually true is unclear, but he did say them. The statements he has provided, his testimony, is real, which we can agree are 'facts'. Kerry has put out an enormous amount of high quality work in a fairly objective fashion, and her recent, inaccurate, perspectives on Corey do not detract from this.
All of this can be discussed as a process of discernment, which has 3 phases of progression; observation, contemplation and evaluation. How can we discern if a thing is true without first gaining complete knowledge about what it discusses? Can we determine if the sky is clear without actually looking outside? The ability to set aside our biases and preconceived notions about a topic is essential so we can observe it clearly. Then once we have taken stock of the topic, we can begin to contemplate it. This is where we put 'facts' on the table and compare them against each other. Once all the facts surrounding a topic have been evaluated, we can now conclude what we think
it means; if it is true, if it accurately reflects reality. This is the final product of a discernment process, a possible
conclusion. The quality of the discerned result depends directly on the preceding steps used. Again how can we determine the truthfulness of something without gaining knowledge of it first?
What I have observed in nearly all the detractors is an incomplete set of observed data, which in turn skews the contemplation process. In the absence of all the facts, we tend to make conclusions based on what we do know, our pre-existing knowledge and preconceived notions. I just recently came across a forum thread where some were claiming Corey is an Illuminati Agent working to promote a Project Blue Beam agenda. The basis to support this conclusion, the observed facts, were Corey's use of the word 'blue' in several updates. This is a highly dubious set of logic, similar to saying that because all people who drink water die eventually, then water must be their cause of death. Correlation is not causation, in other words, elephants are grey, but not all grey things are elephants.
In this respect the conclusions drawn by the detractors reveals their incomplete knowledge and observation of Corey's work, which of course hinders their ability to come to an accurate conclusion.]
The "CABAL" or "Illuminati" (Who ARE AI Prophets) 1. Would NOT expose the incredible magnitude of the AI Threat to the population 2. Would NOT reveal the secret to black magic/power over us (Our Mass Consciousness) OR how WE can use it as a tool for our liberation from the Cabal... 3. Would NOT provide the details of the various SSP's and their infrastructure when they have a good portion of their Military/Intel Agencies believing that the toys they are playing with are state of the art. 4. Detailing and Listing the Crimes Against humanity that evidence and witnesses are being compiled against that weren't being discussed in conspiracy theories already (Interstellar Slave trade etc...). 5. Would NOT approve of humanity working on the power of their shared consciousness but also working to raise their vibrations and to become more loving/forgiving (Sound Luciferian yet?), Service To Others or to free ourselves from karma and past pain by forgiveness of self or of others. I could go down and list many other reasons why these detractors are not only off base but in some cases have just become compromised themselves or are jumping on a bandwagon before they do any research what so ever!
Humanity has been programmed to FOLLOW... To look for someone to save them or give them the answers. ALL who have truly looked at the information I have provided have seen that there is no catch, no hook...
NO AI OR CABAL MIND CONTROL PSY-OP!
The World is existing in a Cabal Mind Control Psy-Op right now that they think is reality. Those that have looked at the info I have presented have seen that I have ALWAYS asked you to use your own discernment filter
. I have Never given the impression that I am a Guru, have all the answers or that the Sphere Being Alliance are "Saviors". I say stop going from website to website looking for people to tell you what to think about any material.
Do the research yourself and then you will discern what resonates as truth. Skepticism is to be expected with all of the different dates and promises that have come and gone. Much of this however has been different than healthy skepticism however.
[A skeptic, in a classical sense, was one who does not accept something at face value. Instead they research and gather as much data as possible, before making a conclusion; and that conclusion is always subject to change once new data is received. In this sense, dismissing an idea without evaluation, research or study is close-mindedness, not skepticism. In nearly every case I have come across for someone dismissing Corey, it is not based on a logical process of research and investigation, it is based on lack of knowledge of Corey's work and speculation. On the other side of the coin, accepting his narrative as absolute truth is also not a valid discernment process. Ultimately both work on feeling and emotion;
if it feels good we tend to accept it, if it feels bad we tend to reject it. But without observation, without complete knowledge of the facts, we won't have anything more than blind faith in either respect. Hence, holistic discernment always seeks to know the details fully. We would know why we think something is true, and can consciously cite what that conclusion is based on; the observable evidence within our store of knowledge.]
I do think that people should be careful of what they are saying online especially when they have left such a clear trail of communications with other parties out there that will just be extremely embarrassing if they were to surface. If they are not embarrassed by the behavior displayed in some of these communication trails then it is more of an ethical issue.
It is also wise to not do anything that will scare away those who are on the fence about coming forward with their experiences and knowledge. If your actions are based on just because you do not like a researcher (jealousy/rivalry?) they are working with or some of their info contradicts your beliefs then you may have lost sight of what is important while rationalizing it and wrapping yourself in your beliefs.
I have no problem with skeptics, but now that anyone can open a blog and make just about any claim they wish or attack anyone they like with manufactured data and we have once respected researchers glumming onto that info without fully researching the data and then going on the attack they become trolls. There is a difference between an intellectual discourse and attack campaigns.
[Discourse is the open
and unbiased discussion of ideas so as to pool one's resources with others to gain insight into the truth. Conversely, a close-minded discussion or 'attack' is chiefly focused on pushing our conclusions on to others, regardless if they are accurate or not. Discourse is an essential tool in these waking times I think, as we all have a unique perspective, but it is incomplete in relation to the whole truth. Only by working together can we develop a more clear picture of what IS.]
This type of behavior is to be expected on all of these hate filled Internet Forums and many blogs. Serious and "Professional" researchers however acting the way that has occurred is something completely different. This not only has the potential to seriously tarnish reputations (where NO one credible will want to interview with) to even ripping apart the loosely nit group of professionals in the "Ufology" or "Truther" field. Trust will certainly be damaged and a certain amount of doubt could cloud the field for years.
We have ignored most of the attacks that were co-ordinated for the week of our show Cosmic Disclosure's release. A few people were suckered into comments during that time window but if you look at the people, dates of their "reports", the contents of the reports along with the fact that a group of them were collaborating in Skypes/Emails rules "coincidence" out of the equation of the timing.
The fact is I never planned on coming out into the open. I was manipulated and coerced into it by a couple of unethical individuals who I had great trust and admiration for at one time. No matter how they try to rewrite the history of what occurred behind the scenes between us the evidence will always speak for itself if the need ever arises to publish it amid more attacks that are based on dis-information and lies. I have no problem with genuine skeptics or people who disagree with me (I will not label them a troll just for that). We all live in our own reality bubble as it is until we are forced out of it at some point. In closing all I can say is do the research yourself, use YOUR OWN discernment on the info presented and not just parrott data blogged about by often unstable or just misinformed individuals.
There is a LOT of disinformation in this field right now and there is also a LOT of Extreme Narcissism and Christ Complexes working high up in this field. Where we are seeking humility and enlightenment in professionals we are often receiving Egomania and battle over UFO Dogma or defending their Core Content for their upcoming books. If everyone begins to look a little deeper and question agenda's of the attackers quite a lot begins to become more transparent... I hope that response covers Patricia & Justin's questions/comments above.
Thanks to: http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/