Arnie Rosner: Response to Judge Anna. We love a lot of what you have taught us and revealed; but it is the dropping of the other shoe about which I have the concern….Posted on December 24, 2015 by arnierosner
While you provide much good information, you also seem to intersperse content to mitigate the guilt of those who should be charged and prosecuted.The Judge – I didn’t say they were ALL “innocent” did I?
arnie – No You didn’t…But I said they were…!
and you should have...and that is my point…
As evidence I offer…But then what explains why 545 members of the Congress have remained MUM on obama’s ineligibility? They know…we know they know. That is treason.
But then what explains the actions of the courts?
When more than 100 cases are rejected by courts which we now know are not lawful courts of the American people and we know they are manipulated…We know the judges are guilty. More treason?
But then what explains the actions of the BAR and their members? When many different cases where attorneys pretend to be protecting their clients, actually are misrepresenting their efforts and are working for the courts…we know the attorneys are acting in fraud. Is that perhaps by accident? Ignorance?
Not meaning to be disrespectful, there’s no other way I can put this…The following comment is Baloney—Judge AnnaBut then what explains the county commissioners who have been exposed as when being elected to county public service officers are also commissioned as corporate officers by the same election results…HENRY COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL FINANCE CORPORATION – 1998
The Judge – “What I said or meant to communicate—“
Sorry again…more garbage…You state exactly what you intend to state. As a dumb old man, I may make mistakes…especially in grammar or spelling…but you? Sorry…not a chance…you are a judge and you know exactly what you are doing.
The Judge – “at any rate is that our public servants have been as misled and misdirected.”
Sorry a continuation of more of the same old malarkeyPart of what you state might be true at the beginning, but upon being challenged by members of their constituency and other credible Americans NONE –
DID YOU TAKE NOTE…? NONE HAVE ACTED TO CORRECT THE SITUATION. NONE HAVE RESIGNED. NONE CAME FORWARD.
THERE IS NO VALIDITY OR CREDIBILITY TO YOUR CONTENTIONS. You are deliberately attempting to mitigate the crimes of which ALL are guilty.
The Judge – “as everyone else and should not be held accountable for not immediately seeing the light, admitting the fraud, and jumping to whatever Anna von Reitz and Arnie Rosner have to say.”
Sorry…this too is False…a lie!You expose yourself as promoting a supportive position to cover for the members who are de facto and who have exposed their criminal intent.
The Judge – “These people have the same rights you do, and the same need to read the history and examine the facts and come to their own understanding of the situation and their own decision about what they need to do, too. 3100 County Sheriffs in this country are waking up with real bad head aches and so are quite a large number of judges and an even larger number of attorneys.”
More conjecture… Sounds good but at this point, I personally know better.The duty of all public servants is clearly to perform the work of the people. As responsible members of society, if they lack sufficient knowledge to perform their job, it is their responsibility as any American, to educate themselves. Ignorance of the law is no excuse!
Now where have we heard that before?
Further, when in their official capacity as representatives of the people, Their personal views count no more than any other constituent—
but even then—they are to act on the will of the people by whom they are being paid…through the public trust…and not on the demand of the lobbyist by whom they are being paid a bribe.
Theses criminals even have gone so far as to deliberately erect restrictive web form barriers to inhibit the ability of their constituency to express their grievances. This is a direct “Breach of the Public Trust” and directly conflicts with the First Amendment. Are we still addressing ignorance?
The Judge – “The Big Picture of what happened and is happening is just beginning to dawn on most people.”
The Judge – “And just because you get it and are raring to go do something about it does not mean that everyone in America is out of bed, much less out of their pajamas.”Enough citizens know more of the truth then might be openly admitted. From my own experience, most admit they are fearful of retaliation. They also have other personal issues involved which forces them to remain silent.
This type of intimidation and coercion is contrary to the protections provided by the Constitution.
Those of the innocent class, to hear you describe them, are very busy at attempting to impose unconstitutional legislation to silence free speech, infringe on the second amendment, and incarcerate those who expose the fraud.
These are the people you contend are ignorant. I say to that BULL… a barefaced lie!
The Judge – “As I have said from Day One– let the public records, treaties, etc. speak for themselves, let people think and act for themselves, and 390 million Americans will come to the right conclusions in short order.”This is No place for more alinsky tactics . this is not about me. This is not about you. This is not about any of us as individuals.
Your attempt here to change the subject is obvious and unacceptably divisive! You disrespect all of those who may be reading this document.
This is clearly about those who have chosen a path of criminality. This is about fraud, impersonation, criminal impersonation and criminal fraud perpetrated on the people.
This is a matter of misrepresentation and violation of the public trust… All serious crimes! And while there may be some who could feign being innocent, it is the duty of every public servant and every American citizen to begin to challenge and question every one of them.
and it is with perfect justification we the people must consider the question and aggressively pursue the answer as to have they lied to us over the last 200 years.
And I challenge you judge Anna to offer any justification that would contradict what I have stated above!
I can’t accept your explanation at this point.If the playing field in America was level at this moment I could agree that that would be a good place from where to begin. However, Judge Anna, In many cases, the public records, to which you refer have been altered and sealed from view, the facts have been altered and the documents distorted, hidden and destroyed.
The treaties to which you point, may be provided as historical events, but in my own personal experience (I refer to the manner in which agenda 21 and the environmentally related seminars are theatrically Produced and presented…)
Created and promoted by private corporations; not even identified as lawful government, (with no apparent delegated authority to do so from the people of their respective countries).
And then they go on to promote and misrepresent the outcomes of these specific agendas as public policy to be implemented by the rest of the world.
Absolutely brilliant case of fraud on display! and all of it carries no force of law and is null and void at the offset, except for the illusion of legitimacy created by the promoting corporations in coordination with a media service which is part of the corporate conglomerate.
So—Where is the legitimacy of what we are being asked to accept as lawful international treaties and agreements based upon natural law… God’s law if you will?
The Judge – It is just because they don’t know the facts and have not sensed the urgency that this situation has lasted as long as it has— but you have got to let them wake up just like I have had to let you wake up.
arniesome of what you say here may be closer to the truth, however, as stated earlier, Judge Anna, this is not about me or you.
This is not about attempting to apply Alinsky guilt tactics or subtly attacking me through my ego; I’m way too dumb and stupid to respond to that trickery.
Bringing you back to the point of this exchange…
This is about crimes committed against the people by those who were trusted enough to be elected to high office in good faith. People who were elected in good faith and chose to dishonor those by whom they were elected.
“You only think you know!”
Available 24/7 –
714-501-8247 – mobile
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2015, at 10:20 AM, ARNIE ROSNER <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Yes…Of course….they are ALL ignorant… They are all misguided…innocent! Just a misunderstanding…
You seem to forget the incompetence of the person with whom you are communicating.
The End of a Perfectly Good public servant relationship.
IT IS ALL ABOUT THE OATH!
So what about the oath of office?
Attention FBI – Obama = Treason
FBI Complaint Letter
Congressman Rohrabacher… Guilty of treason? Guilty of fraud?
Rohrabacher – Grand Jury Presentment
The U.S. Congress’s Assault on Citizens – Letter to representative Rohrabacher
“You only think you know!“
Available 24/7 –
714-501-8247 – mobile
Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com