Anna Von Reitz ~ 1/12/2016
Posts : 58379
Join date : 2012-01-04
Location : Woodstock Nation
|Subject: Anna Von Reitz ~ 1/12/2016 Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:33 am|| |
The Essential Five Second Statement of Why You Can Choose to Be Free Right NOW
by Anna Von ReitzIt is a matter of everyone grasping the FACT that we Americans are either living in our native country or assuming a "residence" in another, and that according to where we "live" or "reside" we are subject to different laws---either organic or statutory._________________________________The two "countries" are created by two jurisdictions--- you either live in the Continental United States, on the land of the Continental United States, and are subject to the Law of the Land, including the Organic Law (Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, Constitution) and the Public Law embodied by the United States Statutes-at-Large, or, you merely "reside" here and are a British Crown Subject liable to obey their corporate administrative "law" and statutory law and Law of the Sea--- that is, international law.This is about political status, not law per se. These vermin have misrepresented your political status as a means of bringing false claims against you and your assets.They have prosecuted you under foreign jurisdiction and in foreign venues of the "law" without your knowledge or consent.You are owed the "Law of the Land" --- which includes your actual Constitution which is NOT the Constitution of the United States of America which is merely a corporate charter issued under a deceptively similar name.Your Constitution is: The Constitution for the united States of America.Please note that you live in states---organic states--- oregon state, new york state, florida state--- on the land, and that the Joint Stock Companies (not corporations) that you are heir to are the "States of America" called "Oregon State" and "New York State" and "Florida State" since the 1870's.You are yourselves all "organic states of the Union"--- replete with your own tripart government: conscience, logic, and freewill. That is why in international law, thanks to our Forefathers, you must be considered a "sovereign without subjects".Please notice also that the "united States of America" are not the same as the "United States of America" nor the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" nor "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".Are you all beginning to catch on to the name games and legal deceits that have been used to entrap and deceive you and your parents and grandparents?Your servants, the British-backed Federal "inhabitants", have committed commercial fraud against you on a vast scale, but that is all it is, and all it has ever been----a crime against innocent people which is now finally beginning to be addressed.Lift up your heads, Americans!John Trowbridge won his case. You can win yours.The end of this travesty is in view.---------------------------------------[size=13]See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net
Last edited by PurpleSkyz on Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:34 am; edited 1 time in total
Posts : 58379
Join date : 2012-01-04
Location : Woodstock Nation
|Subject: Re: Anna Von Reitz ~ 1/12/2016 Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:34 am|| |
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 1900 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
The Lunatic Fringe Round Two, Gurus Be Damned A Further Reply to Bob Hurt, Larry, Et Alia......
by Anna Von Reitz
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Bob Hurt wrote:
See Anna's reply here:
- Quote :
I sincerely appreciate the energy you have expended in writing your assertions of what has happened to enslave the American people. However, I do not agree with many of your assertions, as you know, and neither does attorney Larry Becraft. Larry has clearly documented NUMEROUS falsehoods in your assertions, and he has documented them here:
I invite you to write to me your rebuttal to his points of dispute in order to clarify that you made errors or that you have some explanation for how your assertions differ from apparent reality, and why people should believe you instead of demonstrable history.
Look at it this way. You, by spreading false information, merely prove yourself a crackpot and Pied Piper leading Americans astray. And you do that in spite of the fact that we have plenty of FACTUAL things wrong with government to explain to people without lying to them about history. So, why destroy your own reputation with lies and falsehoods?
Consider this point:
If you wrote those false things in ignorance, you have some excuse for your errors. But once you have facts proving your assertions erroneous, if you continue propounding the false assertions without making an effort to correct them in your distributed writings, that makes you a charlatan and deceiver who knowingly misleads readers (many of whom want to trust you).
THAT explains why Larry and I write as we do to expose your false assertions about history.
Larry Becraft hasn't really proven any of his assertions, Bob. He has just made them. I have read and responded to him, but the fact is, that he is misrepresenting what I wrote and attempting to twist it around by various means, and then "disprove" something I never asserted in the first place. This is a typical lawyer's trick. And Larry is a lawyer. He takes things out of context, shifts focus, reinterprets, and does his little shuffle dance and people are taken in by it. I am not.
Let me give you an example---- the infamous "Act of 1871".
This was the rat's first public attempt to set up a land base for what they had already done in 1864 by setting up the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation. The paper part was finished and they wanted to attach it to the actual land known as the District of Columbia. This was necessary to make "Municipal Law" equivalent to "Federal Law".
Most people don't understand what the Act of 1871 was about to begin with, and they make all sorts of claims about it. They also fail to note that it was repealed and that the intent was accomplished by the Municipal Corporations Acts a few years later.
The point is that this particular song and dance is widely misinterpreted.
So Larry goes in hopping and screaming and bringing forward the fact that this particular piece of legislation was repealed and there he conveniently drops it, as if the intent of the legislation was repealed or somehow not realized in fact-----when it was, in spades. He uses a technicality to obscure the truth and then fails to bring forward the additional facts and admit that, oh, well, yes, the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation was eventually tied to the District of Columbia and that in turn allowed the courts to interpret Municipal Law of the District of Columbia as Federal Law throughout the United States.
In fact, all those people who point to the Act of 1871 (whether it was repealed or not in that instance, it was passed in a slightly altered form and under a different name(s) in a piecemeal fashion later on, just like the Maternity Act which was repealed, reworked, and passed later) were correct in their assertions regarding the intent of the legislation and the legislators, and they and later generations of rats in Congress did in fact achieve their ends, so that we are living with the consequences today.
The same thing was done in England and in Canada and in Australia, so it isn't like we are stuck with a single instance of this being done or with a single basis for tracing the cause and the effect, Bob. It's not really arguable. But Larry argues it anyway.
Why? Because Larry is a lawyer, a loyal, life-long member of the Bar.
And the Bar is the source of all this garbage, Bob. They have been the foot soldiers in an economic "war" waged by the UK Corporation against the British Peoples, the Americans, the Canadians, the Aussies, the Indians, the Germans, the Japanese, the Swedes, the Norwegians, the Greeks, and the list goes on.
Larry also isn't a very good researcher. The more arcane things that he simply can't find, he claims don't exist.
I leave you to ponder the likely end results of that approach to life and whether or not that is a more reliable stance to take than mine, which is backed up with a sworn, witnessed, and published affidavit.
At the end of the day, people have to look at the life they are living, the actual actions of the courts they are familiar with in their own experience, the oppressions of the IRS, the injustices they suffer, the inflation of their money, the whole "enchilada" of what IS. Based on what IS, they have to look at the facts presented and reach their own conclusions.
Just like you and Larry have to answer my question---- if I am a "crack pot" and "wrong" ---- why have I not paid income taxes in twenty years, despite many, many attempts of the IRS to punish me and "make an example" out of me? And why is it that I haven't been arrested for impersonating a judge, though I have been occupying the office for three years and publishing the fact?
For that matter, why is it that John Trowbridge's case wasn't tossed out in the first water? Why did it make it all the way to the United States Supreme Court? And why did it win?
A dentist won against the entire assembled and well-funded might of the U.S. Attorney's Office. How could that happen? And how could his case prove beyond any doubt that what I have been telling you and everyone else is fact and that what Larry Becraft has been teaching is nothing but sophisticated half-truths and "interpretations" of fact?
I will submit to you, Bob, that the proof is in the pudding and not in our discussions about the pudding's genesis or ingredients or whether I used Morton's salt or Sea Salt or pink Himalayan Salt in the recipe.
I will also suggest to you that Larry Becraft and Tommy Cryer, both lawyers, succeeded against the IRS for completely different reasons and with a much harder row to hoe than I have, because they did it while REMAINING in the character of Federal United States Citizens, and that the entire importance of their work and their arguments --- while not applying to me or anyone else claiming their birthright status--- is important for those who wish to remain in a capacity as Federal United States Citizens and plead these same issues from the standpoint of the United Nations.
The same object seen from different viewpoints can appear very different and yet be the same exact thing. If you don't believe me, go outside and look at your house with your nose pressed against the siding. Then move out to the curb and look. How does it appear now? Then hike down the street until you almost lose sight of it-----how does it appear now?
Has the house changed? Or has your view of it changed?
I submit to you, Bob, that my "house" is the same house whether viewed from my perspective or from Larry's. It isn't a matter of me being a "fraud" or a "crackpot"---- and if I were, you can be sure I would have been arrested years ago. It is a matter of everyone grasping the FACT that we Americans are either living in our native country or assuming a "residence" in another, and that according to where we "live" or "reside" we are subject to different laws---either organic or statutory.
I have chosen to live in my native country and to abide by its Organic Laws and no others. Larry has chosen to "reside" here as one of those "inhabitants" and/or subjects of the British Crown who are tasked to provide the rest of us with "essential governmental services", which also obligates him to live within the statutory law.
He has to keep his nose pressed against the siding, Bob. He isn't allowed to view the "house" from the curb, much less from down the street. Those of us who are not obligated to his regimen, however, are not "wrong" or "crackpots" or "lunatics" because we have a longer leash and greater ability to see the forest and not just the trees.
And the United States Supreme Court has recently and resoundingly agreed. Read the Trowbridge case and get a view of the "house" from halfway down the lane.
9 to 0, Bob. And Larry.
[size=13]See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com[/size]
Posted by Paul Stramer at 5:44 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: [url=http://www.paulstramer.net/search/label/Anna von Reitz]Anna von Reitz[/url], [url=http://www.paulstramer.net/search/label/Bob Hurt]Bob Hurt[/url], [url=http://www.paulstramer.net/search/label/Larry Becraft]Larry Becraft[/url], [url=http://www.paulstramer.net/search/label/Tommy Cryer]Tommy Cryer[/url]
BBJanuary 12, 2016 at 7:30 PM
Few years ago when I started to be interested in commerce and its fraud I have intuitively new Larry aka Bob or Bob aka Larry are/is manipulator oh the truth. I felt he/they is infiltrator and his aim is to lie, mislead and confuse People. Hope these infiltrators, gatekeeper will suffocate in their own shit. And my intuition never failed me.
zebu111January 13, 2016 at 1:30 AM
Larry has taken it upon himself to debunk the liberty movement on-line wherever he can.
Comment on www.montanablog.us and spread these articles everywhere.
Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
Links to this postCreate a Link
Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Search This Blog
Try some of these keywords:Try these keywords in the search box above
to find the major topics of this blog:
United States Corporation,Jury, Grand Jury, Income tax, debt, Climategate, Ebola, Silver, wealth Sovereign, Obama, Sheriff, Health, Ron Paul, Tea Party, Guns, Courts, Oath Keepers, Lincoln County, Federal Reserve, Eligibility, Treason, Constitution, Liberty, Prayer, Paul Stramer, Sovereignty, Catholic, Anna von Reitz, Cliven Bundy, Oathkeepers, Sandy Hook, Gun Control, martial law, jurisdiction
Donations to keep this going.It costs a bit to keep this blog going, for the research, the time away from our business, the server space and bandwidth, and the phone to field questions. If you would like to help with that please donate what you can once, or make a monthly contribution.
Here is the PayPal link.
Donate Using Paypal
Who is Paul Stramer
Contact Paul Stramer 800 889 2839 or go to one of our websites: http://www.fm2way.com, http://www.teapartysilver.com, http://www.silverpatriot.com, http://www.silversnowball.net, http://www.lincolncountywatch.org, http://www.paulstramer.com, http://www.annavonreitz.com,
Email Paul at email@example.com
Subscribe via email to this blog
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner
US Civil Flags
Get your own civil flag here:
Network with your Friends with Ham Radio
Radio Communications Gear
Join our Email Updates[size=48]LCW Mail [/size]
We respect your email privacy
Powered by AWeber Email Marketing
About Me Paul Stramer Eureka, Montana, United StatesFormerly a heavy equipment operator in the logging industry, now a full time Internet Marketer. We make our living on line with Silver and Radio Gear. You can see everything we do on line at www.paulstramer.com. Email at firstname.lastname@example.org View my complete profile
Great Websites and Blogs
- All Things Catholic
- American Free Press
- Anna von Reitz
- Campaign for Liberty
- Fully Informed Jury Association
- How to EARN FREE SILVER
- Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
- Lincoln County Watch - Montana
- Montana Shooting Sports Association
- Network with other Patriots ON TWO WAY RADIO
- News With Views Top news website
- Oath Keepers main site
- Patriot issues on Lincoln County Watch
- Patriot videos on Lincoln County Watch
- Paul Stramer on Oathkeepers
- Paul Stramer on Twitter
- Red Beckman
- Sheriff Richard Mack
- Tea Party Silver Medallion
- Why Freedom Will Win
- Why you need SILVER NOW
Tea Party Silver now here.
Protect your Wealth with Silver
New Preparedness book
Not just how, but why to get off the grid
Legal NoticeLEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2014 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Simple template. Powered by Blogger.
Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net
Posts : 1158
Join date : 2012-02-15
Age : 50
Location : Ct
|Subject: Re: Anna Von Reitz ~ 1/12/2016 Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:54 pm|| |
This is well worth the time to read.....Very informative....
Posts : 58379
Join date : 2012-01-04
Location : Woodstock Nation
|Subject: Re: Anna Von Reitz ~ 1/12/2016 Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:53 pm|| |
Nancy Battle: Provides exchange between media and Judge Anna
Posted on January 12, 2016 by arnierosner On Jan 13, 2016, at 12:52 PM, Nancy Battle wrote:———- Forwarded message ———-From: Anna von Reitz [ltr]<[email@example.com][ltr]firstname.lastname@example.org[/ltr][/email]>[/ltr]Date: Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:23 PMSubject: Sent to email@example.comTo: “Paul Stramer at Eurekadsl.net” In reference to your recent story in The Oregonian in which you said:“In late November, Anna Maria Riezinger, an Alaska woman who claims to be Judge Anna von Rietz under the same inaccurate reading of the Constitution that Doucette uses, ruled that the members of Congress, the president and the U.S. treasury secretary all committed crimes and directed U.S. marshals and FBI agents to arrest them.Last week, Riezinger issued a statement about the Harney occupation. In it, she wrote that “The Hammonds and the Bundy Family are Priority Creditors of all the (government agencies) which are now or which have operated in this country in the past. …They and their countrymen are owed the patent to all land within the geographically defined boundaries of their respective states, free and clear of liens, encumbrances, or other presumptions.”Hundreds of people who have used similar sovereign citizen arguments to justify failing to pay federal income taxes, getting drivers licenses or other government requirements have never prevailed in any court.”— Betsy Hammond________________Ms. Hammond,In the first place, I never actually said any such thing. I explained the law and its implications for the members of the law enforcement community. You should read before you gossip and mindlessly repeat sensationalist headlines.If I am not legitimately exactly what I say I am— a Judge operating the Common Law jurisdiction of the Alaska State Superior Court — how is it that I have functioned in that Public Office for three years now, and have not been arrested for “impersonating” a Judge? Certainly, you have heard of me all the way to Oregon. My role is not exactly a secret, is it?How is it that I haven’t paid a penny in federal income tax in twenty years? That’s another good question for you to ask.Could it be that “federal officials” are in fact nothing but private corporate officers with no Public Office at all, and that they are wildly out of compliance with the only commercial contract allowing their presence on our soil?I published their Dunn and Bradstreet Numbers in our sworn, autographed, sealed and published affidavit of probable cause, “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” which is available on Amazon.com. I can also produce their Registered Agents, EIN Numbers, and lots of additional evidence to prove that what you think of as “your government” is in fact not your government.Your government has been incorporated and via that simple mechanism has been usurped into the foreign and international jurisdiction of the sea and placed under the Law of the Sea, not the Law of the Land which you, as an American, are owed.Except for people like me, the Organic Law of this country— The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The Constitution for the united States of America, and the United States Statutes at Large are not being enforced. And now you know the reason.If your interest in providing a “balanced” reporting of the facts is not aroused, it should be.It is true that a great many well-meaning patriots have gone to jail when they tried to enforce their guarantees owed to them under the Law of the Land in courts that are functioning under the Law of the Sea. So what?Those patriots were not wrong in their basic assumptions, they were simply duped, misinformed, as you are Ms.Hammond, about the nature of institutions merely “standing for” our lawful government which is supposed to be “of the people, by the people, and for the people” and not of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation.Please bother to open up a copy of any United States Constitution you can find and look at Amendment VII. There you will find that all issues of value in excess of $20 (around $500 translated to current values) must be tried at Common Law.So like most Americans you probably assume that the courts you are familiar with are operating under the Common Law you are owed, right?Wrong. They are operating under a form of martial common law euphemistically called “Special Admiralty”. It’s the only form of common law that the corporate federal government and its incorporated franchises operating the Federal States and Federal Counties possess.Back in 1938 in a U.S. Supreme Court Case known as Thompkins v. Erie Railroad, the Justices admitted that there is no such thing as federal “General Common Law”, so in order to keep their incorporated Court System going, they had to fall back on a provision made at the end of the Civil War allowing military commanders to establish military common law tribunals in the Southern States for the purposes of punishing and subduing “rebels”.This situation was addressed again by the U.S. Supreme Court in Milligan Ex Parte (1866) which still stands and it was decided that there was no excuse for the use of martial common law in areas where the local Common Law Courts were operating.So via the process of incorporation the rats responsible made sure that the continental Common Law Courts got no support, no access to the public funding they are owed. The corporate managers simply arranged to undermine the lawful Common Law Court System so that the only “common law courts” left were the federal martial common law courts which could be used to further usurp our lawful jurisdiction.And that is what they have done.Foreign Admiralty courts have run rampant upon the land jurisdiction of this country and have inflicted terrible damage upon the American people and their private property assets as a result. And people like you, Ms. Hammond, have supported them in their unlawful and unprincipled acts against your neighbors and have laughed at the poor “deluded” patriots over cocktails, never realizing that this same process of racketeering and usurpation can be applied against you and your family and your friends and your neighbors, too.The history of Nazi Germany is most instructive. It became fashionable to be a Nazi. All those common people who weren’t Nazis were looked down upon, made the brunt of jokes, gossiped about. Just like the patriots are being treated now.At the end of the day when the truth was fully out, it turned out that the Nazis were madmen and criminals and that far from being educated or elite, they were nothing but a crime syndicate with a lot of wanna be “elitist” sycophants following like dumb cattle in their footsteps, wearing their gang colors, and parroting everything these swine said while doing every evil imaginable.Welcome to who you really are, Ms. Hammond— one of those dumbly following along and parroting the fashionable story line without a thought in your head of your own, without an eye for the cognitive dissonance created by living as a slave while endlessly prattling about “liberty”.I suggest you look up the word “liberty” in a dictionary, Ms. Hammond. It’s what British sailors get on shore leave. It has nothing to do with freedom.If you want to preserve what is left of your freedom, you had better double-down on actual hardcore research of the facts instead of merely repeating what is fashionable.Sincerely,Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com
Posts : 58379
Join date : 2012-01-04
Location : Woodstock Nation
|Subject: Re: Anna Von Reitz ~ 1/12/2016 Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:22 pm|| |
THE AMERICAN COURT SYSTEM FOR DUMMIES
Posted on January 13, 2016 by Doreen Agostino And Especially for Snopes.dumb
by Anna Von Reitz
For those who have been attempting to “look me up” among the Bar Association Members in Alaska or searching for my face among the judges of the Administrative and Admiralty Courts —you won’t find me or any of the other Common Law or Federal (Postal District instead of US District) Judges in those locations, because we are part of the Land Courts and they are part of the Corporate and Maritime Courts.
There are three(3) Court Systems in America: (1) Common Law; (2) Administrative Law; (3) Maritime/Admiralty (which includes Martial Law).
Common Law is the Law of the Land, which includes the Organic Law of this Country—- The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The Constitutions (1787) and (1789- 1791), plus the Public Law, the United States Statutes-at-Large. This is all “Land Law” affecting “Land Assets”, which includes people, livestock, houses, barns, etc., etc., And this is why Amendment VII specifically requires Common Law regarding all important decisions regarding people and their property interests.
Our Common Law Courts came here with the first Colonists and have continued to function for over 400 years despite all efforts of the Bar Associations to get rid of them. That’s because Bar Members can’t work in Common Law Courts in America—- it is forbidden by our Constitution because Bar Members hold a title from a foreign government (“Esquire” from Britain—-) and no such conflict of interest is allowed.
Therefore, no Common Law Judges, such as myself, are Bar Members. We don’t appear as Bar Members and we don’t appear as members of the Administrative or Maritime/Admiralty Courts as a result.
And here is a big, fat “Duh!” for all those who have been rampaging around “exposing” what they don’t know, and claiming to “know for certain” that I am a “fake” and listening to Bar Association Members who have an ax to grind because they are in competition with the Common Law Courts actually required by our Constitution.The same Bar Association Members who have been acting in treasonous disregard of the Organic Law of this country and who are about to get served their cajones on toast, with or without croutons, have been trying to avoid the facts for decades, but the persistent Truth has a way of dispelling oceans of Shinola.
Read Amendment VII and realize that according to Thompkins v. Erie Railroad, there is no Federal “General Common Law” which means the ONLY form of “common law” in the Federale’s kit-bag is Martial Common Law, which they have been applying improperly to us “non-resident aliens” and “non-combatant civilians” and using as a means to usurp jurisdiction owed to the landlords.
Thank you, very much. Applause and donations are due to me, but especially to John Trowbridge today.
All the Gurus who think I am kidding are about to not only get the smiles wiped from their faces, but their butts relocated to their occipital domes.
And all you Bar Members out there—- better start gathering around burn barrels in the public squares—- bring your Bar Cards.
For the Boyz in the Ba-El Hood:
This goes out to Larry Becraft who has chosen the unfortunate group name “Kill the Gurus” while he continues to present himself as such, for Dougie-You-Know-Who-You-Are-But-It-Does-Not-Matter, and Bob Hurt (is that your real name?) and all the other Alphonses out there who want to “expose” me as a “fake” and “denounce” me, blah-blah-blah…..
Hey, fellas, it’s part of my mission to teach people to think for themselves.
1. If I am a “fake” and don’t know what I am talking about, how is it that nobody has tried to arrest me for impersonating a Judge after three years?
2. Maybe it is the same reason I haven’t paid “income taxes” for twenty years and all of you have?
Mark Twain was right— it would be easier to defraud you than to show you how you’ve been defrauded.
SOURCE with thanks http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/01/the-american-court-system-for-dummies.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29
Doreen Ann Agostino
all rights reserved
Thanks to: https://ourgreaterdestiny.wordpress.com/
|Follow Out Of Mind on Twitter|