SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE Rh-NEGATIVE BLOODTYPE
Do people with the Rh-negative bloodtype possess greater psychic abilities?
Do they posses a genetic factor separate from this planet, and that they are, in some way descended from a crossover of humans and a kind of ‘cosmic astronaut.’?
In its barest sense, when an alien life force is merged with human DNA, does it create a human with extra sensory power that can lend itself to greater psychic ability?
Are Rh-positive individuals not as ‘Tuned In’ because they are descended from rhesus monkeys that have no link to the cosmic influences?
Genetics alone cannot explain the Rh-negative factor, as genes are hereditary, although some theorists state that the Rh factor was a ‘mutation’ which was then passed on.
That particular theory, however, has no precedent in fact.
The only real fact we have, is that there is no definitive proof where the negative Rh factor actually originated.
Of the human blood types, O is the most common. It is the universal blood type. Blood types are further broken down into two factors …. NEGATIVE (-) and POSITIVE (+).
This is known as the RH factor.
The RH factor is the rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) factor.
The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.
The Rhesus Macacque
When blood type is inherited from your parents, it is now accepted that this factor element of the blood is the most consistent human characteristics passed on to you, the offspring.
There are VERY few aberrations.
It rarely, if ever changes, nor does it ‘Mutate‘.
The greater majority of people on earth, ‘Officially‘ 85% of the world’s population, have RH-positive blood.
That could and does support the universally-taught (Evolutionary) theory that humans evolved from, or were derived from Primates.
Yet 15 % of the remainder have Rh-negative blood.
(40/45% of indigenous Europeans are known to be Rh-Negative, but overall, it is now thought that the actual numbers of Rh-Negatives are nearer 7% of the world’s population).
So does that number support the theory that they originated elsewhere?
If a person’s blood type is one of least mutable human characteristics, where on earth did the Rh-Negative come from?
That question has puzzled scientists, medical professionals and researchers for decades.
There is some documentary evidence that does suggest the Rh-Negative blood type may have appeared on earth around 35,000 years ago.
The appearance was regional, sporadic and appeared to be connected with certain groups/tribes of people.
Northern Spain and Southern France is where some of the highest concentration of the Rh-negative factor can be found, in the Basque people of northern Spain.
Another original Rh-Negative group are known to be among the Eastern/Oriental Jews.
Generally, about 40 – 45% of Europeans have the Rh-negative bloodtype, around 3% are of African descent and approximately 1% of people of Asian or Native American descent.
Due to the larger European numbers, is that where it was introduced into the human genetic code?
Could this also be where the Caucasian was also introduced?
Is the introduction of the Caucasian also related to the Rh-Negative factor?
If the Rh-Negative factor is a ‘normal’ presentation of blood, then why is there a problem when an Rh-Negative mother becomes impregnated with an Rh-Positive baby?
Hemolytic disease, is actually an allergic reaction, but it can cause death for the unborn child when the two different blood types are mixed during pregnancy and birth, without medical intervention.
When the antigenic substances in the mother’s blood attacks the Rh-Positive blood it will attempt to destroy the cells, leading to the ultimate rejection of the ‘alien’ foetus.
So why would a supposedly normal presentation of the human body produce antigens, which would respond so violently to the introduction of a different blood type?
Does the human body see that blood type as being of ‘alien‘ origin?
The only other time this occurs naturally, is when donkeys and horses are crossbred to produce mules.
This is not in any way, a ‘natural act,’ because left alone in the wild, these animals would never cross breed.
Only with human intervention would this happen.
So was there a cross breeding of two ‘humanlike‘ beings in the past, who were of similar physiology but genetically very different?
It is known that those with Rh-Negative blood do have certain ‘characteristics’ that seem to be common amongst them.
Here is a list of the most commonly commented upon. (There are a number of others)
- Extra Vertebra/Ribs
- Higher than average IQ
- Markedly higher levels of E.S.P.
- More sensitive vision and other senses
- A ‘Ridged’ Cranium
- Very few grow ‘Wisdom’ teeth
- Many are ‘Empaths’
- Lower than average body temperature
- Higher/Lower than average blood pressure
- Increased occurrences of psychic/intuitive abilities
- Predominately blue, green, or hazel eyes
- Prone to Red or reddish hair
- Increased sensitivity to heat and sunlight
- Increased incidences of ‘Abductions’ and/or other unexplained phenomena?
So what does this mean and what can, if anything be concluded from this?
And from what has already been outlined above, can we safely assume any of the following?
- The appearance of Rh-Negative blood did not follow the ‘usual’ evolutionary path.
- Evolution, therefore, would then have to be ruled out as a possible source of the introduction of the Rh-Negative bloodtype.
It has been shown time and again that blood is the least likely substance of the human body to mutate and no other blood mutations exist elsewhere in nature.
There is no evidence that shows that the introduction of the Rh-Negative blood type was a NATURALLY occurring part of human evolution.
So could this add weight to the existing theory that the Rh-Negative blood factor was introduced from an ‘outside source’?
Could the source even be from human-like beings from outside our own solar system?
Or are humans as ‘alien’ as they are, in that we are a product of their manipulation and interference?
Could they have come here and manipulated life forms already present on earth to create modern man?
Many ancient texts, including the Christian Bible, do support this theory.
Many stories in the ancient texts, especially pre-Christian texts, do tell about a race of beings that ‘From the Heavens to the earth came’.
And once here, created humankind in their own image.
The early humans saw them as their ‘Gods’, and recorded them as living exceptionally long lives and performing ‘miracles’.
They are depicted in art as ‘flying about in great sky ships‘, ‘shooting fire from strange weapons‘ and ‘creating ear-shattering booms‘.
The early humans watched in disbelief as these gods built massive and glorious buildings, as well as creating beautiful and mysterious structures for various purposes.
From humankind’s primitive point of view, they were indeed ‘Gods‘.
So who were these ‘Gods’?
Ancient stories fortunately do tell us a great deal about them.
They appeared to possess advanced technology and were apparently capable of interstellar travel.
They knew about aviation, understood metallurgy, the plotting and mapping of the universe, the cosmic progression, knew advanced medicine and evidently – understood and practiced very advanced genetics.
They knew how to harness atomic power and build energy weapons and how to use them.
Evidence of this can be found almost everywhere on Earth. (Although, as expected, much of it has been suppressed by mainstream historians and archeologists)
They knew about agriculture and how to create nutritious and superior grains and other food staples.
All of the basic grains that humans rely on for food have been determined to have all appeared at the same time in human history, spanning roughly a 10,000 year period.
A very short time, geologically speaking.
And no new grain has since been developed.
Were there ‘messages’ on earth, represented by a series of images, discovered in grain fields in the form of ‘Crop Circles’?
Ancient texts, including the Bible, also tell us they began to take humans for their spouses.
The Bible says, “the gods looked upon woman and found her pleasant to behold and took her as their wives.”
They then had children with the human women, many, many children.
But not all humans were a result of this later interbreeding.
The first human beings may have been a result of scientific research combining primates’ DNA with the gods’.
The first humans are not believed to be a product of interbreeding.
But small numbers (in comparison) of human beings – almost certainly are, and their anomalous blood type can support this.
Earlier in this article, it described what happens when two species who were physically similar but genetically different interbreed.
Hybrids are produced.
Mules are an example of a hybrid, the product of a union between a horse and a donkey. However, mules are born sterile because there is no genetic relationship between the horse and the donkey.
When humans were first created, were they a product of two genetically similar but not related species?
Were they a combination of the DNA of the primates and the gods and produced ‘artificially’?
If the gods have the technology to create a new species, they would have no problem overcoming the problem of the hybrids being sterile.
A little genetic manipulation and it would no longer be an issue.
Were three ‘prototypes’ of humans created?
Each one successively more advanced.
Two by design and the last entirely by chance.
Nethanderal Man may be an early humanoid species who were not created by the gods, but Cro-Magnon was almost certainly a product of intervention.
The next type of humanoid is who we now know as pre-human, and then we have modern man (Homo Sapiens Sapiens).
Was Modern man therefore, a result of interbreeding between the gods and pre-humans?
This interbreeding for the most part created no problems in the resulting offspring, except for a line that inherited, from their ‘other’ parents, the Rh-Negative blood type.
This is also supported by the fact that these humans did not inherit the protein found in the blood, directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.
They did not inherit it because one of their parents did not have the monkey protein.
This protein is present only because combining primate DNA with hybrid DNA from the gods created the original human proto-type that carried the original monkey protein.
So in conclusion: is it such a leap of faith to suggest that man may be a creation of a highly technological race of human like beings that ‘From the Heavens to the Earth came?’
Could one go even further and suggest that these advanced beings are among us today and are still very active in the affairs of man?
- RAMESES II
- JESUS CHRIST (AB-?)
- MARY MAGDALENE (B -)
- CLEOPATRA SELENE
- JACQUELINE BOUVIER (KENNEDY/ONASSIS)
- LAURA DERN
- PARIS HILTON
- SARAH FERGUSON
- CAMILLA PARKER-BOWLES
- SOPHIE RHYS-JONES
- UMA THURMAN
- KYRA SEDGEWICK
- GRACE KELLY
- MARY VON TECK (B -)
- EDWARD VI (B -)
- SIR ISSAC NEWTON
- VLAD TEPES (DRACUL, The Impaler)
- HILARY DUFF
- BROOKE SHIELDS
- MAGGIE GYLLENHALL
- JAKE GYLLENHALL
- MICHAEL DOUGLAS
- ELLEN DEGENERES
- PAUL McCARTNEY (B -)
- RINGO STARR (A -)
- GEORGE HARRISON
- JOHN LENNON
- ELVIS PRESLEY (O -)
- LIAM & NOEL GALLAGHER (O -)
- PAUL NEWMAN (O -)
- ADOLF HITLER (B -)
- DAN AYKROYD (AB -)
- CHARLES CHAPLIN
- ANGELINA JOLIE
- TOM CRUISE
- MORGAN FREEMAN
- CLINT EASTWOOD
- LEONARDO DICAPRIO
- NICOLE KIDMAN
- NICHOLAS CAGE
- MIA FARROW
- OZZY OSBORNE
- JENNIFER GARNER
- STEVE GUTTENBERG
- KIRSTEN STEWART
- JOHNNY DEPP (B -)
- Dr MARTIN LUTHER KING
- MALCOLM X
- TIGER WOODS
- BRAD STEIGER
- ZACHARIA SITCHEN
- CHARLES, PRINCE OF WALES (O -)
- JIMMY HENDRIX (O -)
- MORGAN FREEMAN
- RICHARD GERE
- TOM HANKS
- SIGOURNEY WEAVER
- GLENN CLOSE
- BEYONCE’ KNOWLES
- ALEC BALDWIN
- JENNIFER GARNER
- SUZI QUATRO
- CLINT EASTWOOD
- FREDDIE MERCURY
- AL CAPONE
- SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE
- ALBERT EINSTEIN
- TENNESSEE WILLIAMS (O -)
- ERIK VON DANIKEN (O -)
- GORDON SUMNER (Sting)
- CHARLES MANSON
- O.J. SIMPSON
- HEATHER MILLS
- QUEEN ELIZABETH II
- PRINCE WILLIAM
- PRINCE HARRY
- DIANA SPENCER PRINCESS OF WALES
- JANIS JOPLIN
- MARC BOLAN
- KURT COBAIN
- BRITNEY SPEARS (A -)
- MIA FARROW (B -)
- LEONARDO DI CAPRIO (B -)
- JACK NICHOLSON (B -)
- JACKIE CHAN (AB -)
- MARILYN MONROE (AB -)
- NELSON MANDELA
- DWIGHT D EISENHOWER (O – )
- RICHARD NIXON ( O -)
- WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON (AB -)
- RONALD REAGAN
- BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (AB -)
- JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY (AB -)
- MICK JAGGER (AB -)
- ALAIN PROST (AB -)