Latest topics
» April LaJune's (FMR) Executive Assistant Jenny Interview #2
Today at 2:33 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Benjamin Fulford — May 21st 2018
Today at 1:26 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Super Stars of Science- Yehuda Shoenfeld, MD and Christopher Exley, PhD: VACCINES & Auto Immunity
Today at 12:29 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Lord Wind -Secret Key to hidden Wisdom
Today at 10:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» Billboard Music Awards 2018: Illuminati and Occult Symbolism Analysis
Today at 9:36 am by PurpleSkyz

» "The Allegory of the Cave" - GESARA Thought - 5.21.18
Today at 9:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» “Checkpoint” Amenti
Today at 9:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Art of Maintaining Core Frequency in Life
Today at 9:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Prepare For The Return Of The Giants - with Steve Quayle Pt1
Today at 9:20 am by PurpleSkyz

» The head of the great Sphinx: is it the gateway to a secret city?
Today at 9:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» Did a PORTAL open in Florida?
Today at 9:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» Fleet Of UFO's Pass Near The International Space Station? What Were They?
Today at 9:11 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Oldie But Goodie -- Rod Class Forever! By Anna Von Reitz plus more
Today at 9:10 am by PurpleSkyz

» Karen Hudes ~ Donald Trump Traitor and Liar
Today at 9:06 am by terbo56

» Forget Q. That's history. Meet T.
Today at 9:02 am by PurpleSkyz

» Snopes Finally Exposed as CIA Operation
Today at 8:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Henderson UFOs Return Again plus MORE
Today at 8:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» David Icke talks to Derek Acorah (Part Two)
Today at 8:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ A Newly Discovered Solar System Object Hints at Hidden Planet Nine plus MORE
Today at 8:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» Whatever is Taken for Granted Will Eventually Be Taken Away
Today at 8:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» Detection of echoes of gravitational waves support Planck-scale structure of spacetime predicted by quantum gravity
Today at 8:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» Lost Ancient High Technology Evidence At Byblos In Lebanon
Today at 8:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» CAN LANGUAGE SHAPE REALITY?
Today at 8:12 am by PurpleSkyz

» Corey Goode - Surviving the Transition - Full Disclosure, Solar Flash, our Future and Ascension
Today at 8:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» POOFness GHOULkowski for MAY 20: "Take It To The Limit One More Time"
Today at 12:04 am by robert18

» POOFness for MAY 20: HELLO WORLD - FOLLOW-UP
Yesterday at 11:58 pm by robert18

» Eyes wide Open ~ Coming Soon - Part 4 - Do you really want to know what IT is!
Yesterday at 7:35 pm by PurpleSkyz

» SHIPPING CONTAINER FULL OF DEAD AMERICANS BODY PARTS
Yesterday at 6:43 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» 34 Bishops in Chile Suddenly Resign After Pedophile Scandal
Yesterday at 3:39 pm by PurpleSkyz


You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came??

What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came??

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came?? on Sun Apr 24, 2016 1:41 am

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came??

Posted on April 23, 2016 by lozzafun
source

What If Nobody Showed Up To Vote?

Submitted by Dan Sanchez via AntiWar.com,
What if a presidential candidate threw a political rally, and nobody came? What if a government held an election, and nobody voted? What if that same government started a war, and nobody participated, whether in body or in spirit?
These questions are related.
Election season is trudging on, as are the wars. Many fans of peace hold out hope that if the former turns out a certain way, the latter may at last be mitigated.
Some are terrified of Hillary Clinton. And who can blame them? As Secretary of State, “Dick Cheney in a pantsuit” was midwife to so many of the disasters that wrack the world with bloodshed and chaos to this day. Many anti-war folk of a left-leaning persuasion are flocking to Bernie Sanders.
http://www.dianomi.com/smartads.epl?id=2381
Others are more concerned with finally toppling the neocons from their perches of power. And who can blame them? The roots of our geopolitical plight reach back to before Clinton’s executive tenure, when the Bush administration neocons were launching their plans to remake the Greater Middle East. Many anti-war folk of the right-leaning persuasion are looking to Donald Trump to be their neocon-slayer.
But is this really the best we can do?
At the end of the day, Sanders is a moderate foreign interventionist who isn’t all too interested in foreign policy in the first place. Must anti-interventionists really settle for that in order to oppose hyper-interventionist Clinton?
And Trump actually out-hawks many Republicans when it comes to torture, the security state, civilian casualties, and blood-for-oil. Is such a man really to be the anti-war movement’s appointed champion against the neocons?
Thankfully, there is no need to support lesser warmongers in order to oppose greater ones.
Imagine if all the anti-war progressives now supporting Sanders, plus all the America-firsters now supporting Trump, were to stop flooding the internet and social media with electoral polemics. What if all that passion and digital ink was redirected to the message of peace.
Imagine “Stop the War on Yemeni Babies!” blazoned across the web instead of “Stop Hillary!” Or “Don’t Let the CIA Arm Al Qaeda in Syria” instead of “Don’t Let the Establishment Steal the Nomination from Trump.”
An intense focus on policies over personas could really turn public sentiment against the actual combat of war, and divert public attention away from its obsession with the theatrical combat of political Wrestlemania.
You may wonder, what about the consequences of the peace camp abandoning its stations in the electoral battle against the worst war hawks? What if as a result Hillary or Ted Cruz’s neocon allies sweep to victory?
A clique may seize office, but the new administration will not govern in a vacuum. All regimes must strive to preserve public legitimacy. And no regime can afford to flout too blatantly the prevailing spirit of the times. The new president may have won a majority of votes. But if only a small proportion of the country actually voted in the first place, that translates into a rather shrunken mandate.
And if the non-voting bulk of the public is stridently anti-war, that especially diminishes the president’s foreign policy mandate in particular. Faced with a sizable segment of the public intransigently opposed to war, even a militaristic president will be constrained, and may even need to draw back.  Even Richard Nixon ended a war when public opinion demanded it.
Throughout history, most reductions in tyrannical violence have had nothing to do with the ideology or virtue of office-holders. Instead, such reforms were the result of shifts in public sentiment. Under such conditions, to be a “reformer,” a politician need no redeeming quality other than being self-serving enough to shift with the wind. And if Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, or any other politician are anything, it is self-serving.
I’m not saying we should hope Hillary or Ted will win. I’m saying that who wins doesn’t matter nearly as much as the public’s attitude toward war and toward the Washington war machine itself.
On election day, if fewer people lined up dutifully to choose between aspiring elective emperors, and more people assembled defiantly to decry the empire itself, peace would have much better prospects.




Thanks to: https://lozzafun1.wordpress.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum