Latest topics
» AMERICAN IDIOTS
Today at 11:35 am by PurpleSkyz

» Strange Intense Sound coming from the SKY scare German residents Jan 8 2017
Today at 9:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» NASA EYES ONLY? the visor enhancements
Today at 9:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Dr. Mercola discusses the FDA
Today at 9:29 am by PurpleSkyz

» Psychic who predicted Brexit, Trump and Nice attack gives his 2017 forecast …
Today at 9:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» This Weeks RV/CGR News 2017:1/22-1/28
Today at 9:14 am by PurpleSkyz

» International Women's March 1/21/2017
Today at 9:00 am by PurpleSkyz

» Pope Francis Orders All Freemasons Expelled After Knights Of Malta Surround President Trump
Today at 8:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Inauguration of Trump: Pie Reacts.
Today at 8:14 am by PurpleSkyz

» Who Built The Moon? - David Icke - The Lion Sleeps No More
Today at 8:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» Light Warp More Clues and Lies
Today at 8:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense & David Oates - Stunning Speech Reversals From President Trump's Inaugural Speech
Yesterday at 11:51 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Top 20 Weirdest Glitches In Matrix Caught On Camera. Strangest Events Ever. Reality Collapse
Yesterday at 10:43 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Pink UFO During Sunset Over Slovakia and MORE
Yesterday at 10:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» JOHN Titor – The time traveler from 2036
Yesterday at 10:38 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The EPA Is Being Pressured To Prohibit The Addition of Fluoride Into Public Drinking Water
Yesterday at 10:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» India – Crime of the Century: Narendra Modi & Rothschild’s BIS Failed Financial Coup
Yesterday at 10:16 pm by PurpleSkyz

» **8.0 Earthquake** Rocks New Guinea
Yesterday at 10:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Now That I Have My Crystals, What Do I Do With Them?
Yesterday at 9:53 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Magnificent Colossi of Memnon
Yesterday at 9:46 pm by PurpleSkyz

» More Astonishing Testimonials About the Keshe Pain Products
Yesterday at 9:40 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Girl Indigo 16 going 61
Yesterday at 9:30 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Trump Says Planet X is Real plus MORE
Yesterday at 9:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Buddha statue 600 years emerged from the waters of a dam in China
Yesterday at 9:20 pm by PurpleSkyz

» MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH: Nearby planet Wolf 1061c could be home to ALIEN LIFE
Yesterday at 5:32 pm by PurpleSkyz

» George W. Bush’s Poncho Struggle Sparks The Photoshop Battle It Deserves
Yesterday at 4:23 pm by PurpleSkyz

» 1/21/2017 -- Scientific VINDICATION -- Plate Tectonics + REWRITING THE GEOLOGY TEXTBOOKS
Yesterday at 4:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Goldwater Report-21 January 2017-President Trump And The US Treasury Department
Yesterday at 3:30 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Healing Music, Relaxation Music, Chakra, Relaxing Music for Stress Relief
Yesterday at 11:14 am by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came??

What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came??

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came?? on Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:41 pm

PurpleSkyz


Admin

What if we Had an Election and Nobody Came??

Posted on April 23, 2016 by lozzafun
source

What If Nobody Showed Up To Vote?

Submitted by Dan Sanchez via AntiWar.com,
What if a presidential candidate threw a political rally, and nobody came? What if a government held an election, and nobody voted? What if that same government started a war, and nobody participated, whether in body or in spirit?
These questions are related.
Election season is trudging on, as are the wars. Many fans of peace hold out hope that if the former turns out a certain way, the latter may at last be mitigated.
Some are terrified of Hillary Clinton. And who can blame them? As Secretary of State, “Dick Cheney in a pantsuit” was midwife to so many of the disasters that wrack the world with bloodshed and chaos to this day. Many anti-war folk of a left-leaning persuasion are flocking to Bernie Sanders.
http://www.dianomi.com/smartads.epl?id=2381
Others are more concerned with finally toppling the neocons from their perches of power. And who can blame them? The roots of our geopolitical plight reach back to before Clinton’s executive tenure, when the Bush administration neocons were launching their plans to remake the Greater Middle East. Many anti-war folk of the right-leaning persuasion are looking to Donald Trump to be their neocon-slayer.
But is this really the best we can do?
At the end of the day, Sanders is a moderate foreign interventionist who isn’t all too interested in foreign policy in the first place. Must anti-interventionists really settle for that in order to oppose hyper-interventionist Clinton?
And Trump actually out-hawks many Republicans when it comes to torture, the security state, civilian casualties, and blood-for-oil. Is such a man really to be the anti-war movement’s appointed champion against the neocons?
Thankfully, there is no need to support lesser warmongers in order to oppose greater ones.
Imagine if all the anti-war progressives now supporting Sanders, plus all the America-firsters now supporting Trump, were to stop flooding the internet and social media with electoral polemics. What if all that passion and digital ink was redirected to the message of peace.
Imagine “Stop the War on Yemeni Babies!” blazoned across the web instead of “Stop Hillary!” Or “Don’t Let the CIA Arm Al Qaeda in Syria” instead of “Don’t Let the Establishment Steal the Nomination from Trump.”
An intense focus on policies over personas could really turn public sentiment against the actual combat of war, and divert public attention away from its obsession with the theatrical combat of political Wrestlemania.
You may wonder, what about the consequences of the peace camp abandoning its stations in the electoral battle against the worst war hawks? What if as a result Hillary or Ted Cruz’s neocon allies sweep to victory?
A clique may seize office, but the new administration will not govern in a vacuum. All regimes must strive to preserve public legitimacy. And no regime can afford to flout too blatantly the prevailing spirit of the times. The new president may have won a majority of votes. But if only a small proportion of the country actually voted in the first place, that translates into a rather shrunken mandate.
And if the non-voting bulk of the public is stridently anti-war, that especially diminishes the president’s foreign policy mandate in particular. Faced with a sizable segment of the public intransigently opposed to war, even a militaristic president will be constrained, and may even need to draw back.  Even Richard Nixon ended a war when public opinion demanded it.
Throughout history, most reductions in tyrannical violence have had nothing to do with the ideology or virtue of office-holders. Instead, such reforms were the result of shifts in public sentiment. Under such conditions, to be a “reformer,” a politician need no redeeming quality other than being self-serving enough to shift with the wind. And if Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, or any other politician are anything, it is self-serving.
I’m not saying we should hope Hillary or Ted will win. I’m saying that who wins doesn’t matter nearly as much as the public’s attitude toward war and toward the Washington war machine itself.
On election day, if fewer people lined up dutifully to choose between aspiring elective emperors, and more people assembled defiantly to decry the empire itself, peace would have much better prospects.




Thanks to: https://lozzafun1.wordpress.com




 “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. 
H
ate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.”
 Martin Luther King Jr


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum