Anna von Reitz: Obviously, you have never considered the question of from where law comes…Posted on April 27, 2016 by arnierosner
On Apr 26, 2016, at 11:12 PM, Anna von ReitzThank you Judge Anna…but doesn’t the law come from the sovereign people? Are not the sovereigns the ultimate authority?
The Creator endows the people with the unalienable rights…Free choice among those rights. And free choice gives the people the right to chose what they believe.
At that point, through free choice, and being of the age of reason, the people can select what ever they chose as their flavor of faith being one of those choices. The above being true, they also get to chose what ever they believe to reflect the proper level of morality and system of justice in which they believe.
It would also seem to follow that the live people today are the ones to determine in what form of government and by what types of law form they wish to adopt to suit their current needs. That there are no obligations to follow historical practises unless the people chose to do so.
In my view, the founders had it pretty much right so I would opt for the founding documents. But I would leave out the impostors who knew better but chose to dishonor the people by whom they were elected.
It is for that reason your suggestion has been proposed as follows:
by default—A lawfully elected government replaces a de facto impostor!
Obviously, you have never considered the question of where law comes from (religion, with the exception of natural law) and how it is that judges serve— the communities where they live elect them.
The Bar Associations elect their judges in elections that appear to be public, but which are not, and the rest of us with few exceptions have simply failed to elect our own Common Law Judges— but then want to bitch and gripe because all we have are openly corrupt and antagonistic Bar attorneys providing court services— and God forbid that a local city, county, or state group rise above ignorance and lethargy and actually elect a Common Law judge to serve, because as my own experience has proven, that will be even less understood and howled about some more.
You all make me want to scream.
Judges SERVE those who contract with them for the service and who consent to receive that service. Period. If you want to live in a lawful society you set up Common Law Court to enforce the Public and Organic Law. You elect judges and sheriffs and coroners to serve that venue and to serve the people who agree to support the Public Law and that is all there is to that.
Those who don’t agree to obey the Public Law– which in this country is all based on the Ten Commandments are known as “outlaws” for this reason.
It seems as if nobody but me ever saw a John Wayne or Clint Eastwood movie in their lives, as if they see the word “law” or “judge” and immediately lose their minds and all they can think of is the evil infesting the foreign international courts of admiralty that have been foisted off on us and all they can do is make stupid assumptions and completely off-base idiotic accusations based on those assumptions.
I am a Common Law Judge elected by people in Alaska who have reclaimed their birthright status as American State Nationals instead of “federal United States citizens”. If anyone can’t grasp those facts it is high time that “person” started reading and thinking and being able to tell the difference between apples and oranges.
On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Arnie Rosner
And by whom are the “whores,” empowered?
“You only think you know!”
The flag of the Continental united States of America
email@example.com Http://scannedretina.com 714-964-4056 714-501-8247 – mobile
On Apr 26, 2016, at 2:13 PM, WordPress
New comment waiting approval on Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People!
don daxx commented on Judge Anna von Reitz, Alaska: all American Common Law Courts are courts based on the land, practicing the Law of the Land.
On Jan 14, 2016, at 12:28 AM, Anna von Reitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: Millions of people are just waking up like …
The problem is that the elitists have had control of the whores in the congress for the last hundred or ‘more’ years and unless the Sovereign Americans prepare an affidavit of facts and law that clearly and lawfully states that they are not a ‘fiction’ that has been assigned to them, and state clearly that they have never knowingly, willingly or intentionally entered into any for of contract, adhesion or otherwise, with the corporate, federal/national government, then it ‘stands to reason’ that the aforementioned government has absolutely no jurisdiction over said Sovereign American. Secondly, the Sovereign American has never knowingly, willingly or intentionally waived or acquiesced any of his/her unalienable Rights, therefore it ‘stands to reason’ that the aforementioned government has absolutely no jurisdiction over said Sovereign American.
There is a preponderance of case law, including the Constitution in support of the above statements of fact and law!
Thanks to: https://scannedretina.com