HomeSearchLog inRegister
Latest topics
» What are Higher Entities?
Today at 8:21 pm by PurpleSkyz

» *BREAKING NEWS* Kim Dotcom EVIDENCE BOMBSHELL: #SETHRICH WAS A HERO
Today at 8:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Big Pharma Shill/Pediatrician Exposed: On Camera Admits Vaccines Cause Autism!
Today at 8:09 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Signs of Spiritual Awakening
Today at 7:49 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UPDATES: MANCHESTER: UK Ariana Grande Concert
Today at 7:26 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Crop Circles Are Not Man-Made 5/17/17
Today at 5:35 pm by Avebury

» Crop Circle ~ Cerne Abbas Giant, Nr Minterne Magna, Dorset. Reported 22nd May 2017
Today at 4:10 pm by PurpleSkyz

» RV delusions of being the "original 11..."
Today at 3:58 pm by Avebury

» Shamanic Medical Intuitive Sessions for $60 during June 2017
Today at 3:46 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Protection mandatd has turned into tolerance
Today at 2:13 pm by microaggressor

» Fleet of Mystery Objects Caught In Belize City?
Today at 1:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» ET ORIGINS – SECRETS OF THE STAR PEOPLE - The Movie - Tribal Elders Speak Out - 2016 Best ET Movie
Today at 12:06 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» FOR THOSE UNSURE OF WHATS GOING ON
Today at 12:02 pm by topspin2

» To the Perpetrators:
Today at 10:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» Losers, losing and Lost in a World of Madness
Today at 9:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Winged object appears after huge burst in the sky over Bundoora, Australia plus MORE
Today at 8:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ TWO SUNS AND RED PLANET-CANCUN-MEXICO plus MORE
Today at 8:53 am by PurpleSkyz

» James Gilliland on the As You Wish Talk Radio, 20.5.2017
Today at 8:13 am by PurpleSkyz

» Podesta Ex Sister-in-Law: Ties To Seth Rich/DC Police Department
Today at 8:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Why is there a DNA Double Helix Carved on this 7,000 Year old Portuguese Cosmic Egg?
Today at 8:06 am by PurpleSkyz

» Exposing the Silent War — Mankind is Under Attack from All Angles
Today at 8:02 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Original Son and the Maya Matrix Perceptual Mind Maze
Today at 8:00 am by PurpleSkyz

» This Weeks RV/CGR News - 2017: 5/21-5/27
Today at 7:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» THE ROSWELL WITNESS: A MYSTERY WITHIN A MYSTERY
Today at 7:37 am by PurpleSkyz

» Congressman Jailed For Treason - It Has Begun
Today at 7:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» Beware of “Issuing our own American National Private Bonds Negotiable Instrument – Money Orders” scam!
Today at 6:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Buckley Hallelujah
Today at 1:03 am by microaggressor

» Amazing grace
Today at 12:38 am by microaggressor

» Jeff Rense & Daniel Estulin - The Bilderbergers… How Did Trump Win?
Yesterday at 11:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

Who is online?

Share | 
 

 The 'evidence is clear' - cell phone radiation causes brain cancer, scientists conclude

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
PurpleSkyz
Admin
avatar

Posts : 59599
Join date : 2012-01-04
Location : Woodstock Nation

PostSubject: The 'evidence is clear' - cell phone radiation causes brain cancer, scientists conclude   Sat May 14, 2016 12:59 am


The 'evidence is clear' - cell phone radiation causes brain cancer, scientists conclude
-by David Gutierrez


The question of whether cell phones cause brain cancer has been definitively settled, doctors and scientists from around the country warned recently at a pediatric conference in Baltimore.

"The weight of the evidence is clear: cell phones do cause brain cancer," said Dr. Devras Davis, president of the Environmental Health Trust.

Children are particularly vulnerable to the damaging effects of cell phone radiation, even in the womb, the experts warned. That's why 
pregnant women should also limit their cell phone use.

"Keep the phone away from the abdomen — especially toward the end of pregnancy," Davis said.

 
Oxidative damage leads to cancer
Cell phones emit a type of radiation known as radiofrequency radiation (RFR), which is also used to transmit wireless internet signals. This is different from ionizing radiation (such as from X-rays), which is known to cause DNA damage and cancer. Until recently, many health experts insisted that RFR was simply too low energy to cause the kind of cell damage that causes cancer – even as the studies linking RFR exposure and cancercontinued to pile up.

In 2010, the landmark international Interphone study found that ten years or more of cell phone use was associated with a 40 percent higher risk of brain tumors, a 300 percent higher risk of acoustic nerve tumors, and also an increased risk of parotid gland tumors. The risk of brain tumors was 400 percent higher among those who began using phones before age 20. Strikingly, the methodology of this industry-funded study was widely criticized for data analysis techniques designed to show lower risk – suggesting that the true risk is much higher.

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RFR as a possible carcinogen.

Then, in 2015, a study in Electromagnetic Biology & Medicine provided part of the answer as to how RFR might lead to 
cancer. A review of prior research into the biological effects of RFR exposure showed that the levels of radiation absorbed through normal cell phone or wireless internet use produce oxidative stress, a condition in which the body's antioxidant capability is overwhelmed, and free radicals start to build up in the body.

Free radicals cause oxidative damage to cells and DNA, and have been strongly linked to cancer, heart disease, dementia and other health conditions.

 
Children at higher risk
Children are especially vulnerable to the health risks of cell phones, attendees at the Baltimore conference warned. According to Davis, their brains absorb twice as much radiation as adult brains do, given the same exposure.

This could explain studies showing that a pregnant woman's cell phone use can affect her unborn child.

"There's a correlation between cell phone use in pregnancy and behavioral problems in their children," said Dr. Hugh Taylor of the Yale School of Medicine.

Children are also harmed by the disrupting effects that 
cell phones have on human social relationships, warned clinical psychologist Catherine Steiner-Adair.

"These devices are really stressing and straining our family relationships because the average mom or dad will check their phones 60 to 110 times a day," she said.

In fact, numerous studies have shown that parents regularly ignore their children to look at their phones instead, and that this is correlated with a higher level of behavioral disturbance in their children. And the children are aware of being ignored: In one international study, a third of children said that their parents spend as much or more time on their mobile devices as they do with them; a similar number said they felt unimportant when their parents were distracted from them by a device; and more than half said their parents check their devices too often.

Parental overuse of mobile devices makes children more likely to develop technology addictions, which in turn is linked with cognitive, emotional and social problems.

"So we're getting like a triple, quadruple whammy between the biological effect, the psychological effects and the brain waves effects," said pediatric neurologist Dr. Martha Herbert.


Sources for this article include: 

Baltimore.CBSLocal.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Science.NaturalNews.com

Thanks to: http://www.newparadigm.ws


  

Back to top Go down
 
The 'evidence is clear' - cell phone radiation causes brain cancer, scientists conclude
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Out Of Mind :: THE INSANITY OF REALITY :: POISON PLANET-
Jump to: