Anna von Reitz – The Alaska State Superior Court: The Authority and MORE

Anna von Reitz – The Alaska State Superior Court: The Authority

Posted on May 27, 2016 by arnierosner  
On May 27, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Anna von Reitz wrote:

 *** PUBLIC NOTICE *** Attention Judicial Impostors: Immediate Order to Cease and Desist | Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People!

In the international jurisdiction under Article X, therefore, I act as a Judge and operate under international law in behalf of the nation-state of Alaska. As most of the misunderstandings and conflicts we currently face are in this foreign jurisdiction this is where I spend the majority of time and this is most often the office I occupy. And that is why you see orders by me signed as a “Judge”.

Judge in International Capacity, Justice at Home — Unanswered Letters 18 — for Patriot Jenn

The Alaska State Superior Court is the “undelegated” side of the Alaska State Court, which the people are owed under The Alaska Statehood Compact—-otherwise, the Compact would be both illegal and unlawful. The two sides of the court can be invoked separately and in fact have to be invoked separately.

To better understand this remember that the actual Constitution delegated only nineteen strictly enumerated functions to the “Federal Government”—all in the international jurisdiction of the sea.  Article X reserved all other undelegated rights, duties, functions and prerogatives in all jurisdictions including the jurisdiction of the sea, either to the states (meaning the states on the land) or the people of the land.

Thus the states on the land and the people retain the exercise of all undelegated powers owed to them in international jurisdiction as well as plenary control of their national (land) jurisdiction. The actual state court acting under the Organic and Public Law is charged to fill serve that “undelegated” international jurisdiction as well as the actual state (national) jurisdiction requirements.

Thus I have duties as a Judge in international jurisdiction and duties as a Justice of the Peace as you have described.

In the international jurisdiction it is my duty (and sometimes pleasure) to stomp on trespasses and usurpations against the sovereignty of the actual states and people made by foreign governments, including the foreign Federal United States Government and its franchises. In the national (state) jurisdiction it is my honor to serve as a Justice of the Peace for those who wish to live under the American Common Law as American State Nationals.

In the international jurisdiction under Article X, therefore, I act as a Judge and operate under international law in behalf of the nation-state of Alaska. As most of the misunderstandings and conflicts we currently face are in this foreign jurisdiction this is where I spend the majority of time and this is most often the office I occupy. And that is why you see orders by me signed as a “Judge”.

I very much hope that in days to come you will see me listening to the vows of happy young people planning a life and family together and recording their marriage on the public records of the land of their birth. You may be sure that I would be signing those records as a Justice of the Peace.

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Paul Stramer at Eurekadsl.net
[ltr]<
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
>[/ltr]
wrote:

I have forwarded your question to Anna.

Paul

—– Original Message —–

From: Patriot Jenn

To: Paul Stramer

Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:00 PM

Subject: Re: Hague Notice of Fraud, Order to Cease and Desist

Dearest Paul,

I have all respect for judge Anna but I was wondering. Shouldn’t she call herself a lower case s Supreme Court “justice?”

Just wondering.

In most parts of the world, a judge is an appointed official of the court who also happens to hold a degree in law. Judges tend to be associated with legal functions that have to do with the enforcement of the laws of the land. As such, a judge will preside at a legal proceeding, such as a criminal hearing or a civil court case. He or she will render a verdict based on the legal procedures and precedents currently in force in the jurisdiction, including the deliverance of sentences for prison terms if the situation merits this course of action.

In contrast, justices will perform a different function within the judicial system. Also sworn to uphold the laws of the land, this person does not necessarily have to be an attorney or have any formal legal training. Instead, he or she will be empowered by the jurisdiction to perform such functions as the witnessing of legal documents, the performance of civil unions and marriages, and other similar duties as defined by the jurisdiction. In some parts of the world, local justice officials are elected rather than appointed.



Thanks to: https://scannedretina.com

Anna von Reitz: Last night all Hell broke loose— but in a good sense.

Posted on May 27, 2016 by arnierosner
On May 27, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Anna von Reitz wrote:

Dear Friends,

Last night all Hell broke loose— but in a good sense. For many years people have sought to determine the source, meaning, and implications of the use of all capital letter naming conventions. Why should such a name as “JOHN HENRY DOE” exist? How is it different from “John Henry Doe”? Or “john henry doe” for that matter?

I have researched it and written memorandums on the results that show that the use of these different “stiles” were used in Ancient Roman Civil Law as a means of distinguishing between free men, bondservants, and slaves, with the “john henry doe” stile indicating a free man, and “John Henry Doe” indicating a bondservant, and “JOHN HENRY DOE” indicating a slave.

The implications of this ancient history taken together with the circumstance surrounding the end of the Civil War (with millions of freed slaves representing “abandoned property” at least to some criminally minded members of the Congress) and the adoption of the 14th Amendment to the Corporate “Constitution” in 1868 and “corporate citizenship” with it—– are obvious without a degree in rocket science.

And now, thanks to friends and fellow researchers in Australia we have the nails to this coffin and are enabled to issue the attached Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation and Order to Cease and Desist.

*** PUBLIC NOTICE *** Attention Judicial Impostors: Immediate Order to Cease and Desist

It is perhaps most fitting that this comes on the eve of the Memorial Day Weekend, when we remember all the good men and women who have fought and died for freedom, and our obligations to them to make sure that freedom for all men and women is secured against the schemes and crimes of perpetrators both foreign and domestic.

God bless you all and may you be assured that your cause is just and your vision righteous as you continue the work of restoring America and putting an end to the crimes and the breaches of trust that have plagued the entire world.

Judge Anna



Thanks to: https://scannedretina.com

“More Disinfo and Hogwash”, by Anna von Reitz

Posted on May 28, 2016 by David Robinson
In answer to reports on NESARANEWS.Blogspot.com that “US Corp: Today, the House will act to take back Congress’s Powers Under the Constitution”—-
Judge Anna says —- “disinformation and hogwash.”  
How can a foreign “Congress” acting as a Board of Directors of a foreign corporation and as oligarchs operating a foreign “union of states” — the Insular States and DC plus fifty Federated “States” operating in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea as a democracy without a mandate— switch its spots and pretend to represent the people and the jurisdiction of the land of these United States? 
It can’t, is the answer.
.
This issue was settled over 200 years ago:  Naturalization Act, Seventh Congress, Session I, Chapter 28, Sections 1-4, April 14, 1802,  sets out the requirements for anyone, including people born in one of the nation states of the Union, to become a United States Citizen.
.
The Several States of the Union have and recognize only State Nationals—- Californians, Texans, Wisconsinites, Mainers and so on.  The Federal United States has always allowed dual citizenship, so that “United States Citizens” will continue to claim that they are Californians, Texans, Mainers and so on while in Federal office, but while that is accepted by the Federal Government— that is, the Corporation and its franchises—- it is emphatically NOT recognized nor accepted, and never has been accepted by the states of Union — that State Nationals can ALSO be United States Citizens. 
.
So far as the states are concerned, you are in or you are out.  You are either a State National, OR you are a U.S. Citizen, but not BOTH.  You either sit in a Continental Congress as a Deputy of the people and the land— that is, as a fiduciary officer accountable to the people and the land-based legislature of your home state— or you sit in a United States Congress as a “representative” of stockholders presumed to exist. 
.
Never the twain shall meet.  
.
There hasn’t been a true Continental Congress convened since the Civil War and until people get a firmer grasp on who is who and what is what it is silly to continue these conjectures and wild claims.  The “House of Representatives” Members in DC can claim to be the Kings and Queens of Sweden for all the good it will do them and the members of the “US Senate” can kindly observe that the “United States” they are “representing” are not the same “United States” controlling the land jurisdiction of this country.  
.
Until they come home and adopt their lawful standing as one of the “free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States” as defined by the Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783, and also accept their public oath of office as a Deputy accountable to the people and the land-based legislature of the people, they are NOT authorized to represent us in any matter outside their limited functions all delegated to operate within the international jurisdiction of the sea as required by the actual Constitution. Period. 
.
I doubt that many of those currently ensconced in the Beltway have the courage and the moral fiber to do that. The fact that anyone would be fooled into thinking that the United States Congress could just flip around and somehow be or reclaim or worse still, just “vote themselves” the status and standing that they threw away with both hands in 1868 shows how dumbed down people have become.  Are Apples oranges?  Are Pears qumquats?  Are Cats dogs? 
.
If there are any members of the US House of Representatives who think that they can just reclaim their powers without due process of expatriation from the United States, and taking their Oath to the actual Constitution, and giving their full allegiance under fiduciary accountability to the land of their birth—- they need to be clued in and told otherwise. 
.
[ So does the rest of the world! ]

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com

Anna von Reitz: They are the sovereigns and must act in their own best interest—- but goading and teaching is as far as I can go.

Posted on May 27, 2016 by arnierosner
Thank you Judge Anna,
Perhaps then, since the lawful civilian authority outranks and controls the military, you, acting as a judge of the land jurisdiction, can act on behalf of the people of the land jurisdiction, can then lawfully order:

1. “Component Units,” of the “Grand Army,” and/or the “Coast Guard,” to provide safety, security and protection from the Pirates of the Sea jurisdiction,
   
2. while the people organize and conduct their own county-wide elections on July fourth, 2016.  And
   
3. Access public funds to finance a proper election effort.
   

It seems we must reach out to lawful protective elements outside of our local community for enforcement of the rule of law.  Contrary to her public assurances …



The sheriff’s, lack of response to a reasonable request for support was not only very disappointing… but it revealed to me, her deliberate intent to commit treason against the Citizens of Orange County, California.
Third Request! We the people have been betrayed…Once More!
When “they” (my opinion— ) assassinated Lavoy Vinicum, they demonstrated, their true intent to not honor their contractual agreements…!   And indeed to violate the very spirit of the enumerated powers.  As I see it, they are no longer legitimate in any form.  But I have advocated that position for some time.  Obama has NO Authority…PERIOD!
As you already revealed, a corporation which violates the principles of its charter, in this case, misrepresenting themselves as the lawful government of the American people, an act of fraud, dissolves their charter, by default.  With no lawful charter they are acting in fraud.  Fraud vitiates all.
How much TREASON is ENOUGH – TO HANG THE OFFENDER?
That would then mean all of the sub-corporation would not have any lawful authority from which their charters would be issued…making their corporations also null and void and with no lawful authority by which to operate their franchises.
That would also mean the states, counties and municipal corporations, all franchises of the mother corporation, impersonating the lawful government units and their respective appointed “Component Units,” posing as the various other authorized authority, all have no basis to lawfully operate or function even as service corporations under contract.   See references below in the 2015 CAFR:

Isn’t all of this evidence of the fraud being perpetrated on the people enough to establish the employees of the contractors living in America, are no longer serving the peaceful intent of satisfying the contractual agreements for which their functions were created? And…isn’t their continued “bad,” behavior sufficient to classify them as enemies of the American people? Enemies to be arrested and prosecuted for breach of contract—on sight?
And on that note, isn’t there sufficient justification to invoke the use of our military forces; the very basis of founding the “government,” in the first place, as it becomes required, to reestablish our peaceful and tranquil communities along with the republican form of government due us as the American people?
-arnie, just one of the people.
 
On May 27, 2016, at 8:29 PM, Anna von Reitz wrote:
Doesn’t quite work that way. Wish it did sometimes—- LOL. No, our lawful government only works from the ground up, not the top down. I can stand in the doorway and defend against the unlawful attacks and usurpations, but I can’t order the People to do anything. They are the sovereigns and must be goaded to act in their own best interest—- but goading and teaching is as far as I can go.
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Arnie Rosner [ltr]<[email=arnie@arnierosner.com][ltr]arnie@arnierosner.com[/ltr][/email]>[/ltr] wrote:
Judge Anna,
Since it is now apparent we as the American people are being defrauded, what might be the impact of giving orders in Alaska to hold elections? July 4th, seems to be a good date…
Will an order, issued from a superior court in Alaska, to hold county-wide elections to elect lawful public servants as required to fill the vacant public offices, become a force by which all states/counties will be obligated to also obey…based upon the full faith and credit clause?
arnie
“You only think you know!”

The flag of the Continental united States of America
arnie@arnierosner.com
Http://scannedretina.com
[url=tel:714-964-4056]714-964-4056[/url]
[url=tel:714-501-8247]714-501-8247[/url] – mobile
 

Thanks to: https://scannedretina.com