Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock - Illuminati Salvage Plan – The Cabal's Attempt at Damage Control from the World of Entertainment
In this episode of Wisdom Teachings, we learn that there is much more to the situation of disclosure than past episodes have revealed. Within the discussion, David Wilcock continues his exposé on the most remarkable events to hit the news in the year of 2015. The discussion proved that the farther we get into the revelations of last year, the more remarkable they seem.
Priceonomics - Why Do All Hollywood Movies Lose Money?
Wilcock begins by discussing his experience in Hollywood film production, and sharing how difficult it is to be successful in this industry. As he describes, most Hollywood productions end up loosing significantly with regard to overall profit. This may have been one of the reasons why the Illuminati/cabal launch their extended P.R. campaign within the world of film and entertainment. It is this reasoning which we intend to discuss, along with the various results of this campaign within media. We start things off with further revelations from the previously discussed, Sony hacks.
Sony Hacks Abound
In my view, this episode revealed some of the most amazing evidence of government manipulation in media to date. In the last few discussions, the series covered the connection between the Rand Corporation and Sony as well as numerous other media companies which are controlled by the military-industrial complex.
Within this discussion, we are actually able to read the evidence in the form of email correspondents from Sony regarding the creation of various media productions. Before we get into that subject, however, we will learn just what these emails represent. For these details we turn to two websites. The first of these comes from the site of the well-known publisher, Variety.
WikiLeaks has added “thousands” more hacked Sony Pictures Entertainment emails to its searchable database.
WikiLeaks made the announcement Thursday in a posting on its Twitter account.
The move came two weeks after WikiLeaks disclosed that it had published 30,287 documents and 173,132 emails stemming from last winter’s cyber-attack on Sony Pictures Entertainment. WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange said in an April 16 statement that information was newsworthy, adding, “It belongs in the public domain. WikiLeaks will ensure it stays there.”
The hack was reportedly initiated by North Korea in response to the studio’s decision to release the comedy “The Interview,” centering on an assassination attempt on North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. As a result, embarrassing correspondence between top executives and producers became public and helped lead to the ouster of studio chief Amy Pascal and her being replaced by TriStar chief Tom Rothman.
Sony Pictures strongly opposed the release of the material in an April 16 statement: “We vehemently disagree with WikiLeaks’ assertion that this material belongs in the public domain and will continue to fight for the safety, security and privacy of our company and its more than 6,000 employees.”
The April 16 disclosure by WikiLeaks included the revelation that Ben Affleck had attempted to conceal his slave-owning ancestors from the PBS documentary series “Finding Your Roots.” Affleck subsequently apologized for having having done so.
As we may remember, we have the Alliance hacking into the Sony database and making off with a large amount of information, including our evidence of interest. (We will also remember that this particular hack revealed the foul play which took place within the production of the movie, The Interview.)
Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock: Out with the Old and In with the Floating Cities - Further Disclosures, Plus an In-Depth Investigation into the Concept of 4th Density
(It is important to note that theft of information is considered unethical. However, when that information directly pertains to the plans of a company to manipulate the public for monetary gain, the situation changes. If such information reveals that crimes and offenses against the people are continually being committed, then we may have an obligation to examine such information in order to stop these crimes from continuing.
David Wilcock also makes the point that once any information hits the web, there is no real way to get it back, and that since this information is already out in the open, it can only help us to learn how to prevent the injustices which Rand and Sony have committed.)
Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock - Free Energy Should be Free - Breaking Though a Century of Cabal Deception
We have previously learned about how Sony Entertainment and the Rand Corporation have colluded together in order to create various forms of propaganda. Let's see what other details we can uncover. The next article comes from the website, Green Leaf.com.
WikiLeaks reveals Sony's hidden ties to Washington
“The Sony Archives show that behind the scenes this is an influential corporation, with ties to the White House (there are almost 100 U.S. government email addresses in the archive), with an ability to impact laws and policies, and with connections to the US military-industrial complex,” WikiLeaks said.
According to WikiLeaks, Sony Pictures’ CEO Michael Lynton is on the board of trustees of the RAND Corporation, which the whistleblower website described as “an organization specializing in research and development for the United States military and intelligence sector”.
WikiLeaks said its newly released trove of documents brings to light the “flow of contacts and information” between Sony’s US subsidiary and RAND. This ranges from Sony setting up celebrity visits to special events for the military research company, to RAND offering advice to Sony Pictures on how to handle blowback from North Korea over the film, The Interview.
In total, the trove includes more than 30,000 documents, collectively dubbed by WikiLeaks as “The Sony Archives”. The documents were first leaked online late last year by hackers.
Following this article, David Wilcock makes the point that this information shows a situation which is completely contrary to what media is supposed to be. When we watch television or movies, many of us expect to be watching nothing more than pure entertainment. However, this information from Wikileaks tells a completely different story. Here we see the that Michael Lynton, the CEO of Sony, is on the board of trusties of the Rand Corporation.
Federal Trade Commission - The Antitrust Laws
As Wilcock states, this situation basically represents monopolization of media, and flies in the face of virtually every antitrust law that has ever been written. As many may know, anti-trust laws exist to insure that all businesses operate under clear and fair standards which are most beneficial to the consumer. However, this is most definitely not what Sony and Rand seemed to have in mind. It is this situation between these colluding corporations which can easily be defined as crime, and it is more than likely that the criminal nature of these actions is the true reason why Sony "vehemently disagrees with WikiLeaks’ assertion" regarding the need for public oversight of such activities.
(It is understood that the determination of criminality of this type of monopolization are up to the judgement of the courts. However, I cannot see any just court acquitting any party who deliberately conspires to manipulate the people for selfish gain.)
It is clear that Sony did not want this information which Wikileaks acquired to be made public. They give the reason that it is a violation of privacy. However, this is not likely the only reason behind the objection. It is a given that a criminal (or criminal organization) will not typically reveal their own guilt if they intend to continue their criminal behavior.
Huffington Post - America’s Justice System Has Failed Us All
In order to investigate any crime, private information must be examined, and any functional criminal justice system with integrity to speak of will thoroughly examine such situations in order to determine if crime has been committed. However, this did not seem to be the situation at the time these hacks came to the surface. This is why the hacks and Wikileaks revelations were necessary. Justice was not being served, and the very system charged with handling the would-be investigation was showing to be an accessory to the crime itself.
Taking a Closer Look
Up until this point, we have only been able to speak on the possibility of foul play within the collusion between Rand and Sony. Though that possibility was known to be very strong (given the amount of propaganda we have clearly been able to see) it was only partially proven. However, the details within these Sony emails may dispel all doubt that crime has taken place. Here is Wikileaks on the subject.
RAND's Politics Aside - A Can't Miss Experience in Santa Monica
RAND's Politics Aside - A Can't Miss Experience in Santa Monica | RAND
RAND's Politics Aside - A Can't Miss Experience in Santa Monica | view in browser
We're pleased to have the current director of the NSA join us for what will be a dynamic day of discussions.
Admiral Michael S. Rogers
Commander of U.S. Cyber Command and Director of the National Security Agency/
Central Security Service
Visit our website to see a full list of the other speakers who will be joining us. The number of participants is limited. Purchase your passes today!
A portion of the cost of each pass is a tax-deductible contribution to RAND.
Your participation in Politics Aside helps support RAND research.
RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.
RAND Corporation. 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401-3208.
RAND® is a registered trademark.
Privacy statement | Email email@example.com to unsubscribe.
This doesn't at all look like business as usual for any company who produces simple entertainment. Upon seeing this email, many are probably curious as to why one of the largest entertainment companies in the country is meeting with the NSA (the agency we all know to be guilty of spying on a good majority of the planet) for an entire day.
We can clearly see propagandistic films and media such as The Interview produce by Sony, as well as numerous other sources. Combine this knowledge with the fact that Sony is likely gathering information from the NSA as well, and we have a multi-level collusion in media for the sake of manipulating the common population with strategic precision. As David Wilcock state, the profitability of a media company has nothing to do with spying unless there are clear ulterior motives which these media companies hold.
Hollywood’s Pedophilia Epidemic Exposed in ‘An Open Secret’
Film Review: ‘Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe’
Wilcock goes on to explain that there are virtually no Hollywood productions which oppose the cabal in any way. When we think of such revealing movies as Andrew Wakefield's Vaxxed, or Amy Berg's An Open Secret (which respectively document the the dangers of unchecked vaccine manufacturers, and the epidemic of pedophilia in Hollywood), and how these films seemed to fall flat, it becomes clear that films which oppose the cabal/Illuminati never make it to the big screen in Hollywood. This is not accidental, but by design. It is a monopolization of the industry much like we see in every profitable industry the cabal controls. In short, those who have opposed them tend to fail, while those who conspire with them tend to succeed.
Let's take a look at another email. Here we have evident correspondents between Sony and the Rand Corporation on the exact subject of changing journalistic publications to the advantage of government image.
FW: Snowden Final DRAFT
From: Weil, Leah
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:00 PM
To: Guerin, Jean
Cc: Klein, Megan; Kaplan, Todd; Sipkins, Charles
Subject: RE: Snowden Final DRAFT
Privileged and Confidential
Jean – a few comments
1. In the first sentence of the second paragraph - delete the phrase “illegal spying” and either leave it simply as “operations” or replace it with “intelligence gathering” – so the clause would read “U.S. government’s intelligence gathering operations.”
2. In the second sentence of the second paragraph – delete the phrase “misuse of power” and replace it with “actions” or “activities” so that it would read “the NSA’s actions” or “the NSA’s activities”
I wonder in his quote whether we want to have him say it is a “political film”. That’s really more of a PR point so up to you guys – and I suspect since it is his own quote Greenwald will feel strongly.
Please also ensure that the use of quotes from the reviews is an accurate portrayal of what was said. Because they are excerpts we want to make sure that there is no change in the meaning etc. and that the attributions are correct.
From: Guerin, Jean
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Weil, Leah
Cc: Klein, Megan; Kaplan, Todd
Subject: Snowden Final DRAFT
Hi Leah, We thought you might want to review attached before it goes out to the media. Greenwald has been given creative input on this release – as a matter of fact, it cannot go out without his final approval. Please let us know what you think. Ideally as Greenwald is on a world press tour right now, we’d like to announce this afternoon or early tomorrow morning.
Thanks as always, Jean
We can see that this email was sent from personnel at Rand, and is advising Sony on an article on Edward Snowden's revelations. This person at Rand is basically dictating to Sony how to best give the NSA a positive image in the eyes of the reader--basically fashioning the opinions of the public for private interests.
As Wilcock points out, there is not supposed to be a hierarchical arrangement which links government, military, and entertainment together. What do the results of the 'Nation Spying Agency' have to do with Hollywood production and publications? In my view, this is downright Orwellian, and has no place within a country which boasts the statutes of freedom and equality. If people aren't even allowed to think for themselves without being unknowingly manipulated by the entertainment industry, I can hardly consider such a situation “free”.
We see the Rand Corporation and the NSA basically using Sony as their own personal advertisement agency as they dictate Sony's publications to them. These emails prove that the military-industrial complex is manipulating and censoring journalism, the news, and numerous other avenues of the entertainment industry.
WikiLeaks – Sony Email Archive
(David Wilcock makes a note that he appreciates Gaia because he can say whatever he wants on the network. He also says that in sharing all of the secrets of Hollywood and the mainstream, he will most likely never be able to work there again.)
At this point, we've proven that Sony Entertainment is taking orders from the NSA and the Rand Corporation, but what exactly is this salvage plan of the cabal's mentioned in the title?
More Schemes from the Mainstream
It has been discussed in past weeks that the cabal has been slowly dissemination their own version of reality to the public. This is so that if they find their situation deteriorating to the point of imminent defeat, they can use their partial-disclosure script to distract the public and cast themselves in a positive light--changing the story to their own advantage.
On this subject of disclosure in the Wisdom Teachings series, the cabal's numerous nuggets of truth have been various in scope and significance. In contrast, this episode showed that the cabal is leaving little to the imagination for anyone who is paying attention.
The next disclosure of interest comes to us from the website, Gizmodo.com, and discusses the exotic technology of cloaking devices.
We've Just Developed a Portable Cloakig Device
If you’re a non-magical being, you might think your chances of becoming invisible are slim to nil. But don’t jump to conclusions just yet: Researchers are now claiming to have developed a portable system that can make small objects, like your keys or pet lizard, disappear from sight.
The key to real life invisibility lies in clever optical tricks that bend light around an object, shielding it from detection. In principle, such technology has only been demonstrated for very tiny objects, but now, a group of researchers from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology say they’ve developed a scaled-up system that can be ported around and used for classroom demonstrations.
When the KIT researchers want to cloak an object, they place it inside a hollow metal cylinder coated with acrylic paint, which diffusely reflects light. That metal tube is then embedded inside a light-scattering PDMS block. If the time it takes light to travel through the block is just the right proportion of the time it takes light to travel through the cloak, the cloak becomes invisible. Or so the researchers say—the first actual demonstration of this technology will take place on May 13th, according to a press release.
As Gizmodo reveals, scientists "just" developed a technology which has the ability to bend light around objects so that they become invisible. However, as we have heard, this technology is not at all limited to small objects within metal tubes.
Crystal Links - Montauk Project
Wilcock explains the likelihood that this technology exists on a grand scale, and that the ships we hear of within the Secret Space Program commonly use this cloaking technology to mask their operations from view. He tells of how there could be major thoroughfares in the sky full of ships and we would not be able to tell. It may be that the cabal is pushing this information of cloaking technology out to the mainstream so as to prime the public for their PR salvage plan.
Project Camelot Interviews Dr. Pete Peterson
The discussion moves to the Avengers movie series, and how this series seems to have numerous soft disclosures of the various technologies the cabal possesses. David Wilcock mentions the testimonies of Dr. Pete Peterson on how the floating aircraft carrier depicted in these movies was almost exactly the way the actual carrier appears. It is very likely that this cloaking technology is used to mask these carriers despite their massive size, according to Wilcock.
A Comical Attempt at Redemption
The next subject of interest was extremely strange to hear about. This involved a PR stunt that was so far out in left field that one would have to see in order to believe. To see this actual attempt made, at first made me angry, but afterward, it just makes me laugh.
Due to the excessive amount of propaganda we see coming from Hollywood studios in modern times, it is no surprise that the cabal has major influence within this industry. Consequently, it is in their best interests to make this industry as profitable as possible while spreading their own version of reality through propagandistic productions. It wasn't until various hacks that the reality behind this shady business began to come forward.
One of these shady dealings involved an attempted mass-publication of a comic book, along with motions to trademark the word Illuminati so that no one else could use the word. The following article comes from Bleeding Cool.com, and gives details on this little PR stunt.
Marvel To Publish An ‘Illuminati’ Comic?
The Illuminati are the secret society that rule the world. Originally the Bavarian Illuminati of 1776, the phrases has reoccurred over the years, more popularly used now to describe groups like the Bilderberg group, the idea of the New World Order, made up of the most powerful people, controlling us in an undemocratic fashion. Possibly lizards.
In the Marvel Universe, the Illuminati are a group invented by Brian Bendis that comprise the cleverest, most powerful “good” people in the Marvel world, state leaders, great thinkers, great inspirers. They were originally Mister Fantastic, Iron Man, Professor X, Namor, Black Bolt and Doctor Strange, though their membership has changed over the years, with Medusa, Beast, Black Panther, Captain America and Amadeus Cho, Medusa, Yellowjacket, Captain Britain and “Doc Green” Hulk joining their ranks.
Well, last week Marvel registered the trademark for “Illuminati” for “Comic books; printed periodicals in the field of comic book stories and artwork”.
This usually means that Marvel are planning a comic book of the same name and are getting the trademark in early, or that the TV/movie/games wing of the publisher is pursuing something along those lines and they want to shore up the comic book name rights against anyone who fancies trying it on, or someone is proposing a legal challenge.
That's right. ...An Illuminati comic. Keep in mind, this article from Bleeding Cool was published on May 5th--only 4 days after Sony added such damned email evidence to their database on May 1st. (You can't beat them for quick/desperate responses, I guess.)
We see these cabalists taking original characters from other comics and successful movies, and conflating them into one series for the sake of saving their own image. As Wilcock points out, in order to create a Marvel-based movie, you first need a comic series. With this in mind, it seems likely that the cabal wanted to trademark the name "Illuminati" not only because they intended to create a movie series, but also for the sake of copyrighting their Illuminati name. So what's the significance of the copyright?
Wikipedia - Illuminati Comics
When any material is copyrighted, it means that the owner has sole rights over the copyrighted material. At that point, no one else can use that name without the cabal's expressed consent (which I can't see them giving to anyone except their own members). This would mean that no publisher, no documentary, no blog, and no other party whatsoever could use their name in any production, as this would legally be considered copyright infringement.
Wikipedia - Illuminati (Madonna song) Madonna Dressed as Lucifer
This act of damage control would be their own special attempt at information control. Fortunately, the fact that this article was published last May tells me that this comic didn't really do too well in stores, and I can't see Marvel going through the entire process of creating a movie just to lose millions when it tanks at the box office.
(One thing to note... Most of us would obviously find this attempt at image management ironic. This is due to the fact that much of the real Illuminati belongs in prison. They have shown themselves to be chronic liars, cheats, and manipulators, and yet they are attempting to portray themselves as geniuses and saints. The bottom line is that if people are truly good, they don't need PR. Truly good people Are PR, and have no need for stunts like this.)
Copyright Law of the United States
The part about this stunt that irked me at first was the fact that it demonstrates just how little the cabal contributes to anyone but themselves. The cabal/Illuminati can't seem to do anything on their own, and seem to require the creativity of others to do whatever it is they aim to do. We see them buying themes and franchises, buying characters, buying popularity, but when it comes down to it, all they themselves have is a load of worthless monopoly money. With regard to newness in creativity, they don't have anything to add. This is the likely reason why Hollywood has turned to producing nothing but unnecessary remakes and Luciferian propaganda.