The Vanishing Act ~ Anna von Reitz and more...

The Vanishing Act

Posted on October 27, 2016 by David Robinson  
  Judge Anna von Reitz
Ever wonder how things vanish? Massive things? Entire civilizations, not to mention vast business empires that just go “Pop!” —- now you see ’em, now you don’t?
The Ten Tribes of Israel? Well, they didn’t really vanish. They were “spiritually lost” and succumbed to the charms of Babylonian idolatry. We actually know where they went and we know where their descendants are to this day.
In the 1300’s the vast Knights Templar organization folded and disappeared overnight taking the bulk of their wealth with them. A few leaders were captured and tortured and killed, most notably, Jacques de Molay, but as for the gold and thousands of others, they simply disappeared.
We know that they went to Scotland and the Isle of Mann and Malta and the Hebrides and Iceland and Norway and Russia and back to their home bases in the Middle East and Africa—-and that they not only embellished the Inner City of London long after the purge of the Pope and the French King—- they continued to be Lords of the Admiralty and the Exchequer. They were on the boats to the New World along with the most ardent Spanish treasure seekers and their members swelled the ranks of the Jesuit Order.
Did they vanish, really, or have they always been hidden in plain view?
And then, there was the mammoth Dutch East India Trading Company, four or five times larger than its nearest competitor, the British East India Company—easily the most successful, most predatory, and richest commercial company on Earth, and yet, it vanished overnight. Poof!
And except for Frank O’Collins and a few other Intrepid Explorers into the realms of Utter Darkness, we would probably remain ignorant of the deals the Dutch East India Traders made with the British which allowed them to come here, to America, and act as predators let loose on our shores.
Then as now, the Dutch East India Company specialized in dealing in slaves, drugs, prostitution, money laundering, war profiteering, and every other nasty, unspeakable vice. If nothing else, we can follow their progress in the New World by the proliferation of their wares.
And now, the parasites that began their journey in Babylon 8,000 years ago and who have wandered the Earth like their Father, Cain, generation to generation, are moving on again. They have turned their faces to the sun and yet continue to see and read everything in reverse.
As crazy and unlikely as it seems, a good portion of all the ill-gotten wealth acquired from centuries of war, pillaging, and plundering, is moving to China. When the commentators woke up last week and realized that the perpetrators of all this fraud have vanished the rumors flew wildly around the globe and pole to pole.
Had they all shipped out “off world” to travel to other dimensions and galaxies?
Had they headed for underground bunkers and prepared for the worst?
It’s much more prosaic than that. They all just up-ended and relocated to China, like tapeworms journeying on, host to host, they will subtly eat away the substance of China and the Chinese People and this, despite our best attempts to warn them all.
The Forbidden Fruit, the Great Lie, is hard to beat.
One wonders what will happen when the world wakes up and realizes that they are gone from our shores, and gone from Europe, too. What will people make of yet another “Vanishing” and what sorts of tricks will they pull from their kit-bags upon landing in Beijing?
Will they take to silk? Learn to drink tea—-again—after 300 years in New York?
And what about the rest of us? Have we finally grown up enough to recognize their attempts to pit Russia and America against each other and provoke a war between their own two natural enemies?
Make no mistake— the predatory parasites would like nothing better than to cook something up and stand back and watch us kill each other. Why? Because they are Monarchists and they always have been.
It is far easier to control a single Monarch than bamboozle 390 million separate sovereigns.
They realized early on that the American Republic and American workers actually had more in common with the Russian workers and the ideals of Russian Communism than they did with old crumbly European Monarchies—– so almost from the first, it has been the modus operandi of the Divine Right proponents to spread suspicion, fear and hatred of Russians among the Americans and suspicion and fear and hatred of Americans among the Russians.
Keeping us at each other’s throats has been very convenient. It kept both young, powerful, idealistic nations busy and prevented us from noticing all that they were quietly doing to us behind our backs to benefit themselves at our mutual expense……and even now, when they have quietly vanished, simply disappeared to their new royal palaces and set up their stock and trade behind a seawall composed of billions of Chinese bodies, they continue to prod us and hope that we will be stupid enough to oblige their sincere wish for our mutual destruction.
Sooner or later, we all have to quit being the straight men in these evil, self-interested games. Sooner or later, we have to stop doing what we are told—-especially when we are being prodded into war.

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com

The Basics

Posted on October 27, 2016 by David Robinson
  Judge Anna von Reitz
I have been asked multiple times recently for a “Quick Guide” to bring people up to speed on all this history, and I always feel overwhelmed.  I have, in large respect, already provided a “Quick Guide” in the form of a large print cartoon illustrated book, “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” available on Amazon.com for around $20 or as an ebook for around $5. http://tinyurl.com/hh2ug3u
God knows, I have done my best to get the information out there and get the American people up on their feet and moving.
But I understand, too, the desire for a Five Minute, 25 Words or Less Cheat Sheet— a sort of Cliff Notes version people can very quickly grasp.  I am not sure it can be done, and if it can, it must rest on very limited supporting citations— in other words, you pretty much have to accept what I am telling you because there isn’t time or room in such a document to bring in any reams of proof.
That said, here’s my best shot at it this morning:
1.  At the end of the Revolution there were two populations of people left on this continent—- “the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States” and the “Inhabitants”—– British Subjects known as “citizens” here to provide “essential government services”.   The evidence for this is in The Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783 and in Article IV of the original Constitution called The Constitution for the united States of America.
2. There are still two populations on this continent— the American State Nationals who are the present-day “free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States” and two brands of present-day “inhabitants”—- “United States Citizens” occupying the District of Columbia and “citizens of the United States” occupying the Washington DC Municipality.
3. The actual states of the Union are all Republics.  The government of the District of Columbia is a democracy.  The municipal government of Washington DC is an oligarchy.  All these populaces co-habit the same space and freely roam about this country, but they all function under different rules and occupy different jurisdictions and are subject to different forms of law.
4.  The “United States Citizens” (British Subjects) and the “Municipal citizens” (Corporate Slaves) are here to serve —-both to provide essential government services under contract to our state republics and also to serve their own separate foreign “federal” and “municipal” governments.
5. The American State Nationals inhabiting the Republics are the “free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States” who are owed “essential government services” from these other governments as our employees—and we are all born into that political status as Americans—but soon after birth, and without any full disclosure to our Mothers, we are entrapped by legal chicanery and “presumed to be citizens” and “wards of the state” and members of these other populations instead.
6.  This undisclosed process which is a direct violation of Section 11 of the 1933 Securities Act results in a form of political genocide known as mischaracterization of non-combatants and it is a war crime carrying the death penalty.
7. This international war crime has been carried out against the unsuspecting American people by their own employees in gross Breach of Trust and violation of both the letter and the spirit of The Constitution for the united States of America— the actual and only original equity contract that all American states and American State Nationals are owed.
8. Who is ultimately responsible for this outrageous circumstance?  In direct terms— Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Sir Winston Churchill.  In more abstract terms, the members of the United States Congress and the British Government.
9. Finally, though we have been the victims of this crime and have unknowingly allowed our own employees to entrap us and make false claims against us and our property rights, we bear some responsibility ourselves, for failure to knowledgeably assert our own political identity and clarify our separate political status in the pubic records.
10.  Our birth events should have been recorded as part of the land records of our lawful organic state republics and instead were only registered in the foreign and international jurisdiction of the sea.  We trusted our employees to do their jobs, not work calamity against us while on our payroll.  The British Crown, a foreign commercial corporation seized upon our Given Names and copyrighted them and claimed to act as our usufruct—- using our good names for its benefit, so long as it did not harm us in the process.
11. Purposeful self-interested non-disclosure of any contractual arrangement is fraud and fraud vitiates all “laws” and contracts—including any merely presumed political status.  Fraud has no statute of limitations.
12.  The testimony of six generations of Americans impacted by British Breach of Trust (ever since the Civil War and only more terribly and recently since the Second World War) carried out by British Subjects operating as United States Citizens on our soil is eloquent and the nearly disastrous results of it are plain to see— corruption of our government and its institutions, pillaging and plundering of American property, enslavement of the American people, false commercial claims, illegal foreclosures, counterfeiting of our credit, non-consensual hypothecation of debt against our assets.  The ravages of equally foreign “citizens of the United States” upon our economy and well-being are also self-evident in the burgeoning welfare rolls, crime statistics, unemployment, frustration and anger and suffering of our people.
12. Your remedy?  Know who you are — a living, breathing, age of majority, non-citizen American State National — objecting to and rebutting any presumption otherwise, owing no allegiance other than your natural allegiance to the soil of your organic state of the Union.  Place record of your self-declaration of political status firmly on the public record by having it witnessed and notarized and recorded by the land recorder’s office.  Every single one of them has a “miscellaneous file”.
13. Second, bring your claim and redeem your estate. Go to the State Secretary of State’s Office in the state where you were born and tell them who you are and that you are here to redeem your estate.  Watch the worms turn and the cockroaches scatter.
—————————————
See this article and over 300 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com

The “False Flap” Over Bruce Doucette

Posted on October 27, 2016 by David Robinson
  Judge Anna Von Reitz
For the last several days I have been getting stupid comments from wannabe patriots who are, as usual, completely misunderstanding the Law and The Constitution, both in function and in jurisdiction—-but who are nonetheless trying to use both as a means to tear down the valid efforts of their more informed countrymen to restore the Public and Organic Law of this country and enforce the provisions of The Constitution we are owed and rebuild the American Common Law Court System which we owe ourselves.
American Common Law modeled on British Common Law flourished in this country from the time the first pilgrims stumbled ashore to the 1960’s. Some of us are old enough to remember its fading glory before it was swept under the rug by corporate interlopers abusing maritime and administrative courts to pillage the American People.
Central to the issue is simply this—- are you a “citizen” meaning a British Subject here to provide our states with governmental services per Article IV of the Constitution, or are you a “national” meaning one of the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States?
In other words, do you choose to function as a “person”—- a corporate entity—- or as one of the “people”—a living and breathing being?
Depending on your answer, you are bound by The Constitution or protected by it.
You either exist to serve the government, or the government exists to serve you.
It is one or the other—- government slaves or free people, and you get to choose, so long as you have knowledge enough to make the choice and live accordingly.
A group of “Don’t Know Who We Are, But We Think We Are Going Somewhere” patriots have the mistaken idea that we are all “citizens” and that we are parties to The Constitution and that we are bound to the limitations and prohibitions of The Constitution.
If we are acting as British Subjects we are indeed bound by The Constitution while living on American soil, but if we are American Nationals, we are not parties to The Constitution and not defined, limited, or bound by it.
The Constitution is not the source of any of our rights and material interests. It exists to create and define and limit the activities of the “Federal Government” and that includes Federal employees and dependents, African Americans, and political asylum seekers.
Its only function with regard to the People of this country is to protect them and their National Trust, which includes the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights, and the right to Common Law provided for in Amendment VII, and the exemptions established by Article IV.
Period.
So here comes Mr Goodman and Hartford Van Dyke, both good enough men and well-intentioned, but fundamentally ignorant of some very important and basic information.
They want to object to the restoration of the American Common Law Court System and they want to object to the induction and instruction of Federal Continental Marshals, because they say that this is not part of The Constitution. Why would it be?
The power to appoint Federal Continental (Land Jurisdiction) Marshals falls under Article X of The Constitution—- rights reserved in international jurisdiction to the states and the people of the states.
And by states, we mean the actual geographic states.
Likewise, the right of the people to assemble their own Jural Assemblies, and elect their own sheriffs, judges, and other court officers, to create and enforce the organic and public law of this country is not covered by The Constitution. It far pre-dates The Constitution and functions totally outside and without regard to The Constitution, which applies only to the Federal Government and Federal Citizens.
People who think that The Constitution is the “be all and end all” are missing by far the greater portion of the Public Law and don’t have a clue as to the proper functioning of our government. In fact, they mistake themselves as British Subject “Citizens” of one stripe or another, and attempt to curtail the activities and abrogate the rights of others according to their own ignorant and limited vision.
The recent attacks against Judge Bruce Doucette are emblematic of this idiocy.
The free people of Colorado have the guaranteed right to elect him as their judge and all the British Subjects functioning as “US Citizens” and living under the limitations of The Constitution don’t have the right to say “Boo!” about it.
Picture it as two groups — one Irish, living under Irish law, and one Spanish, living under Spanish law— in the same community.
What happens when the Spanish mistake an Irishman for one of theirs? Does he become subject to Spanish law? Of course, not.
And the same thing happens when a British Subject Citizen who lives as a “person” under the prohibitions of The Constitution mistakes Judge Bruce Doucette, one of the people of Colorado, as one of theirs and attempts to complain about him as if he was their judge.
The plain and simple fact is that Bruce is one of the people, not a “person” and he has been elected to serve as a Judge by others living in Colorado, who have also elected to live as people, not persons.
He is in a completely separate jurisdiction and is owed complete immunity from attacks, presumptions, or demands based on any “Constitution” whatsoever.
I will say it again:
British Subjects called “citizens” and “residents” who are here to provide governmental services per Article IV, are bound by The Constitution which creates, defines and limits their activities on American soil.
American State Nationals are instead protected by The Constitution and are not bound by it. We recognize and enforce the limits of The Constitution, but to us, it is simply an agreement our states made a long time ago to receive certain stipulated governmental services and which set the rules and parameters within which those services are provided. We are not even parties to The Constitution. Our states are parties to The Constitution.
So long as we elect to function as people instead of persons, we are not bound by any “Separation of Powers” or other limit established by The Constitution.
We are not obligated to live as subjects of any government. We are not citizens of any kind or stripe. We can locally elect among ourselves anyone we like to serve as our Justices and Judges, our sheriffs, and our clerks and bailiffs, and so on, and nobody who wishes to continue to live as a British Subject under The Constitution has any right or reason to object or say one word to us about it.
It’s our business. Not yours.
Judge Bruce Doucette isn’t your judge and isn’t pretending to be. He is the freely elected Judge of the people of Colorado—not the “persons” of Colorado—- and if you are still ranting about The Constitution and calling yourself a “citizen”, you aren’t one of the people—-you are operating as a British Subject, a foreigner, with no right to complain and no right to object and no right to interfere in the operations of the American Government.
In fact, you would do jolly-well-enough to pay attention to the mammoth mis-administration and criminality of your own government—- the Federal Government and its “State of State” franchises— which are on the verge of collapse and international indictment as a result of their numerous crimes against the American people they are bound to serve and the many other nations which have suffered from their unique combination of guile and self-interest.
And so much for the “interpretations” of Mr. Goodman and Hartford Van Dyke and the 90 British Subjects bringing their complaints against the American Judge Bruce Doucette.
—————————————
See this article and over 300 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com

Postscript to The “False Flap” Over Bruce Doucette

Posted on October 27, 2016 by David Robinson
  Judge Anna von Reitz
A very intelligent question was asked by Elvia who wanted to know what the complaint against Judge Doucette was about.
Essentially, those complaining thought that The Constitution prohibits the Judicial Branch from making appointments—- which it does, so they objected to Judge Doucette appointing new Federal Continental Marshals.
What the Complainers didn’t grasp and probably still don’t, is that Judge Doucette isn’t operating as part of the Federal Government, even though he is acting in international jurisdiction. Instead, he is exercising the reserved international jurisdiction of the states and the people per Article X of The Constitution.
Under The Constitution, the Executive Branch of the Federal Government makes appointments, not members of the Judicial Branch—- but we are not part of the Federal Government and not part of its Judicial or Executive Branches, and we are not attempting to exercise any of the powers delegated to the Federal Government, either.
Under the reserved powers of the states and people (Article X) when operating as Federal (Continental) Judges we can also appoint Federal (Continental) Marshals as officers serving the Federal Postal District Court which is part of our “reserved” international jurisdiction as opposed to the “United States District Court” which holds the delegated international jurisdiction granted to the Federal Government—subject to The Constitution.
Postal District = international land jurisdiction.
“US District” = international sea jurisdiction.
Judge Doucette is operating as a Colorado State Judge under American Common Law and as such has the right to swear in both elected Sheriffs and men appointed as Deputies by the Sheriff—who are Officers of the Common Law Court.
These men are called “peace officers” not “law enforcement officers”.
Peace officers enforce the Organic and Public Law of the nation-states, including The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation (1781), The Constitution for the united States of America, Northwest Ordinance, and United States Statutes at Large, as well as State Session Laws.
Law enforcement officers enforce Codes, Statutes, and Regulations, which are supposed to apply only to corporations and employees and dependents of the Federal Government and “federated” State of States.
Federal “citizens” called “United States Citizens” and “citizens of the United States” are all British Subjects and they are all considered to “reside” in our actual land-based states on a temporary basis for the purpose to providing us with an agreed upon roster of “governmental services” as indicated in Article IV of The Constitution.
So there are profound differences between peacekeepers and law enforcement officers, and there are equally profound differences between Justices —the proper title for Common Law “judges” operating under the American Common Law– and Admiralty or Administrative Court Judges operating under the Law of the Sea.
In addition to his duties as a Colorado State Superior Court Judge, Judge Doucette also functions as a Federal Postal District Court Judge under Article X, exercising the Reserved Rights of the people and Colorado State in international jurisdiction.
This is a little bit harder for people to grasp, but still simple enough when you think about it.
The Constitution agreement between the states and the new “Federal Government” delegated a portion of the state’s powers and responsibilities to the federal entity created, defined, tasked, and limited by The Constitution. These included nineteen enumerated duties expressed as “powers” which the Federal Government was obligated to provide as services to the subscribing states.
Always remember that The Constitution is a service contract, just like a service contract you might have with a company to mow your lawn, rake your leaves, clean your gutters and do certain other enumerated tasks.
All nineteen of these services/duties assigned to the Federal Government are in international jurisdiction and under the international Law of the Sea.
So, in effect, the states gave away a portion of their international jurisdiction to the Federal Government to administer, but the rest of their international jurisdiction they reserved for the states and the people—- the international jurisdiction of the sea was thus split between the states and the people on one side and the federal government on the other.
Under Article X the Colorado State and the people retain control of the Federal Postal Districts and the Federal Postal District Courts. The Article X Judges, including Judge Bruce Doucette, may swear in Federal (Continental) Marshals to serve as Peace Officers in the same way that a Sheriff swears in Deputies.
And just as with the distinction between actual Sheriffs on the Land who are peace officers versus “Sheriffs” on the Sea who are law enforcement officers, Federal (Continental) Marshals are peace officers concerned with enforcement of The Constitution and protection of the people and delivery of the services guaranteed to the states, while United States Marshals are law enforcement officers tasked to ride herd on United States Citizens and “citizens of the United States” and with the enforcement of codes, statutes, and regulations.
Thus at the international level in this country we have two court systems—Federal Postal District Courts and United States District Courts—— one Court to exercise the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction owed to the people and the state, another Court to exercise the delegated portion of international jurisdiction that is the responsibility of the Federal Government and the appointment practices of one do not apply to the other.
—————————————
See this article and over 300 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com