Latest topics
» The Office of POOFness - 12.10.18 - "Ring the Bells" & BUY MY LAPIS SO WE CAN KEEP ON SCAMMING YOU!
Today at 11:19 am by PurpleSkyz

» Suppressed Ancient Underwater Discoveries That Could Rewrite History
Today at 9:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» #Q Anon Drama Theater: The World is Watching plus more
Today at 8:45 am by PurpleSkyz

» New Evidence To Throw Hillary In Jail Could Set Her On The Run
Today at 8:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» Crazy sounds in the sky in Pennsylvania 12.02.2018
Today at 8:38 am by PurpleSkyz

» Huge Meteor Fireball Disintegrates Over Mexico
Today at 8:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Long Island UFO crosses the ocean and appears again over Lautoka, Fiji plus MORE
Today at 8:23 am by PurpleSkyz

» What science is confirming about the benefits of CBD oil
Today at 8:21 am by PurpleSkyz

» Towers of an ancient castle discovered in Antarctica
Today at 8:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Pagan Roots of Christmas
Today at 7:55 am by PurpleSkyz

» Violet (Viola ordorata)
Today at 1:41 am by Herb Lady

» Laws of Maybotics collapse in PM's theatre of the absurd
Yesterday at 8:34 pm by bs4ever

» JETS SCRAMBLED To Intercept "Unknown Craft" Over UK
Yesterday at 8:31 pm by bs4ever

» Blue Chicken Cult - BEHIND MAJESTIC INTERVIEW SERIES WITH DAVID WILCOCK Part 1,2,3,4 of 6
Yesterday at 7:15 pm by PurpleSkyz

» "THIS PLANET WILL BE THEIRS." David Jacobs on the Richard Dolan Show. Dec. 10, 2018.
Yesterday at 7:10 pm by PurpleSkyz

» #LIVE #QANON #LadyDragon + New Q @potus
Yesterday at 6:12 pm by LadyDragon

» Integrating Your Shadow and Light - How to Embrace Your WHOLE Self
Yesterday at 5:53 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Goblecki Tepe - You May Question Everything After Watching This...
Yesterday at 5:26 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Secrets of Compassionate Relationships
Yesterday at 5:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Stonehenge Scandal: Damage at Blick Mead
Yesterday at 4:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» G$$GLE CRYPTED CODE?%?
Yesterday at 3:45 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Sacha Stone on Self Actualisation, Activism and Sovereignty
Yesterday at 1:20 pm by PurpleSkyz


CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS




You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » UK Ambassador: Russia Hacking Claims Are “Bullsh*t”

UK Ambassador: Russia Hacking Claims Are “Bullsh*t”

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin
UK Ambassador: Russia Hacking Claims Are “Bullsh*t”

Posted on December 12, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai





Former UK ambassador Craig Murray has called the CIA’s claim that Russia hacked the DNC in order to help Trump win the election as “bullsh*t”.

Murray claims that he has met the hackers personally, and they’re most definitely not Russian.
I know who leaked them,” Murray told the UK’s Guardian newspaper. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider.”
Zerohedge.com reports:
I had a call from a Guardian journalist this afternoon. The astonishing result was that for three hours, an article was accessible through the Guardian front page which actually included the truth among the CIA hype:
The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia. A second senior official cited by the Washington Post conceded that intelligence agencies did not have specific proof that the Kremlin was “directing” the hackers, who were said to be one step removed from the Russian government.
Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.”

“I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.
“If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States.
“America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.”
But only three hours. While the article was not taken down, the home page links to it vanished and it was replaced by a ludicrous one repeating the mad CIA allegations against Russia and now claiming – incredibly – that the CIA believe the FBI is deliberately blocking the information on Russian collusion. Presumably this totally nutty theory, that Putin is somehow now controlling the FBI, is meant to answer my obvious objection that, if the CIA know who it is, why haven’t they arrested somebody. That bit of course would be the job of the FBI, who those desperate to annul the election now wish us to believe are the KGB.
It is terrible that the prime conduit for this paranoid nonsense is a once great newspaper, the Washington Post, which far from investigating executive power, now is a sounding board for totally evidence free anonymous source briefing of utter bullshit from the executive.
In the UK, one single article sums up the total abnegation of all journalistic standards. The truly execrable Jonathan Freedland of the Guardian writes “Few credible sources doubt that Russia was behind the hacking of internal Democratic party emails, whose release by Julian Assange was timed to cause maximum pain to Hillary Clinton and pleasure for Trump.” Does he produce any evidence at all for this assertion? No, none whatsoever. What does a journalist mean by a “credible source”? Well, any journalist worth their salt in considering the credibility of a source will first consider access. Do they credibly have access to the information they claim to have?
Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access. After access, you consider truthfulness. Do Julian Assange and I have a reputation for truthfulness? Well in 10 years not one of the tens of thousands of documents WikiLeaks has released has had its authenticity successfully challenged. As for me, I have a reputation for inconvenient truth telling.
Contrast this to the “credible sources” Freedland relies on. What access do they have to the whistleblower? Zero. They have not the faintest idea who the whistleblower is. Otherwise they would have arrested them. What reputation do they have for truthfulness? It’s the Clinton gang and the US government, for goodness sake.
In fact, the sources any serious journalist would view as “credible” give the opposite answer to the one Freedland wants.But in what passes for Freedland’s mind, “credible” is 100% synonymous with “establishment”. When he says “credible sources” he means “establishment sources”. That is the truth of the “fake news” meme. You are not to read anything unless it is officially approved by the elite and their disgusting, crawling whores of stenographers like Freedland.
The worst thing about all this is that it is aimed at promoting further conflict with Russia. This puts everyone in danger for the sake of more profits for the arms and security industries – including of course bigger budgets for the CIA. As thankfully the four year agony of Aleppo comes swiftly to a close today, the Saudi and US armed and trained ISIS forces counter by moving to retake Palmyra. This game kills people, on a massive scale, and goes on and on.

Thanks to: http://yournewswire.com



  

bs4ever

avatar
Craig Murray wrote:UK Ambassador: Russia Hacking Claims Are “Bullsh*t”

No shit Sherlock a ok



"आप सिर्फ यह है आप नहीं था क्या मतलब है यह देखने के लिए किया था"

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum