Latest topics
» WHAT IS IT? Massive Lines RETURN Above Earth...
Today at 10:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Body Language: The Bush Sr Funeral
Today at 9:47 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Calling it "mammoth"! - Nearly 400,000 without power
Today at 6:45 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Earthquake Swarm Strikes Off Vancouver Island Coast, Eastern Tennessee Activity
Today at 6:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» DeepMind’s AlphaZero now showing human-like intuition in historical ‘turning point’ for AI
Today at 6:39 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Kabbalah Secrets Revealed! An Expose 2/2 Doreen Dotan
Today at 6:23 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Kabbalah Secrets Revealed! An Expose 1/2 Doreen Dotan
Today at 6:17 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Arrested Huawei CFO’s Bail “Couldn’t Be High Enough”
Today at 5:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Bad-clown Rising - CHRISTMAS REPORT
Today at 4:55 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Hypnosis, truth drugs and remote-operated dogs: Declassified papers on CIA’s 'mind control' research
Today at 2:56 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact
Today at 2:55 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Brexit: The Final Straight?
Today at 12:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Canadian Rally Against Globalists UN Migration Compact (Parliament Building Ottawa)
Today at 12:39 pm by PurpleSkyz

» France - This is NOT about Gas Prices
Today at 12:35 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ UFO Caught On TV News In Texas plus MORE
Today at 12:01 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Eyes Wide Shut
Today at 11:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Alien Researcher Discovers UFO and Owl Accounts That Defy Any Simple Explanation
Today at 10:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» Quantum Healing - Solfeggio 528 Hz
Today at 10:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» #Q Anon Drama Theater: D5 INDICTMENTS? TRAITORS! TREASON! JUSTICE! plus more
Today at 9:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» Strange light CAPTIVATES two men as they watch it GLOW above Lake Ontario
Today at 9:38 am by PurpleSkyz

» How to see Comet 46P/Wirtanen - The Christmas Comet
Today at 9:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» Blue Chicken Cult Update - California WILDFIRE: David Wilcock Exposes the Scorching TRUTH, Exclusive Interview [Part 1/3]
Today at 12:31 am by PurpleSkyz

» Dozens Of UFOs On Mars Captured By The Curiosity Rover
Today at 12:28 am by PurpleSkyz

» Together with Oumuamua there are another 4 Extraterrestrial Visitors registered in the Solar System
Today at 12:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» Easter Island and The Peruvian Red-Haired Elongated Skull Connection
Today at 12:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Popocatepetl volcano eruption December 8, 2018
Today at 12:20 am by PurpleSkyz

Today at 12:17 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Pagan Roots of Christmas
Yesterday at 11:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

Yesterday at 7:22 pm by 4-truth




You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » Results of Obama's eligibility hearing today in GA

Results of Obama's eligibility hearing today in GA

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]




By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a
lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of
course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia
eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a
very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution
and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point,
if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot
in Georgia.

With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen
fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the
attorneys and the appearance of the judge.

Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was
nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing
in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.

Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had
attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He
first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to
Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the
law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that
Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.

After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court,
Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State
attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was
not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.

Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later
telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate
but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.

Game on.

5 minutes.

10 minutes.

15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.

20 minutes.

It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys
return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the
judge’s chambers.

Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to
participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing
Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in
court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?

Certainly not.

Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered
into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966
or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his
father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s
father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents
were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given
citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion
from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and
“Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs
Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not
alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is
pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme
Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs
Happersett opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have
2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the
United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is
that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case,
laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and
the challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents
testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the
Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the
RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish
that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing
their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would
not participate.

Dreams From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered
into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of
Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney
showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing
Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social
Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this
number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977,
shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was
originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and
should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop.
He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is
layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different
parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is
not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This
is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by
Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is
caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document
showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should
not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand
stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same
indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was
issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never
resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others
issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and
different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr.
Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual
with regards to immigration records

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth
records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be
filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen,
he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released
nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.

What can we take away from this?

It’s interesting.

Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.

One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.


Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security
number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in

One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under
the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to
be eligible to serve as President.

What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems
nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence,
because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will
be allowed on the Georgia ballot.

It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.

Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.


What this Judge rules will determine whether or not this is the first DOMINO to FALL...
THANK YOU for sharing this!!!

:flower: ❤ gmaHunniBee ❤ :flower:
Galatians 5:22-23
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law."

Isaiah 40:31
"But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint."


did you get this from that link you posted, because it didn't work for me...?

:flower: ❤ gmaHunniBee ❤ :flower:
Galatians 5:22-23
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law."

Isaiah 40:31
"But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint."


Link still down, but BLESS you for copying and pasting this. We would have no way of knowing this otherwise!

:flower: ❤ gmaHunniBee ❤ :flower:
Galatians 5:22-23
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law."

Isaiah 40:31
"But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint."


Lets see if the court has what it takes to follow thorugh or not ...rick152


Link worked fine for me (Thurs. 1/26 - 9:30 p.m. EST) KathyD


Amen to that rick152!


gmahunni wrote:Link still down, but BLESS you for copying and pasting this. We would have no way of knowing this otherwise!

You're so welcome. This really is a HUGE deal, and most people don't even know it's happening! If enough states follow suit and end up leaving him off of their ballots, he won't have a prayer.


There were a LOT of Presidents with parents both NOT US citizens...........


I just watched this and want to share it here. It's a fascinating, in depth, creative study of the issue of citizenship. While I don't subscribe to the tone of combativeness or the snarky remarks scattered throughout that are derogatory toward liberals, the ingenious way they brought our history alive is incredible! I see the future of education here!

I learned a lot, and had a few giggles watching this:

:flower: ❤ gmaHunniBee ❤ :flower:
Galatians 5:22-23
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law."

Isaiah 40:31
"But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint."


GoldPeg9 wrote:There were a LOT of Presidents with parents both NOT US citizens...........



You are wrong GoldPeg 9 . Need to educate on what has been happening behind the scenes.

The constitution is very clear that the office of the President must have a father and mother both USA citizens at the time of birth. This is to protect America from a person who may have dual loyalties. He may be loyal to Britain and to the USA if he mom is Brit and his father is an American. He is the commander in chief of a large military. Anyway watch this and you will understand that they tried to change the constitution 9 times during 2000-2008 but failed until McCain came along. McCain just helped in this dishonest endeavor.


Evil is in the White House, Congress and the Senate. Time to clean house.


it has happen before , but it should never be allowed to happen again

but its not a LOT!!

Barack Obama's birthplace has been a subject for questioners.
There is a "birther" movement that drew some considerable interest. (See
the related link) But Obama is not the first president to have question
raised about whether he was born in the US.
· Martin Van Buren - First Language Dutch was Dutch and people thought he might have been born in Holland.
· Chester A . Arthur
- born in Northern Vermont, near the Canadian border and parents lived
in Canada for many years and his father was born in Ireland.

Presidential Candidates who have had their Citizenship Questioned
· Christopher Schurmann 1896 Election
· Charles Evans Hughes 1916 Election
· George Romney 1968 Election
· Barry Goldwater 1964 Election
· Lowell Weicker 1980 Election
· Roger Calero 2004 and 2008
· John McCain 2000 and 2008
Read more:


Tell a Friend

Was there an American president who was born in Canada?

According to the U.S constitution, a person can only become president
if he or she is born in the United States. That's why there was some
controversy about whether Chester A. Arthur, the 21st president, should
have had the right to the job.

Arthur was officially listed as being born in Fairfield, Vermont, a
town in the northwest corner of the state near the Canadian border. But
over the years some people have argued that Arthur was in fact born
across the border in Quebec. In fact, Burke's Presidential Families of
the United States of America says that despite the official birthplace,
Arthur "was probably born in Canada." Other sources make the same
claim, almost off-handedly, but argue that since his parents were U.S
citizens Arthur's eligibility for the presidency wasn't challenged.

But in fact, his eligibility was challenged around 1881 when Arthur
was the vice-presidential candidate running with James Garfield.
Several of Arthur's political enemies spread rumours that he was born in
Canada and should be disqualified from the race. According to Thomas
C. Reeves, a biographer of Arthur's, the Democrats hired a New York
attorney named Arthur Hinman to explore these rumours and make a report.
Hinman seems to have gotten carried away because he came back saying
that Arthur was born in Ireland and was brought to the U.S. as a boy of
14. However, Hinman abandoned this theory and later alleged that Arthur
was born in Quebec (Lower Canada at the time) at his grandparents'
house. Hinman says Arthur's mother often visited her parents in Dunham
in Quebec. Hinman published a pamphlet in 1884 called "How A British
Subject Became President of the United States."

Another biographer George Howe describes this theory as "an
interesting hoax" that received little attention at the time. Because
many people saw Garfield as a young, vital president, they probably
didn't have to worry much about Arthur's background.

However, in 1881, Garfield was assassinated, and Arthur became
president. Apparently one acquaintance was heard to say in disbelief,
"Good God, Chet Arthur, President of the United States." Arthur had
never held elected office in his life, but had been more of a backroom
political figure. He also distinguished himself as a lawyer fighting a
case in which he defended a black woman who had been kicked off a
streetcar. His win in that case eventually led to the desegregation of
the New York transportation system.

The day after Arthur took the presidential oath, the New York Sun ran
an article refuting the claims about Arthur being born in Canada.

But there are interesting tidbits surrounding this story. First,
several sources list Arthur's birth date as October 5, 1830, but Reeves
said Arthur was actually born October 5, 1829 and changed the date out
of vanity. Arthur's father was an Irish immigrant who first came to
Canada, living in Stanstead and Dunham, Quebec and eventually preached
in communities in both Quebec and Vermont. Arthur's mother, Malvina,
did live in Quebec for a time and her parents lived there until the
1850s. As well, before he died, Arthur destroyed all his personal
papers. And while Arthur was listed as being born in Fairfield, some
residents believe he was really born in nearby Waterville, Vermont.

Reeve and other scholars (and most people of the time) dismiss
Hinman's claim, but it was quite an elaborate story. According to
Hinman, the Arthurs had three sons, William Chester Alan, who was born
in Dunham, Quebec, Chester Abell who was born in Fairfield, and William
born in Hinesburgh, Vermont. When the second William was born, William
Chester dropped his "William" name and went by Chester Alan (he's the
one who became president). He retained the named Chester because his
other brother Chester Abell had died in infancy and so now the "Chester"
name was available. He also appropriated the birth record of this
second brother so that he could sustain his American citizenship, Hinman

And as for why there was no record of this death of the second son,
Hinman argued that Arthur's father had sold the body to a medical
school. In the end, there seemed to be no proof of this claim that
Arthur was born in Canada, and there is a marker in Vermont pointing out
where the 21st president was supposedly born. Arthur died Nov. 18,

GoldPeg9 wrote:There were a LOT of Presidents with parents both NOT US citizens...........

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum