Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Threats are Inappropriate
2012 September 12
Posted by Steve Beckow
Several
lightworkers wrote me today to suggest that I might want to read Greg
Giles’ latest message. When I did, I was surprised to find a strong
condemnation of those who won’t post their messages coming from beings
claiming to reside in the Fifth Dimension and higher.
I’ve reproduced the offending parts of the message from Greg’s
sources below so that you can read them. As I discuss below, I bear no
animosity towards Greg, but I do disagree with his sources.
Let me contrast their words, given below, with those of Hatonn and
Ashtar, given through Suzy Ward, in addressing questions about the
reliability of other channels who purported to be channeling them. I
think you can see the gulf between the ways that Hatonn and Ashtar speak
and the way the “GFL” has.
Hatonn characterized himself as being forthright in his comments.
“Suzy was about to reply … and I told
her, let me handle this. I’m more forthright than either my
gentler-speaking colleague Matthew or my dear little friend Suzy.” (1)
And yet as forthright as he is, he confesses that he will not
interfere with what other channels say or with their freewill to say it,
including those who purport to channel him:
“I cannot interfere with this false
information, which I’ll admit is frustrating, but the free will aspect
of all involved can’t be infringed upon.” (2)
He repeated his unwillingness to intervene or infringe on freewill in a second letter.
“Hatonn here. … everyone is responsible
for his or her choices. Sometimes, quite often in fact, those choices
make my job of getting the truth ‘out here’ down to Earth extremely
frustrating. There’s no way I can cut off the sources of false
information—even when they’re attributing it to me!—or keep others from
believing that information is true and passing it on.” (3)
In a third letter from Suzy Ward, Ashtar said he would not interfere with those who purport to channel him and don’t.
“Steve, this is Ashtar. … When I say
something, it has substance, not the blathering she says [XXX says] she
is hearing from me. But like Hatonn, I can’t put a stop to anyone
attaching my name to whatever they wish.” (4)
Hatonn recommends that we consult our own inner messengers in responding to channeled messages.
“Now I’ll say what Matthew would — he
does in all such situations — and that is, pay attention to your
sensations, your intuition or instincts or impressions! You know that
those come from your soul and are far better indicators of what is truth
and what isn’t than any analyzing you could ever do. It is the time —
past the time! — for separating the negative from the positive
intentions, so follow your soul’s messages in using my information as
the light warrior you are.” (3)
Hatonn concludes by decrying false information coming from unreliable channels.
“There’s no time for false information to
keep getting bandied about, misinforming or at least confusing people
who rely on ‘news from “beyond”‘ so they’ll know what to think and do. …
It’s time for the truth to be known to all, and the truth is within
each soul! How many times has Matthew said this, but how many of the
people who know him as a trusted source are applying his words?” (6)
So Hatonn and Ashtar (both leading figures in the Galactic Federation
of Light) will not interfere with our freewill whereas Greg’s “GFL”
sources today do attempt to interfere with and infringe upon the
freewill of others, which is one reason why I reject that message (not
Greg, but the message) as not being genuinely from the GFL.
Now let me respond to what Greg’s “GFL” has written. And while I do so firmly, I don’t respond with rancor.
First of all, I don’t believe that higher-dimensional galactics would
speak in the harsh manner that these purported representatives of the
GFL spoke in Greg’s column today.
Secondly, no matter who it is that is speaking, as one of the people
who has dropped Greg’s columns because I don’t honor his sources, I say
without hostility but with firmness to the “GFL”: I will not be bullied
by anyone, whether of this dimension or higher. I will not be silenced
by threats or take up a course of action my heart urges me not to.
Thirdly, we here publish the GFL messages from SaLuSa, Blossom’s
sources, Suzy Ward, the Arcturian Group, Mira, and numerous others. We
are well covered and can receive messages from the GFL through channels
other than this one if we need to. It is not as if we don’t listen to
the GFL.
Fourthly, these other sources we publish not only do not predict the
kinds of catastrophic Earth changes that Greg’s sources do; they deny
that they will happen, as Archangel Michael has also said to me on
several occasions.
I therefore find communications such as were released today to be
inappropriate and uncharacteristic of the GFL in particular and
higher-dimensional beings in general. We will not publish these
messages. But people who wish to read them can do so quite easily on http://www.ascensionearth2012.org/.
Perhaps I can share the kind words that Archangel Michael has said to
me about Greg. I do ask AAM regularly about channels to help guide me
around who to post and who not to. I don’t post his words on this
subject often, though I guide myself by them, but I will here.
Archangel Michael has consistently said of Greg that he is sincere,
hard-working and clear. At the same time, he has denied that some of the
messages coming through Greg are accurate; specifically those that
predict disaster. So in my eyes, the problem does not lie with Greg but
with his sources.
Finally, I also know that this is all illusion. While it’s necessary
to “play the game” and play it honorably so as to evolve, I don’t give
these events any more reality and credence than as matters being played
out to develop integrity – on both Greg’s part and my own.
So Greg, I bear you no animosity, even if I disagree with your sources.
Namaste (I bow before you).
Footnotes
(1) First Letter from Hatonn, April 6, 2012.
(2) Second Letter from Hatonn, July 30, 2009.
(3) Loc. cit.
(4) Third Letter from Hatonn, Aug. 3, 2012.
(5) Second Letter, ibid.
(6) Third Letter, ibid.
Thanks to: http://the2012scenario.com
and: http://kauilapele.wordpress.com
2012 September 12
Posted by Steve Beckow
Severallightworkers wrote me today to suggest that I might want to read Greg
Giles’ latest message. When I did, I was surprised to find a strong
condemnation of those who won’t post their messages coming from beings
claiming to reside in the Fifth Dimension and higher.
I’ve reproduced the offending parts of the message from Greg’s
sources below so that you can read them. As I discuss below, I bear no
animosity towards Greg, but I do disagree with his sources.
Let me contrast their words, given below, with those of Hatonn and
Ashtar, given through Suzy Ward, in addressing questions about the
reliability of other channels who purported to be channeling them. I
think you can see the gulf between the ways that Hatonn and Ashtar speak
and the way the “GFL” has.
Hatonn characterized himself as being forthright in his comments.
“Suzy was about to reply … and I told
her, let me handle this. I’m more forthright than either my
gentler-speaking colleague Matthew or my dear little friend Suzy.” (1)
And yet as forthright as he is, he confesses that he will not
interfere with what other channels say or with their freewill to say it,
including those who purport to channel him:
“I cannot interfere with this false
information, which I’ll admit is frustrating, but the free will aspect
of all involved can’t be infringed upon.” (2)
He repeated his unwillingness to intervene or infringe on freewill in a second letter.
“Hatonn here. … everyone is responsible
for his or her choices. Sometimes, quite often in fact, those choices
make my job of getting the truth ‘out here’ down to Earth extremely
frustrating. There’s no way I can cut off the sources of false
information—even when they’re attributing it to me!—or keep others from
believing that information is true and passing it on.” (3)
In a third letter from Suzy Ward, Ashtar said he would not interfere with those who purport to channel him and don’t.
“Steve, this is Ashtar. … When I say
something, it has substance, not the blathering she says [XXX says] she
is hearing from me. But like Hatonn, I can’t put a stop to anyone
attaching my name to whatever they wish.” (4)
Hatonn recommends that we consult our own inner messengers in responding to channeled messages.
“Now I’ll say what Matthew would — he
does in all such situations — and that is, pay attention to your
sensations, your intuition or instincts or impressions! You know that
those come from your soul and are far better indicators of what is truth
and what isn’t than any analyzing you could ever do. It is the time —
past the time! — for separating the negative from the positive
intentions, so follow your soul’s messages in using my information as
the light warrior you are.” (3)
Hatonn concludes by decrying false information coming from unreliable channels.
“There’s no time for false information to
keep getting bandied about, misinforming or at least confusing people
who rely on ‘news from “beyond”‘ so they’ll know what to think and do. …
It’s time for the truth to be known to all, and the truth is within
each soul! How many times has Matthew said this, but how many of the
people who know him as a trusted source are applying his words?” (6)
So Hatonn and Ashtar (both leading figures in the Galactic Federation
of Light) will not interfere with our freewill whereas Greg’s “GFL”
sources today do attempt to interfere with and infringe upon the
freewill of others, which is one reason why I reject that message (not
Greg, but the message) as not being genuinely from the GFL.
Now let me respond to what Greg’s “GFL” has written. And while I do so firmly, I don’t respond with rancor.
First of all, I don’t believe that higher-dimensional galactics would
speak in the harsh manner that these purported representatives of the
GFL spoke in Greg’s column today.
Secondly, no matter who it is that is speaking, as one of the people
who has dropped Greg’s columns because I don’t honor his sources, I say
without hostility but with firmness to the “GFL”: I will not be bullied
by anyone, whether of this dimension or higher. I will not be silenced
by threats or take up a course of action my heart urges me not to.
Thirdly, we here publish the GFL messages from SaLuSa, Blossom’s
sources, Suzy Ward, the Arcturian Group, Mira, and numerous others. We
are well covered and can receive messages from the GFL through channels
other than this one if we need to. It is not as if we don’t listen to
the GFL.
Fourthly, these other sources we publish not only do not predict the
kinds of catastrophic Earth changes that Greg’s sources do; they deny
that they will happen, as Archangel Michael has also said to me on
several occasions.
I therefore find communications such as were released today to be
inappropriate and uncharacteristic of the GFL in particular and
higher-dimensional beings in general. We will not publish these
messages. But people who wish to read them can do so quite easily on http://www.ascensionearth2012.org/.
Perhaps I can share the kind words that Archangel Michael has said to
me about Greg. I do ask AAM regularly about channels to help guide me
around who to post and who not to. I don’t post his words on this
subject often, though I guide myself by them, but I will here.
Archangel Michael has consistently said of Greg that he is sincere,
hard-working and clear. At the same time, he has denied that some of the
messages coming through Greg are accurate; specifically those that
predict disaster. So in my eyes, the problem does not lie with Greg but
with his sources.
Finally, I also know that this is all illusion. While it’s necessary
to “play the game” and play it honorably so as to evolve, I don’t give
these events any more reality and credence than as matters being played
out to develop integrity – on both Greg’s part and my own.
So Greg, I bear you no animosity, even if I disagree with your sources.
Namaste (I bow before you).
Footnotes
(1) First Letter from Hatonn, April 6, 2012.
(2) Second Letter from Hatonn, July 30, 2009.
(3) Loc. cit.
(4) Third Letter from Hatonn, Aug. 3, 2012.
(5) Second Letter, ibid.
(6) Third Letter, ibid.
Thanks to: http://the2012scenario.com
and: http://kauilapele.wordpress.com
