You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » TRUTH IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES » CONSPIRACY & FALSE FLAG EVENTS: PAST & PRESENT » 9/11 ~ Questions to Ask if You Still Believe the Official Narrative

9/11 ~ Questions to Ask if You Still Believe the Official Narrative

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin
September 11, 2001: Questions to Ask if You Still Believe the Official Narrative



September 11, 2017
By Tony Cartalucci
The attacks of September 11, 2001 (9/11) left nearly 3,000 dead in NYC, Washington D.C. and over Pennsylvania. The attacks transformed America into a deepening police state at home and a nation perpetually at war abroad.
The official narrative claims that 19 hijackers representing Al Qaeda took over 4 commercial aircraft to carry out attacks on New York City’s World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington D.C.
The event served as impetus for the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan which continues to present day. It also led directly to the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Attempts to cite the attack to precipitate a war with Iran and other members of the so-called “Axis of Evil” (Libya, Syria, North Korea, and Cuba) have also been made.
And if this is the version of reality one subscribes to, several questions remain worth asking.
1. Can the similarities between 9/11 and plans drawn up by the US Department of Defense (DoD) and Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) in 1962 under the code name “Operation Northwoods” be easily dismissed? 
The US DoD and JCS wrote a detailed plan almost identical to the 9/11 attacks as early as 1962 called “Operation Northwoods” where the US proposed hijacking commercial airliners, committing terrorist attacks, and blaming Cuba to justify a US military intervention.

Far from a fringe conspiracy theory, mainstream media outlets including ABC News would cover the document in articles like, “U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba,” which would report:
In the early 1960s, America’s top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba’s then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.

A full PDF copy of the document is available via George Washington University’s archives and states specifically regarding the hijacking of commercial aircraft:
An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.
The document also cites the USS Maine in describing the sort of event the DoD-JCS sought to stage, a US warship whose destruction was used to maliciously provoke the Spanish-American War. It should be noted, that unlike the DoD-JCS document’s suggestion that airliner-related casualties be staged, the USS Maine explosion killed 260 sailors. It is likely that DoD and JCS would not risk engineering a provocation that leads to major war but allow low-level operators left alive with the knowledge of what they had participated in.
Considering that the US sought to deceive the public in order to provoke an unjustifiable war that would undoubtedly kill thousands or tens of thousands of innocent people, and that other proposals did include killing innocent people, it is worth considering that US policymakers would also be just as willing to extinguish innocent lives when staging the hijacking of aircraft to provoke such a war.
2. Why did US policymakers draw up extensive plans to reassert US global hegemony – including regime change in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen – without any conceivable pretext until 9/11 conveniently unfolded? 
In 2000, US policymakers from the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) sought a sweeping plan to reassert America as a global hegemon. In a 90-page document titled, “Rebuilding America’s Defense: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century” (PDF), a strategy for maintaining what it called “American military preeminence” would be laid out in detail.
It involved global moves the United States – in 2000 – could never justify, including placing US troops in Southeast Asia, building a global missile defense network prohibited by treaties signed during the Cold War, and the containment of developing nations that would eventually end up rolling back US global hegemony in the near future, including Iran, Iraq, China, North Korea, Libya, and Syria.
The report noted the difficulties of proposing and executing the transformations necessary to achieve the objectives laid out in the document. It would be explicitly stated that:
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
In fact, the entire body of the document is an uncanny description of the post-9/11 “international order,” an order unimaginable had the events of 9/11 not transpired.
It should also be remembered that wars predicated on 9/11 like the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, were admittedly planned before 9/11 took place.
The Guardian in its 2004 article, “Bush team ‘agreed plan to attack the Taliban the day before September 11’,” would report:
The day before the September 11 attacks, the Bush administration agreed on a plan to oust the Taliban regime in Afghanistan by force if it refused to hand over Osama bin Laden, according to a report by a bipartisan commission of inquiry. The report pointed out that agreement on the plan, which involved a steady escalation of pressure over three years, had been repeatedly put off by the Clinton and Bush administrations, despite the repeated failure of attempts to use diplomatic and economic pressure.
While it seems inconceivable that the American or global public would tolerate the multi-trillion dollar 16 year war that the invasion of Afghanistan has become without the attacks on 9/11, such a war was admittedly in the making – in fact – years before 9/11 unfolded.
Similarly, the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was strongly linked to the aftermath of 9/11, but was likewise decided upon long before 9/11 unfolded.
CNN in its article, “O’Neill: Bush planned Iraq invasion before 9/11,” would report:
The Bush administration began planning to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq within days after the former Texas governor entered the White House three years ago, former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill told CBS News’ 60 Minutes.

This echoes similar statements made by US Army General Wesley Clark who repeatedly warned that the US sought globe-spanning war post-Cold War to assert its hegemony over the planet, and fully sought to use 9/11 as a pretext to do it.
General Clark would list seven nations slated for regime change post 9/11, including Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen – all nations now either at war or facing war with the United States and its proxies – or in the case of Libya – entirely divided and destroyed in the wake of US military operations.
3. If primarily Saudi hijackers with Saudi money and Saudi organization perpetrated the attacks of 9/11, why has the United States waged war or threatened war with every nation in the Middle East except Saudi Arabia and its allies? 
Not only has the United States made no moves against Saudi Arabia for its apparent role in the 9/11 attacks – spanning the administrations of US President George Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump – the United States has sold Saudi Arabia billions in arms, provided military support and protection to Saudi Arabia’s military and government, partnered with Saudi Arabia in its ongoing conflict with Yemen – all while US government documents and leaked e-mails between US politicians reveal Saudi Arabia is still a state sponsor of Al Qaeda – the organization officially blamed for the 9/11 attacks.

Indeed, a 2012 US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report would explicitly admit:
If the situation unravels there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).
The DIA memo then explains exactly who this “Salafist principality’s” supporters are:
The West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition; while Russia, China, and Iran support the regime.

Alive After Crisis - Complimentary E-Book (Ad)


This “Salafist principality” is now known as the “Islamic State,” an affiliate of Al Qaeda still operating with significant state sponsorship everywhere from Syria, Iraq, and Libya, to the Philippines and beyond.
Coincidentally, Saudi-armed and -funded terrorists in the Philippines has served as a pretext for US military assets to begin expanding their presence in Southeast Asia, just as the aforementioned 2000 PNAC document had sought.
Additionally, in a 2014 e-mail between US Counselor to the President John Podesta and former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, it would be admitted that two of America’s closest regional allies – Saudi Arabia and Qatar – were providing financial and logistical support to the Islamic State.
The e-mail, leaked to the public through WikiLeaks, stated:
…we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to [the Islamic State] and other radical Sunni groups in the region.
While the e-mail portrays the US in a fight against the very “Salafist” (Islamic) “principality” (State) it sought to create and use as a strategic asset in 2012, the fact that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are both acknowledged as state sponsors of the terrorist organization – and are both still enjoying immense military, economic, and political support from the United States and its European allies – indicates just how disingenuous America’s “war on terror” really is.
If the US truly believed Al Qaeda carried out the deadly attacks of 9/11, why does it count among its closest allies two of Al Qaeda’s largest and most prolific state sponsors?
Together – by honestly answering these three questions – we are left considering the very real possibility that 9/11 was not a terrorist attack carried out by foreign terrorists, but rather an attack engineered by special interests within the United States itself.
If we reject that conclusion, we must ask ourselves why the US DoD and JCS would take the time to draft plans for false flag attacks if they did not believe they were viable options US policymakers might seriously consider. At the very least we must ask why those at the DoD and JCS could be caught signing and dating a conspiracy to commit unspeakable terrorism to justify an unjust war and not only avoid criminal charges, but remain employed within the US government.
We must also ask ourselves why US policymakers would draft long-term plans for reasserting American global hegemony without any conceivable pretext to justify such plans. Even in the wake of 9/11, the US government found it difficult to sell the invasion of Iraq to the American public and its allies. Without 9/11, such salesmanship would have been impossible. In Syria – with 9/11 disappearing into the distant past – US regime change efforts have all but stalled.
Finally, we must find adequate explanations as to why those sponsoring the supposed perpetrators of 9/11 have remained recipients of unwavering American support, weapon sales, and both political and military protection. We must attempt to answer why militants fighting in Syria under the banner of Al Qaeda have been able to openly operate out of NATO-member Turkey’s territory for the past 6 years, side-by-side US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) personnel who are admittedly fueling the conflict with weapons, money, and training “accidentally” ending up in Al Qaeda’s hands.
It is clear – that at the very least – the official narrative in no shape, form, or way adds up. If the official narrative doesn’t add up, what does?
You can read more from Tony Cartalucci at his site Land Destroyer Report, where this article first appeared.




Thanks to: https://www.activistpost.com



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin
Alaska University: Impossible That WTC Building 7 Collapsed By Small Fires As Claimed By NIST

September 11, 2017

By Aaron Kesel
The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) was tasked with investigating how World Trade Center 7 fell on 9/11; the findings were live-streamed a few days ago. The team found that WTC 7 did not fall due to fire, contradicting NIST who said the building collapsed from structural damages due to the fire.


By Mercury, Chicago’s Skyline Cruiseline
The presentation was presented by Dr. Leroy Hulsey. Hulsey spoke about the building, its design, as well as the methods the team used to determine their first of two conclusions. The first part of the experiment is finished; the UAF team found that WTC7 did not collapse due to fire. The next part of the study is to map out the building’s structural system’s response and what would have had to happen in order for it to fall down. The report was published on Thursday on the UAF’s website.



https://youtu.be/vMV8E_83NiI

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) opened an investigation into the collapses of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 in August 2002. NIST released its final report on WTC 7 in 2008, finding that the fires that were ignited by falling debris from WTC 1 caused the collapse of WTC 7. Independent researchers, however, have assembled evidence that has raised profound questions regarding the notion that WTC 7 collapsed because of fire.

The study was backed by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth; the researchers used a virtual model of the building to conduct the investigation.
Last year, Activist Post talked to the Director of Strategy and Development for A&E 9/11 Truth, Ted Walter, who is also in charge of working with the professor and raised the money to fund the WTC 7 Evaluation. Walter previously told Activist Post that “the project began in May 2015 and should wrap up in April of next year.” That deadline was passed but the study should wrap up in October according to the project’s website.
The reported failure was simulated using three-dimensional finite element computer models of the building. The research team studied the building’s response using two finite element programs, ABAQUS and SAP2000 version 18.
Three types of evaluations were performed:

  1. the planar response of the structural elements to the fire(s) using wire elements.
  2. the building’s response using the NIST’s approach with solid elements; and lastly.
  3. the validity of NIST’s findings using solid elements. At the macro-level, progressive collapse, i.e., the structural system’s response to local failures, is being studied using SAP2000 with wire elements, as well as with ABAQUS, and it is near completion.

The study concluded:
“The findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building. Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously,” the website for the study noted.
The building’s structural system’s response to local failures is being studied using SAP2000 with wire elements, as well as with ABAQUS, and it is near completion according to the website for the study.
Former U.S. Congressional staffer Susan Lindauer, a CIA asset, has previously said that she was told by her CIA handler Richard Fuisz not to return to New York City in September of 2001 and that it would be ‘far too dangerous’ to do so due to an ‘imminent’ detonation of a miniature thermonuclear device.

Alive After Crisis - Complimentary E-Book (Ad)








https://youtu.be/fAawF22QUMs

Interestingly enough, a peer-reviewed scientific publication identified the presence of nano-thermite in the WTC rubble. One of the critical aspects of that paper has been confirmed by Chemical Engineer Mark Basile.
A draft report of UAF’s current re-evaluation will be “released in October or November 2017 and will be open for public comment for a six-week period, allowing for input from the public and the engineering community with a final report to be published in early 2018,” www.wtc7evaluation.org, noted.
Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post and is Director of Content for Coinivore. Follow Aaron at Twitter and Steemit.
This article is Creative Commons and can be republished in full with attribution. Like Activist Post on Facebook, subscribe on YouTube, follow on Twitter and at Steemit.
Image Credit: Anthony Freda Art


Thanks to: https://www.activistpost.com



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin



15 Disturbing Facts About 9/11 You’ll Wish Weren’t True

September 11, 2017 Openhearted Rebel 

By Arjun Walia, Collective Evolution
When it comes to the American people, and the global population not believing in an “official explanation” for an event, 9/11 is at the top of the list, along with many others, unfortunately. Democracy doesn’t really seem to exist. Instead, we have what I like to refer to as the “illusion of democracy.” We believe we are making choices through voting, but our choices are severely limited. The corporate and financial world have gripped the United States government, and will not remove their claws.
Today, in large part, democrats and republicans are just “two wings of the same bird, and the flight path never changes.” We are constantly pointing our fingers at presidents and politicians who seem to be the “fall” people for the even bigger, larger, and more powerful Deep State.
Political parties are supposed to adhere to the people, but today they are simply “tools of corrupt interest which use them impartially to serve their selfish purposes,” as Theodore Roosevelt once told us. He and many others gave reference to this secret government, or the Deep State, emphasizing that “behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government, owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”
16 years later, 9/11 still serves as a wake up call for humanity to acknowledge this Deep State, and the corrupt interests that control the US government, and what seems to be the entire western military alliance, puppeteered by those within—what Eisenhower coined as, “The Military Industrial Complex.”
More than half of the American people today don’t believe the official story that the government put out with regard to 9/11. This is a long list, full of thousands of architects, engineers, scientists, military and political whistleblowers, and more.
“All three buildings were destroyed by carefully planned, orchestrated and executed controlled demolition.”
– Professor Lynn Margulis, Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts at Amherst and National Academy of Science member, one of many academics who has been very outspoken regarding 9/11 (source) ([url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=QBO1f_7roJ0C&pg=PA152&lpg=PA152&dq=All+three+buildings+were+by+carefully+planned,+orchestrated+and+executed+controlled+demolition&source=bl&ots=EQJtgST_yw&sig=ZAws4z1-jpZqZT7sesDkQSWPjpo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAGoVChMI-c7Y4o-NxgIVig2SCh10rwD1#v=onepage&q=All three buildings were by carefully planned%2C orchestrated and executed controlled]source[/url])
For example, just last year physicists published a study titled “15 Years Later, On The Physics Of High-Rise Building Collapses” in the European Scientific Journal.
In it, they conclude that:
It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.
Now, Dr. J Leroy Hulsey, chair of the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, has teamed up with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth to commence a rigorous academic study into what really caused building 7 to collapse. World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC) is the building that collapsed on 9/11 despite only experiencing some small fires on a couple of floors — it was not hit by a plane. It’s the same building that multiple mainstream media outlets reported as having collapsed before it actually did. See one example from the BBC here.  Check him out for more info.
They recently concluded their study, and determined that it was indeed a controlled demolition. You can read more about that and access the study here.
The point is, the examples are endless; multiple firefighters have also expressed that they heard bombs go off in the lobby.
Don’t forget about the thousands of architects and engineers that crushed the official “911 commission report,” which is also mentioned in the video below.
There are so many points to discuss, show, and so much information out there for anybody who is willing to look, beyond the mainstream media narrative. We’ve covered this information in depth in multiple articles that we’ve been publishing on our site over the years. To check those out, please click HERE.
Below is a video from HighImplactFlix, titled “15 disturbing 9/11 facts you’ll wish weren’t true.” In it, he provides links to the sources of his information, and urges the viewers to do their own research, and I agree.
As a researcher myself, it’s of the utmost importance to gather information from multiple sources, and do your own fact checking instead of letting somebody else do it for you. This is critical thinking, and it’s needed by all of us today, especially in a world where we rely on a television set and corporate media to tell us “what is.”
The main take home message of 9/11 is that 16 years later, it’s still serving humanity, it’s serving as an opportunity to wake up and see. The global elite constantly use tragedy, pain, and memorials on T.V. to “honor” those that lost their lives that way, but to me, it seems they do this to further push the “terror” threat, so they can justify the invasion of other countries from ulterior motives, and much more.
9/11 might have been the pinnacle of false flag terrorism, something that continues on a regular basis today.

Thanks to Wes at: https://openheartedrebel.com



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin
Sacha Stone
2 hrs ·



Thanks to Sasha via facebook



Today i do not acknowledge the anniversary of a shadow government sponsored crime of epochal ramifications. Instead i honor the life and work of Dr Judy Wood. I was honored to moderate the Global Breakthrough Energy conference in Holland in 2012 where she presented 9/11 evidences to destroy the grotesquely insulting official narrative. Sitting next to her at a press panel at the convention i turned to her and asked her what really happened that day? She told me that it was the casting of an epic dream spell, one which was designed to spellbind the entire world into cognitive dissonance at a civilisations level. An occultic event designed to hurl us back into blood economy and justify a monumental sacrifice of innocents. Of course she continues to be proven right...
Sacha Stone /\
.......................................................
This is only a small fraction of the large and conclusive body of verifiable, forensic evidence from 9/11 that Dr. Judy Wood has assembled. "My intellectual integrity prevents me from calling this a collapse. This is why I have chosen to stand up. My conscience leaves me no other choice." -Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D (Materials Science Engineering) www.wheredidthetowersgo.com | www.drjudywood.com
Humankind has made a major scientific discovery by learning to manipulate matter using directed energy in a new and extremely powerful way. This is one of the most important scientific discoveries since the nuclear fission technology that was used to create the atomic bomb. It is an irrefutable fact that directed energy technology was used to transform the WTC buildings to fine dust in midair on 9/11/2001. This inescapable conclusion is revealed by the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, and is overwhelmingly proven beyond any reasonable doubt. I have already contacted numerous law enforcement agencies and government officials about this matter, including the FBI, branches of the military, my local sheriffs department, and several congressional representatives.
Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology http://www.facebook.com/drjudywood/videos/1341127552618534
I hope you are brave enough to consider my words with an open mind, and to not look negatively upon me for my attempts to make our world a better place. The powerful knowledge that is conclusively revealed by the large body of evidence from 9/11 can help to rapidly bring more truth, justice, and liberty to our great nation and awesome planet, so please take the time to learn about and understand this extremely important topic. I must stress to you that despite the negative connotations associated with the tragedy of the 9/11 attacks, you may someday agree with me that 9/11 is one of the primary reasons that immensely positive changes and increasing levels of citizen activism are sweeping across our planet at a more rapid pace than ever before. To better understand my intention in sharing this information, please consider the following words from Martin Luther King Jr. "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." -Martin Luther King Jr. (I Have a Dream: Writings and Speeches That Changed the World)
This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland).
http://www.facebook.com/drjudywood/photos/a.108769095854392.12444.108768449187790/516718861726078
Source: http://drjudywood.com/ & http://vimeo.com/57923364
9/11 is irrefutable proof that highly advanced forms of energy technology, such as those discovered and inspired by the great Nikola Tesla, do indeed exist and could be providing our entire planet with a breakthrough form of energy technology, right now. 9/11 is irrefutable proof that countless lives and resources have been wasted on wars of death and destruction, all as a result of an extremely inaccurate, unscientific story, when these precious lives and resources could instead be used to improve our awesome country and planet. Most importantly, 9/11 is irrefutable proof that each and every one of us is capable of seeing straight through the deception and dishonesty by thinking critically and studying the available facts for ourselves, which is a self-empowering and life-transforming fact. The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11, gathered and assembled by materials science engineer Dr. Judy Wood PhD, is conclusive and irrefutable, so one only needs to study it in detail to prove this beyond any reasonable doubt, no theories or speculation are necessary.
IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: http://www.youtube.com/watch…
Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.
9/11 & Directed Energy Technology [Evidence-Packed Slideshow | 500 Slides]: http://www.slideshare.net/jps2041/dr-judy-wood-911
Thanks to communication technology and passionate activism that are currently spreading throughout our world, this is the best chance we have ever had in all of history to escape this dishonesty and corruption, so we may create a magnificent future guided by truth, justice, freedom, peace, and love, for our children and all future generations. With all of my heart, I request that you please study the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 in great detail, for our entire planet and everything on it will benefit if you do.
http://WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
http://DrJudyWood.com
http://CheckTheEvidence.com
http://Facebook.com/DrJudyWood
http://pookzta.blogspot.com
http://Irrefutable.tv
Sincerely,
-Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, M.D.
PGY4 Neurological Surgery
B.S. Biology/Neurobiology
#Fact #911Truth #September11th #September11th2001 #Politics #Military #MilitaryIndustrialComplex #War #ForeignPolicy #Corruption #Freedom #Liberty #Truth #Conclusive #Verifiable #Proven #Irrefutable #Evidence #Justice #Peace #Knowledge #Science #Physics #Chemistry #Energy #NYC #NewYork #USA #UnitedStates #America










  

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum