You are not connected. Please login or register



Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]



Sept. 18, 2012

JESUITS (1): http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/vatican_jesuits.htm#menu

JESUITS (2): http://vaticannewworldorder.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2012-09-03T14:05:00-07:00&max-results=7&start=3&by-date=false
13 PAPAL BLOODLINES: http://vaticannewworldorder.blogspot.com/2011/12/ptolemaic-papal-bloodlines-orsini_21.html
Leo Zagami: Purported current and former high-level member of the Illuminati turned whistleblower HERE:
and HERE: http://www.leozagami.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=18

Holy Smoke and Mirrors – The Vatican Conspiracy (David Guyatt)
ITCCS - International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State

1765-1783 – American Revolutionary War Period
During the decades preceding the American Revolution, the East India Company, while still continuing to amass great wealth through the opium trade, changed its name to the British East India Company. They were intimately involved in financing every aspect of the American revolutionary war, having had their orders sent down directly from the puppet masters wielding ultimate control from behind the curtain within the Vatican. Make no mistake, though: The founders of the United States constitution, the likes of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, etc., were very well aware of the existence of these groups. It is for this very reason that they attempted to break away from what they perceived as the oligarchical and tyrannical rule of the British monarchy, for they knew full well what was happening in the Far East with the opium trade. It was no secret that during this time in history, a vast amount of the land, resources, and wealth in England were controlled by a very small number of people, and the majority of the populace played the role of serfs to the ruling elites. For a time, England did lose control of the New World to the victorious colonial forces and to the founders of the constitution. This situation, however, was not to last for very long.
1815 – Nathan Rothschild ‘purchases’ England
“Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.”
Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

On the early morning of June 20th, 1815, Nathan Rothschild, one of five sons of Mayer Amschel Bauer, pulled off one of the most devious financial schemes in history. Less than two days prior, in the late evening hours of June 18th, 1815, Napoleon was defeated at the battle of Waterloo by an allied alliance led by England. This ended the Napoleonic wars. Nathan Rothschild, at that time an already wealthy and influential individual, was able to get word of the allied victory, (through a private messenger), several hours prior to the official announcement to the rest of the public. In a bold and deceptive move, Rothschild began selling off vast amounts of British consuls or consolidated annuities, essentially what would today be called stocks. When other investors throughout the country noticed this action by Rothschild, a mode of panic began to set in. Everyone assumed that Rothschild’s actions signaled that Waterloo was a victory for Napoleon, NOT for the allied forces, with the implication being that the value of the consuls would drop in the case of a French victory. A large number of folks followed suit, selling off their consuls in anticipation of a French takeover of the country. Then, moments before the official announcement was made that Napoleon had been defeated, Rothschild bought up a massive amount of consuls at rock bottom prices. The announcement was made, the value of the consuls soared, and Nathan found himself with an increase of wealth 6,500 times more than what he had previously owned. In essence, he robbed the country blind, and became, for all accounts and purposes, the owners of most of England. From this point forward his family, with now more wealth than they could have dreamed, became an influential player in the government, and steered policy decisions going forward. It also bears noting that this scheme by Rothschild was historically important for another reason: It showed how ‘fabricating’ disaster can lead to massive financial gains.

Through the use of the funding provided by such wealthy individuals as Nathan Rothschild and others, the British East India Company eventually morphed into The Committee of 300: A group of 300 global elitists who adopted a secret policy of domination over the Western world. The British monarchy, which stood at the upper echelon of this new power structure, had itself amassed grand wealth as part of the opium trade. The idea behind their plan of domination was quite simple: Whomever could control the world’s wealth could ultimately exert a massive amount of power and influence over the planet.
It is well documented that people such as the Rothschilds and the monarchs of Britain viewed the mainstream populace as insignificant slaves, often referred to as the ‘masses or the ‘useless eaters’. From this point forward, a very small number of people began to control a vast amount of Europe’s resources, land, and finances. The populace played the role of pawns on a grand chessboard, serving the needs of the elite while being blissfully unaware of what was going on behind the curtain.

1865 – The American Civil War

In the decades that both preceded and followed the American civil war, The Committee of 300, the Jesuits and the 13 Papal Bloodline families began an overt attempt to exert influence over, and to regain control of, the United States of America. The British monarchy accomplished this in much the same way that it had previously done throughout England: Through the control of land, resources, and finances. By aligning themselves with wealthy individuals such as J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Mellon, Paul Warburg, and E.H. Harriman (many of whom had become quite rich through their efforts in acting as defense contractors as part of the war effort), the same scheme was enacted all over again: Accumulation of massive amounts of wealth through war and, afterwards, at the expense of slave labor, but this time in the United States. Incidentally, Morgan and Warburg were American agents of the Rothschild family back in England.

1868- 14th Amendment and the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871
13th Amendment:
In the years immediately following the American Civil War, a most heinous scheme was undertaken by the British monarchy to take back control of the United States. The first step that needed to be taken was that of enacting a ‘coup d’etat’ against the original ”Constitution for the United States of America” and the original, organic 13th Amendment. The process began when, in 1865, in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, the currently listed 13th Amendment, which deals with the issue of the outlaw of slavery, was passed by Congress to overwrite the original, organic 13th Amendment, which was passed on May 1st of 1810, and reads as follows,

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.“
The reason for the passing of the original 13th Amendment in 1810 is explained as follows by modern-day military insider Drake Bailey, as he states,

“After winning our independence from Great Britain, the United States became alarmed that agents representing the interest of foreign powers were meddling in our internal affairs. International Bankers, lawyers and other opportunists were using their money to purchase special benefits and privileges from the government officials. In order to prevent the corruption, the Senate and the House approved of a 13th amendment in 1810. This Amendment prohibited government officials from taking bribes in exchange for political favors. The Amendment prohibited anyone from receiving a Title of Nobility or receiving any honor or entitlement that would not be available to all Americans. Lawyers were prohibited from serving as elected officials while they were active members of a BAR Association. The proponents of the Amendment did not believe that a Lawyer, being an officer of the Court should simultaneous serve as a member of both the Judicial and Legislative Branches of Government.”
It is important to bear in mind that, while the modern-day version of the 13th Amendment seems at first glance to be an honorable attempt to end slavery America, it was in fact a blatant attempt to ‘hide’ and to ‘suppress’ the original 13th Amendment, which again, prohibited titles of nobility as well as prevented government officials from receiving any type of gift, monetary or otherwise, from a noble. This is of vast importance when one understands that the entire history of the European world, dating back to the time of ancient Greece and Rome, has been the story of one tyrannical emperor after another, one oligarchy following the next, for thousands of years. The modern-day descendants of these ancient bloodlines still exist to this day, and assume command of the very highest levels of global control and power. The very foundations of the United States are based upon our ‘breaking free’ from the chains of control exerted over us by these ancient bloodline families. The following links will provide a great deal more insight into this issue.


The following article by archival researcher David M. Dodge and former police investigator Tom Dunn goes into great detail regarding the fact that the ‘disappearance’ of the original, organic 13th Amendment was a key phase in the silent takeover of the United States by the British monarchy.

Click HERE: http://www.quia.com/pages/constitutionalstudies/page410 to listen to a complete radio broadcast on the Friends of Liberty radio program regarding the missing 13th Amendment.
14th Amendment:
The foundation of the United States of America was, without question, a unique historical event. One very important fact that has, to a great extent, been lost to history is that, through the wording of both the Articles of Confederation as well as the Constitution, each individual State within the union was recognized as a sovereign entity, an independent nation-state. The powers of the federal government were severely limited, and the States themselves held most of the power. Many of the original founders of the Constitution foresaw the inherent dangers in placing too much power into the hands of one central governing body, and these men took careful measures to both ensure and to protect the States’ rights. Thus, it was decided by those in positions of power outside of the United States that the best way to take apart the nation was to divide it by making a covert attempt to strip away the rights of the individual nation-states and to centralize power.
In April of 1866, a 2/3 vote of both Congress and the House of Representatives allowed the passage of the Civil Right’s Act, despite the bill being vetoed by President Andrew Johnson. This act by Johnson forever tarnished his name, and history has branded him a racist. In a statement made to the Senate in March of 1866, Johnson states the following:
“By the first section of the bill, all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the United States. This provision comprehends the Chinese of the Pacific States, Indians subject to taxation, the people called Gipsies, as well as the entire race designated as blacks, people of color, negroes, mulattoes, and persons of African blood. Every individual of these races, born in the United States, is by the bill made a citizen of the United States. It does not purport to declare or confer any other right of citizenship than Federal citizenship; it does not propose to give these classes of persons any status as citizens of States, except that which may result from their status as citizens of the United States. The power to confer the right of State citizenship is just as exclusively with the several States, as the power to confer the right of Federal citizenship is with Congress. The right of Federal citizenship, thus to be conferred in the several excepted ratios before mentioned, is now, for the first time, proposed to be given by law.”
The most important thing to take away from this statement, when reading between the lines, is the fact that Johnson is telling the Senate that the language of this bill sets forth a FEDERAL citizenship status upon all natural born peoples of the United States, thus taking that right away from the States. This was a first step in a much larger plan to centralize power into the hands of the federal government.
In July of 1868, the 14th Amendment of the Constitution was ‘ratified’ by Congress. What many do not realize, however, is that this act was never ratified by President Johnson, but was rather vetoed by the President. Prior to this, in 1867, Congress went outside of its Constitutional powers by declaring the first of two Reconstruction Acts, (again, vetoed by Johnson), which divided the Southern States into five separate military districts, each under the rule of a military general. This was a further extension of the state of martial law which had been declared by President Lincoln in 1863. In response to the Reconstruction Acts, Johnson stated,
“I have examined the bill ‘to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States’ with the care and the anxiety which its transcendent importance is calculated to awaken. I am unable to give it my assent for reasons so grave that I hope a statement of them may have some influence on the minds of the patriotic and enlightened men with whom the decision must ultimately rest.
The bill places all the people of the ten States therein named under the absolute domination of military rulers; and the preamble undertakes to give the reason upon which the measure is based and the ground upon which it is justified. It declares that there exists in those States no legal governments and no adequate protection for life or property, and asserts the necessity of enforcing peace and good order within their limits.” (Full text viewableHERE).
As we are told by historical researcher Gordon Epperly (full research report viewable HERE: http://www.14th-amendment.com/introduction.htm),

“Several ‘Governors’ of the southern States were removed from Civil Office by ‘Military Commanders’ under…Section 2 of the Reconstruction Act of July 19, 1867 and were replaced with ‘Army Officials’ or other military appointees. These Military Commanders or appointees declared that they had the authority to reject or approve ‘Resolutions’ of the Legislatures of their ‘Military Districts’ and they declared that they had the authority to submit ‘Resolutions of Ratification’ to the U.S. Secretary of State declaring that the Legislatures of their ‘Military Districts’ had ratified the 14th and 15th Amendments to the United States Constitution. [Note: 'Military Districts' are not 'States' of the Union. 'Military Districts' are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress while a State of the Union is a foreign corporation to the United States *(more on this in the next section) that exercises sovereign authority of its own. The two forms of government are different and they cannot co-exist. The U.S. Congress, in and through its Military Districts, has no authority to ratify Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.].”

As we can plainly see, the 14th Amendment of the Constitution was never ratified by the U.S. president and was passed under illegal and unconstitutional circumstances while the nation was under a state of forced martial law. In essence, what the 14th Amendment did was to change the citizenship status of all U.S. citizens, making them FEDERAL citizens as opposed to STATE citizens. This fact is of extreme importance, for as we shall see, the final ‘phase’ of this operation, this silent ‘coup d’etat’ against the original United States Constitutional Republic, was yet to come.
The District of Columbia Act of 1871:
The District of Columbia Act of 1871 represents the single most tyrannical action ever undertaken against the Constitution for the United States of America and its citizens.

In the aftermath of the Civil War, the nation found itself torn in two and with barely the financial means to maintain itself as a Republic. Through the illegal and unconstitutional signing of the 14th Amendment, (by military commanders under Martial Law), the citizen status of ALL U.S. citizens was changed from State to Federal. What happened next almost defies logic, but was a scheme so clever, so deceptive, that it makes one’s head spin. With the passage of the District of Columbia Act of 1871, the Constitution for the United States of America was officially changed to the CONSTITUTIONOF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (all caps). The name of the country, as written on all legally binding documents, was changed from the United States of America to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (all caps). This is important because as we are told by the U.S. Government Printing Office Styles Manual, ALL CAPS in a legal document signifies either a U.S. vessel, a corporation, or a debt person. What this did, (are you ready for this one), is transformed the country into a CORPORATION under the control of the British monarchy, and each and every citizen of the Republic then became a Corporate Vessel with a monetary value, under the ownership of the corporation. We were no longer seen as people, but rather we have been used as debt instruments against the overall debt of the U.S. corporation, whereby a trust fund was (and still is) set up in our names upon the time of our birth when our mother signs off on our birth certificate. Our social security number is used as a means of setting up ten separate and distinct trust funds under the auspices of the U.S. corporation. The District of Columbia, i.e. Washington, D.C., become a completely separate entity unto itself, which became the head of this corporation. In effect, the Constitutional Republic was given a sleeping pill, and in its place was formed a CORPORATION ultimately under the control the British Monarchy and the Rothschild banking cabal. All that we had fought for one hundred years earlier as part of the American Revolution was falsely shoved aside into the waste bin with the stroke of a pen. From this point forward, each and every single member of Congress, the House of Representatives, and the U.S. President swore an allegiance not to the Constitutional Republic, but to the CORPORATION of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. This effectively labels them as traitors to the Republic and to the people of this nation, as this system of tyranny remains intact to this very day. In effect, the ‘government’ became the overseers of Corporation U.S.A. According to the exact wording in Chapter 62 of the Act itself,
“Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes.”
This is explained very succinctly in the following excerpts taken from an article written by Lisa Guliani of Babel Magazine, viewable HERE: http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/corp_us.htm (and please read this very carefully to understand the complete ramifications of this):
“What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution.

Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed. By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.”

Lisa goes on to tell us that,

“In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain’s banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what the common herd believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed the common herd all rights of sui juris [sovereignty].

Congress, with no authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land…the Civil War was, in fact, little more than a calculated front with fancy footwork by backroom players.

It was also a strategic maneuver by British and European interests (international bankers) intent on gaining a stranglehold on the coffers of America. And, because Congress knew our country was in dire financial straits, certain members of Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone’s pie)…There you have the WHY, why members of Congress permitted the international bankers to gain further control of America.

Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers read: ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ [note that neither the words 'united' nor 'states' began with capital letters]. But the ‘CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”

In the simplest sense, the disappearance of the original, organic 13th Amendment, the illegal ratification of the 14th Amendment, and the passage of the District of Columbia Act of 1871 signaled the end of the legal and lawful United States Constitutional Republic and the ushering in of a de facto government, i.e. a corporation, headquartered in the District of Columbia. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has been as such ever since this time. The bureaucrats who hold seats in our government, (and this goes all the way up to the office of the President), are not tasked with maintaining the welfare of the people, but rather the welfare of the corporations and the big banks. Yet it is important to note that the legal and lawful U.S. Constitutional Republic has not been destroyed; it is merely in a state of deep slumber. The lawful and constitutional ‘seats of government’ under the Constitutional Republic have merely been vacated, and instead replaced by seats that serve a corporation, NOT a government. We as U.S. citizens have every legal right to reawaken our true form of government. One of the ways this can be done is through the process of declaring oneself as being free from this false paradigm. In essence, we, each and every one of us, can once again declare ourselves free people in a free nation through the process of ‘forgiveness’ to the U.S. corporation. *NOTE: The process of declaring oneself free from this system goes beyond the scope of this website. It will be up to you as a free person, as one who longs to break free from the corporate chains that bind you, to do your own research on this subject. However, the following links provide a great deal of information regarding this process, and further delve into the many hidden truths surrounding this most pivotal of times in our nation’s history.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum