Latest topics
» Salients are lost in the planetary commotion
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 4:58 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Concerns raised in NZ over hunt for 'giants'
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 4:13 pm by PurpleSkyz

» SpaceX in new bid to send tourists into space
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 4:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Cult Alert - Sourcetruth Enterprises Inc. Continues To Expand
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 2:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Huge UFO hurtling towards the Moon plus MORE
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 12:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Rh Negative Immunity: What’s The Deal?
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» MIND GAMES: DNA Tuning & The Frequency War On Human Consciousness
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:37 am by PurpleSkyz

» RFKjr Submitted Historic Case Against U.S. Government for Children Injured by Wireless Technology Radiation
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:32 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID19 UPDATES - US Breaks Cruise Ship Quarantine plus MORE
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» Ten Years To Break Out The Perceptual Bubble - David Icke
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cracks Are Opening in Earth's Magnetic Field - Solar Storms Are Underway
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:09 am by PurpleSkyz

» 11 Surprising Mysteries Scientists Can’t Explain
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» Climate Change Mass Indoctrination - Corruption of Science 2020
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Best Planet X Nibiru Information - The Undisputed Proof Planet X is Real plus MORE
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 10:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» Nikola Tesla’s “Black Box”: A Free Energy Device That Powered His Car
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 10:51 am by PurpleSkyz

» Harvard Prof Looks at Regular Fast Radio Bursts from Space and Says “It’s Aliens”
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 10:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense With Remote Viewers Dick Allgire, Edward Riordan - Coronavirus Horror
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyToday at 10:45 am by PurpleSkyz

» UAP Crash Retrievals: Public Statements from TTSA Members. Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure.
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyYesterday at 9:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» What Is This Strange Area On Mars? If Real.
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyYesterday at 5:50 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Numerology: discover your sun number
Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more EmptyYesterday at 5:48 pm by PurpleSkyz





You are not connected. Please login or register


Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more Empty Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more on Tue Feb 20, 2018 2:18 pm



Use Your Heads

Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more Proxy?
By Anna Von Reitz

If you cannot look at the two names "Riezinger" and "Ratzinger" and see for yourself at a glance that they are two different names, there is no hope for you. You need to give up and cling to your shackles and pray that your masters don't eat you instead of a turkey next Christmas.
Presumably, you also have trouble and confuse "Johnson" and "Olson"? Or "Sanford" and "Sandeman"? Or can't see that "O'Brien" and "Bannon" are different, either?
God help us all --- what happens when I try to teach you that the "Wisconsin State" is not the same as the "State of Wisconsin" and that "Wisconsin" itself is different than either one of them?
Why, exactly, would I need anyone in the old, failed, nasty, corrupt banking system to issue bonds for me against assets that I control?
Why, exactly, would I ever need anyone to issue bonds in my behalf at all, since it is plain on the public record that I have issued sovereign bonds aplenty and made them stick?
Why would I, an American Common Law Justice of the Peace, threaten anyone's life? The Public Law is what establishes the penalties and juries are the ones that decide guilt or innocence in our system of things --- not individual judges.
It's in THEIR system that judges write private warrants against those unfortunate enough to be classified as "U.S. citizens".
I am not confused about my position or how our American system works, so why would I be doing something evil and unjust that only judges in their foreign system do? Eh?
Not very plausible, is it?
And let's see here.... I warned you all to turn on your Shinola Sensors, wake up, and start thinking for yourselves. Does that sound like advice from a guru seeking to lead you-- much less lead you astray?
And also, all that I promised anybody was a lot of hard work to reclaim your lawful political status and your good Name and Estate, followed by more hard work to restore the lawful government you are owed.
No piles of unimaginable wealth for free, no Easy Street, no Free Pie-in-the-Sky offered here. Yet I am supposedly the Pied Piper? Where's the "cheese" I am offering you? Where have I offered you anything but 500 hours in the trenches, with a hope of being able to recoup what you are lawfully owed at the end?
If you think about it for five seconds, don't those promising you riches-for-nothing fit that "Pied PIper" bill a lot better?
But if you needed me to point these things out to you, you might as well go home, shut the door, and pull the shades down tight. There's no likelihood that you will benefit from anything being said here.

See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here:

 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

Posted by Paul Stramer at 6:18 PM

Thanks to:




An Education on the Birth Certificate from Frank O'Collins

Use Your Heads By Anna Von Reitz plus more Proxy?
From Anna Von Reitz

I am constantly receiving questions about Birth Certificates.  The essence of a BC is that it proves that a live man or woman was born on the actual birth day, as opposed to the "filing date" or "birthdate" which marks the creation of the THING named after you. 

A Birth Certificate does not positively identify you, but it admits that a living being with your name came into this world, touched down, and there is no actual, viable proof of your death--- only a presumption of death based on the fact that the Vital Statistics people haven't heard from you since you left the hospital.  No doubt it is time we all gave them and the Deputy Clerks of the Probate Courts across America a big, fat "Hulloooo!"  

A BC does not function as a valid recording of your Common Law copyright to your own Name and Estate, rather, it is a false claim against your Name and Estate which has to be corrected---- but in a negative way, the proof that it provides does preserve "a" public record of an event which you can prove and invoke by private means and from other public records to reclaim your interest in your Name and estate.  So it is a means you should employ in building your claims. 

What follows was taken directly from the old Ucadia website, which Frank subsequently removed from the internet because unscrupulous people were attempting to piggy-back upon and thwart and misrepresent and misuse Frank's work. This particular section is of so much public benefit I pray he will forgive me for re-printing with full credit given and an injunction to my Readers to honor the man and his work and always give him credit for anything you quote and also be sure to tell anyone you send it to that they are not allowed to change, edit, or amend one word of it.  You may not plagiarize or edit anything that appears here: 

7.14 Corruption of Law
Article 325 - Settlement (Birth) Certificate
Canon 3348  [size=11](link )

Settlement  Certificate , also known as a “Birth Certificate ” since the formation of Central Records and Registers in 1836 (6&7Will.4 c.86 ) is an official document , possessing multiple legal functions and "states" under the central presumption that those against whom such instruments are issued are a form  of “property ” and bonded servant (slave), to Western-Roman and private Banking interests, regardless of status of family or history.
Canon 3349  (link )
Under Statutes and Policies promulgated from Westminster and other bodies, a Birth Certificate , fulfills multiple and distinct functions and states, depending upon its recognition and activity at hand, including but not limited to:
(i) Certificate  of Title to Cestui Que Use of Person  being recognition that the State  claims ownership  by virtue of the Certificate  itself and all the information contained on it, therefore proving a Cestui Que Vie Trust  in place and that the man or woman or new born to whom the Certificate  applies only has “beneficial use” of the name; and
(ii) Certificate  of Title to Property  being the recognition of the fact  of a Birth Certificate  being a certificate , that the name is property  and therefore the man or woman or new born is now treated as property  and no longer as a living man or woman, subject to the Rule of Law ; and
(iii) Certificate of Deposit  and Bailment (Custody) being the recognition through the terms  used to describe the father and mother that a transaction has taken place and the new born is no longer “owned” by the parents but is in the custody of the State , with the new born now a Thing , subject to the Jurisdiction  of the Courts, having being registered (enrolled); and
(iv) Certificate  of Second Class Citizenship  under Cestui Que Use of Person  being that the Certificate recognizes a new born not being a Citizen , but a “second class” citizen  not having full control over their body , or mind , or name, or spirit all claimed through the morally repugnant, profane, sacrilegious and deceptive conduct of public  officials; and
(v) Certificate  of Bondage  as Slave being the certificate  as recognition of a man or woman or new born as a member of the poor, the paupers, the infants, the idiots and lunatics, the “horned cattle”, the beasts, the creatures, the humans, the dispossessed, the insolvent  debtors and criminals and enemies of those who have created wholly mythical religious and legal texts to justify their exclusive positions as masters of a “planet of slaves”.
Canon 3350  (link )
The term Birth is a synonym of the Admiralty term Berth from the late early 1600’s meaning  “a fixed address; or position on a ship; or room in which the ship’s company  mess resides; or a space for a vessel  to moor (settle )”. 
Canon 3351  (link )
In terms  of the history of Birth Certificates, Settlement  Certificates and diminishing, tricking, deceiving, lying, seizing, condemning and cursing free people as slaves, wards, infants, cattle, poor and commodities:
(i) In 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28 ) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property  of the poor and common  farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”. By 1539 (31Hen.8 c.13 ) he did the same for large religious estates. By 1540, (32Hen.8 c.1 ), all property  was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown  to the Benefit  of use of Subjects with the most common  being Estates for the non wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate ”. Then in 1545 (37Hen.8 c.1 ) King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade  of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning  literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves. The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically unlawful positions continued into the 21st Century as connected with Birth Certificates; and
(ii) In 1547 (1Ed.6 c.3 ) , Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and activities and whether or not to work. All people (except those members of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa, Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and legal texts) now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were found to be idle, or enjoying life  then they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either sold as a slave or exterminated. The only exception to the rule, were those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549 (3&4Ed.6 c.16 ). However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (14El. c.5 ) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force; and
(iii) Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers. In 1589 (31El c. 7 ) peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled as available to be press-ganged into work; and
(iv) To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced in 1601 (43El. c.2  and “secret version” as 43 El. c.3 ) to begin to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”. Thus the Apprentiship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the Non-Christian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the "Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy property  owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and
(v) Under Charles II of England, the concept  of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (14Car.2 c.12 ) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement  Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate , passport and social security ” rolled into one document . A child 's birthplace was its place of settlement , unless its mother had a settlement  certificate  from some other parish stating that the unborn child  was included on the certificate . However from the age of 7 upward the child could have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”. The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common  houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The act also modified the age of “emancipation” from child  slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and
(vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (14Car.2 c.12 ), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement  Certificate ”. If a person  entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement , and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath , the justices would determine if that person  had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order , the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice ” when a sheriff  removes people from their home; and
(vii) In 1667 (19Car.2 c.4 ) the concept  of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England. This is the act that invented the concept  of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy. Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and
(viii) The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable and a new act was required in 1670 (22Car.2 c.18 ) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts  to the Crown ; and
(ix) Previous acts were continued and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement  Certificates” as the origin and ancestor  of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (1J.2. c. 17 ) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; and
(x) Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (3W&M c.11 ), the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations; and
(xi) In 1697 (3W&M. c.11 ), one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with the letter  “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve. Furthermore, all evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of badges as a stigma to status is most likely this act and subsequent acts against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify themselves as members of the same non-Christian religion invented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity. The use of the “P” as a form  of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property , Peon) used today; and
(xii) In 1698 (9&10W3 c.11 ) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease  taxable at ten pounds or more, making at the time more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and
(xiii) In 1713 (12Ann. S.2 c.18 ), the extension of Settlement  Certificates as a form  of negotiable Security  was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a Settlement  Certificate  (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation ; and
(xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (9Geo.1 c.7 ) in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief  from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive . Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract  with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”.
(xv) In 1733 (6Geo.2 c.32 ), one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase  a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”. Thus the baby slave trade  was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society ; and
(xvi) In 1761 (2Geo.3 c.22 ), Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies. This was further reinforced with the act in 1767 (7Geo.3 c.39 ) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and
(xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (13Geo.3 c.81 ), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (41Geo.3 c.109 ), English Parliament effectively "privatized" massive amounts of common  land for the benefit  of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance. In America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the "War of Independence". Almost the entire Patriot milita were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Company of Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwalis of the East India Company  Red Army. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and
(xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws  of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws  being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (5&6Will.4 c.76 ) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacriligeous framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act). Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked "to death"; and
(xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (6&7Will.4 c.86 ) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes. Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth Certificate  was formed as the successor  of the Settlement  Certificate  for all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society  of Lloyds as it is still today; and
(xx) Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”. The Local Government Act of 1871 (34&35Vict. c.70 ), Public  Health Act 1872 (35&36Vict. c.79 ) and in 1874 (37&38Vict. c.89 ) and the Public  Health Act 1875 (38&39Vict. c.55 ) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public  health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894 (57&58Vict. c.73 ), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept  of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”; and
(xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (11&12Geo.6 c.29 ) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor Laws . However, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.
Canon 3352  (link )
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child , the system of issuing birth certificates as proof  of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
Canon 3353  (link )
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic form  of a Birth Certificate within present Western Roman Systems:
(i) Whilst the same general form  and extracted information almost exactly the same as a Birth Certificate  may be used (eg a Bond , or other form  of Security ), unless it is officially “titled” a “Birth Certificate ” it is not therefore a “Birth Certificate ”; and
(ii) There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from the birth register information uses the title “Birth Certificate ” (when it is most likely the term Bond  is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same certificate  is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in fact  the real question is the use of the information; and
(iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same form  of a Birth Certificate  is used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such information by governments.
Canon 3354  (link )
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns:
(i) The historic record  of Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more ancient and more common  terms  in the English language such as nascence (from Latin nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In fact , the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English continue the tradition of using words descended from nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and
(ii) Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe newborns by the early 1700’s. However, this should be discounted as almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead, the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from Berth is by early 1800’s such as (6&7Will.4 c.86 ) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (35Geo.3 c.58 ) and reinforced in 1813 (54Geo.3 c.151 ) and 1823 with (4Geo.4 c.41 ).
Canon 3355  (link )
In respect of Birth Certificates clearly being derived and dependent upon the history of acts concerning Settlement Certificates of the Poor and the commercial control of Admiralty:
(i) Any argument, claim , judgment, edict, statement, affidavit  that denies the overwhelming prima facie  evidence that Birth Certificates are descended from and a variation of Settlement  Certificates is therefore irrational, unreasonable and in error and null and void from the beginning; and
(ii) Any public  official, or occupant of public  office that denies Birth Certificates are derived from Settlement Certificates and the Poor Laws  therein is culpable of gross deceptive and misleading conduct.
Canon 3356  (link )
The surrender , return, rejection of a Birth Certificate  by definition of the Poor Laws  that remain in effect and including the law of Admiralty and Settlement  Certificates actually places the individual in greater moral danger, without any sensible advantage:
(i) A man or woman who has perfected their own Will and Testament  through the prescribed model of Voluntatem Et Testamentum is able to demonstrate a far superior  claim  and position than any official or enforcement officer  under the Birth Certificate  Regime; and
(ii) Under the model of Voluntatem Et Testamentum, the Birth Certificate  is irrelevant as all persons are registered within the proper Rolls of the Estate  as property  of the Estate ; and
(iii) It could be reasonably argued that a man or woman who surrenders their Birth Certificate , demonstrates an act of complete stupidity and incompetence and therefore subjects themselves to greater control as wards, idiots and lunatics.
Canon 3357  (link )
Under the limited terms  of relief  of those who possess Settlement  Certificates, the holder  of a Birth Certificate  in past periods was able, in limited circumstances, to use the Birth Certificate  as evidence of a right to maintenance and direction to discharge debts against the Cestui Que Vie accounts , otherwise denied. In other words, the extremely limited circumstances by which a Birth Certificate  is converted into a bond  by the authorised holder  in Cestui Que Use:
(i) Whilst the holder  of a Birth Certificate  possesses only Cestui Que Use of the Person , they hold sufficient legal authority to endorse the back of a valid  and certified copy  of the Birth Certificate , thus creating a legitimate Bond ; and
(ii) The endorsement on the back of a valid  Birth Certificate  is always at 90 degrees – (Never at 45 degrees) to the main direction of the writing  on the front side of the Certificate . A Birth Certificate  never has its face changed by the holder  as this renders the instrument  defective and useless; and
(iii) The words to be included with the signature and the word Endorsement or Endorsed are “Pay to the holder without recourse for all debts, duties, fines and legacies concerning account number (account number being the account listing the debt )”; and
(iv) No amount is ever listed as part of the set-off and effective discharge. If an amount of money  is listed, then such an endorsement is void and may be construed as a deliberately false act with deeper consequences; and
(v) The acceptance  of such a bond  was extremely limited to certain cases in relation to public  debts (such as hospitals, taxes and court  fines). However, it is unclear in the collapse of any resemblance of law if any such remedy  remains permitted by the wholly corporate  model of broken government.
Canon 3358  (link )
The existence of a Birth Certificate  is prima facie  evidence of the existence of one or more Cestui Que Vie Trust . Therefore, any argument, or denial of such fact  is gross deceptive and misleading conduct at best, or incompetence and stupidity at worst.
Canon 3359  (link )
The existence of Birth Certificates and the statutes that created them from Settlement  Certificates to Admiralty based Birth Certificates is overwhelming and irrefutable evidence of organized and systematic slavery, in complete contradiction to all laws  claiming the abolition of slavery and servitude.
Canon 3360  (link )
A fundamental flaw that remains within the Settlement  (Birth) Certificate  System for the Roman Cult  and its agents remains the fact  that a Settlement  Certificate  is proof  that a man or woman must have been born on the land for the certificate  to have effect, regardless of convoluted subsequent presumptions of what the certificate  actually represents. If a man or woman was not born on the land somewhere a certificate  could not be issued. Therefore any rejection, or return of a Birth Certificate  serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on the land and support to any Affidavit  of Truth  concerning their immutable rights from the Divine Creator .
Canon 3361  (link )
As Settlement  Certificates and later Birth Certificates are solely and purposefully designed to disenfranchise men and woman from their rightful inheritance through voluntary enslavement and admission to being "paupers", the system of Birth Certificates is wholly without legitimacy, a global system of organized fraud and crime and without lawful effect.
Canon 3362  (link )
As Birth Certificates and their use are a deliberate corruption of all forms of law, philosophy of law and application  of law, the system is reprobate, forbidden and never permitted to be revived.
Canon 3363  (link )
The system of Live Borne Records which recognize the full rights of all men and women as equal and higher order  beings possessing sacred and immutable rights which can never be abrogated is a superior  system to Birth Certificates and can never be compared to the slavery system of Birth Certificates and Settlement  Certificates.[/size]

See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here:

 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

Posted by Paul Stramer at 6:09 PM

Thanks to:


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum