Latest topics
» Solar Nebula Hypothesis Ready for History's Dustbin?
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 11:06 am by PurpleSkyz

» A Lot Going on at the ISS
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 11:04 am by PurpleSkyz

» Shadow People - The Mysterious Dark Watchers
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 10:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID19 UPDATES - U.S. Marines and Navy Prepare to Execute Pandemic Plan plus MORE
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 10:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Strange space vehicles seem to appear out of flashes of light
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» Police Obtain Warrant for DNA Database
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 10:28 am by PurpleSkyz

» Assange most important symbol of press freedom today – journalist
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 10:26 am by PurpleSkyz

Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 10:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» Meanwhile in London.........
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 6:15 am by bs4ever

Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyToday at 12:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» ‘Food As Medicine’, Return to Nature
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 8:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Jenny McCarthy talks to Blue Chicken Cult Leaders about their documentary "The Conman Secret."
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 7:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Body Language: Mike Bloomberg First Debate Performance
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 7:53 pm by PurpleSkyz

» BiNaural beats study music - improve memory and concentration
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 2:40 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Steve Bassett Brilliantly Explains Why UFO Disclosure Is Closer Than Ever Before
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 2:33 pm by PurpleSkyz

» New snail species named after Greta Thunberg
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 2:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Japan to launch Phobos sample-return mission
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 2:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» This Already Happened on our Earth... !! 2020 . Events From all over The World
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 11:09 am by PurpleSkyz

» Conference on Extraterrestrials in the Vatican: This is what happened
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 11:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» Soğmatar Built By The Lost Aliens of Malta?
Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz EmptyYesterday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz





You are not connected. Please login or register


Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]



Let Those Who Have Understanding See

Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz Proxy?
By Anna Von Reitz

Today I am posting a long and potent list of court decision citations kindly provided by Larry Moe, which taken together can lead to very mistaken assumptions if you are still in the dark about the nature of the federal government versus the actual government of this country.

First, read through these valuable citations which expose the nature of the federal and federated state and county courts, plus the need to establish jurisdiction ---and then engage your brain cells for my brief commentaries about each at the end.

"There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464 , Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178

"Courts are Administrative Tribunals" Clearfield Trust, et al v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943)

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2  Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491

"When jurisdiction is challenged the burden of proof is on the government. Title 5 USC Sec 556(d)

"No sanction can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction." "Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be 'assumed', it must be proved to exist!" Stanard v. Olesen, 74 S. Ct. 768

"The law requires PROOF OF JURISDICTION to appear on the Record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings." Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533

"No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore." Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105

"If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity." Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262

1. In the first instance, Keller v. PE, the federal administrator alleges that there are no judicial courts in "America".

What they should have said is that there are no judicial courts in the "Territorial or Municipal United States"--that is, in federal jurisdiction-- but such a truthful and unobscured statement is too much to expect.

In America, the actual America, we have always had American Common Law Courts that are judicial courts, also known as public courts of record. They have been largely inactive and unstaffed since @ 1965, but they exist and they are used and they are peopled by living, breathing Americans standing on the land and soil they are heir to.

It is only in the foreign international jurisdiction of the Federal Territorial and Municipal United States that "courts" assume the character of in-house administrative tribunals and cease to have judicial authority. This is because these foreign courts are supposed to be dealing exclusively with incorporated franchises instead of living people and are incompetent to address living people as living people.

2. The Clearfield decision cited also says clearly that courts are administrative tribunals but falls short of saying which courts. Again, it should say "federal courts and federal franchise state of state and county courts" are administrative tribunals, but since they are talking from their perspective about their courts, they can be somewhat forgiven for not being more explicit.

3. In the Marbury v. Madison case, notice the small "l" on laws, which indicates legislative "laws" which indicates statutory laws of incorporated franchises infringing on the guarantees owed to our "vessels" in international jurisdiction. These are federal courts sorting out cross-jurisdictional claims, so again, all is not exactly what it seems. What is legislated as "law" by federal territorial and municipal corporation legislatures cannot abridge or overcome any Public Law on American soil, and most especially cannot abrogate the constitutional contracts owed by the federal subcontrators to the states and people. For example, the federal government corporations passed the National Defense Authorization Act in 2011, providing that U.S.citizens can be arrested and indefinitely detained, but if you are not a U.S. citizen and you are owed the guarantees of the actual Constitution no "Act" of the Territorial or Municipal United States Congress that abrogates your guaranteed rights can be sustained.

4. The next three citations concerning jurisdiction are sometimes ignored by State of State/STATE OF STATE and County/COUNTY courts, until you remind them that they have incorporated themselves as franchises of the federal territorial and municipal court systems and no longer have any discretion about obeying federal standards. That is, because they have adopted the status and nature of corporate franchises as "states of states".

5. In Murdoch v. Pennsylvania note that the word "state" in not capitalized, and the word "liberty" is used. This is very clearly talking about one of our states of the Union trespassing upon and licensing a federally mandated "liberty" granted to a federal citizen---for example, an attempt to license voting. Please note that Americans enjoy "freedoms" while federal citizens have "liberties", and that our actual states are referred to using the small "s" in the federal system of things. Actual states occupy a completely different jurisdiction than States of States, and just as they infringe upon us, it is possible for us to infringe upon them. I know some very good men and women who are sitting in jail in Colorado because they wouldn't believe me and wrap their heads around this point. We have our rights and turf, but the Federales also have theirs.

6. In the final quote, someone has again mish-mashed language -- a right is not a liberty. A right is a material asset. A liberty is a privilege granted by a higher authority. For a "citizen"-- a servant of the government -- the government is the entity conferring the privilege. So the right interpretation of this citation requires striking out the words in parenthesis and paying attention to what remains. We see that the word "State" is capitalized and that it is preceded by "the"--- a definite article. This could reference any one of the land jurisdiction States, or the concept of "State" in general, but not a State of State. We see also that it speaks of "citizens" which, as in the prior case, indicates that this is a cross-jurisdictional issue in which our States were attempting to tax or license or otherwise limit federal citizens living on American soil. An example would be a State levied "Poll Tax" on the right of a federal citizen to vote. From our perspective federal voting rights (as an example) are a privilege granted by the foreign federal corporations to their employees and dependents, but from their perspective, these privileges are considered material rights. One man's trash is another man's treasure.

As these examples demonstrate, opinions issued by federal and federated state-of-state and county courts are written from their own perspective--- not from ours. When they talk about "courts" --in the absence of any further qualification-- they are talking about their courts, not ours. When they talk about "rights" they are talking about the rights of "citizens" -- not our natural and unalienable rights as people. When they talk about "liberties" they are talking about privileges enjoyed by federal employees and dependents, as when a sailor in the Navy is given "liberty ashore"-- not our freedoms.

These same presumptions apply to everything and anything published by the federal government corporations and by their state-of-state and federated counties and agencies, including their codes, their statutes, their applications, their regulations-- it is all and always written from their perspective, not ours. It takes no small effort to learn and to twist your perspective around to see what they are really talking about.

We are considered to be "non-resident aliens" with respect to their watery international jurisdiction. We are considered to be "non-citizens" and are referred to in their lingo as "United States Nationals" instead. Their "states" are what we recognize as "States of States" and "STATES OF STATES", while to them, our states are referred to like this--- "the California State" -- which represents the international land jurisdiction or simply "California", for example.

Attempting to read federal or federated state or county publications without being aware of their context is endlessly confusing and trying to use citations from their court cases often results in nonsense arguments because the words mean one thing to us, and something else to them.

Where, for example, would we be left if we took the statements in Keller v. PE (the first example above) on face value? We would believe and would have evidence seeming to support the idea that there are literally no judicial courts in America --- and we would be wrong, because the Federales are talking about their courts not being judicial courts and not referencing our courts at all.

The Judicial Power in this country was retained by the People. We didn't give that away to any foreign power. As a direct result, the Territorial and Municipal Courts function as administrative tribunals. That fact does not imply that our American Common Law courts are non-existent, invalid, or lacking judicial power when properly invoked by people having the standing to operate these judicial forums.

When the Bundys get their wish and an actual American County Court is invoked by Americans who have corrected their political status and elected their own justices and sheriffs and other officers of the court, it may be a rare event in the past fifty years, but it will not be lacking in judicial power and enforcement authority.

See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here:

 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Posted by Paul Stramer at 9:10 PM

Thanks to:




What Does Anna Want? --- Again

Let Those Who Have Understanding See By Anna Von Reitz Proxy?
By Anna Von Reitz

Let's begin with the fact that I am raising my voice for the dead and the unborn and those who do not have or can't find a voice, not just myself.

Let's also clarify the fact that I don't want anything.  I have lived a good and happy life full of adventure, and at the end, I have all that I need.

So it isn't my wanting that need to be addressed. It's the whole concept of "want" and the repugnant Doctrine of Scarcity that needs to be addressed along with the question of why -- in this day and age -- there isn't abundant energy, clean water, food, and everything else that people need to live happy, healthy, secure lives on this planet? 

Sixty thousand years ago, give or take a few, what we have called "demons" began arriving on Earth.  They were coming here as refugees from an advanced civilization and a doomed home planet. They were never meant to be here, but they came anyway, in violation of treaties and laws set down by our Creator.  They didn't want to come to our ho-dunk little time-space, but they had to, because they had nowhere else to go.

Our carbon-based bodies are somewhat like spacesuits or shells that are inhabited by our energy and ordered consciousness and memory-- our own unique and individual "self" that is supported as part of the One Life of this planet. These demons are made of energy, too, but it is foreign energy, quite different than our own.  They can inhabit our carbon-based bodies just as we do.  If our spirits are weak or poorly connected to our Source of Life or traumatized or simply willing to give way, it is fairly easy for these demons to "walk in" and possess us and use us as Avatars. 

Left to themselves, if they project a physical body to inhabit, they naturally appear as reptiles of one kind or another--snakes, dragons, basilisks, chimera, chameleons, teradons which are flying reptiles-- or as odonts, which are insect-like creatures with tough external skin and no differentiated internal organs. If you are not aware that these creatures exist it can be quite a mind-numbing and frightening experience to learn that they do.

The leader of the most populous band of these other-world refugees was named Marduk. His son was named Satan.  His grandson is named Lucifer.
They touched down in the Middle East, found hosts, and began proliferating there.  Their exo-DNA got mixed in with ours and various kinds of hybrids were the result, some of them very brilliant, some of them insane.

Demons are not immortal, but they are very long-lived by our standards, just as we are very long-lived compared to a mayfly.

Last week, Lucifer showed up at my house in a huff because I am insisting that my workers be paid, and because I am not allowing him to just re-boot another round of fraud, sex, and death on this planet.  I told him that the peace has been declared (see the Payment Bond delivered to the Vatican Chancery Court) and that if he breaks it, his head is mine.  And I threw him out. 

A couple days later, three of his henchmen showed up singing the blues about having to cough up back pay for all the people who have been working their butts off to restore their lawful government and rebuild their countries and clean up the planet. I showed them no sympathy either.  It is written that a worker is worth his hire, so pay up, I told them.  

I don't personally believe in money at all and I don't care if people are trading peanut shells as money, but whatever the currency is I want those who have labored long and faithfully and those who have just picked up the plow to be paid for their effort, so that they can do their work and not worry about lack of casino chips on top of everything else.

The greatest blasphemy in galactic history is that Our Father was a Deadbeat Dad and didn't provide us with enough of everything to "have life and have it abundantly".  It's beyond past time for that offensive song and dance to end.

So, yes, I am a bit "testy" this week and not showing a great deal of patience or sympathy for the demons, who despite all the advantages of their advanced technologies and superior knowledge and far longer lives didn't learn anything from the destruction of their own planet and are just as self-centered as ever.

Earth has been quarantined because of them.  Practically the entire Heavenly Host is parked in Near Space because of them.  Our planet is being judged because of them. 

And this morning, I had the distinct displeasure of listening to a whining, blubbering demon speaking through his human interface about how they had "given us everything" and they "never meant to do us harm" and how all the enslavement and harshness and deprivation and immorality were necessary for us to make the "progress" we have made and how "everything has gone so terribly wrong" and how they have "lost control" and oh, my, oh, my, what happens now? 

He knows what he deserves.  He knows what most of them deserve.  And it is the fact that they have lost control that really concerns him, because that means that yes, they are likely to be condemned and booted off planet and erased from memory once and for all. 

I have been told more than once that I don't have to worry about it. One day we will simply wake up and the demons will be gone. I can imagine that happy morning, the birds singing, the Earth quiet and at peace, renewing itself. I look forward to it.

No more predators or oppressors.  No more charlatans.  No more lies.  No more wants. No more threats. No more scarcity.  Just friendly neighbors who want to live and let live and have a decent life---and otherwise be left alone to enjoy their own firesides and families in peace.

So what do I want? 

I want this "transition" over with the same way a woman dreads and fears and yet wants pregnancy to end. 

I want everyone to have everything they need to survive and thrive-- to live and live abundantly.

I want everyone on Earth to know and agree that life is the most precious thing there is, and admit that without it, all else is moot.

I want everyone on Earth to confess the fact that we don't own the Earth-- the Earth owns us, so all the things we do to buy and sell and use the Earth as chattel is in effect a Big Fat Lie, as we are selling what isn't ours and buying what has already been freely given to us all.

I want the false kingdom of Mammon to end and for fair and enlightened trading to take its place. 

I want the madness of Washington, DC to end, for peace to be declared, and actual peace to be embraced.  All the energy we have wasted on war, I want turned to other things--- I want our Armies to clean up our planet, rebuild our bridges, and our Navies to clean and care-take the seas.

I want the new technologies that have so long been delayed and controlled and suppressed to be released and made available to everyone.

I want the spirit of Our Father, our True Father, to rest upon us all, and for His peace and compassion and generosity to be our portion, our relief, and our joy.

Our Father is not petty, not vengeful, not stingy in the least; there is no smallness of mind or spirit in Him, no corner of His heart is unjust. 

The glory, honor, goodness, and love of Our Father endures forever; I want everyone to experience that, know that it is true, and know also that as part of Him, we are part of that glory, honor, goodness, and love. 

The demons have admitted their illness and confessed their sins. They know that they cannot overcome the Heavenly Host.  Their time is indeed short.  They still thrash around and still threaten and still obstruct, but they are under demand and they know the conditions of the peace will eventually lead to their death, just as Satan's apple eventually led to Eve's death.

It is only right and fair that this is so. 

So all things run their course and all things are made new and the justice of Our Father comes; all is to be made whole and right again for this planet and for the people.  And that is what Anna wants.

The Holy Will of Our Father is for your life and not your death, for your kindness and your righteousness, and not for your stupidity and mistakes. And that is what Anna wants: for His Will to be fulfilled.

See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here:

 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Posted by Paul Stramer at 12:43 AM

Thanks to:



Larry Moe, and CURLY....Hmmmmm. Anna?

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum