Posted on October 7, 2012
SaS was developing an
Op-Ed on the subtleties of how the cabal plays mind games with us,
confuses the issues, and manipulates and controls us. As we
began to discuss it, the door just seemed to fly open
to several terrific examples of the way the cabal operates. By the end
of our discussion, we both felt we were being directed by the ONE to get
all this information out to you, and so this post, showing how the ONE
works as it collaborated with us, became a kind of intro to the several
posts to follow.
The first post is the SaS
Op-Ed called, the Nature of the Thing, followed by the movie, Heaven and
Earth, directed by Oliver Stone, a movie that accurately
describes how war and just plain killing/murder affects us in our hearts
and lives – and not just in the instant, but for generations to come.
Because we then realized how all this info directly relates to the
discussion of the apparently more sanitary drone kind of killing/murder
that is being pushed on us, we present a special Bill Moyers’
interview with Oliver Stone. Oliver Stone is a man who, on a personal
level, knows well the horrors of war. Having enlisted in the United
States Army in 1967, Stone requested combat duty in Vietnam. He fought
with the 25th Infantry Division, then with the First Cavalry Division,
earning a Bronze Star with Combat V, an Army Commendation Medal and a
Purple Heart with an Oak Leaf Cluster before his discharge in 1968 after
15 months. We
wonder as we present this material if we will permit ourselves to be
drawn into another war—simply to feed the seemingly insatiable lust for
violence and deviousness so much the signature characteristic of
anything associated with the cabal.
Here is a bit of our discussion to key you into this topic. It centered around an article from Veterans Today called Now It Can Be Told! The REAL Reason Obama Was Nearly Devoured by Carnivorous Plesiosaurs on Mars . When SaS read this article, he almost shouted at me: Wait a minute! Wait a minute! Don’t post my article yet! Read this!
We decided to present the
article to which SaS refers in full at the very bottom of this post. In
fact, we suggest you stop and read it now before continuing on
~J and SaS
Now that you’ve read the article -
Question from ~J: Are
you actually saying that Webre was used/encouraged and somehow set-up
to be the judge there so the cabal could discredit the entire hearings?
To me, it isn’t clear.
Answer SaS: Actually, the article
says that. I’m just pointing out the consistency of his behavior with
that of the “Sting.” I think Webre should be exposed for the behavior
that he displayed. He is a Harvard Graduate, a trained and certified
Lawyer, and he should have known better! The ‘Rove’ part of the story
was included by Barrett to show the consistency of “scenario planning”
by the Cabalistas.
Answer (continued): These quotes are taken from the article -
“Confronted, Webre emitted a series of verbose, evasive, weaselly email diatribes. The stench of guilty demeanor was palpable.
“One does not have to be a psy-ops expert to formulate a hypothesis explaining the above events.
“Let’s take this from the top. On Sunday, June 17th, 2012, Webre celebrated the end of the Vancouver Hearings by having dinner with participants Barbara Honegger and Ernst Rodin.
“Over dinner, he confided to
Honegger and Rodin that he hoped to evade (i.e. break) his promise to
Jim Fetzer by including Andrew Basiago’s time-travel-based claims about
9/11 in the Vancouver 9/11 Tribunal emerging from the Vancouver
“Honegger and Rodin were horrified.” [Dr. Kevin Barrett: Veterans Today]
~J: Now we have some important commentary from SaS:
Comment SaS: If
you’ve taken the time to read through this short but informative
article, you can see if Webre had been allowed to “feather” the
conference and its proceedings with his wild-ass science fiction
vignettes, he would have made the entire affair appear to have been
nothing more than a convention of tin foil hats emerging from their
backyard root cellars to offer the judiciary a very public examination
of their psychosis! After that, all the detailed empirical evidence and
eye-witness testimony would have accounted for nothing.
SaS continues: Here’s another vivid example of how these psy-ops or “Sting” operations work!
“The main way that covert
operators keep secrets is not by keeping them, but by revealing them –
through a discredited source. For example, young George W. Bush’s
cocaine arrest, which got him thrown out of the National Guard, was
revealed (in an operation orchestrated by Karl Rove) to a journalist
named Jim Hatfield. Rove, Bush’s minister, and others confirmed the
story to Hatfield.
“Just as Rove “skunked” the Bush
coke bust story by feeding it to Hatfield, the 9/11 cover-up operators
tried to “skunk” the Vancouver 9/11 Hearings, and the Fernando
Imposimato prosecution, by sending the certifiably nutty Alfred Webre to
serve as the discreditable messenger.” [Dr. Kevin Barrett: Veterans Today]
Comment SaS – continued: You see what this is? It is “Misdirection”
in process and it follows – exactly—what my article describes as the
actual process that I’ve observed! Take note of how the disparagement is
constructed in each case.
Aside from the fact that we now have overwhelming evidence there is
an “objective” in play, we must also “receive” the information as “just
information” carefully dissecting Webre’s reputation with our inquiring
minds. His actions (not ours) expose facts and aspects of his behavior that reveal discrepancy! Why
is he doing this? What purpose does it serve? How will it advance
“Enlightenment?” Who is he attempting to represent? Where is he taking
his better judgment?
I smell pork (or “It ain’t Kosher” if you prefer). We’ll have to use
our discernment whenever we are exposed to Alfred Webre’s work in the
- Here is another example of “misdirection” as I’ve described it in
my new Op-Ed. They are actually trying to “cultivate” an entirely new
perception inside of the minds of Americans that is not a natural, human
way of thinking: “AUTOMATED KILLING!” After all, humanity naturally
believes that killing is wrong, but now they’re trying to promote the
idea that automated killing is an alternate category of a natural process. From this deviant, are we to “assume” that it is a better method of savagery? As I see it, NO KIND OF KILLING IS A “BETTER KIND” OF KILLING!!!
Iran Has Changed US Drone Development Forever
“Professor: Drones Will Soon Be Able To Kill During War Without Human Assistance“—CBS
“A future for drones: Automated killing“—Washington Post
And then this doozy from The Atlantic—”How Terrified Should We Be of the Pentagon’s Plan to Automize Drones?”
“Well, the answer the article gives is that Americans should be terrified if their government doesn’t automate drones.“ [The Business Insider]
Automated killing is “process oriented” killing (like what goes on in a
slaughter house) and would require no ethical consideration of either
its necessity or its legitimacy … or so these mountebanks think!
“There are a few key ideas behind drone
automation, and yes, one of them is that Americans will be able to take
operators from “in the loop” and put them “on the loop” — which means
they’ll go from direct controlling [the intentional initiation of "the kill"] to monitoring.” [The Business Insider]
Comment SaS: What are these strange words telling
us: Killing will be easier, because we won’t be directly involved? We
won’t have to experience the horror of “the other’s” death? We won’t
have to consider the look of abandonment on the faces of his family as
they realize that there are only seconds remaining?
They want us to be removed from it—from the communal empathy and
caring that make us human. This is the message of the “Trans-human
Agenda”—Bender did it! Oh, right! And, will we permit them that
latitude? Will we surrender our humanity, our ability to feel and care
for others just as well? Remember, what we do to others, we do to
ourselves—and they know it. Oh, yes, they do know it very well!
* The full article from VeteransToday, as mentioned above:
Now It Can Be Told! The REAL Reason Obama Was Nearly Devoured by Carnivorous Plesiosaurs on Mars
by Dr. Kevin Barrett
Source: Veterans Today
Webre and Basiago think the Loch Ness Monster is a plesiosaur, and
that carnivorous martian plesiosaurs devour humans who teleport to Mars
in CIA “jump rooms”
Have you heard the news? A self-proclaimed CIA time traveler
named Andrew Basiago says he teleported to Mars with Barack Obama, and
was once nearly devoured by a carnivorous Martian plesiosaur.
And if that isn’t enough for you, Basagio adds that he once
traveled back in time to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania just minutes after
Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address, and was photographed there –
the proof is a blurry picture from some Civil War archive.
Basiago’s unhinged tales have been taken seriously by Alfred Webre , a Yale-educated (Scroll and Key ) lawyer and self-proclaimed expert on not only international law, but extraterrestrial law and “exopolitics.”
Webre has managed to spread Basiago’s bizarre anecdotes all over the
internet. The question is, why? Who invented these fantasies, and to
The answer emerged last week, as Webre attempted to wreck the Vancouver 9/11 Hearings , and sabotageItalian Supreme Court Justice Ferdinando Imposimato’s attempt to prosecute 9/11 in the International Criminal Court , by skunking up both proceedings with the odor of Andrew Basiago.
Let’s take this from the top. In winter 2012, Alfred
Weber contacted Jim Fetzer, the organizer of the Vancouver 9/11
Hearings, and offered to serve as judge. Fetzer, impressed by Weber’s
work at the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunals, agreed.
Then it emerged that Webre was spreading
Basiago’s lunatic science fiction as if it were gospel. I advised Dr.
Fetzer to dump Webre – or if that weren’t feasible, to make sure he
promised to leave the time travel and UFO tales out of the Vancouver
9/11 Hearings. (At the time, we assumed Webre was sincere but deluded.)
Webre made the promise – then broke it.
On Sunday, June 17th, 2012, Webre celebrated the end of the Vancouver Hearings by having dinner with participants Barbara Honegger and Ernst Rodin.
Over dinner, he confided to Honegger and Rodin that he hoped to evade
(i.e. break) his promise to Jim Fetzer by including Andrew Basiago’s
time-travel-based claims about 9/11 in the Vancouver 9/11 Tribunal
emerging from the Vancouver Conference.
Honegger and Rodin were horrified. They strongly
urged Webre not to mix up Basiago’s fantasy world with the
evidenced-based world of the Vancouver 9/11 Hearings. Webre appeared
unconvinced. He seemed passionately attached to the Basiago material.
At least three times during the following months, Honegger shared
with me her concerns about Webre’s time machines, beam-me-up-Scotty
“jump rooms,” and carniverous martian plesiosaurs. If this stuff got
mixed up with the hard, undeniable evidence that 9/11 was a false-flag
operation, it would make the 9/11 truth movement look like a bunch of
loonies who accept crazy stories unsupported by evidence. I repeatedly
passed her concerns on to Jim Fetzer.
It all came to a head in late September. Webre,
perhaps inadvertently, revealed that he was indeed planning to break his
promise to Fetzer and include Basiago’s time-travel material in the
Vancouver 9/11 Tribunal, alongside the serious presentations proving
that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, the Pentagon
bombed rather than struck by a plane, and Israel the main force behind
Then it got worse: We learned that Webre was going to ignore all the serious Vancouver Hearings presentations, and forward only Basiago’s time-travel nonsense to Italian Supreme Court Judge Ferdinando Imposimato, who has stated his intention to prosecute the 9/11 coup d’état in the International Criminal Court .
Confronted, Webre emitted a series of verbose, evasive, weaselly email diatribes. The stench of guilty demeanor was palpable.
One does not have to be a psy-ops expert to formulate a hypothesis explaining the above events.
The main way that covert operators keep secrets is not by keeping
them, but by revealing them – through a discredited source. For example,
young George W. Bush’s cocaine arrest, which got him thrown out of the
National Guard, was revealed (in an operation orchestrated by Karl Rove)
to a journalist named Jim Hatfield. Rove, Bush’s minister, and others
confirmed the story to Hatfield.
Then when Hatfield revealed the coke bust in his book Fortunate Son, Rove in turn revealed that Hatfield was an ex-con with a conspiracy-to-murder conviction. Sixty Minutes did
a hatchet job on Hatfield, and all copies of the book were burned by
the publisher. From then on, no respectable journalistic outlet would go
near the Bush cocaine arrest story.
Just as Rove “skunked” the Bush coke bust story by
feeding it to Hatfield, the 9/11 cover-up operators tried to “skunk” the
Vancouver 9/11 Hearings, and the Fernando Imposimato prosecution, by
sending the certifiably nutty Alfred Webre to serve as the discreditable messenger.
The moment any “respectable” media outlet learns
that Alfred Webre is involved in a 9/11 prosecution effort, the story
will shift from the depressing facts about the murderous September coup
d’état, to Webre’s much more colorful and amusing tales of Obama being
chased across the deserts and/or swamps of Mars by man-eating
Young Basiago and Obama (before he was sheep-dipped in pigmentation) getting ready to teleport in their CIA time machine
This, I believe, is why the stories of Gettysburg
Address time-travel photos and Obama-chasing Martian plesiosaurs were
invented in the first place.
Webre, a lawyer who had “cognitively infiltrated” the 9/11 truth
movement years before, was tasked with promoting the Basiago nuttiness,
and then smearing it all over any future attempts to prosecute 9/11.
Cass Sunstein, Obama’s former Information Czar, has
come right out and said that the government needs to “cognitively
infiltrate” the 9/11 truth movement in order to wreck the “conspiracy
theories” by infusing them with “beneficial cognitive diversity.”
And what could be more cognitively diverse, and more damaging to the
true and proven “conspiracy theory” that 9/11 was an inside job, than
the insane and entirely unsupported time-travel and teleportation claims
of Webre and Basiago?
I have been informed by a source intimately familiar
with the intelligence community that the 9/11 cover-up team “pulled out
all the stops” to wreck the Vancouver 9/11 Hearings. The highlights
were the repeated death threats and bomb threats, and the planting of
“Judge” Weber and his plesiosaurs to “skunk” the event and any
prosecutions that might emerge from it.
So that, dear reader, is why you may have readEditing: Jim W. Dean
somewhere on the internet that someone, somewhere, supposedly takes
seriously the claim that Obama and other teleported earthlings have
braved the hazards of man-eating martian plesiosaurs.
You can’t make this stuff up – but they can. It’s just “your tax dollars at work.”
Thanks to: http://jhaines6.wordpress.com