Latest topics
» POOFness for MAR 24: Every Things Going To Be Alright A Soon As You Send Me More Donations!!!
Today at 9:20 pm by 4-truth

» UPDATE WITH SEAN DAVID MORTON FROM PRISON - MARCH 20TH
Today at 6:18 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ MEXICO PLANET X NIBIRU UPDATE " ELECTRIC UNIVERSE plus MORE
Today at 4:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The Betty & Barney Hill Case - Richard Dolan
Today at 4:52 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Mysterious Tornado appeared above Kukulkan Pyramids over Mexico!
Today at 4:51 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Bad-clown Rising - Mr Duck Explains the World
Today at 4:47 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Lying Neil Keenan Update - 3/23/2019
Today at 1:30 pm by PurpleSkyz

» David (Blue Chicken Cult) Wilcock: Antarctic Atlantis and Secret Space Program 2019
Today at 1:23 pm by PurpleSkyz

» #LIVE - #QANON - #MUELLERREPORT coming soon @POTUS
Today at 1:13 pm by LadyDragon

» Dave Schmidt moving to Florida - due to pregnancy?
Today at 1:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Galactic Federation Of Light And New Age Deception
Today at 1:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Mysterious UFO Recorded From Plane Window? plus MORE
Today at 12:58 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Hands off Mother Earth: Campaign against Geoengineering
Today at 12:52 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» NO SOIL NO FOOD US BLOCKS RESOLUTION ON SRM #WEATHER WARFARE LIVE!! #ANALYSIS
Today at 12:51 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» NOAA Warns Of Historic Flooding Through May, 200 Million At Risk, Food Price to Skyrocket
Today at 12:50 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Hellbent: 78 Days of Bombing Yugoslavia
Today at 12:49 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» The Truth About 5G - Dr Graham Downing
Today at 12:48 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» ITC Chemical Fire Reignites, MO: More Towns Flooding, Evacs, Mo Bill Requires Residents To Own AR-15
Today at 12:48 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Weather Warfare, & Army Corps Of Engineers - What You See Here Is The Prelude For 2019
Today at 12:47 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Special UK Armed Soldiers In 'NUCLEAR-PROOF BUNKER' Have Been Activated for Brexit
Today at 12:46 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» EVERYBODY with a PULSE...Needs to Understand THIS...NOW!!
Today at 12:45 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» THE SECRET TRUTH REVEALED BEHIND THE CURSE OF THE ALIEN KING 2019!
Today at 12:45 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Civil war in USA - was a cover up story?
Today at 12:44 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Giant Cloaked Zeppelins | UAP
Today at 12:40 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Breaking: "Computer Glitch" Crashes Ghana's Currency
Today at 12:37 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, March 23, 2019, #189 ( Dane Wigington )
Today at 12:01 pm by PurpleSkyz

» BOOM: Julian Assange Says HE WILL NOT Be Cooperating With Dems WITCH HUNT Into Trump
Today at 11:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» RH Negative Blood Type - Blood of Sion?
Today at 11:20 am by PurpleSkyz

» People MARVEL at Global Sky Phenomena - Showing up EVERYWHERE!
Today at 11:04 am by PurpleSkyz

» Scientists Meet To Investigate The 'Great Silence'
Today at 11:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» *More Plane Crashes-Georgia-Texas-Colorado-New Mexico-Michigan-New Zealand*
Today at 10:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» #QTard Drama Theater - MAYDay plus more
Today at 10:53 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense - WW2 German Flying Disc Technology
Today at 10:32 am by PurpleSkyz

» 250 concerned scientists issue major warning about potentially carcinogenic effects of wireless tech
Today at 10:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» NBE Talks To Vaccine Expert Dr Sherri Tenpenny
Today at 10:23 am by PurpleSkyz

» Paracas DNA Results: March 2019 Update
Today at 10:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Max Igan - What They Dont Want You to See in The NZ Mosque Shooting Video - And Its Not "CGI"
Today at 10:14 am by PurpleSkyz

»  #LIVE #QANON #LadyDragon + #SundayMorningFutures #MariaBartiromo #MUELLERREPORT @potus
Today at 10:03 am by LadyDragon



CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW
TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS





CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS








ONLY NATURES MAGIC


ONLY NATURES MAGIC
Featuring Homemade Herbal Salves Made in the Ozarks
https://onlynaturesmagic.com

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » MEMBER ADVERTISING & BLOG FORUMS » Consciousness Of Economics » Supreme Court Establishes that Police, But Not the Rest of Us, Can Get the Law Wrong—And Not Face Charges

Supreme Court Establishes that Police, But Not the Rest of Us, Can Get the Law Wrong—And Not Face Charges

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Consciousness Of Economic

Consciousness Of Economic
Supreme Court Establishes that Police, But Not the Rest of Us, Can Get the Law Wrong—And Not Face Charges

If a police officer’s erroneous understanding of the law leads to him pulling someone over, does he violate the Fourth Amendment, which established “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”?
On Monday, the Supreme Court said no, it’s not a violation. In Heien v. North Carolina, eight justices held that a police officer does not violate the Fourth Amendment if he has a mistaken but reasonable interpretation of state criminal law. (Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented.)
What Constitutes a Reasonable Seizure
The Fourth Amendment forbids, among other things, “unreasonable” seizures. A traffic stop is a “seizure,” and a seizure is unreasonable unless the police have a “reasonable suspicion” that a person has committed a crime (or is about to).
For nearly 50 years, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the “reasonable suspicion” requirement does not demand that an officer be absolutely right; in fact, the officer need not even be more likely right than wrong. A police officer can make a mistake of fact about whether someone has committed a crime and yet still be “reasonable.”
In the Heien case, the Court, by an 8-1 vote, added to that law. The Court ruled that a stop can be “reasonable” even if the officer makes a reasonable mistake of law.
The Heien opinion will leave many people with the impression everyone must know the criminal law except for the police.
In Heien an officer mistakenly, but reasonably, believed that a driver had violated a state traffic law by having only one working brake light. The officer stopped the vehicle, questioned the driver and another occupant, and ultimately found cocaine, which was used to convict the driver and passenger.
Because the officer’s interpretation of the traffic law was reasonable, the Court concluded, there was no Fourth Amendment violation, even though the officer was wrong about the law (in North Carolina, it is not a violation so long as at least one brake light is working).
Police Officers’ Obligation to Know the Law
The Heien opinion will leave many people with the impression everyone must know the criminal law except for the police.
The Heien opinion holds that the police can act “reasonably” even if they don’t know the criminal law but then says that no private party can act “reasonably” if he or she makes the same mistake. That dichotomy implies that the police can break the law, but members of the public cannot, a double standard that is offensive to longstanding American values.
That problem arises from two facts: Private parties use the term “reasonable” in a common-sense manner as a guide for their conduct, but the Fourth Amendment uses that word as a term of art and as a legal standard. The result is that the police can act unlawfully but “reasonably” because the scope and requirements of the Fourth Amendment are not identical to those features of the substantive criminal law. The Court could have saved itself some criticism by making that point, but that is the lesser problem with the opinion.
Citizens and Ignorance of the Law
An obvious question raised by the Heien case is whether a private party can also raise a mistake-of-law claim when he is charged with a crime. The Supreme Court appeared to say “no.”
Unfortunately, the Court too glibly treated this important issue.
The Heien opinion will be read as an endorsement of the common law rule that ignorance of the law is no excuse to a crime. The opinion, however, does not examine what that rule means and how it arose.
The common law did not recognize a mistake of law defense because (1) the defense made no sense in past eras when there were only nine felonies, (2) each felony outlawed obviously immoral and harmful conduct, such as murder, rape and robbery, and (3) each crime required the government to prove that the defendant acted with a “guilty mind” or “evil intent.”
The no-ignorance rule made sense 600 years ago but makes no sense today because (1) there are thousands of crimes, (2) in many cases no reasonable person would have thought that the conduct at issue was a crime, and (3) the prosecution does not have to prove that a person acted with a “guilty mind” or “evil intent” in every case.
As Heritage has stated on several occasions (see here, here, and [url=http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7436&context=jclc&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dlarkin%2Bmistake%2Bof%2Blaw%26src%3DIE-TopResult%26FORM%3DIE10TR#search="larkin mistake law"]here[/url]), a strong argument can be made that the Supreme Court should abandon the common law no-ignorance rule because in many cases it has become a senseless anachronism that creates manifest injustices utterly unimaginable when English jurist William Blackstone described the criminal law.
The Supreme Court did not discuss the arguments on the merits of that issue because it did not arise in Heien. The Court discussed the issue merely to respond to an argument advanced by some non-parties who filed amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs.  Unfortunately, however, many lower courts will cite the Heien opinion as having endorsed the common law rule.
But all may not be lost. It is important to remember, especially at this time of year, that there still could be a happy ending. After all, even Ebenezer Scrooge changed his mind when he finally confronted his past. There is hope that the Supreme Court will do so, too, when a defendant presents a mistake-of-law defense in a proper case.


https://www.dailysignal.com/2014/12/16/supreme-court-establishes-police-not-rest-us-can-get-law-wrong-not-face-charges/?fbclid=IwAR1FNR68TYb21jetzyA1MMtCzXDq0PvWiiYQ7k2XPzeU1XwJFZacIRnJlSs

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum