Latest topics
» Salients are lost in the planetary commotion
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 4:58 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Concerns raised in NZ over hunt for 'giants'
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 4:13 pm by PurpleSkyz

» SpaceX in new bid to send tourists into space
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 4:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Cult Alert - Sourcetruth Enterprises Inc. Continues To Expand
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 2:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Huge UFO hurtling towards the Moon plus MORE
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 12:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Rh Negative Immunity: What’s The Deal?
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» MIND GAMES: DNA Tuning & The Frequency War On Human Consciousness
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:37 am by PurpleSkyz

» RFKjr Submitted Historic Case Against U.S. Government for Children Injured by Wireless Technology Radiation
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:32 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID19 UPDATES - US Breaks Cruise Ship Quarantine plus MORE
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» Ten Years To Break Out The Perceptual Bubble - David Icke
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cracks Are Opening in Earth's Magnetic Field - Solar Storms Are Underway
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:09 am by PurpleSkyz

» 11 Surprising Mysteries Scientists Can’t Explain
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» Climate Change Mass Indoctrination - Corruption of Science 2020
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Best Planet X Nibiru Information - The Undisputed Proof Planet X is Real plus MORE
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 10:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» Nikola Tesla’s “Black Box”: A Free Energy Device That Powered His Car
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 10:51 am by PurpleSkyz

» Harvard Prof Looks at Regular Fast Radio Bursts from Space and Says “It’s Aliens”
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 10:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Jeff Rense With Remote Viewers Dick Allgire, Edward Riordan - Coronavirus Horror
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyToday at 10:45 am by PurpleSkyz

» UAP Crash Retrievals: Public Statements from TTSA Members. Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure.
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyYesterday at 9:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» What Is This Strange Area On Mars? If Real.
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyYesterday at 5:50 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Numerology: discover your sun number
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G EmptyYesterday at 5:48 pm by PurpleSkyz





***********

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS







You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » POISON PLANET » STOP 5G » Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G

Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G Stop-5G-Radiation-Banner

Severe Warning Issued by Scientific American on Dangers of 5G
October 26, 2019

In a recently published article entitled, We Have No Reason to Believe 5G is Safe , Scientific American (SciAm) magazine issued a stern warning about the known and potential dangers of 5G technology .
Of particular significance is the fact that SciAm is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States, founded by inventor and publisher Rufus M. Porter in 1845, and running monthly since 1921. It is a highly influential publication, widely reputed for its rigorous scientific standards, and lauded by today’s fact-checkers  as highly credible and staunchly pro-science.
In the article, University of California, Berkeley public health researcher Joel M. Moskowitz  argues that 5G, along with previous w-fi and cellular technology, is much more harmful than the government and telecomm industry wants the public to believe.
His primary concerns center around a recent FCC announcement, made in a press release , that the FCC is close to reaffirming the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that were previously adopted by the commission in the 1990’s… well before the introduction of 5G, 4G, 3G, 2G or even WiFi.
In short, the safety standards that the FCC wishes to maintain are severely outdated and fail to reflect the growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating harm.
Moskowitz notes that the ’90’s exposure limits only address the singular concern over the potential effects of the intensity of exposure to RFR. With the research we now have available the health concerns are much broader, including a sincere risk of cancer, among other things.
“The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves  for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures.
Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility).
The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts  of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect , not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior.” ~Joel M. Moskowitz, Scientific American
Moskowitz also cites the the International EMF Scientist Appeal , which elaborates on the now-known dangerous effects of RFR:
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.” [Source ]
Moskowitz points out that,”the scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.” Inviting readers and policy makers to consider the weight of more than 500 peer-reviewed research studies  finding, “harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating,” Moskowitz believes that more rigorous studies are necessary before the rollout goes forward.
In other words, the scientific jury is already out on the harmful effects of RFR, and the FCC is flat-out derelict in its duty to put public safety above telecomm industry interests.
Regarding the propaganda dimension of this debate, Moskowitz addresses the fact that industry spokepersons and related government officials frequently refer to contrarian viewpoints as ‘fear-mongering,’ pointing out that the current scientific research is legitimate, leaving the scientific community with a genuine responsibility to speak out about these concerns.
“The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of “fear mongering” over the advent of wireless technology’s 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.” ~Joel M. Moskowitz, Scientific American
Final Thoughts
Cracks are showing in the government and telecom industry’s blanket assertion that 5G is safe, and many prominent and influential scientists dignitaries , and organizations  are now speaking out against 5G – the global human experiment without consent . For the editorial board of Scientific American to run a piece this condemning 5G is a very strong signal that even the most mainstream elements of the scientific community are genuinely concerned.
Terence Newton
Waking times


https://bendedreality.com/severe-warning-issued-by-scientific-american-on-dangers-of-5g/


Thanks to: https://bendedreality.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum