Latest topics
» Who owns these Buildings and Vehicles on the far side of the Moon?
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyToday at 1:32 am by Em

» Can your dreams predict a person's death ?
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyToday at 1:26 am by Em

» World's first genuine 'fly and drive' car unveiled
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyToday at 1:21 am by RamblerNash

» SCAMMER ALERT! - Judy aka Quartz Crystal the Source Player is PLAYING You for DONATIONS! - PLUS A CULT MEMBER CONVERSATION
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyToday at 1:07 am by RamblerNash

» Quantum physicist describes alien encounter
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 11:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» Amazing stories of impact | Philippines | Plastic Bank
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 11:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» SOURCE ENERGY: Wal Thornhill on the Basics of Electric Universe Theory
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 11:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» Active shooter at Pensacola naval base; 10 patients transported to hospitals… Developing…
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 11:12 am by PurpleSkyz

» Does ball lightning move like this or is it something else?
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 11:03 am by RamblerNash

» Flurries of the new countenance are received with joy and playfulness
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 10:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» Rare Atmospheric Wave Supercharges Noctilucent Clouds Over the Southern Hemisphere
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 10:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» Local Islanders Surprised By"FREAKISH" Weather Event! - "Just Looked Out of Place"
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 10:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» FULL (of it) Benjamin blablabla Fulford 12-02-2019… Trump lashes out in all directions as world tension escalates to dangerous levels
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 9:44 am by topspin2

» POOPness for DEC 5: CHRISTMAS IS COMING BUT FORGET ABOUT SPENDING ON YOUR LOVED ONES!!!!! SEND ME YOUR MONEY!
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 1:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Giant Sphere UFO - Multiple UFOs Sighted Over New York! plus MORE
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 1:38 am by PurpleSkyz

» Body Language: Justin Trudeau, Making Fun Of Trump
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 1:13 am by PurpleSkyz

» Geminid Meteor Shower 2019 - Earth Passes Through a Stream of Debris from 'Rock Comet' 3200 Phaethon
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 1:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Something really weird shows up on Google Earth in Antarctica
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyYesterday at 12:23 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Black Star Report plus MORE
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyThu Dec 05, 2019 1:52 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Navy officer saw 'two-mile-wide UFO' over base
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories EmptyThu Dec 05, 2019 1:48 pm by PurpleSkyz







CURRENT MOON

You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » DISCLOSURE » SPACE NEWS & UFO DISCLOSURE » MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories

MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories


The Smoking Man

Source – unz.com
“…NASA admitted in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. Since then, Richard Nafzger, an engineer at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, who oversaw television processing at the ground-tracking sites during the Apollo 11 mission, has been looking for them. The good news is he found where they went. The bad news is they were part of a batch of 200,000 tapes that were degaussed — magnetically erased — and re-used to save money” 
SM: Do I believe NASA erased 200,000 tapes of mankind’s single greatest achievement in order to save a few bucks?….of course I do. Governments are servants of the people, insomuch as the salaries we pay them, is to protect our hard earned dollars from wasteful expenditures. I personally tip my hat to those at NASA for thinking about me, the lowly tax payer, before themselves”
The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind? – An introduction to the mother of all conspiracy theories
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories Shutterstock_313435067-768x768
Are believers in danger of extinction?
Coming up is the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. In 2016, a survey showed that 52 percent of the British public thought that Apollo missions were faked. Skepticism is highest among those who were too young to see it live on TV: 73 percent of aged 25-34 believe we didn’t land on the moon, compared to 38 percent of those aged 55 or more. These numbers seem to be rising every year. British unbelievers were only 25 percent ten years ago. It is not known how may they are today, but a 2018 poll by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center revealed that 57 percent Russians believe that there has never been a manned lunar landing. The percentage rises to 69 percent among people with higher education: in other words, the more educated people are, and the more capable of rational reasoning, the less they believe in the moon landings. In the US, the percentage seems much lower: A 1999 Gallup poll indicated just 6 percent Americans doubting the moon landings, and a 2013 Pew Research showed the number to have risen to a mere 7 percent. Not surprisingly, then, a 2010 Pew Research poll showed that 63 percent of Americans were confident that NASA would land an Astronaut on Mars by 2050.
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories MoonHoax-1
The moon hoax theory was almost unheard of before the spread of Internet, and gained momentum with the development of YouTube, which allowed close inspection of the Apollo footage by anyone interested. Before that, individuals who had serious doubts had little means to share them and make their case convincing. One pioneer was Bill Kaysing, who broke the subject in 1976 with his self-published book We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle. He may be called a whistleblower, since he had been working for Rocketdyne, the company that designed and built the Apollo rockets. Then came Ralph René with his NASA Mooned America!, also self published.
Research gained depth and scope, and disbelief became epidemic around the 30th anniversary of Apollo 11, thanks in great part to British cinematographer David Percy, who co-authored the book Dark Moon with Mary Bennett, and directed the 3-hour documentary What Happened on the Moon? An Investigation into Apollo (2000), presented by Ronnie Stronge. It remains to this day greatly valuable for anyone willing to make an informed opinion.
Then there was the much shorter A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Moon (2001), directed by Bart Sibrel, which brings in valuable insight into the historical context. Sibrel also went around challenging NASA astronauts to swear on the Bible, in front of the camera, that they did walk on the moon, and he compiled these sequences in Astronauts Gone Wild, together with more useful footages of embarrassingly awkward statements made by NASA astronauts who are supposed to have walked on the moon but sound hardly competent and consistent; Alan Bean from Apollo 12 learning from Sibrel that he went through the Van Allen radiation belt is a must-see.
Then, using materials from those films and other sources, came the groundbreaking TV documentary Did we land on the moon? (2001), directed by John Moffet for Fox TV. To my knowledge and judgment, this is still the best introduction to the arguments of the “moon hoax theorists”: You can watch it here from its 2013 rebroadcast on Channel 5:



https://youtu.be/MIy8ZqqK5G8

There are very few books available on the subject. I am not aware of a more researched one than One Small Step? The Great Moon Hoax and the Race to Dominate Earth From Space by German researcher Gerhard Wisnewski, originally published in 2005, from which I will quote repeatedly.
I am not going to discuss all the evidence presented in these sources. I can only recommend them and a few others on the way. I will simply sort what I see as the most convincing arguments, add a few recent developments, give my best conclusion, place the issue in the broader historical perspective, and draw some lessons from it all about the Matrix we have been living in.
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories 51ennq-yul
First of all, we need to be clear about the aim of such an inquiry. We should not expect any conclusive proof that Neil Armstrong, or any other Apollo moon-walker, didn’t walk on the moon. That cannot be proven, absent some indisputable evidence that he was somewhere else (orbiting around the earth, for example) at the precise time he claimed to have spent on the moon. In most cases, you cannot prove that something didn’t happen, just like you cannot prove that something doesn’t exist. You cannot prove, for example, that unicorns don’t exist. That is why the burden of proof rests on anyone who claims they do exist. If I say to you I walked on the moon, you will ask me to prove it, and you will not take as an answer: “No, you prove that I’m didn’t go.” Does it make a difference if I am the NASA? It does, because calling the NASA a liar will inevitably lead you to question everything you have been led to believe by your government and mainstream media. It is a giant leap indeed! Just like children of abusive parents, decent citizens of abusive governments will tend to repress evidence of their government’s malevolence. And so, people choose to believe in the moon landings, without even asking for proofs, simply because: “They wouldn’t have lied to us for more than 50 years, would they? The media would have exposed the lie long ago (remember the Watergate)! And what about the 250,000 people involved with the project? Someone would have talked.” I can actually hear myself speaking like that just 10 years ago. All these objections must indeed be addressed.
But before that, the scientific thing to do is to start with the question: can the NASA prove they sent men to the moon? If the answer is no, the next step is to decide if we take their word for it or not. That requires pondering what could have been the reasons for such a massive lie. We will get to that.
But, first of all, can the NASA provide hard evidence of the moon landings?
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories Iurqfg5l45
Rock-solid evidence from Antarctica
Yes, they can. They brought back pieces of the moon: roughly 380 kilograms of moon rocks and soil samples, all Apollo missions combined. Moon rocks prove the moon landings, don’t they? Yes they do, but only if it can be firmly established that they were not dug out from the earth. And that is the problem. As explained here, “meteorites have been found in Antarctica which have proved to have the same characteristics as the moon rocks.” It may be helpful to know that in 1967, two years before Apollo 11, the NASA set up an expedition to Antarctica, joined by Wernher Von Braun, the leading NASA propagandist for the lunar missions; Antarctica is the region of the earth with the biggest concentration of meteorites, but it is not known whether the expedition included geologists, nor if meteorites were brought back. In fact, it was not until 1972 that lunar meteorites were officially discovered in Antarctica; their lunar origin, of course, was determined by comparison with the moon samples brought back by Apollo crews (Wisnewksi 202).
So the moon rocks are a far cry from proving the moon landings. As a matter of fact, none of the so-called moon rocks can be proven to have been brought back from the moon rather than from Antarctica or somewhere else on earth. But it gets much worse: some of the so-called moon rocks have been conclusively proven to be fake. In the 1990s, British astrobiologist Andrew Steele was granted the special privilege to get close to some of the precious samples locked in NASA safes, and imagine his surprise when discovering in them a bristle, bits of plastic, nylon and Teflon and tiny earthly animals (Wisnewski 207). Another moon rock made the headlines when, 40 years after having been handed personally by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the Dutch prime minister, it was scrutinized and proven to be petrified wood. Granted, a few fake moon rocks don’t prove that all moon rocks are fake. But it should be reason enough for starting a systematic scientific examination of the dozens of other samples that the USA ceremoniously gave away in 1969 and the 1970s.
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories MoonHoax-3
The photographic evidence
What other proofs does the NASA have of the moon landings? The films and photographs, of course! The films are notoriously blurry, which makes their examination difficult. How, for example, can you be sure that astronaut David Scott from Apollo 15 is dropping a real hammer and a real feather to demonstrate Newtonian gravity in an atmosphere-free environment, when you can hardly see the objects? We do have a clear photo of the hammer and the feather on the ground, but how do we know they are the same as the blurry objects dropped in the film?
What would be helpful for a proper investigation is the original NASA footage. Researchers have been asking for access to these films for decades, under the Freedom of Information Act. In 2006, they were given an answer. Here is what you can read on Reuters:
“NASA admitted in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. Since then, Richard Nafzger, an engineer at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, who oversaw television processing at the ground-tracking sites during the Apollo 11 mission, has been looking for them. The good news is he found where they went. The bad news is they were part of a batch of 200,000 tapes that were degaussed — magnetically erased — and re-used to save money.”
Russians are so evil-minded: as a result of this NASA admission, Russian officials have started demanding an international investigation.
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories MoonHoax-4
Fortunately, we have the photos. Besides planting a US flag and collecting rock samples, the astronauts spent much time taking photos on the moon. And let’s be fair: in 2015, the NASA released to the public thousands of them in high resolution. They are accessible here, and can be examined in detail. Most of them are remarkable for their quality.
The Apollo 11 crew used a standard Hasselblad 500C with a few alterations, including the removal of the reflex mirror. The film used was a standard Kodak Ektachrome diapositive film, 160 ASA. That is a surprisingly sensitive film for a place where the sunlight is unfiltered by any atmosphere, especially considering that some photos, which came out perfectly exposed, were taken directly against the sun. There are also technical issues with the reliability of this material on the surface of the moon, where temperatures go from under 100°C minus to over 100°C plus: the only protection against heat for both camera and magazine was a reflexive coating. (How the astronauts survive such temperatures is an even more serious issue.)
Another problematic aspect is the professional quality of most of those pictures. Every single shot taken by Neil Armstrong, for example, is perfectly framed and exposed. Wisnewski (144-149) quite correctly points out how incredible that is, given the fact that Armstrong (or any other astronaut) could not take aim, since the camera was fixed on his chest where he could not even see it. Not to mention the difficulty of setting aperture, exposure time, focus and field of view manually with his pressurized gloves and no vision of the camera, and with no experience of photography on the moon environment. We need to remember that photography was a very skilled occupation in those days, even on earth, and it is quite astonishing to see that all of Armstrong’s shots were just perfect.
More to the point, is there any evidence that these pictures were shot on the moon? None whatsoever. They are easy to make in studios. As a matter of fact, the NASA went to great length to train the astronauts in indoor settings reproducing the condition of the moon surface as they imagined it, fabricating tons of “moon dust” for that purpose (even before anyone had seen real moon dust), and even simulating the black sky. Some of the photographs taken in these movie-like studio settings, such as the following one from NASA archives, would be hard to distinguish from the “real” thing, if framed differently.
MIND GAMES: ‘Fasten Your Van Allen Belts’, An Introduction to the Mother of all Conspiracy Theories Moonhoax-5
Armstrong and Aldrin practicing on fake moon dust under fake black sky
Let’s face it: there is no proof that any of the Apollo photographs are genuine. That may not be enough to destabilize the believers. But what should is that quite a few of these photographs are “replete with inconsistencies and anomalies,” in the words of David Percy, who proves his point in What Happened on the Moon? The film contains an interview of Jan Lundberg, the Project Engineer for the Apollo Hasselblad. When asked to explain some of the inconsistencies concerning shadows and exposure (for example, astronauts fully lit despite being in the shadow of the lunar module, as in the photo reproduced on the cover of Wisnewski’s book), he answers: “I can’t explain that. That escapes me… why.”
Incidentally, Lundberg’s embarrassed admission is the perfect illustration of how compartmentalization may have made the moon hoax possible. Like the hundreds of thousands of people involved in the project, he worked on a “need to know” basis, and had no reason to suspect he was working for something else than what he was told, at least until someone challenged him to explain impossible pictures. Just a handful of people had to know the full picture, and it is not even certain that President Nixon was among them. As Wisnewski (121-126) illustrates with the Corona alias Discoverer program (a US research satellite launched around 1959 with the secret purpose of spying over the Soviet Union), it is wrong to assume that the US military, spatial and intelligence communities cannot keep a secret. To take another example, hundreds of thousands of people worked on the Manhattan Project, which remained completely hidden from the public until the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima.
I will not list and examine the anomalies of the Apollo photographs, since they are analyzed in the documentaries mentioned above. But I do recommend browsing through and zooming on the high definition photographs on the NASA archive site, with the aim of assessing their credibility with basic common sense. Ask yourself, for example, if you can believe that the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle (here, here, or here) could have landed two astronauts on the moon and sent them back into lunar orbit to reconnect with the orbiting Command Module. Or pick Apollo 14’s LM Antares (here), or Apollo 16’s LM Orion (here, or here with the rover that miraculously came out of it), or Apollo 17’s LM Challenger (here). Keep in mind that these shabby huts had to be hermetically pressurized in a vacuum environment, and that, in the last two cases, two astronauts spent more than 3 days (respectively 71 hours and 76 hours) on the moon and slept 3 nights in the module. If you want to be guided along this reflection, I can recommend this 15-minute video.



https://youtu.be/s6vAiyUIQog

MORE HERE: https://rielpolitik.com/2019/11/12/sercet-space-fasten-your-van-allen-belts-an-introduction-to-the-mother-of-all-conspiracy-theories/

Thanks to: https://rielpolitik.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum