Latest topics
» AnnaV Rietz, Are U Still In There Girl?
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 3:48 pm by topspin2

» MAX IGAN - Most People Have No Idea What's Happening
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 10:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» FREE Electricity - Calling All Mayors - Michael Tellinger
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Large stationary Triangle shaped craft spotted in Akron, Ohio plus MORE
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:50 am by PurpleSkyz

» Dr. Shiva: We Are at War. #FireFauci. End the Shutdown.
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:46 am by PurpleSkyz

» Comet ATLAS Might Be Fragmenting Or It's JUST 'Taking A Breather' Before Another Outburst
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» ‘Reputation Managers’ Are Scrubbing Clinton-Epstein Connection from Wikipedia
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:39 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Hunger Games Society - Crashing The Economy By Design - David Icke
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:36 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID19 UPDATES - Donald Trump Says The Coronavirus Was “Artificially Induced” plus MORE
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:29 am by PurpleSkyz

» Italians Take to the Streets to Protest New Mandatory Vaccination Law
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:20 am by PurpleSkyz

» FULL (of it) Benjamin blablabla Fulford 4-6-20… “Global System Collapse and Mass Arrests Proceeding; Reset Inevitable”
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:06 am by PurpleSkyz

» #QTard Drama Theater - Why Would THEY Want To Cause MASS HYSTERIA? plus more
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyToday at 8:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» POOPness for APR 8: MIDWEEK ZAP CRAP
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyYesterday at 10:13 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Dave Schmidt (Meta 1 Coin) Doesn't Like Some Folks Putting Him On Their Radar! Wonder Why?
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyYesterday at 10:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID19 UPDATES - WHY ARE SO MANY PEOPLE THAT HAVE “RECOVERED” FROM THE CORONAVIRUS TESTING POSITIVE AGAIN? plus MORE
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE EmptyYesterday at 10:33 am by PurpleSkyz





***********

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS







You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » OUT OF MIND » COVID-19 » COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE

COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

Report: China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases.

COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Victoria-Head-Shot-Social-Media-.sized-50x50xf
By Victoria Taft March 21, 2020


COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE AP_20070377919994-scaled.sized-770x415xt

In this photo released by China's Xinhua News Agency, Chinese President Xi Jinping (Xie Huanchi/Xinhua via AP)
The world has taken heart from news that China has "flattened the curve" reflecting few to no new cases of COVID-19.
China's good news was reported by The New York Times Thursday, which trumpeted, "China Hits a Coronavirus Milestone: No New Local Infection."


COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Nyt-no-new-local-cases-1024x444 Screenshot/New York Times

The Washington Post reported, "China reports zero new local coronavirus infections."

COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Wapo-no-new-local-cases-1024x248

COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Wapo-no-new-local-cases-1024x248 Screenshot/Washington Post
NBC News reported China's National Health Commission's report about there being no new COVID-19 cases from inside the massive country:
"China’s National Health Commission on Friday reported no new local coronavirus cases, which marked the second time it has done so since the epidemic began.
There were 39 new cases reported on the mainland Thursday, but all were called “new imported confirmed cases.” Deaths on the mainland rose by three, bringing the total dead to 3,248, according to the health commission’s numbers.

There have been 80,967 cases reported on the mainland in all, the national health commission said."
But a report out of Japan by Apple Daily HK says that rosy view from China is a lie.
"Report by @appledaily_hk , Japanese news outlet interviewed Wuhan doctors, and confirmed Wuhan has stopped testing, that is why new case = 0 there. They release people in quarantine early too."

MORE HERE: https://pjmedia.com/trending/report-china-stopped-testing-for-covid-19-thats-why-there-are-zero-new-cases/

Thanks to: https://pjmedia.com



  

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
Canada, Australia Withdraw From Tokyo Olympics Amidst Coronavirus Epidemic
Date: March 24, 2020 Author: Nwo Report
The Olympics could be postponed or cancelled.

COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Screen-Shot-2020-03-23-at-1.08.24-AM-1200x630
Source:  Richard Moorhead
Canada and Australia have formally withdrawn from participating in the 2020 Tokyo Olympics as planned, and it appears possible that the Olympic Games are set to be either postponed to cancelled entirely on the basis of the global Chinese Coronavirus epidemic.
Canada nor Australia will not be participating in the games if they’re held at all this year, with the Olympic committees of the two nations ruling out participating at all if they’re held in 2020. This may force Japanese authorities to move the games to 2021 if they plan on hosting them after all.
An Olympic tournament ultimately would prove to be a considerable threat for global spread of the disease. The games always involve a considerable deal of global travel, and it’s almost a certainty the movement of hundreds of thousands of people for the games would bring home the coronavirus when they return home.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe acknowledged the possibility that the games may not occur as planned as a result of the pandemic on Sunday. He forcefully rejected the notion of having to cancel them outright, stating such a possibility was “not an option. ” The opportunity to host an Olympic tournament is highly coveted by the nations of the world, and it’s not surprising that Japan doesn’t want to consider cancelling the games at this point.
The Internation Olympic Committee is said to be in intense deliberation over the planning for the event. It’s hard to imagine a structure for the games that would be isolated from the coronavirus threat.

The games have only been wholly cancelled three times since their inception- all during World Wars I and II.
If the coronavirus epidemic truly does result in the postponement or cancellation of the Olympics, it would likely solidify the virus’ place in world history as a truly massive event.

https://nworeport.me/2020/03/24/canada-australia-withdraw-from-tokyo-olympics-amidst-coronavirus-epidemic/

Thanks to: https://nworeport.me



  

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
COVID19: FOUR QUESTIONS TO ASK THE KNEE- JERKING SHEEP
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Cropped-dscn0311

Staggering inconsistencies in the Corona virus narrative suggest the threat is being more than 100-fold exaggerated

 
 


In a situation where alarmist élites have created information cacophony about COVID19, and thus mass hysteria, there is an urgent need to keep things conclusive and simple.
This is not going to happen via a site of my limited influence, unless one staggering factoid were to be discovered by me which then went viral. So for the time being, one can only keep piling on the evidence, and returning to the logic (where possible) of a consistent argument querying the need for this “global emergency”.
Today, I’d like to do that using the medium of questions appealing to the common sense of the reader.
1. To take three of the key Western heads of Government urging total shutdown across the board, Donald Trump is a retail property billionaire, Boris Johnson is a pro-Bourse globalist neoliberal, while Emmanuel Macron is a radical monetarist reformer and one time senior Rothschild banker.
Judging from their personalities, track records and previously expressed priorities, does it seem likely to you that their sole motive for crashing the World Economy is to save the lives of an additional 0.4 – 0.6% of humanity….most of whom will be over 60 and already in trouble with other health pathologies?
Remember: Trump closed the US Control Disease Center, Boris Johnson has acquiesced in the embezzlement of State pensions due to 3.64 million 60+ British women, and Macron is at war with the CGT and the Gilets Jaunes about mass reductions in citizen pension rights.
2. Let us say the ‘lockdown’ approach lasts three months, and during that time only reduces the global GDP by 7.5%. In 2019, the global GDP was $142 trillion, and so the reduction in output would be $11 trillion.
The global population is 7.7 billion. 0.6% of that is 46.2 million.
The cost per life, even at a 100% success rate of death avoidance, would be $240,000. That would cripple the welfare provision capability of every economy in the world.
46.2 million sounds like an obscene number of deaths, doesn’t it? But 60 million people will die in 2020 anyway. When you compare that to the 99.4% of people who won’t die, however – but will see their standard of living reduced perilously – what’s being suggested by world leaders is ridiculous to the point of being utterly surreal.
So why are they following that course?
3. Now, I would argue that the deathcount I’ve postulated above is in fact ridiculously high. The Boston-based catastrophe risk modelling firm AIRW would certainly agree: they’re projecting 30,000 deaths in total by the end of this 1st Quarter – ie, March….in a period where everyone’s been running to catch up.
If the Draconian thing is indeed effective, then one could suggest an absolute maximum death toll of 100,000 during 2020. But even were it to be four times that, 400,000 is only 1/115th of a 0.6% death rate.
That’s an unthinkable cost per head – but not really the point: the question here is surely this: why is every national leadership in the world projecting 46 million fatalities, when AIRW projects a figure 115 times smaller?
Because, like it or not, that’s what 0.6% of 7.7 billion is.
So either AIRW is up the pole, or the élites and their media are vastly exaggerating the threat.
4. OK, bear with me – we’re almost there. 35 years ago I found myself developing an advertising strategy for the Department of Health, as it then was. This meant I had to do a crash course in epidemiology. So I spoke to a number of eminent virologists and specialists in tropical medicine and so forth.
This was the Page One learning: if you can’t contain an infectious disease – whatever its mode of reproduction – then the only possible approaches are (a) immunisation and/or (b) exposing patients to the disease, and letting their immune system do the best it can.
Among the few things anyone can agree about in relation to COVID19 is that it is remarkably good at seeking out new hosts. The latest stats I’ve seen suggest for example that it is 15.5 times easier to catch C19 than it was SARS.
Today’s (10am CET) best estimate is that we are at least 10 months away from any kind of immunity serum.
Ergo, the best way to build natural immunity in the population (without that involving patient death) is to focus on very stringent isolation of the vulnerable, but otherwise carry on normally, let people catch the damn thing, and then watch it die out.
The thing most likely to minimise natural immunity is lockdown.
Aside from Holland, lockdown is the chosen approach of all the leading players in this drama.
Why?


So the bottom line is this: regardless of how and why COVID19 kicked off or what motives may be involved in the Establishment reaction to it, the questions to be addressed are > > > why should we believe in the philanthropy of sociopaths, why is it worth spending a quarter of a million bucks per head to save lives by trashing the global economy, why is there a 100+fold mismatch between élite projected death rates and private consultancy estimates, and why are we minimising immunity when we should be humanely maximising it?
I don’t see any of that as paranoid or in any other way loopy. I simply see four questions being snowjobbed into silence by those with dubious motives.
There is a fifth question of course, which becomes more pressing every day – is the “science” narrative being dictated by Unelected States or the People’s needs? But that’s one for another day.

https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/covid19-four-questions-to-ask-the-knee-jerking-sheep/

Thanks to: https://hat4uk.wordpress.com



  

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
Coronavirus: The Spanish mortality rate is 15 times higher than in Germany

COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE 15848677515366

By Kaos. Kaos. Estado Español , Spanish State
Shared with thanks. Translation TheFreeOnline

On Sunday, March 22, the official number of those affected by coronavirus in Germany (22213) was similar to that of the Spanish State (28603). However, the death toll is much lower in the Germanic country (93 deaths there for 1,756 here) despite almost doubling the Spanish population. The death rate is therefore 15 times lower in Germany: 0.4% by 6.13%. How do you explain that abysmal difference?
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE W1240-p16x9-4e8cad7a4f9448fedf99157e2d7ec1db1701b77f-scaled
In this regard, Fernando Simón, director of the Center for the Coordination of Health Alerts and Emergencies in the Spanish State, said publicly that he could not explain it. “We do not know,” he replied Friday in his daily appearance before the media in response to the question of how this abysmal difference in mortality between the two States was possible, which, as of March 22, is 19 times higher in the case of the Spanish State, whose population is 47 million compared to 83 in Germany.
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Evolucion-casos-curados-fallecidos-coronavirus-espana-15febrero-23marzo-2020-elimparciales-586x409
Cold statistical data and analysis hide, as we know, a socially dramatic reality. In the Spanish State, the mortality caused by the coronavirus is not only, or even mainly, due to its lethality: it is mainly of public health, a macabre business at the cost of the health and life of the majority.
However, to know the health situation of both countries, it is worth taking a look at the health spending of each one: Germany in 2018 allocated 9.48% of its GDP to health spending, that is, 321,134 million, representing 21.36 % of total public spending. On the other hand, the Spanish State only dedicated 6.27% of its GDP, that is, 75.434 million, 15.14% of total public spending.


COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Coronavirus-italia-paciente-trasladado-una-nueva-area-del-hospital-san-raffaele-milan-1584989198378
Therefore, while Germany spends 3,878 euros per inhabitant in health, the Spanish State only invests 1,616 euros:
if 9.48% of GDP were invested in health here as in Germany, health spending would have risen 38,000 euros more (more than the half that at present) going from 1600 euros to over 2400 per inhabitant and year.

This alone (apart from other considerations such as the ongoing privatization process, the unpredictability of those responsible, the confinement of the population, the lack of basic protection material …) can perfectly explain why the German health system has ten times more ventilators and beds dedicated to intensive care and why 160,000 weekly tests have been carried out in the Germanic State, decisive factors in explaining the difference in mortality between the two countries.
As we said in light of the previous data, the relationship between the number of people affected and the number of deaths in Germany is enormously low compared to Italy and the Spanish State. For now, only South Korea and Japan support the comparison. Differences in health structure, as well as in the early detection strategy, would be the main cause.
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcRFrmEqhlJBlRWbxDPST1sEO8W7IxoEVp-Lhm4YxU0x-_aab3ab
In this sense, several sources consider four factors to be decisive in explaining what happens in Germany: the number of intensive care units (ICUs), the number of beds allocated to these units for critically ill patients, the number of vents, the devices that facilitate artificial respiration , and the number of tests for the detection of Covid-19, which allow early detection and rapid medical intervention.
Thus, according to the Ministry of Health, in the Spanish State there are about 4,400 ICUs and about 5,500 beds in intensive care services, 4,627 of which are part of the public network. The same data indicates that there are about 2,500 respirators. The average occupation of an ICU varies, according to the source, between 65% and 80% and it is estimated that between 5% and 10% of patients will require respiratory support. All this for a population that borders 47 million people.
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQODxIZ1gRMxlb_rso4SwHoWCWiSZUL4sCT-YHJy2xcWdQuSjYD
In the case of Germany, on the other hand, with a population of 82 million people, the number of respirators is around 25,000 and in the coming weeks they plan to add 10,000 more. On the other hand, the German system has 28,000 beds dedicated to intensive care, a figure that, according to the Reuters agency, will soon be expanded to 50,000. According to these data, Germany almost multiplies the availability of Spain by 10.
In the Spanish case, if the average occupation of the ICUs is between 65% and 80%, the massive arrival of cases that require intensive care -as it is already happening- is very easy to end up saturating the system or even collapsing it. Especially if it is taken into account that Covid-19 patients need more days of stay than other pathologies.
The average is between 15 and 20 days for the Covid-19 and about 5 days for other pathologies. To this must be added the difficulty of the Spanish system to acquire new respirators in an international market saturated by the demand of other countries (and without the intention of the political leaders to take the necessary measures to produce them here).
As for the number of tests, Germany is doing 160,000 per week, has assured the Financial Times Lothar Wieler, president of the Robert Koch Institute, center where the data is centralized.
In contrast to the number of Spanish tests, barely exceed 30,000 in total since the pandemic began
(South Korea came to make about 15,000 daily). The tests detect cases of Covid-19 even in patients who suffer few or no symptoms and are essential in the spread of the coronavirus. They also indicate that Germany is likely to have fewer undetected cases than countries where the test is less frequent, or virtually non-existent as in Spain, and that more than 80% of people infected with coronavirus are under the age of 60.
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE ET21t7SXkAEeRkc?format=jpg&name=small
Cold statistical data and analysis hide, as we know, a socially dramatic reality. In the Spanish State, the mortality caused by the coronavirus is not only, or even mainly, due to its lethality: it is mainly due to the lack of sufficient public investment, to the cuts of these years (to, among other things, pay the debt and rescue the banks) and the privatization of public health, a macabre business at the cost of the health and life of the majority.
By Kaos. Kaos. Estado Español , Spanish State
Shared with thanks. Translation TheFreeOnline

.
.
original en Castellano
A debate Bloque1SD Ciencia y tecnología

https://thefreeonline.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/coronavirus-the-spanish-mortality-rate-is-15-times-higher-than-in-germany/

Thanks to: https://thefreeonline.wordpress.com



  

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin



  

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
How long does coronavirus live on certain surfaces?


Posted on March 23, 2020
 
https://fox4kc.com/news/how-long-does-coronavirus-live-on-certain-surfaces/

NEWS

by: Nexstar Media Wire
Posted: Mar 23, 2020 / 08:20 AM CDT / Updated: Mar 23, 2020 / 08:20 AM CDT



NEW ENGLAND — COVID-19 can live in the air up to three hours and on certain surfaces for several days, according to a recent study  in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Scientists from the National Institutes of Health, CDC, UCLA and Princeton University conducted the study and penned the conclusion paper.
They sought to examine the stability of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) as well as comparing this particular strain of coronavirus with the similar SARS virus (SARS-CoV-1) that appeared in the early 2000s.
According to the NIH, SARS infected more than 8,000 people in 2002 and 2003. No cases have been detected since 2004.
But if the two viruses are so similar, why was SARS so limited in its spread in contrast to COVID-19? The answer may be two-fold.
The study found that COVID-19 survived on surfaces longer than SARS .
Scientists could detect COVID-19 in the air up to three hours after it was introduced, up to four hours on copper, 24 hours on cardboard, 48 hours on stainless steel and up to 72 hours on plastic surfaces.
COVID19 UPDATES - China Stopped Testing for COVID-19. That's Why There Are Zero New Cases plus MORE Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-11.37.54-AMSource: The New England Journal of Medicine
In addition, the study suggests COVID-19 has greater success in spreading because carriers may be asymptomatic or they may not recognize the symptoms quickly enough.
As always, the NIH and other healthcare professionals are advising the public to develop and maintain good, safe habits to combat the spread of coronavirus:

  • Avoid close contact with people who are sick
  • Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth
  • Stay home when you are sick
  • Cover your cough or sneeze with a tissue, then throw the tissue in the trash
  • Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces using a regular household cleaning spray or wipe


https://theextinctionchronicles.wordpress.com/2020/03/23/how-long-does-coronavirus-live-on-certain-surfaces/

Thanks to: https://theextinctionchronicles.wordpress.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum