Me and the NLA by Anna Von Reitz and MORE

Me and the NLA by Anna Von Reitz

Posted on February 16, 2016 by David Robinson  
  Judge Anna von Reitz


About me and the NLA: 
I TRIED to work with NLA early on.  I also in good faith delivered a wet-ink signed and thumb-printed and sealed copy of our affidavit of probable cause to John Daresh, but nothing was done about our affidavit—which has been published as “You Know Something Is Wrong When….An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” available on Amazon.com.
 >
When I attempted to contact NLA regarding their silence and inaction with regard to the grave accusations of criminality our affidavit raised, they hung up on me.  A couple weeks later, Mr. Gary Jolly, contacted me and said something inane like, “we know who you are and we don’t trust you”— as if this was an excuse for failure to address capital crime?
 >
I also rubbed them the wrong way when I revealed that the Common Law Grand Jury is only about one-fourth of the Common Law Court System we are owed, and without the Common Law Judges (properly called Common Law Justices) and Trial Juries and Clerks and other members of the Common Law Courts including the Sheriffs operating the land jurisdiction of this country, the Common Law Grand Juries have no enforcement capability.  They can hand down their findings, and the “District Attorney” can ignore them, so that the entire effort goes astray and has no teeth.
 >
Therefore I pointed out the need to elect people to fill the other, additional vacated Public Offices we are owed and to re-established the American Common Law Court System that is supposed to be in place and acting in support of the Common Law Grand Juries.  Mr. Daresh and Mr. Jolly would hear none of it.
 >
Three years have gone by with the Citizens Common Law Grand Juries being set up and spinning their wheels, accomplishing nothing much for all their work and good will.  Meanwhile, those who waved good-bye to NLA and proceeded to set up their counties on the land and elect and fill the vacated Public Offices have made great strides. They are actively setting up and restoring County-level government and educating people all over this country, while NLA continues to accomplish…….what?
 >
As a result of all this, I have grave concerns about NLA’s leadership.   Some months ago, I heard that John Daresh is actually a Bar Attorney from New York named John Vidurek.  So I asked him, up front, in good faith— just wanting to know the truth of the matter.  He refused to answer me, but he did answer Rodger Dowdell in Florida, that yes, this is so.  His given name was John Vidurek and yes, he is from New York and yes, he is a Bar Attorney.
 >
To me, a Bar Card is a strong indicator that Mr. Daresh may not be operating in good faith.
 >
A second indicator is that he has adopted a nom de guerre that has nothing whatsoever to do with his real name.
 >
Third, why quote me out of context in a major Writ of Mandamus and not even bother to contact me, yet leave it seeming that I was involved?  That doesn’t add up, either.
 >
Fourth, why harbor vaguely stated and semi-threatening “suspicions” such as Gary Jolly expressed toward me?   Honest men ask honest questions. They don’t hide behind vague insinuations.
 >
A fifth concern about NLA leadership is the lack of progress by the CLGJ organizations in the states where NLA is in control of the CLGJ’s compared to what is going on in other states where people have struck off and done it without NLA’s “help and direction”.  These spin off groups are miles ahead in addressing the real problems we are facing.
 >
A sixth concern in NLA’s failure to admit and educate people regarding the fact that the CLGJ’s are just a part— about one quarter– of the Common Law Court System that we are owed and which we need up and fully functioning to give the CLGJ’s both teeth and administrative support.  How can you run a wagon train with one-wheeled carts?
 >
A seventh concern is NLA’s complete lack of response to a signed, sealed, witnessed affidavit of probable cause that has been exhaustively researched and demonstrated.  We brought forward damning evidence of immense, systemic, institutionalized fraud— fraud against the Republic, fraud against the probate and bankruptcy courts, fraud against American States and American people—- and NLA puts the blinkers on and pretends it never heard a word?
 >
So we are supposed to ignore capital level crimes, including war crimes, being committed by foreign banks and their storefront organizations run as “governmental services corporations” because……?  Why?
 >
If it is NOT the job of the CLGJ’s to investigate crimes against Americans, just exactly what does Mr. Daresh propose that their job is?  To stand around issuing pointless documents filled with ignorance and outrage so that his buddies down at the local Bar Association can have a good laugh?
 >
Daresh is a Bar Attorney.  He knows better than to send a Writ of Mandamus to an Admiralty Court.  He was playing everyone for laughs.  He was saying, “Oh, look at this, boys!  These people are SO clueless, SO dumb, that they are going to put their time and energy into doing this! Hahahahahah! — And for EXTRA fun, I am going to sign Anna’s name to it and take her work out of context, so everyone can laugh at her, too!  Hahahahahahah!”
 >
I believe that many, many of the people in NLA are wonderful, patriotic, well-intentioned, and determined. I believe that the vast majority are trying in good faith to make a badly needed difference and to fill in a very necessary Public Office—- but I also believe that they are being purposefully limited and misguided by leaders who have their own contrary agenda, which is simply to keep the horse in the barn and not let the CLGJ’s function as they could and ought to, and also prevent people from addressing the need to restore the ENTIRE American Common Law Court System which is owed and needed to make the work of the Common Law Grand Juries count.
 >
The way things are run under Daresh, you might as well be riding unicycles.  It’s entertaining, but without the other “wheels” of the American Common Law Courts in place—- the Justices, the Clerks, the Recorders, the Bailiffs, the Sheriffs operating on the land jurisdiction, and the Trial Juries—-you are stuck, chasing around in circles without enforcement, wasting your time. Apparently, that kind of window dressing role is what Mr. Daresh wants.  Just “be there” appearing to do something and creating an illusion of remedy, while in fact providing no real alternative to the Admiralty Court and Administrative Court System at all.
 >
If the CLGJ’s were operating as they should, as part of the American Common Law Court System, they would hand down orders to a Sheriff operating on the jurisdiction of the land of this country, and the Sheriff would bring the orders to a Common Law Justice who would issue the warrants for arrest and to Public Prosecutors who would prepare the discovery subpoenas and complaints, and this would all wind up in front of a Jury of Twelve Honest Peers who would review the facts and hand down a decision for the Justice to read in open court on the record and execute.  That is how it is supposed to work.
 >
As it is, the CLGJ’s are misguided to function as laughingstocks for the Bar Members and spend their days making pleas to District Attorneys who ignore the CLGJ’s just like they ignore everyone else, and writing Writs in Law addressed to Admiralty Courts that can’t even hear a Land Writ.
 >
Sigh.  So, there is my assessment of the current status of the CLGJ’s and their role under the limitations imposed by John Daresh and NLA—- and right where they are is where they are likely to stay, in my opinion, until or unless people wake up a second time and realize that they are spinning their wheels at a moment in history when they ought to be making desperately needed progress.
 >
NLA could be instrumental in restoring the entire American Common Law Court System, in reviving and restoring the land-based government we are owed—- but that isn’t where the NLA leadership has gone and that doesn’t appear to be where they are going.
—————————————
See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com


Thanks to: http://mainerepublicemailalert.com

Sheriff’s letter of support

Posted on February 15, 2016 by arnierosner
On Feb 15, 2016, at 5:34 PM, Anna von Reitz wrote:
Sheriff Palmer and Sheriff Clarke in Oregon have both realized that the “Federal Government” corporation and its for-hire agencies have usurped unlawful jurisdiction, but they may still not realize exactly how or why, so I wrote the following Letter of Support to Sheriff Palmer to make it absolutely clear:
 
February 15, 2016
Sheriff Glenn E. Palmer
Grant County Sheriff’s Office
205 South Humbolt
Canyon City, Oregon RFD 97820
 
Dear Sheriff Palmer,
I want to thank and congratulate you on your strong stand in behalf of The Constitution and for honoring the guarantees that both the States of America and the living people are owed.
Although you are currently employed by a “governmental services corporation” that forces you to spend your time and effort on corporate law enforcement activities—- enforcement of “Public Policies” and “code” and “statutory law” and “regulations” instead of enforcing the Organic and Public Law we are all owed—- Sheriff Richard Mack brought this very issue all the way to the US Supreme Court in Mack and Prinz v. USA and it was determined that you have every right to exercise your office in defense of The Constitution.
If anyone tries to intimidate you or tell you that you can’t enforce the Organic Law of this country, you just waive that under their noses.
That said, it must be clearly stated that as things now stand, you are not occupying any Public Office. This isn’t your fault and I am not criticizing you. This circumstance resulted from the units of State and County governments choosing to “incorporate” as franchises of the USA, Inc. back in the 1950’s and 60’s.
When you take a company operating on the land and under the Law of the Land and incorporate it, the resulting corporation then has to operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the international Law of the Sea.
The Constitution is the “Supreme Law of the Land” so far as the Federal Government is concerned, but without an unincorporated County or State organization to access that jurisdiction, you are stuck operating as you now are—- a mere employee of a governmental services corporation, placed between your stated and moral duty to enforce The Constitution and the Organic Law of this country and the demands of those operating the private corporation management for you to do nothing but enforce their edicts and regulations instead.
Mack and Prinz v. USA guarantees your right to enforce The Constitution, but a man cannot ultimately serve two masters.
The move is on to elect men like you to the true Public Office of Sheriff on the Land in restored Counties operating as unincorporated body politics owed absolute control of the land jurisdiction of this country once again. As a peace officer— as opposed to a “law enforcement” officer— you will be able to occupy the vacated Public Office of Sheriff on the Land and hold the highest peace keeping office in America. You will be able to deputize as many men as you need to deputize to guarantee The Constitution and enforce it and the rest of our Public Law. You will be able to commandeer whatever equipment you need.
The De Facto Rule of the Corporations as opposed to the Rule of Law and their usurpation upon our jurisdiction is swiftly coming to a well-deserved and ignominious end, as these organizations are being recognized internationally as the self-interested crime syndicates they have become.
The banks that have been running these “governmental services corporations” as storefronts and misrepresenting them as if these organizations were in fact our lawful government have been caught red-handed in mammoth fraud, unlawful conversion of assets, and enslavement.
From the “Governor” on down, people have knowingly or unknowingly been impersonating lawful Public Officials and appearing to act in our lawful Public Offices, while in fact occupying private corporate offices instead. Many of them have taken secretive advantage of the resulting lack of accountability to plunder our country and our people. Those who have abused our trust and used these similarly named private offices as a means to abuse the power of Public Offices for private gain and purposes of plunder are guilty of terrible crimes. They will be prosecuted accordingly.
Please try to inform your fellow-Sheriffs of the facts so that no more of them fall into the trap of obeying unlawful and immoral orders. The Nuremburg Tribunal has been reopened to serve those who, like Sheriff Ward, continue to follow orders that are: (1) not issued by anyone holding valid Public Office; (2) violate the Organic and Public Law of this country; (3) result in harming innocent people and their public and private property interests.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska RFD 99652
 
***Please, take the time to add your voices. Send your letters and cards of support to Sheriff Palmer at the address above. He has been under a lot of pressure from the criminals operating the Federal Corporation and its “Oregon” franchise to stand down from his support of the actual Public Law of this country. He needs your support and he needs to know why he is right and why those criticizing him are wrong.***


Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com

Judge Anna: Open Letter to Sheriff Glen Palmer, Grant County, Oregon

Posted on February 16, 2016 by arnierosner
February 16, 2016
Sheriff Glenn E. Palmer
Grant County Sheriff’s Office
205 South Humbolt
Canyon City, Oregon RFD 97820

Dear Sheriff Palmer,
I want to thank and congratulate you on your strong stand in behalf of The Constitution and for honoring the guarantees that both the States of America and the living people are owed.
Although you are currently employed by a “governmental services corporation” that forces you to spend your time and effort on corporate law enforcement activities—- enforcement of “Public Policies” and “code” and “statutory law” and “regulations” instead of enforcing the Organic and Public Law we are all owed—- Sheriff Richard Mack brought this very issue all the way to the US Supreme Court in Mack and Prinz v. USA and it was determined that you have every right to exercise your office in defense of The Constitution.
If anyone tries to intimidate you or tell you that you can’t enforce the Organic Law of this country, you just waive that under their noses.
That said, it must be clearly stated that as things now stand, you are not occupying any Public Office. This isn’t your fault and I am not criticizing you. This circumstance resulted from the units of State and County governments choosing to “incorporate” as franchises of the USA, Inc. back in the 1950’s and 60’s.
When you take a company operating on the land and under the Law of the Land and incorporate it, the resulting corporation then has to operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the international Law of the Sea.
The Constitution is the “Supreme Law of the Land” so far as the Federal Government is concerned, but without an unincorporated County or State organization to access that jurisdiction, you are stuck operating as you now are—- a mere employee of a governmental services corporation, placed between your stated and moral duty to enforce The Constitution and the Organic Law of this country and the demands of those operating the private corporation management for you to do nothing but enforce their edicts and regulations instead.
Mack and Prinz v. USA guarantees your right to enforce The Constitution, but a man cannot ultimately serve two masters.
The move is on to elect men like you to the true Public Office of Sheriff on the Land in restored Counties operating as unincorporated body politics owed absolute control of the land jurisdiction of this country once again. As a peace officer— as opposed to a “law enforcement” officer— you will be able to occupy the vacated Public Office of Sheriff on the Land and hold the highest peace keeping office in America. You will be able to deputize as many men as you need to deputize to guarantee The Constitution and enforce it and the rest of our Public Law. You will be able to commandeer whatever equipment you need.
The De Facto Rule of the Corporations as opposed to the Rule of Law and their usurpation upon our jurisdiction is swiftly coming to a well-deserved and ignominious end, as these organizations are being recognized internationally as the self-interested crime syndicates they have become.
The banks that have been running these “governmental services corporations” as storefronts and misrepresenting them as if these organizations were in fact our lawful government have been caught red-handed in mammoth fraud, unlawful conversion of assets, and enslavement.
From the “Governor” on down, people have knowingly or unknowingly been impersonating lawful Public Officials and appearing to act in our lawful Public Offices, while in fact occupying private corporate offices instead. Many of them have taken secretive advantage of the resulting lack of accountability to plunder our country and our people. Those who have abused our trust and used these similarly named private offices as a means to abuse the power of Public Offices for private gain and purposes of plunder are guilty of terrible crimes. They will be prosecuted accordingly.
Please try to inform your fellow-Sheriffs of the facts so that no more of them fall into the trap of obeying unlawful and immoral orders. The Nuremburg Tribunal has been reopened to serve those who, like Sheriff Ward, continue to follow orders that are: (1) not issued by anyone holding valid Public Office; (2) violate the Organic and Public Law of this country; (3) result in harming innocent people and their public and private property interests.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska RFD 99652


Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com