MUST READ! Breach of Trust (Fee Schedule) “It is the responsibility of those who exercise power to show that it is legitimate.” Noam Chomsky It is not possible to charge or arrest people for statutory offenses under the common law.
Monday, March 3, 2014
Breach of Trust (Fee Schedule)
“It is the responsibility of those who exercise power to show that it is legitimate.” Noam Chomsky
It is not possible to charge or arrest people for statutory offenses under the common law. The U.S. Corp. is operating under presumed Admiralty – Maritime (pirate) jurisdiction when they arrest “persons” (within 2-letter code followed by 5 number code “pirate jurisdiction”) for statutory offenses. This is considered an “in rem” action against a vessel (action against the thing).
In “Economic Analysis of Property Rights”, Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, Barzel observed that, what really matters for an individual is his ability to “use” a given commodity. Under these considerations, it can be seen that the extent to which an individual can enjoy the attributes of his or her property actually defines his rights over that good. To make his point, Barzel stated that “anyone who expects to benefit from an asset, be it a legal owner or a thief, is (at least) a partial owner”. To include this real but informal dimension, Barzel defines property rights to include legal (formal) property rights and economic (informal) property rights.
In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide:
• They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time.
• They can exclude others from using them.
• They can also grant similar advantages to selected others.
Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule.
If the man or woman has put those impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action.
Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
“Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).
The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads:
“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906).
Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands.
Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in 1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union.
Posted by John MacHaffie at 2:39 PM