OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Teacher Speaks Out: “I Know 2 Kids Who Died Suddenly in the Last 3 Days”
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyToday at 11:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Georgia Guidestones...You Should Pay CLOSE Attention
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyToday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» Fracking Company Admits Criminal Responsibility
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 12:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Strange Phenomenon Filmed in Ecuador
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 11:24 am by PurpleSkyz

» Released JFK Files Reveal US Military Personnel Intercepted Coded Messages About Assassination Plot
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 11:19 am by PurpleSkyz

» Uncounted Vaccine Deaths on Our Highways and Railways
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 11:16 am by PurpleSkyz

» Died Suddenly's 12/02/22
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 11:08 am by PurpleSkyz

» French study looks at potential for fully covid jabbed to “shed” byproducts onto others
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 10:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» GOP Senators Say They Will Block Military Funding Unless Vaccine Mandate Scrapped
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 10:33 am by PurpleSkyz

» Australian PM Tells US to Drop Charges Against Julian Assange
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 10:29 am by PurpleSkyz

» Top Oncologist: Cancer in Patients Exploding After COVID Shots
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 10:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» Elon Musk "Confident" Brain Chip Company Neuralink Can Begin Human Trials In Six Months
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyYesterday at 10:13 am by PurpleSkyz

» IRS Warns Americans To Report Annual PayPal, Venmo Transactions Exceeding $600 Per Year
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 2:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Archeologists Rediscover an Ancient Peruvian Fresco That Hasn't Been Seen In 106 Years
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 12:14 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Eyes Wide Open - We Need More CowBell
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 11:36 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Vaccine Cult Wants to Rid the Earth of Anti-Vaxxers by Labeling Them Insane and Dangerous
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 11:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» Ka-Boom!!!
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 11:17 am by PurpleSkyz

» Tonight's Sky: December
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 10:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» DEAD MEN DON’T TALK: Who Is Killing The Crypto Millionaires?
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 1:29 am by PurpleSkyz

» FBI Wants 66 Years to Release Seth Rich Laptop Data It Said It Didn’t Have
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 1:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» “My Boy Is Dead From The Vaccine, F **K YOU!” Angry Dad Tells Weak Soy Boy Trudeau
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 1:08 am by PurpleSkyz

»  The Revolt in China: What It Means by Jon Rappoport
How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters EmptyThu Dec 01, 2022 12:57 am by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENTS & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters

How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters


  • Big Brother
  • Police State
  • Surveillance Society

by Elle - Jun 27, 2015
0 2

How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters 1435223707312-700x438





How the Feds Asked Me to Rat Out Commenters Print
Photo Illustration by Emil Lendof/The Daily Beast
Dick Gillespie
The Daily Beast
Reason.com, the website I edit, was recently commanded by the feds to provide information on a few commenters and not discuss it. Here’s why we’re speaking out.
Is there anything more likely to make you shit your pants out of a mix of fear and anger than getting a federal subpoena out of the blue?
Well, yes, there is: getting a gag order that prohibits you from speaking publicly about that subpoena and even the gag order itself. Talk about feeling isolated and cast adrift in the home of the free. You can’t even respond honestly when someone asks, “Are you under a court order not to speak?”
Far more important: talk about realizing that open expression and press freedom are far more tenuous than even the most cynical of us can imagine! Even when you have done nothing wrong and aren’t the target of an investigation, you can be commanded, at serious financial cost and disruption of your business, to dance to a tune called by the long arm of the law.
This all just happened to my colleagues and me at Reason.com, the libertarian website I edit. On May 31, I blogged about the life sentence given to Ross Ulbricht, the creator of the “dark web” site Silk Road, by Judge Katherine Forrest. In the comments section, a half-dozen commenters unloaded on Forrest, suggesting that, among other things, she should burn in hell, “be taken out back and shot,” and, in a well-worn Internet homage to the Coen Brothers movie Fargo, be fed “feet first” into a woodchipper.
The comments betrayed a naive belief in an afterlife and karma, were grammatically and spelling-challenged, hyperbolic, and… completely within the realm of acceptable Internet discourse, especially for an unmoderated comments section. (Like other websites, Reason is not legally responsible for what goes on in our comments section; we read the comments sometimes but don’t actively curate them.)
But the U.S. attorney for U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkthought differently and on June 2 issued a grand jury subpoena to Reason for all identifying information we had on the offending commenters—things such as IP addresses, names, emails, and other information. At first, the feds requested that we “voluntarily” refrain from disclosing the subpoena to anybody. Out of sense of fairness and principle, we notified the targeted commenters, who could have moved to quash the subpoena. Then came the gag order on June 4, barring us from talking about the whole business with anyone outside our organization besides our lawyers.
You can read a detailed account of how events, including the lifting of the gag order, played out here. As the legal blogger Ken White of Popehat has argued, the episode is plainly a huge abuse of power.
To the extent that the feds actually thought these were serious plans to do real harm, why the hell would they respond with a slow-moving subpoena whose deadline was days away?
I’ll leave the detailed legal arguments to White, who confesses that once upon a time he was “an entitled, arrogant little douchesquirt when [he] was a federal prosecutor.” I’ve got my own reasons for seeing this episode as outrageous and something that all of us who read and write online—whether as bylined authors or anonymous commenters—should be worried about.
For starters, the subpoena was unnecessary because the comments obviously weren’t real threats. One of the commenters scooped up in this had written, “I hope there is a special place in hell reserved for that horrible woman” while another opined, “I’d prefer a hellish place on Earth be reserved for her as well.” What kind of country are we living in where you get in hot water for such tepid blaspheming? Even the more outrageous comments—“Its (sic) judges like these that should be taken out back and shot” —wouldn’t exactly stir fear in the heart of anyone who has accessed the Web since AOL stopped charging by the hour.
As White writes, “True threat analysis always examines context. Here, the context strongly weighs in favor of hyperbole. The comments are on the Internet, a wretched hive of scum, villainy, and gaseous smack talk. They are on a political blog, about a judicial-political story; such stories are widely known to draw such bluster. They are specifically at Reason.com, a site with excellent content but cursed with a group of commenters who think such trash talk is amusing.”
But here’s the thing we non-lawyers might think of first: To the extent that the feds actually thought these were serious plans to do real harm, why the hell would they respond with a slow-moving subpoena whose deadline was days away? By spending five minutes doing the laziest, George Jetson-style online “research” (read: Google and site searches), they would have found publicly available info on some of the commenters. I’m talking things like websites and Google+ pages. One of the commenters had literally posted thousands of comments at Reason.com, from which it is clear that he (assuming it is a he) is not exactly a threat to anyone other than common decency.
But that’s your tax dollars at work, costing a reputable, award-winning website—albeit one that is sharply critical of government when it comes to snooping in the boardroom and the bedroom—time and money to comply with a subpoena for non-threatening readers. Even worse, the feds are doing the same to readers who may or may not have any resources to help them comply with legal proceedings that can go very wrong very quickly.
More Here>>
+++
[hat tip: Michael]
ZenGardner.com


Thanks to: http://www.zengardner.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum