OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» German City to Stop Publishing Statistics of Vaccinated Hospitalizations to Avoid “Playing Into the Hands of Corona Deniers”
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 11:51 am by PurpleSkyz

» Current Map of Cargo Containers at Sea Around the U.S.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 10:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» Fireball Witnessed in 9 States Was Likely a Failed Russian Satellite
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» New Zealand PM Brags About Making Unvaxxed People Second-Class Citizens as Part of Push to Get Covid Jab
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 10:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID For Amish: Herd Immunity Achieved With No Hospitalizations, Isolation, or Vaccines
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 10:09 am by PurpleSkyz

» Tens of Thousands in Bern, Switzerland Reject Vaccine Passports, Mandates
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 12:35 am by PurpleSkyz

» NYC WORKERS ANTI-MANDATE MARCH
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 12:32 am by PurpleSkyz

» Millions Worldwide Push Back Against Tyranny & Stand for Freedom: “We Do Not Consent. We Will Not Comply.”
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 12:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» BREAKING ALERT !!! OROVILLE DAM POWER PLANT SHUTTING DOWN !
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 12:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» Three Ohio judges “die unexpectedly” in nine-day span after vaxx mandate in Cuyahoga County
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 12:25 am by PurpleSkyz

» Analysis Of VAERS Data: 5,427% Increase In Deaths Following COVID Shots Compared To ALL Vaccines The Past 10 Years
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptyYesterday at 12:21 am by PurpleSkyz

» WILLY MYCO'S $100,000.00 (100k) CHALLENGE TO ANJALI
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 3:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Scientist Asks: Why Are We Still Letting Fluoride Harm Kids?
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 10:33 am by PurpleSkyz

» Indiana tells fired unvaccinated Chicago cops to come work there – no covid vaccines required
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:55 am by PurpleSkyz

» Light On The Mystery of UFOs
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:53 am by PurpleSkyz

» Tonight’s Sky- November 2021
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» Josh Watkins is a hero! His Powerful Story About Being Fired From Highly Specialized Job Went Viral
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:33 am by PurpleSkyz

» New physics: latest results from Cern further boost tantalizing evidence
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:21 am by PurpleSkyz

» Is consciousness fractal?
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:19 am by PurpleSkyz

» As the protests continue - the people are awake
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:16 am by PurpleSkyz

» Fabled 'Island of Gold' discovered in Sumatra ?
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:12 am by PurpleSkyz

» Canadian Librarians Join Country-wide Walkout Against Mandated Toxic Injections
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist EmptySun Oct 24, 2021 9:07 am by PurpleSkyz





Holistic Alternative
Health Care
by Bridgette Lyn Dolgoff

CONTACT HERE TO SCHEDULE ONLINE SESSIONS
www.https://coe-llc.com

NEW ETSY SHOP FEATURING HERBAL SALVES

NOW MAKING A MEDICATED OIL FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE PCR DAMAGE
www.https://coe-llc.com








You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » POISON PLANET » POISON PLANET » American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist Gmo
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist





A researcher breached ethical regulations by publishing a paper which allegedly used ethical mis-steps to advance their study. The paper, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, used human subjects, including children. One of the complaints which led to the paper’s retraction was that the researchers were unable to provide appropriate documentation which clearly showed that all adults and children involved in the experiment were provided with a full consent form for the study. The paper was also retracted for other reasons, including their possible noncompliance with NIH guidelines, and also the question of whether some participants in the study were even eligible. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition gave the following specific reasons for their retraction of the paper(1, 2):
The article cited above, which was originally published in the September 2012 issue and prepublished on 1 August 2012, has been retracted by the publisher for the following reasons:

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition retracts unethical GMO study by dishonest biotech scientist ;libID=118499

1. The authors are unable to provide sufficient evidence that the study had been reviewed and approved by a local ethics committee in China in a manner fully consistent with NIH guidelines. Furthermore, the engaged institutions in China did not have US Federal Wide Assurances and had not registered their Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Review Committee).
2. The authors are unable to substantiate through documentary evidence that all parents or children involved in the study were provided with the full consent form for the study.
3. Specific eligibility issues were identified in regard to 2 subjects in the study.
The study revolved around the supposed nutritional benefit of Golden Rice. Golden Rice has been touted as the answer to world hunger and vitamin A deficiency, most common in poorer countries where the people don’t always have access to adequate nutrition. Vitamin A deficiency often leads to blindness and death. Golden Rice is a genetically modified organism that has been surrounded by controversy. Wang Jing, a campaigner for Greenpeace in China, pointed out that the researchers didn’t tell the parents or children involved in the study that they were using a GM crop. “They actually hid the fact that golden rice is a genetically modified crop,” said Wang, as reported by NPR.(3)

Research driven by greed and profit?

The paper, titled “β-Carotene in Golden Rice is as good as β-carotene in oil at providing vitamin A to children” focused on comparing β-carotene from Golden Rice with β-carotene in oil form; the paper also claimed that Golden Rice was better at providing vitamin A to children than spinach. A 2013 paper published by Greenpeace International titled “Golden Illusion: The Promises of ‘Golden’ Rice” cries foul to the researchers’ claims(4):
Receive breaking news, alerts and stories from the Glitch email list

But exactly how beta-carotene from golden rice would be processed in the human body, and how the products compare to natural beta-carotene in plants, is not yet known.
Any food safety assessment of golden rice would be extremely complex. Most regulatory systems rely on the concept of substantial equivalence, where the plant is considered equal to its non-GE counterpart except for the protein produced by the introduced genes. However, because golden rice attempts to introduce a whole new biochemical pathway, the concept of substantial equivalence is not applicable.
Greenpeace goes on to say that Golden Rice really isn’t needed, or necessary, which begs the question, why promote this product anyway?
Perhaps there is money behind conducting a study to show the benefits of a GM product like Golden Rice. As Greenpeace points out, the Golden Rice research project has a great PR team. Yet, in 2015, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy the US Patent and Trademark Office awarded the Golden Rice inventors with a humanitarian award.(5)
As GRAIN.org points out, “Golden Rice is being developed by a ‘public-private partnership’ led by Syngenta, one of the world’s largest pesticide and seed corporations and the owner of the patent rights involved, and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).”(6) Scientists benefiting from the very industry their studies are based on can not be trust to be honest in their own published work. If the scientists themselves cannot conduct research ethically on this product, then how are we to believe that his isn’t a profit-driven scheme backed by major agrochemical companies who are, rightly known, to be nefarious in their work?
Sources:
(1) GMWatch.org
(2) RetractionWatch.com
(3) NPR.org
(4) [url=http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/agriculture/2013/458 - Golden Illusion-GE-goldenrice.pdf]Greenpeace.org[/url][PDF]
(5) Independent.co.uk
(6) Grain.org


Thanks to: http://glitch.news



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum