OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Boris Johnson: "The government will no longer mandate the wearing of face masks"
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 11:35 am by PurpleSkyz

» Updated Info: Olympic Sprinter Announces Pericarditis Diagnosis on Facebook Following Pfizer Booster Jab
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 11:10 am by PurpleSkyz

» Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: Latest Bombshell About COVID “Vaccines” W
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 11:08 am by PurpleSkyz

» Astronomers Analyze Impact of SpaceX’s Starlink Satellites
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» Canadian Business Owners Fight Back Against New Lockdowns
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» Good People Doing Good Things — Little Things Mean A Lot
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 10:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» VAXXED Blood - The Issue of Transfusions
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 10:26 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Truckers Block Highways On Canadian Border To Protest Vaccine Mandate
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 1:58 am by PurpleSkyz

»  NCAA: Athletes Who Had COVID Will Be Considered ‘Fully Vaccinated’
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyToday at 1:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» After The “Vaccine” Rollout, Myocarditis Rates Skyrocketed – See For Yourself!
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 12:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Five nurses speak out about what is really going on in hospitals
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 12:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The History of Blood Type Personalities
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 11:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» Washington, DC ‘Defeat the Mandates’ March — January 23rd: Full List of Speakers
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 11:50 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger: On the Bio-Hacking of Humanity via Graphene Oxide in Vaccines & 5G/WiFi
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 11:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» MIT-Educated Doctor Ordered to Undergo Psych Evaluation After Prescribing Ivermectin
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 11:24 am by PurpleSkyz

» Stunning Vitamin D Papers Currently Ignored When Needed Most
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 11:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» Up to 65% Increase in Deaths Among 18-49 Year Olds in the U.S. During 2021, the Year of the Experimental COVID “Vaccines”
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 11:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» Has anyone seen this report?
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyYesterday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» 36 Million Families to Stop Receiving Monthly Child Tax Credit Payments in January
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyMon Jan 17, 2022 6:11 pm by bigdog2aton

» Mysterious town in Japan is obsessed with UFOs and aliens
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyMon Jan 17, 2022 1:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Martin Luther King, Jr. I Have A Dream Speech
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets EmptyMon Jan 17, 2022 12:20 pm by PurpleSkyz








U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets 4ccd9cb4-22af-4abe-a6c4-4d57fbce210b_zps8t6pdo1h

You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » HOW TO BEAT THE SYSTEM » U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets

U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin



U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets

Posted on June 10, 2016 by David Robinson



“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”
Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –
Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”
Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”

Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.”

Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). “A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.”
Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41. “The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.”
Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. “The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”
House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. “The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles.
Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666. “The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.”
Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 “A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159;
Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”
-American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: “(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…” 10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. “A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.”
-International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’”
AND MANY MORE


Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com



  

topspin2



This is a true and accurate statement...I am living proof.  I have been through the courts and the courts agreed, they have no authority over the living man.....So do your homework and stand up to these thugs......The system is a parasite and cannot function without your energy..Take it back....

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum