Anna von Reitz ~ 10/29/2016

A Plague of Hopelessly Inept Demands and Declarations

Posted on October 28, 2016 by David Robinson
  Judge Anna von Reitz
My email has been jammed the past few weeks with all sorts of high-sounding “Declarations” and “Demands” and “Orders” and accusations of “Conspiracy Against the Constitution” and “Writs of Mandamus” and “Writs of……”
Well, you get the picture. All sorts of very angry people, and all of them talking in very high-tone and calling the government out in the name of “We, the People, of the United States of America”.
My friend, Ron, sent me another one of these tonight, and wearily, I just had to sit down and tell him—-
“Yes, but it is all totally useless and meaningless and if you take the time to listen I can tell you why.”
Americans are defined as “the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States”.
Catch that?
NOT the “free, sovereign and independent people of the United States of America”.
That is because there is no country [at least no country of ours] called the United States of America. And no National Trust established under that name.
It’s the “United States Declaration of Independence” — not the “United States of America Declaration of Independence”.
Where you start seeing the words “united States of America” is in the original Constitution, called “The Constitution for the united States of America”—— but note, there is a small “u” on the word “united”. It is used as an adjective describing “States of America”—- the actual name of the entity contracting for services from the federal government.
And what was the “States of America”?
It was a group of states (originally nine out of thirteen) who chose to create an association of “states” outside the already existing perpetual union created by The Articles of Confederation (1781).
Remember that in legalese, the word “of” means “without” in the sense of “within and without” or “outside of” or “belonging to” in the sense of a possession or attachment.
So “States of America” means “States Without America” or “States Outside of America” or “States Belonging to America”—- but they are not the same as the United States.
There are the States and there are the “States of States”. There is the within and the without. There is the land jurisdiction of the geographically defined state referred to as the “Texas State” and there is the “State of Texas” which is a corporation in the business of providing governmental services.
So what are the “united” States of America? They are businesses providing government services to the people living inside the boundaries of the land mass called “Texas” or “Rhode Island” or “Tennessee” that united in delegating some of their “powers” –that is, services they are responsible for providing— to a new subcontractor, an entity known as the “federal government”.
Originally, there were only nine out of thirteen, but the advantages and cost efficiency of banding together to provide for self-defense and with regard to other tasks, eventually won out.
By 1868, these original “State of State” businesses had incorporated under the auspices of the State of Delaware, the only State in the Union to have a Chancery Court and to allow insurance and registration of commercial corporations —-and they formed a new organization—an international commercial corporation calling itself the “United States of America”.
The United States of America formed by the “States of_________” was a private, mostly foreign-owned, multi-national corporation operating franchises under names styled as “State of Florida” and “State of Oklahoma” et alia and all these member franchises are in the business of providing government services.
So when you say, “We, the People, of the United States of America”—– what are you talking about? The only “people” involved in operating the “United States of America” are government employees, and by definition, government employees exist to serve the government—-not to be served by it.
We are treated to the unlikely and ultimately farce-like spectacle of people identifying themselves as government employees—- and at the same time trying to boss the government around.
Do employees boss their employer around? Since when?
Can you think of anything more pathetic? Laughable? Sad?
The authors of these high-sounding “demands” are most likely angry, half-awake, “stubbed my toe and ran out of coffee” American State Nationals blundering around with all their assumptions about reality intact and not a clue in this world what is actually going on. They don’t realize yet that they are “people of the United States” and not “People of the United States of America”—- and they probably haven’t even noticed that there is a difference.
But if you want to get beyond the stumbling around and angry stage you have to notice and you have to think.
If you want to act and be recognized as Americans and give orders to the government, you have to say, “We, the People, of the United States” ——the ones who signed The Declaration of Independence, the ones who fought the Revolution, the ones who own the land of the United States, the ones who are owed the United States Trust, the ones who are NOT bound by or parties to any “Constitution” and who owe no duty of “citizenship” at all to any government.
Because “We, the People of the United States of America” are all government employees, elected officials, their dependents, etc., and they are all British Subjects, all bound and required to serve the government, and they can’t order the government around because they work for the government and are dependent on the government and are considered “franchisees” of the government.
Now, isn’t that a kick in the pants? Maybe someone— you— should explain all this to these folks? And while you are at it, tell them that even when and if you choose to reclaim your actual birthright political status as American State Nationals and even when and if you choose to act as one of the “free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States”—-it is still true that you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar and it is not fair, right, or honorable to be rude and accusatory and unkind toward people who are just as confused as you were before I clued you in.
So if you feel any shred of thankfulness for the half hour I spent writing all this down for you and your friends, be as kind to the government employees as I have been to you. Show them some decency and respect and realize that they really are just here to serve you—- once you stop shouting and unwittingly claiming to be one of them.
LikeShow more reactions
CommentShare
My email has been jammed the past few weeks with all sorts of high-sounding “Declarations” and “Demands” and “Orders” and accusations of “Conspiracy Against the Constitution” and “Writs of Mandamus” and “Writs of……”
Well, you get the picture. All sorts of very angry people, and all of them talking in very high-tone and calling the government out in the name of “We, the People, of the United States of America”.
My friend, Ron, sent me another one of these tonight, and wearily, I just had to sit down and tell him—-
“Yes, but it is all totally useless and meaningless and if you take the time to listen I can tell you why.”
Americans are defined as “the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States”.
Catch that?
NOT the “free, sovereign and independent people of the United States of America”.
That is because there is no country [at least no country of ours] called the United States of America. And no National Trust established under that name.
It’s the “United States Declaration of Independence” — not the “United States of America Declaration of Independence”.
Where you start seeing the words “united States of America” is in the original Constitution, called “The Constitution for the united States of America”—— but note, there is a small “u” on the word “united”. It is used as an adjective describing “States of America”—- the actual name of the entity contracting for services from the federal government.
And what was the “States of America”?
It was a group of states (originally nine out of thirteen) who chose to create an association of “states” outside the already existing perpetual union created by The Articles of Confederation (1781).
Remember that in legalese, the word “of” means “without” in the sense of “within and without” or “outside of” or “belonging to” in the sense of a possession or attachment.
So “States of America” means “States Without America” or “States Outside of America” or “States Belonging to America”—- but they are not the same as the United States.
There are the States and there are the “States of States”. There is the within and the without. There is the land jurisdiction of the geographically defined state referred to as the “Texas State” and there is the “State of Texas” which is a corporation in the business of providing governmental services.
So what are the “united” States of America? They are businesses providing government services to the people living inside the boundaries of the land mass called “Texas” or “Rhode Island” or “Tennessee” that united in delegating some of their “powers” –that is, services they are responsible for providing— to a new subcontractor, an entity known as the “federal government”.
Originally, there were only nine out of thirteen, but the advantages and cost efficiency of banding together to provide for self-defense and with regard to other tasks, eventually won out.
By 1868, these original “State of State” businesses had incorporated under the auspices of the State of Delaware, the only State in the Union to have a Chancery Court and to allow insurance and registration of commercial corporations —-and they formed a new organization—an international commercial corporation calling itself the “United States of America”.
The United States of America formed by the “States of_________” was a private, mostly foreign-owned, multi-national corporation operating franchises under names styled as “State of Florida” and “State of Oklahoma” et alia and all these member franchises are in the business of providing government services.
So when you say, “We, the People, of the United States of America”—– what are you talking about? The only “people” involved in operating the “United States of America” are government employees, and by definition, government employees exist to serve the government—-not to be served by it.
We are treated to the unlikely and ultimately farce-like spectacle of people identifying themselves as government employees—- and at the same time trying to boss the government around.
Do employees boss their employer around? Since when?
Can you think of anything more pathetic? Laughable? Sad?
The authors of these high-sounding “demands” are most likely angry, half-awake, “stubbed my toe and ran out of coffee” American State Nationals blundering around with all their assumptions about reality intact and not a clue in this world what is actually going on. They don’t realize yet that they are “people of the United States” and not “People of the United States of America”—- and they probably haven’t even noticed that there is a difference.
But if you want to get beyond the stumbling around and angry stage you have to notice and you have to think.
If you want to act and be recognized as Americans and give orders to the government, you have to say, “We, the People, of the United States” ——the ones who signed The Declaration of Independence, the ones who fought the Revolution, the ones who own the land of the United States, the ones who are owed the United States Trust, the ones who are NOT bound by or parties to any “Constitution” and who owe no duty of “citizenship” at all to any government.
Because “We, the People of the United States of America” are all government employees, elected officials, their dependents, etc., and they are all British Subjects, all bound and required to serve the government, and they can’t order the government around because they work for the government and are dependent on the government and are considered “franchisees” of the government.
Now, isn’t that a kick in the pants? Maybe someone— you— should explain all this to these folks? And while you are at it, tell them that even when and if you choose to reclaim your actual birthright political status as American State Nationals and even when and if you choose to act as one of the “free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States”—-it is still true that you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar and it is not fair, right, or honorable to be rude and accusatory and unkind toward people who are just as confused as you were before I clued you in.
So if you feel any shred of thankfulness for the half hour I spent writing all this down for you and your friends, be as kind to the government employees as I have been to you. Show them some decency and respect and realize that they really are just here to serve you—- once you stop shouting and unwittingly claiming to be one of them.

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com

Late in the Evening Comes the Dawn — the Bundys Exonerated

Posted on October 28, 2016 by David Robinson
  Anna von Reitz
For months now members of the Living Law Firm have labored to bring forward vital information to the patriots imprisoned over the stand-off at the Malheur Wildlife Refuge near Burns, Oregon. They have labored side by side with Bar Attorneys who risked their careers and honored their calling to seek justice for all.
And last night, just before bedtime, I got a call.
The Bundys, Shawna Cox, and all the others misidentified and falsely accused by the corporate scum have been exonerated and found “Not Guilty” on all charges.
This is a true victory and one that was won against a stacked deck.
The trial was held in a Federal Court— a court owned and operated by sister corporations of those corporations that brought the charges.
Imagine that you and Cousin Bobby Sue are squabbling over the ownership rights of a doughnut. She has already eaten hers, so she grabbed yours. You objected. And her aunt from the other side of the family gets to decide who gets the doughnut.
Not exactly a level playing field. Her Aunt knows her and doesn’t know you from Adam. And Bobby Sue is jumping up and down and pointing her finger at you and saying, “It’s my doughnut! It’s mine! He tried to take it from me!”
You are standing there as Aunt Bertha comes down on you, knowing full well that you spent your allowance for the weekend buying the doughnut Bobby Sue already wolfed down, plus the doughnut she is trying to steal from you.
You did your part and more. Without you, there wouldn’t be a doughnut to fight over. You were the source of the property from the start, but Aunt Bertha doesn’t know that. She’s standing there in her Size 11’s, glaring at you, moving her tremendous bulk into position to seize the doughnut back, give it to Bobby Sue, and paddle your butt.
That’s the position the Bundys and Shawna Cox and the others have been in from the start of this fiasco. The truth of the matter was utterly obscured and they have had to fight uphill every step of the way against the prejudice of the Court and the Media and the zombie-like ignorance of millions of government slaves.
Throughout the trial the judge kept redacting evidence and disallowing evidence. Sometimes it seemed like the Bundys weren’t going to be allowed to present their side of the story at all. The jury wasn’t allowed to know their political status. Historical facts were “disallowed”. It was gag order upon gag order.
The protesters had to stand trial as if they were “citizens” obligated to obey and serve the government, otherwise the government couldn’t claim jurisdiction over them, so the government judge just “disallowed” the evidence showing otherwise.
And the jury? Well, the jury pool was — you guessed it — all government “citizens”—- people who at least on paper admit to being employees or dependents of the government and who owe their “allegiance”—- as in serfs and kings, to the government.
Now imagine the situation.
Aunt Bertha has you by the ear and is dragging you into the house where all Bobby Sue’s other relatives are gathered. They are going to be your jury. And Aunt Bertha isn’t even letting you tell your side of the story— just bits and pieces of it that she deems credible.
You are being tried as a stranger in a strange land. You are being judged by foreigners who have a natural conflict of interest and bias against you, because “one of theirs” stands to gain if you are found guilty and dispossessed of your property.
Against all odds against it, that unlikely jury found the Bundys and the others not guilty on all charges. Somehow, somewhere, the truth rang out and they heard it despite every attempt to squelch it.
God bless the jurors.
Even if they weren’t actually “peers” of the Bundys and the others, even if they were “pledged” as infants to be stoodges owned and operated by the government and its franchise corporations, like the BLM and FBI, they still delivered the only right, true, and honest verdict possible.
It was a long, hard, dangerous proceeding, but in the end, the jury prevailed. Justice was done. And it only took six hours of deliberation.
For the Bundys there is one more challenge to be faced, because there were also charges brought in Nevada. There, again. they will face the same situation, the same false presumptions, the same trial as strangers in a foreign jurisdiction, being judged by people who have a natural conflict of interest.
But within that conflict of interest lies the germinating seed of truth— and the realization that in truth, we are all Americans. We all have a dog in this fight.

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com

A Crash Course in Skepticism —- and Hope

Posted on October 28, 2016 by David Robinson
  Judge Anna von Reitz
Take a good look at my face. My hooded eyes. My cupid’s bow pout. Where have you seen them before? Only in all the great houses and the great portrait galleries of the world. I am a Hapsburg. The map of the Holy Roman Empire is written on my face.
A hundred generations of European skullduggery runs in my veins. I am the living heir of the Holy Roman Empire—- first, second, third, fourth, and however many iterations of it there are or may be, here I am, the end of the line.
It all comes down to me and the Holy See knows it.
Merovingian, Carolingian, Batavian, Hanoverian, Mecklenburger, Lichtensteiner, I am like the Grand Central Station of bloodlines, all intersecting.
And as Voltaire correctly observed, the mess that I am heir to is not holy, not Roman, and not an empire.
It’s an unholy, worldwide, multi-national corporation that my Father lived and died to protect me from ever knowing anything about.
Thanks to him, my Father, I grew up innocent as the flowers in May of any such heritage. It was only after his death that the darkness began to ooze forward, like a pool of blood from a corpse hidden under the bed.
Just as you can look at my face and know more or less where I came from, you can look at other faces, too.
Take out your newspaper clippings and look at photos of George Bush. Senior and George W. Bush and Jeb Bush and then look at their “cousins”– Governors Bill and Scott Walker.
Look at Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski’s face and family history and what do you find?
It’s all over, everywhere, hidden in plain sight—- and easy to read for anyone who has eyes to see and ears to hear.
All these crazy stories you are hearing about ruling families and bloodlines are true, but that being true does not necessarily give rise to all the other crappola that is deduced or extrapolated from it or theorized about it.
Being a Hapsburg doesn’t mean that I drink blood for breakfast. It doesn’t mean that I am super-wealthy. It doesn’t mean anything more or less than being a Johnson or an O’Brien or a Montagne.
Individuals are born into families, and that’s the way it is.
For perhaps a million or more years on this planet, an advanced civilization prospered. It was a caste system similar to the caste system still found in India today. Circa 32,000 years ago, this Aryan civilization was destroyed in what is known as The Great Plasma War.
You live in its wreckage every day.
These people being identified and called “Reptilians” are descendants of the Warrior Caste of that ancient civilization They were born and bred for war the same way that Dachshunds are bred for going down badger holes. They can’t help being what they are and they are not intrinsically evil, but they are not well-suited to functioning as political leaders.
They simply step into the gap for lack of anyone else to do it, and then get blamed for accepting the ugly job nobody else wants.
In the ancient Aryan Caste System, the rulers were the priests, and the priests were not priests as we think of them today. They were scientists and they were known as the “All Seeing”—-for their uncanny ability to see through and beyond appearances and to discern truth in spite of all efforts to lie and obfuscate.
How is it that I always know the truth, whether I want to or not?
Blaming people for their genetic heritage— whether it is expressed as a skin color or an inability to think beyond patterns of “either/or” or a deformed arm— is like blaming a rock for being granite instead of sandstone.
You have to take each utterly unique creation one by one, just as God makes them, judging them according to their fruits and their words and their deeds. If you are sane yourself, you can’t make assumptions about people and write them off because of such inheritances— “Oh, he’s a Rothschild, so he’s bad!” is as illogical as, “She’s got green eyes, so she’s jealous!”
One of the best allies I have had in the long fight to free people and see to it that they have what they need to thrive and be happy is a Rothschild.
And I will stand in front of the World Court or anywhere else on Earth and say so, too.
Another True Friend of decency and peace and compassion is descended from the Egyptian Pharoahs.
Another is a Muslim who faithfully prays five times a day, facing Mecca, and he is faultlessly generous and wise and kind.
Another is a former member of the Russian Mafia, who “turned the corner”, experienced miracles in his life, and came to God.
It’s not where we all come from that counts—- it’s where we are going, and on this journey you can make no pat assumptions about anyone or anything. You have to look and see and think for yourselves.
You have to be skeptical, yes, very skeptical all the time. You have to test and weigh things in the balance. You have to look for the motivations behind what people say and do. You have to do your own sifting and proving.
But in the end, you also have to take chances and believe and make leaps of faith, because as necessary as healthy cynicism is, it serves only the limited function of winnowing out the bad from the good and the true from the false. It does nothing positive toward building a future.
A man may have been a criminal ten years ago and be a saint today.
If I am to speak to you as I would speak to my own son, I would say that we walk on a balance beam all our days, and that we must be resolute in the face of great evil and recognize it for what it is. Yet at the same time, there is no need to fear and no need to falter.
In our heart of hearts we all know what is good. We all know what is true. We all know what is valuable.
Focus on that. Keep it mind. Hold it close. Let that be your compass in all the strange and even bizarre things that happen. Your logic may fail you. Your senses may deceive you. Your heart may mislead you. But the Holy Spirit which is Truth lives in you and if you listen closely and with an open mind, the “still small Voice” will bring you safely home.

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailalert.com