Hiding the Evidence: New Zealand Gladio-Style Black Op?

Hiding the Evidence: New Zealand Gladio-Style Black Op?

William Craddick at Disobedient Media has written a bombshell article, entitled “Evidence Indicates Link Between North Korean embassy Break-in and Christchurch Attacks”, which points to evidence that a paramilitary group was involved in the Christchurch massacre and while the Mainstream Media is only naming a single suspect, Australian national Brenton Tarrant, this distracts from the fact that the he was arrested with other suspects.
The investigation and analysis by Disobedient media indicates that Tarrant and his group likely have professional military connections, citing details that suggest the terror attack in Christchurch was perpetrated by the same cell as the February 22nd break-in of the North Korean embassy in Madrid, Spain. Craddick surmises this cell has ties to the intelligence agencies in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, cooperating jointly under the UKUSA “Five Eyes” (FVEY) Agreement.
In both Madrid and Christchurch, the units were skilled in breach and clear tactics of buildings filled with people; in both cases, the buildings were cleared quickly and efficiently, even though the goal of the Madrid incident was focused on intelligence-gathering, as opposed to mass-murder.
In addition, Turkish state media has published an image of Brenton Tarrant taken at airport security from when he entered that country on at least two occasions in 2016. Citing Tarrant’s writings, the Turkish government is claiming that he entered Turkey to carry out a terror attack or attempt the assassination of Turkish President Erdogan.
Craddick tweeted that Tarrant appears also to have visited Afghanistan and Xinjiang, the Western Chinese province populated by ethnic Uyghurs where an estimated 1 million Uyghur Muslims have been sent to re-education camps by the Chinese Communist Party over the past year, with many dying in these facilities. Travel privileges for foreign nationals to this region are normally restricted.
Video footage of the attacks being distributed online shows two individuals at the scene in Christchurch carrying firearms. As is typical in this kind of an attack, multiple shooters are originally reported and then only one person is named, never to speak of the other suspects again. Sean from the SGT Report notes numerous additional discrepancies between the footage and the news reports.
Incidentally, Kiwis are prohibited from viewing or possessing copies of this video. Zero Hedge reports that, “New Zealand authorities have reminded citizens that they face up to 10 years in prison for ‘knowingly’ possessing a copy of the New Zealand mosque shooting video – and up to 14 years in prison for sharing it. Corporations (such as web hosts) face an additional $200,000 ($137,000 US) fine under the same law.”
Facebook removed 1.5 million videos of the attack around the world within the first 24 hours – over 1.2 million of which were blocked during the upload stage (!) Facebook also removed all versions not showing graphic content, “out of concern for those affected.”
The NZ police has reportedly been contacting websites worldwide that are hosting this video and demanding they hand over the IP addresses of anyone conversing about or sharing it. (Kiwis wishing to engage in political debate about the attacks may consider getting a VPN).
In a familiar twist, the two officers who arrested Tarrant were not local police and had been in Christchurch for “firearms training”. The attack came the day after the New Zealand speaking tour of infamous Clintonista John Podesta.
Perhaps the biggest tell that all may not be quite as it seems was the immediate announcement by New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern that the NZ government would change their gun laws and crack down on the ownership of weapons, with several Kiwis voluntarily turning their weapons ahead of any new laws. Regardless of the ultimate nature of the attacks, it is undeniable that the tragedy is now being exploited by various special interests.



https://youtu.be/dOCwYd4ogFY


Thanks to: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net

https://youtu.be/vXqyq8jD1Sw

The Christchurch mosque-shooting video banned by New Zealand government
Posted on March 18, 2019 by Dr. Eowyn 


On March 14, 2019, New Zealand sustained its deadliest mass shootings in modern history when a gunman, 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant, killed 50 people and injured another 50 at Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, New Zealand. The media immediately identified Tarrant as that most noxious of all monsters — “an alt-right affiliated white supremacist”. (Wikipedia)

The shootings began at the Al Noor Mosque in the suburb of Riccarton at 1:40 p.m., and continued at the Linwood Islamic Centre at about 1:55 p.m.

Tarrant recorded and streamed the first attack on Facebook Live.
As reported by ZeroHedge, copies of Tarrant’s livestream, along with his lengthy manifesto, began to rapidly circulate on various file-hosting sites following the attack, which were quickly scrubbed from mainstream platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Scribd. YouTube went so far as to intentionally disable search filters so that people cannot find Christchurch shooting materials — including footage of suspected multiple shooters as well as the arrest of Tarrant and other suspects.
On March 16, 2019, two days after the shootings, freelance Ohio-based journalist Nick Monroe retweeted a message from WellingtonLive, a news media company, that the New Zealand government had banned the mosque-shooting video. New Zealanders are told not to download the video. Anyone found to “knowingly” possess a copy of the video will face up to 10 years in prison; anyone who shared the video will get up to 14 years in prison. Corporations (such as web hosts) face an additional $200,000 ($137,000 US) fine under the same law.

Why would the New Zealand government take such extreme measures to prevent its citizens from seeing the video?
As of the writing of this post, the video can be viewed on BitChute, the file-sharing video hosting service. Click here.
At the 5:57 mark of the video, the gunman gets out of his car, whistling the brisk and cheerful tune of the British Grenadiers, the band of Her Majesty’s Coldstream Guards. He retrieves a semi-automatic rifle from the trunk of the car, and proceeds to walk into the compound of Al Noor Mosque.
As he enters the mosque, he begins shooting (6:38 mark).
His first victim is a man in a blue top and blue pants, who is shot at the doorway. Note that the man is the only body at the doorway.

The shooter continues shooting as he walks down the hall, into rooms as he passes them, and in two large rooms where more people are assembled. The victims each immediately falls to the ground like a sack of sand.
In an audio interview, Professor James Fetzer, a former U.S. Marine second lieutenant, and Dr. Scott Bennett, former U.S. Army Psychological Operations Officer and State Department Counterterrorism Contractor, made the following observations:

1. Fetzer said the semi-automatic rifles deployed by the mosque shooter are fakes made of plastic, designed to make noise.
   
2. Bennett points out the video shows no bullet holes and no exploding glass because no solid projectiles were used by the gunman, which means nothing solid impacted the victims’ bodies, which means “no living person was legally killed or wounded”.
   
3. No blood spatter on the victims, walls, or furniture.
   
4. In a real shooting with real bullets, especially when civilians are shot, they would be in a state of hysterical, emotional shock. Panic-stricken, their bodies flooded with adrenalin, they would violently flail, run or crawl away. They do not simply fold up and fall to the ground like sacks of potatoes. Read more about Dr. Bennett’s forensic analysis of the shootings on James Fetzer’s blog.
   

Back to the mosque gunman’s video.
The gunman repeatedly returns to the hallway and rooms to shoot the people who had already fallen.
At the 8:45 mark, he leaves the mosque.
Curiously, there are now two bodies lying in the doorway — the gunman’s first victim and another man. Where did the second man come from? Note the absence of blood around the feet of the first victim and the head of the second man.

At the 8:56 mark, the gunman is outside the mosque’s front gate and begins shooting down the street. At the 9:06 mark, the gunman turns around and shoots down the street in the other direction. Curiously, the video shows shell casings being ejected from the semi-automatic, but the casings then disappear into thin air. No shell casing is on the ground.


The gunman then returns to his car and exchanges the anti-automatic rifle for another. He walks back into the mosque, past the bodies of two victims in the doorway.
Remember the screenshot at the 8:45 mark in the video of the two bodies in the doorway when the gunman left the mosque, showing no blood?
Now, there is blood.

Between the 8:45 and 10:32 marks, in one minute 47 seconds, suddenly there’s a pool of blood at the feet of the first victim and the head of the second man.
The gunman walks down the hallway and into rooms, shooting at the bodies that are already crumpled on the floor to make sure his victims are really dead.
As the screenshots below show, the bodies now show blood (circled in yellow).

At the 11:42 mark of the video, the gunman finally leaves the mosque.
H/t Vivian Lee and Jim Fetzer.
See also:

• New Zealand mosque shootings: the John Podesta connection
  
• New Zealand prime minister says, “Our gun laws will change”
  

~Eowyn


https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/heres-the-christchurch-mosque-shooting-video-banned-by-new-zealand-government


Thanks to: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com