OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» “Faulty upload” in Arizona gave Biden more than 6,000 of Trump’s votes
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 7:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Meta 1 Coin Scam (Dave Schmidt) Is Robert Dunlap Soliciting More Investor Funds With Ads And A New Website?
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 7:01 pm by PurpleSkyz

» New docuseries to explore Heaven's Gate cult
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 5:46 pm by PurpleSkyz

» What the Covid Vaccine Hype Fails to Mention
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 5:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Does Hangar 18, Legendary Alien Warehouse, exist ?
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 5:26 pm by PurpleSkyz

» OUT ° OF ° SHADOWS - Documentary Trailer (2020)
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 5:20 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Julian Assange's partner appeals to Trump to pardon him
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 12:08 pm by PurpleSkyz

» ZAP Update - Jerzy's Top Scientist Still Saving The World!
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 12:05 pm by RamblerNash

» Campaign to Recall Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom Gains New Life
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 12:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Strange Glowing UFO Filmed Near Stonehenge plus MORE
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 11:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» Mexico's president again declines to recognize Biden win
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 11:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 11:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Difficult Way Forward
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 11:21 am by PurpleSkyz

» THE PURGE BEGINS! PRESIDENT TRUMP REMOVES KISSINGER, ALBRIGHT, AND MORE!
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 11:19 am by PurpleSkyz

» Rudy Giuliani: 1.8 Mail-in Ballots Were Sent Out in Pennsylvania, But 2.5 Million Were Counted
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 11:06 am by PurpleSkyz

» 7 Things Regarded As ‘Crazy Conspiracy Theories’ Are Becoming Facts Right Now
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyToday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» What is going on! Strange sound in the sky all night. 27-11-2020.
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyYesterday at 8:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Giant UFO - Triangle near our Sun plus MORE
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyYesterday at 8:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» HAPPY TURKEY DAY TO ALL
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyYesterday at 8:19 pm by PurpleSkyz

» DARK JOURNALIST: JFK NASA NAZIS X-PROTECT AND THE UFO FILE !
Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto EmptyYesterday at 8:17 pm by PurpleSkyz


***********

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS







You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » POISON PLANET » POISON PLANET » Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto

Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto


Missouri Farmer Wins $265 Million Verdict Against Monsanto 5a29b419dcd72ce63206f1525c850ff4--monsanto-healthy-living

Jury finds that because of dicamba, a peach farmer is going out of business
Photo by JJ Goulin/iStock
By Carey Gillam | Feb 25 2020
A Missouri peach farmer notched a rare courtroom victory this month, defeating the former Monsanto Co. and chemical giant BASF in the first of what is expected to be a series of court fights over claims that the companies are responsible for pesticide damage that has wiped out orchards, gardens, and organic farm fields in multiple states.
On February 14, a unanimous jury awarded Bill Bader and his family-owned Bader Farms $15 million in compensatory damages. The following day, they added on another $250 million in punitive damages to be paid by Bayer AG (Monsanto’s German owner) and BASF. The jury found that Monsanto and BASF conspired in actions that created what Bader’s attorney called an “ecological disaster” designed to increase profits at the expense of farmers such as Bader.
The verdict followed three weeks of documentary evidence and testimony introduced in US District Court in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. The evidence proved that Bader Farms suffered extensive damage to its peach business from dicamba, a herbicide sprayed by neighboring farmers that drifted into the Bader orchard. The dicamba did so much damage that the Bader farm is essentially being forced out of business due to the loss of 30,000 peach trees, according to Bader attorney Bill Randles. 
“It’s very sad,” Randles said in an interview with Sierra. “He’s been the ‘peach guy.’ Now . . . his peach farm cannot survive.”
The Bader lawsuit is one of many brought by farmers around the country blaming Monsanto and BASF for dicamba damage to their fields, gardens, and trees. Dicamba has been used by farmers for decades to kill weeds on their fields but historically was not sprayed during hot summer months because of the tendency of the herbicide to become volatile and drift long distances where it could kill non-targeted plants. 
Monsanto upended that caution when it introduced genetically engineered soybeans and cotton designed to tolerate a direct spray of dicamba. The company said fields planted with its new GMO crops could be sprayed with new dicamba formulations developed by Monsanto and BASF that would not drift away from the targeted fields. That meant farmers buying the GMO seeds could use the dicamba herbicides at will to help fight weeds even during the warm months of the season and not worry about harming a neighbor’s fields, the companies said. 
Monsanto announced in 2011 that it would work with BASF to introduce the new dicamba system because its “Roundup Ready” system, which was based on the use of glyphosate herbicides and glyphosate-tolerant crops, had led to an epidemic of glyphosate-resistant weeds.
Scientists warned that while the new system might work well for people buying the special seeds, it would threaten the production of farmers growing anything other than Monsanto’s GMO soybeans and cotton. Publicly, Monsanto and BASF scoffed at the concerns and assured regulators that their new dicamba cropping system would not create problems.
But internal corporate communications introduced at trial by Randles showed that the companies secretly predicted there would be thousands of complaints about dicamba damage and even planned how to avoid liability. The documents also showed that the companies believed many cotton and soybean farmers would buy the special GMO seeds not because they wanted or needed the weed control but as a defensive measure against drift.  
“They knew they were going to hurt people, and they planned to make money off of it. It is that simple,” Randles said. “There were a lot of documents in which they privately acknowledged the harm they’re causing.” 
The jury largely agreed with the Bader Farms’s allegations, finding that Monsanto was negligent in distributing its GMO dicamba-tolerant seeds before new herbicides were released, which encouraged farmers to spray old versions of dicamba. The jury also found that Monsanto and BASF were negligent because even their new dicamba herbicide formulations drifted off target despite the companies’ representations that they would not. 
Bayer said that it would appeal the verdict and that there was “no competent evidence presented” attaching liability to Monsanto’s products. BASF said it was “surprised by the jury’s decision” and would join in the appeal. 
“BASF is convinced of the safety of its products when they are used correctly following the label instructions and stewardship guidelines,” the company said in a statement.
Lawsuits similar to Bader’s have been brought by roughly 140 farmers and have been combined as multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the federal court in Cape Girardeau. The same judge who oversaw the Bader trial, Judge Stephen Limbaugh, is overseeing the MDL. 
Randles said he is confident that the jury verdict will be upheld. 
“They’re going to pay. Can they stall it? Yes,” Randles said. “Can they overturn it? No.”
Like what you read? Sign up for daily updates from Sierra magazine.

https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/missouri-farmer-wins-265-million-verdict-against-monsanto

Thanks to: https://www.sierraclub.org



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum