OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Simon Parkes
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 10:23 pm by bs4ever

» 5 More Ways Joe Biden ‘Swamp Elect’ Magically Outperformed Election Norms
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 1:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Meta 1 Coin Scam (Dave Schmidt) Is Robert Dunlap Soliciting More Investor Funds With Ads And A New Website?
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 12:37 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Meta 1 Coin Scam Press Release - Did Dave Schmidt Give Meta 1 The Boot?
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 11:50 am by Carl Spackler

» The Sun Shoots Out a Powerful M4.4 Class Solar Flare - Largest Eruption of Solar Cycle 25
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 11:49 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Massive glowing objects flying past the sun plus MORE
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 11:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Breaking News The MONOTLITH Has Disappeared! Who Took It?
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 11:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» Lunar eclipse time: What time is the penumbral eclipse?
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 11:05 am by PurpleSkyz

» Whole plates shifting in one days time -- Major seismic unrest due next several days
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 10:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» Italy Dr speaks against the cv19 vaccine
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 10:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» What to see in the night sky, December 2020
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» Steven Cambian - The mystery of coral castle, with special guest Smoke King & Jiggy.
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 10:28 am by PurpleSkyz

» LONDON OUTRAGE! Massive Police Brutality Recorded with Attacks Against Peaceful Protesters Over COVID Restrictions
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 10:21 am by PurpleSkyz

» Tonight's Sky: December
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptyYesterday at 12:21 am by PurpleSkyz

» WARNING: We are about to enter the Dark Shadow of Aquarius
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptySat Nov 28, 2020 7:41 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Los Angeles County Officials Announce Three Week Stay-at-Home Order
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptySat Nov 28, 2020 7:38 pm by PurpleSkyz

» CIA document: “Using psychic powers to break needles & make them whole again”
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptySat Nov 28, 2020 7:32 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Ex-NASA scientist claims the Viking missions found proof of alien life on Mars back in the 70s
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptySat Nov 28, 2020 7:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Resuscitation of the ancient Egyptian book of breathing
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptySat Nov 28, 2020 7:26 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Has the source of the Wow! signal been found ?
ARE WE NOT MEN?  EmptySat Nov 28, 2020 7:20 pm by PurpleSkyz


***********

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS







You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » HOT TOPICS » COVID-19 » ARE WE NOT MEN?

ARE WE NOT MEN?

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1ARE WE NOT MEN?  Empty ARE WE NOT MEN? on Fri May 15, 2020 8:51 pm

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
ARE WE NOT MEN?  Safe_image.php?d=AQA1rJ5De8oENphb&w=500&h=261&url=https%3A%2F%2Fconsequenceofsound.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F05%2FDEVO-face-shields

Trump is devolution going backwards to a dark time in history Devolution, de-evolution, or backward evolution is the notion that species can revert into more "primitive" forms over time. In modern biology the term is meaningless: evolutionary science deals with selection or adaptation that results in populations of organisms genetically different from their ancestral forms, where evolution has no intrinsic directionality.[1] The discipline makes no general distinction between changes leading to populations of forms less complex or more complex than their ancestors, and in such terms the concept of a primitive species cannot be defined. Current non-technical application of the concept of "devolution" is based largely on the fallacies that: in biology there is a preferred hierarchy of structure and function, and that evolution must mean "progress" to "more advanced" organisms with more complex structure and function. Those errors in turn are related to two misconceptions: that: evolution is supposed to make species more "advanced", as opposed to "primitive"; and that modern species that have lost some of the functions or complexity of their ancestors must accordingly be degenerate forms. (Note however that degeneracy in this context has little to do with the current technical use of the term degeneracy in biology). The idea of de-evolution is based at least partly on the presumption that "evolution" requires some sort of purposeful direction towards "increasing complexity". Modern evolutionary theory, beginning with Darwin at least, poses no such presumption and the concept of evolutionary change is independent of either any increase in complexity of organisms sharing a gene pool, or any decrease, such as in vestigiality or in loss of genes.[2] Earlier views that species are subject to "cultural decay", "drives to perfection", or "devolution" are practically meaningless in terms of current (neo-)Darwinian theory.[3] Early scientific theories of transmutation of species such as Lamarckism and orthogenesis perceived species diversity as a result of a purposeful internal drive or tendency to form improved adaptations to the environment. In contrast, Darwinian evolution and its elaboration in the light of subsequent advances in biological research, have shown that adaptation through natural selection comes about when particular heritable attributes in a population happen to give a better chance of successful reproduction in the reigning environment than rival attributes do. By the same process less advantageous attributes are less "successful"; they decrease in frequency or are lost completely. Since Darwin's time it has been shown how these changes in the frequencies of attributes occur according to the mechanisms of genetics and the laws of inheritance originally investigated by Gregor Mendel. Combined with Darwin's original insights, genetic advances led to what has variously been called the modern evolutionary synthesis[4] or neo-Darwinism. In these terms evolutionary adaptation may occur most obviously through the natural selection of particular alleles. Such alleles may be long established, or they may be new mutations. Selection also might arise from more complex epigenetic or other chromosomal changes, but the fundamental requirement is that any adaptive effect must be heritable.[5] The concept of devolution on the other hand, requires that there be a preferred hierarchy of structure and function, and that evolution must mean "progress" to "more advanced" organisms. For example, it could be said that "feet are better than hooves" or "lungs are better than gills", so their development is "evolutionary" whereas change to an inferior or "less advanced" structure would be called "devolution".


https://youtu.be/-JfJlaLO9bk



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum