OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» NYC Pub Declares Itself “Autonomous Zone” After Government Tries To Shut It Down
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 6:38 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Study: Cocoa Flavanols Can Improve Cognition and Brain Oxygenation
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 6:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Uri Geller apologizes for Pokemon lawsuit
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 6:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Did a 9th planet 'escape' billions of years ago ?
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 6:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» 2nd Monolith Appears in Romania
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 6:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Body Language: Facebook Censorship & Data-Tracking Tools “Centra”
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 6:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Crafts caught in and around the skies of new Brunswick Canada plus MORE
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 12:32 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Benjamin bla bla blah Fulford 11-30-20... Troops Rally Around Trump as Final Showdown Begins
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 11:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Excavations in Costa Rica Have Revealed a Massive, Nearly Perfect, Stone Sphere
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 11:36 am by PurpleSkyz

» Brazilian President Says He Will Not Take a Coronavirus Vaccine (Neither Should You)
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 11:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» An Egyptian Pyramid in Australia? Archaeologists Claim Massive Structure Dates Back 5,000 years
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 11:12 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Covid-19 celebrity humanitarianism – Sean Penn and the Great Reset, funded by Bill Gates and the Clinton Foundation
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 11:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» The 'Smartest Man In The Room’ Just Joined Sidney Powell’s Team
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine Arrives at Chicago's O'Hare Airport: Source
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyToday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» Simon Parkes
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyYesterday at 10:23 pm by bs4ever

» 5 More Ways Joe Biden ‘Swamp Elect’ Magically Outperformed Election Norms
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyYesterday at 1:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Meta 1 Coin Scam (Dave Schmidt) Is Robert Dunlap Soliciting More Investor Funds With Ads And A New Website?
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyYesterday at 12:37 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Meta 1 Coin Scam Press Release - Did Dave Schmidt Give Meta 1 The Boot?
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyYesterday at 11:50 am by Carl Spackler

» The Sun Shoots Out a Powerful M4.4 Class Solar Flare - Largest Eruption of Solar Cycle 25
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyYesterday at 11:49 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Massive glowing objects flying past the sun plus MORE
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed EmptyYesterday at 11:47 am by PurpleSkyz


***********

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS







You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » POISON PLANET » POISON PLANET » #FluorideTrial: ruling delayed

#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed Empty #FluorideTrial: ruling delayed on Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:30 pm

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed Img_5272


#FluorideTrial: ruling delayed


 ... as judge asks defense and plaintiffs to discuss new evidence
The historic trial examining the dangers of water fluoridation reached a temporary conclusion on Wednesday after the judge delayed the ruling so the parties may consider new evidence on fluoride.
(To read about week 1 of the trial, please see this)
On Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Edward Chen delayed a ruling in the case between the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The FAN is aiming to prove the harms caused by community water fluoridation. The government is defending water fluoridation and seeking a dismissal of the petition by the plaintiffs.
Over the last two weeks, Judge Chen has heard arguments from witnesses with the FAN and EPA. Attorneys with FAN argue that water fluoridation violates the 1970 Toxic Substances Control Act provisions which prohibit the “particular use” of a chemical which has been found to present an unreasonable risk to the general public. Under section 21 of the TSCA citizens are allowed to petition the EPA to regulate or ban individual chemicals.
Judge Chen suggested the FAN file a new petition with the EPA, a suggestion which plaintiffs attorney Michael Connett was not eager to accept given the fact that it has taken four years to get the lawsuit to court. Connett told the court that the plaintiffs might not have the resources to continue this fight for another couple of years and cautioned against delaying a ruling because it would continue to endanger Americans due to ongoing fluoride exposure. The EPA’s attorneys were equally disinterested in a delayed ruling, stating that there is “no way” the EPA could conduct a review within the required 90 days.
Judge Chen said he was only discussing delaying the ruling for another couple of months, not years. Chen also noted that the evidence presented by both sides went “well beyond administrative record, because so much has changed since that petition was filed” in 2016. “Doesn’t it make sense to have the agency take a second look?” Judge Chen asked the attorneys for the EPA and FAN.
Judge Chen noted that the National Academy of Science is expected to publish a study later this year and the National Toxicology Program is working on a review of the literature on fluoride. These new studies, he said, should be considered by the EPA. The judge did acknowledge it is undisputed that fluoride can cause harm to the human brain and is a neurological hazard. The disagreement between EPA and FAN hinges on arguments over the levels at which fluoride causes neurological damage.
Ultimately, Judge Chen, the EPA, and the FAN agreed to delay a ruling until both parties have time to discuss whether the EPA will revisit the original petition, FAN will file a new petition, or the judge will rule on the current case. A briefing between both sides is scheduled for August 6.
During the discussions about the potential ruling, Judge Chen admitted that the EPA held the FAN petition on water fluoridation to a standard which is not typical of petitions under TSCA. “The EPA appears to have applied a standard of causation, which from my read of TSCA is not accurate, is not a proper application, not the proper standard,” Chen said to the EPA. This fact was acknowledged by FAN attorney Michael Connett on Tuesday during cross examination of EPA witness Dr. Tala Henry. Under standard TSCA procedure, parties must show an association — not causation — to prove the harm of water fluoridation.
Connett also spent much of his cross examination of EPA expert witnesses drawing attention to their previous testimony in defense of chemical companies and chemicals known to be hazardous to humans. Two of the EPA’s witnesses are employed by the corporate firm Exponent Inc. While cross examining EPA witness Dr. Ellen Chang, Connett asked how much biotech/pesticide company Syngenta paid her for a presentation she had given.
Connett also questioned Dr. Chang about how much she was being paid to defend water fluoridation. Chang stated that Exponent Inc was paying her an estimated $149,000. Dr. Chang was also questioned by Connett about her previous work for Monsanto, Dow Chemical, and other chemical companies and associations. Specifically, Connett called attention to the fact that Dr. Chang had previously stated that despite an association between Monsanto/Bayer’s glyphosate and cancer, she concluded there was no risk. Chang admitted that one peer-reviewer of her study on glyphosate found her analysis “devolved into a laundry list of every possible cause of bias.”
Despite arguments from the EPA’s attorneys that the EPA would never fail to act to protect Americans from harm, the fact remains that the U.S. government hired corporate scientists to defend water fluoridation. The EPA attempted to diminish the concerns brought by the plaintiffs and their experts, while simultaneously attempting to present last-minute evidence which had not been peer-reviewed. If the EPA wants to protect the American people they should accept the plaintiffs petition and end water fluoridation. If they refuse to do so, Judge Chen should see clearly that fluoride is a neurotoxin which poses an unreasonable risk to human health.
Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.


https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/home-family-pets/fluoridetrial-ruling-delayed


Thanks to: https://nexusnewsfeed.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum