OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Boris Johnson: "The government will no longer mandate the wearing of face masks"
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 11:35 am by PurpleSkyz

» Updated Info: Olympic Sprinter Announces Pericarditis Diagnosis on Facebook Following Pfizer Booster Jab
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 11:10 am by PurpleSkyz

» Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: Latest Bombshell About COVID “Vaccines” W
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 11:08 am by PurpleSkyz

» Astronomers Analyze Impact of SpaceX’s Starlink Satellites
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» Canadian Business Owners Fight Back Against New Lockdowns
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» Good People Doing Good Things — Little Things Mean A Lot
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 10:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» VAXXED Blood - The Issue of Transfusions
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 10:26 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Truckers Block Highways On Canadian Border To Protest Vaccine Mandate
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 1:58 am by PurpleSkyz

»  NCAA: Athletes Who Had COVID Will Be Considered ‘Fully Vaccinated’
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyToday at 1:48 am by PurpleSkyz

» After The “Vaccine” Rollout, Myocarditis Rates Skyrocketed – See For Yourself!
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 12:11 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Five nurses speak out about what is really going on in hospitals
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 12:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The History of Blood Type Personalities
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 11:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» Washington, DC ‘Defeat the Mandates’ March — January 23rd: Full List of Speakers
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 11:50 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger: On the Bio-Hacking of Humanity via Graphene Oxide in Vaccines & 5G/WiFi
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 11:40 am by PurpleSkyz

» MIT-Educated Doctor Ordered to Undergo Psych Evaluation After Prescribing Ivermectin
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 11:24 am by PurpleSkyz

» Stunning Vitamin D Papers Currently Ignored When Needed Most
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 11:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» Up to 65% Increase in Deaths Among 18-49 Year Olds in the U.S. During 2021, the Year of the Experimental COVID “Vaccines”
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 11:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» Has anyone seen this report?
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyYesterday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» 36 Million Families to Stop Receiving Monthly Child Tax Credit Payments in January
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyMon Jan 17, 2022 6:11 pm by bigdog2aton

» Mysterious town in Japan is obsessed with UFOs and aliens
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyMon Jan 17, 2022 1:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Martin Luther King, Jr. I Have A Dream Speech
What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? EmptyMon Jan 17, 2022 12:20 pm by PurpleSkyz








What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? 4ccd9cb4-22af-4abe-a6c4-4d57fbce210b_zps8t6pdo1h

You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » QUESTION EVERYTHING - DISCERNMENT REQUIRED » ANNA VON REITZ » What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do?

What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do?

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do? Image

What Did You Expect the Supreme Court to Do?

Posted on December 12, 2020 by David Robinson  
By Judge Anna von Reitz | Big Lake, Alaska


I awoke today to cries of anguish and shouts of joy, as the two misbegotten sides of the political spectrum erupted in response to the news that the United States Supreme Court declined to hear arguments from the State of Texas, et alia. 
As I pointed out yesterday, there is a dangerous confusion caused by using the word “State” to describe “Confederate States” that are actually State-of -State business organizations, and not actual States at all.
 
This exact confusion is what happened here.
The case in question was being raised by the State of Texas, not Texas.  
As I also pointed out, such a suit would have to be entertained in Original Jurisdiction, which is only accessible when one State attacks another State in international jurisdiction.   
So, Original Jurisdiction can’t be accessed by the State of Texas for the same reason that the State of Texas, as an incorporated entity, can’t legitimately invoke sovereign immunity. 
A State, as I keep preaching, is not “the same as” a State-of-State. 
The United States Supreme Court knows this as well as I do, and knows that a State-of-State that functions under corporate private law in international jurisdiction doesn’t have the standing to enter Original Jurisdiction.  
Texas, not the State of Texas, would have to bring the suit for it to be in Original Jurisdiction, and that is not even possible.  
Why?  Because the Cause — election tampering involving a foreign-owned corporation’s private elections — is miles outside of Texas’ interests and jurisdictions. 
That would be like me bringing suit because the corporation providing my lawn care services held new corporate elections and cheated, leaving me to work with Joey Brazos instead of Leon Helmdich.  
As the Employer, I can tell the lawn care corporation that I won’t work with Joey Brazos, because he is a known crook, and as a result, he doesn’t have permission to come onto my property to provide any services.  
But that is not a matter for the Supreme Court to decide. That’s a matter for the Employer and Party-to-Contract to decide.  
It’s apparent to me and I hope that it is now apparent to you (and to the clueless State Attorney Generals) that the United States Supreme Court couldn’t entertain the complaint brought by the State of Texas and seventeen other such “Confederate States” — because none of them have standing to enter Original Jurisdiction. 
Therefore, it is absolutely no surprise that despite the gravity of the situation, the Supreme Court turned them down.  The Supreme Court Justices literally could not hear such a case, even if they wanted to. 
Instead, the published statutes of the corporations in question, common sense, and the authority of the Commander-in-Chief will have to prevail. And I have no doubt that it will. 
As for all of you reading this, this is an excellent lesson.  
Your State, your actual State of the Union, is calling you to get involved in self-governance, an occupation you are heir to and which you have been neglecting to your own detriment.  Only your State has the standing to abide in Original Jurisdiction and only you have the right and responsibility to direct its affairs.  
Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and get started today

https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2020/12/12/what-did-you-expect-the-supreme-court-to-do/

Thanks to: https://mainerepublicemailreport.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum