Published on March 9, 2022
Written by Igor Chudov
I did a little bit more digging into the topic of my article about genes from 2018 Moderna patent. I wrote about it yesterday, but kept reading and digging and found much more disturbing stuff than I expected.
First, a recap: Sars-Cov-2 virus has a genetic insert that exists ONLY in Moderna patent 9,587,003 from 2018. Obviously, bats could not copy the patented insert into their viruses by themselves, right?
So, then, since cave bats cannot copy genes from a Moderna patent into their coronaviruses, obviously a question arises how did this happen. The explanation from @JikkyKjj is as follows:
Rephrasing his explanation: Sars-Cov-2 was passed through human cells, which were specifically of the line developed by Moderna, which contained mutated MSH3 genes. Due to such passage, Sars-Cov-2 cells acquired the Moderna mutation. In other words, they say, the CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG sequence was randomly picked off human cells, that happened to be Moderna patented human cells. It is just a sign of what kind of lab work was performed.
But go back to the patent where CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG appears: This is a Moderna patent (by Bancel et al) that is ONCOLOGY (Cancer) related and is about making cancer-causing proteins. The patent
Thus, I would like to present an alternative that is much more sinister. The specific sequence of the MSH3 mutation that we are discussing, is not a random mutation, it is a cancer gene added on purpose. It’s point is, duh, to ensure PRODUCTION OF ONCOLOGY RELATED PROTEINS, just like in the patent — the proteins that end up in the spike of the Sars-Cov-2 virus.
It possibly was purposely edited into the Sars-Cov-2 genome, just as HIV genes were edited in, and was not an artifact of accidental and sloppy lab work. Furthermore, CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG is a key part of the spike protein and is present in in the key location of the spike protein of the Sars-Cov-2 virus. Is it really an “accident”?
Let’s take a look.
HistoryThe gene MSH3 has been long known for its mutations that cause cancer. Here’s the NIH article from 1996:
Here’s a good explanation of how MSH3 encoded proteins are related to cellular repair and prevention of cancer:
MutS homolog 3 (MSH3) is a gene that encodes a protein that is a component of MutS beta – a post-replicative DNA mismatch repair system. The protein functions in DNA mismatch repair. Missense mutations, nonsense mutations, silent mutations, frameshift deletions and insertions, and in-frame deletions are observed in cancers such as intestinal cancer, skin cancer, and stomach cancer.
MSH3 is altered in 2.28% of all cancers with colon adenocarcinoma, endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, and conventional glioblastoma multiforme having the greatest prevalence of alterations .
Oddly Enough, Spike Protein does the same
The article explains that free-floating spike protein penetrates cell nuclei (where DNA is) and inhibits normal DNA repair, leading to cancers. Just like the Moderna cancer patent’s MSH3 mutations do!
As Sars-Cov-2 appears to be genetically edited, with HIV sequences embedded in it, can we ask: is it possible that CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG was intentionally added to Covid-19 spike, for the specific purpose to do the same things as it does in MSH3 mutations?
That is, with the purpose to suppress DNA repair and cause cancers?
In other words, there are two possibilities:
- CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG was accidentally picked up by Sars-Cov-2 virus as it was passaged through Moderna’s patented MSH3-mutated cell lines, developed for Moderna’s cancer experiments
- CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG was intentionally added to Sars-Cov-2 spike protein code to inhibit V(D)J recombination and p53 repair, and cause cancers in anyone who receives spike protein (from Covid or otherwise).
The tip to our answer is that CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG does not appear in some random place in the Sars-Cov-2 genome, but instead it appears IN THE SPIKE, and near the furin cleavage site — the centrally important part of the spike!
We do not yet know which of these possibilities is right. What we DO know is that everything else about Sars-Cov-2 was extremely thoughtfully and professionally done, such as HIV fragments added to it. Why should we assume that a cancer-causing mutation code from a cancer-related Moderna patent, was inserted into just the perfect location on the spike, purely by chance?
Giving credit where it’s due, I asked @JikkyKjj prior to publishing. He answered in a manner that indicates that itis worth thinking about. If he gives me permission, I will post his brief answer. EDIT: He did and ALSO made some generous suggestions regarding the content.
My last question is: CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG is patented. Was the author of Sars-Cov-2 adding it with the permission of patent holder? What do you think?It’s too convenient to be accidental, when combined with the gp120 sequences. Read Pradhan’s paper again
Also: if you disagree with something, please say so and rebut me! I am not a molecular biologist and I am just asking questions.
The Press is Now TalkingA new mainstream newspaper article appeared
See more here: substack.com
Thanks to: https://principia-scientific.com