OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Cool Lightening Event Caught on Film
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:52 am by PurpleSkyz

» William Shatner is going to space, aged 90
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» LIDAR reveals hidden secrets of Teotihuacan
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» Rose McGowan Survives Murder Attempt Following Her Threats To Expose Clinton
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» Amtrak train derailed in Montana
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» Despite Horrifying State Violence, Brave Australians Continue to Resist COVID Police State
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:24 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Large protest against COVID restrictions in Bern, Switzerland.
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» MASSIVE DEMONSTRATION AGAINST THE VACCINE PASSPORT IN LAUSANNE
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:20 am by PurpleSkyz

» UK Medicine Regulator Confirms Injury and Fatality Stats
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:12 am by PurpleSkyz

» New Yorkers Rising Up as Mandatory COVID Shot Deadline Looms – Citywide Walk Out Planned Same Day
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID "Vaccine Shedding" Data, CDC/FDA Accused Of COVID "Willful Misconduct" & The COVID Illusion
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 10:03 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID-19: A Legal & Historical Retrospective
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 9:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» Care home workers can be exempt from being vaxxed for 12 weeks
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 9:53 am by PurpleSkyz

» Former Merck Sales Rep Brandy Vaughan Speaks From The Grave: The Truth About The Criminal Circle Of Vaccines
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyToday at 9:49 am by PurpleSkyz

» Bad-clown Rising - Which Way the River Flows
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyYesterday at 2:35 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Protests Around the World Target Global Corporate Food Empire
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyYesterday at 1:50 pm by PurpleSkyz

» JERZY SCAMKOWSKI USES THE SAME OLD STORY TO BEG FROM THE GULLIBLE
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyYesterday at 11:07 am by ANENRO

» How the CDC Creates Mandates
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyYesterday at 11:02 am by PurpleSkyz

» New Movement Launched by Physicians to Fight Medical Tyranny
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyYesterday at 10:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» Over 17,000 Duplicate Votes Were Found In Maricopa County
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping EmptyYesterday at 10:54 am by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » THE INSANITY OF REALITY » GOVERNMENT & THE NEW WORLD ORDER » Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping

Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

godsfool713

godsfool713
Obama Fights to Retain Warrantless Wiretapping


http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=19369


AllGov
Despite being propelled to victory by progressive supporters critical of the Bush administration’s record on civil liberties, President Barack Obama has directed the Justice Department to defend many of the policies of George W. Bush, including warrantless wiretapping. Last week, the Justice Department filed papers asking the Supreme Court to overturn an appeals court ruling that allowed the continuation of an ACLU lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a 2008 law giving the government unprecedented authority to monitor Americans’ international emails and phone calls.
That monitoring has its origins in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when, a few years later, President Bush instructed the National Security Agency (NSA) to intercept Americans’ telephone calls without warrants, which were required by the Constitution and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). FISA, a post-Watergate statute meant to rein in domestic surveillance, created a special court, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), to approve or reject requests for domestic surveillance.
Between 1978 and 1992, presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush presented 7,030 applications for warrants and the court approved all of them as submitted. During his eight years in office, President Bill Clinton and his Justice Department presented 6,057 warrant applications. The FISC approved 6,055 of them, modified one and rejected one.
However, the harmonious relationship between the executive branch and the FISC changed after George W. Bush became president. The court rejected six requests outright and modified 179. It is worth noting that all eleven members of the Bush-era FISC were selected by conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist. Annoyed by the FISC judges’ refusal to rubber-stamp his policies, Bush bypassed the law and ordered the NSA to secretly conduct illegal wiretapping.
When Bush’s secret program was revealed by The New York Times in 2005, the Bush administration first agreed to seek FISC approval, and when that failed, got Congress to permit the previously prohibited warrantless wiretapping by passing the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. President Bush signed the bill into law on July 10, 2008, and the ACLU filed its challenge less than an hour later. The provisions of the act are scheduled to end at the end of 2012.
The appeals court ruling, which was issued in March 2011, rejected the Obama administration’s argument that the case should be dismissed because the ACLU’s clients could not prove their communications would be collected under the law, which was true largely because the law creates great secrecy around the wiretaps in the first place–a true “Catch-22.”

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum