Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Blood of the Gods - A True Story!
at 01:30 Posted by Vatic Master
Vatic Note: There was a part in here that I wish to clarify. He asks a bunch of questions about who the offspring of Adam and Eve married to continue the species, and that is a question, we all have asked who study this and research it. I believe I have as valid an answer as anyone, but you have to go back and reread Genesis. Here is what I think and used only deductive reasoning to determine what that is.
Actually if you read Genesis, there were two creations, it was the second creation where God blew his breath into Adam, and I suspect that was to give man a soul/spirit which the first creation did not have, since in Genesis, it does not say that the first creation God blew his breath into man that he created. I believe that is why God told the second creation "not to inter-marry with the previous creations".
I believe that happened because God was not happy with the first results and if we carry that to further consideration, it would be because the first creation had no soul/spirit and were probably psychopaths, and that is why they have the RH neg factor, but not the compassion and capacity for love that the second creation had. You have to believe the Bible is done in parables for simpler people that would not have understood what was really going on.
The first were the ones that preserved their bloodline and why they hate the "real Jews" so much. I think the second creation were the corrections that solved the problem and maybe even those that enoch described if you take what was written as parables for the ancient astronauts that came down and mated with the daughters of man. Could there have been several species of ancient astronauts that did that? Is this why after every revolution that the real Jews and Christians were massacred by these khazars?
I believe they became the khazars later on, maybe through the line of Esau who then became the "Edomites" of old and turned into the khazars through migration, and its why the khazars hate the "real Jews" and Christians. I hope this makes some sense, if we remember that Enoch told us about all this.
It may also explain why the flood was used to cleanse the earth, but some of the original survived and there was intermarrying which made God mad. I think that is why Enoch was taken out of the Bible by those in control, much later and called Apostasy. How could that be?
Enoch was so favored by God that God walked with him and took him up into the heavens ALIVE, and he did not have to die to join God, along with a whole town of good people to save them from the flood. So how could his writings not be of God? He was more valid than Constantine of the Nicene conference who was a pagan and never converted to Christianity or Judaism.
Well, you read and decide for yourselves. I am sure my theory needs some tweeking, but I think its essentially right on, based on those writings in Genesis and Enoch. In any case, this, below, was a fascinating write up and triggered a creative event within my brain cells. lol
Blood of the Gods, Part 2
http://www.rhnegativeregistry.com/blood-of-the-gods-by-mabel-royce.html
Interesting article by the late Mabel Royce, Copyright 1976
Are you an Rh Negative blood type? If so you could be a descendant of the ancient astronauts themselves!
About a year and a half ago my sister Bonnie and I were discussing some of the unusual characteristics of our family. Bonnie had a problem with infants haemolytic disease.
She has 0 negative blood. She has written a book including this problem called "The Deux" by Venus Thaddeus. One of the questions we asked was why does this haemolytic disease occur?
Why, along with the Rh negative blood does our family have such a high IQ (135-140 average). Why so many psychic experiences? Why this urge to ask "why?" Why the early maturity or the large head and eyes? Why have, we always felt we were "different" from other people. And so many other things to set us apart.
We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions we asked. Why doesn't anyone else ask these same questions? We are not satisfied with the answer "just because". Are there others out there who ask the same questions? Then we heard about the possibility of the ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.
For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings. Who are these visitors? Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?
If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants of these visitors? If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are? Who are the "Children of Israel?" Why was their seed blessed? Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they told to preserve their geneology? Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if they were the only "humans" on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive. This factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous combination of traits inherited from all our ancestors. Nothing more and nothing less.
Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor, their blood would have evolved the same way. Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. It would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime in the ancient past.
All other earthly primates also have this Rh factor. But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative. If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the Rh negatives come from? If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child.
Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.
No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.
Read more »
Thanks to Vatic Master at: http://www.vaticproject.blogspot.com/
at 01:30 Posted by Vatic Master Vatic Note: There was a part in here that I wish to clarify. He asks a bunch of questions about who the offspring of Adam and Eve married to continue the species, and that is a question, we all have asked who study this and research it. I believe I have as valid an answer as anyone, but you have to go back and reread Genesis. Here is what I think and used only deductive reasoning to determine what that is.
Actually if you read Genesis, there were two creations, it was the second creation where God blew his breath into Adam, and I suspect that was to give man a soul/spirit which the first creation did not have, since in Genesis, it does not say that the first creation God blew his breath into man that he created. I believe that is why God told the second creation "not to inter-marry with the previous creations".
I believe that happened because God was not happy with the first results and if we carry that to further consideration, it would be because the first creation had no soul/spirit and were probably psychopaths, and that is why they have the RH neg factor, but not the compassion and capacity for love that the second creation had. You have to believe the Bible is done in parables for simpler people that would not have understood what was really going on.
The first were the ones that preserved their bloodline and why they hate the "real Jews" so much. I think the second creation were the corrections that solved the problem and maybe even those that enoch described if you take what was written as parables for the ancient astronauts that came down and mated with the daughters of man. Could there have been several species of ancient astronauts that did that? Is this why after every revolution that the real Jews and Christians were massacred by these khazars?
I believe they became the khazars later on, maybe through the line of Esau who then became the "Edomites" of old and turned into the khazars through migration, and its why the khazars hate the "real Jews" and Christians. I hope this makes some sense, if we remember that Enoch told us about all this.
It may also explain why the flood was used to cleanse the earth, but some of the original survived and there was intermarrying which made God mad. I think that is why Enoch was taken out of the Bible by those in control, much later and called Apostasy. How could that be?
Enoch was so favored by God that God walked with him and took him up into the heavens ALIVE, and he did not have to die to join God, along with a whole town of good people to save them from the flood. So how could his writings not be of God? He was more valid than Constantine of the Nicene conference who was a pagan and never converted to Christianity or Judaism.
Well, you read and decide for yourselves. I am sure my theory needs some tweeking, but I think its essentially right on, based on those writings in Genesis and Enoch. In any case, this, below, was a fascinating write up and triggered a creative event within my brain cells. lol
Blood of the Gods, Part 2
http://www.rhnegativeregistry.com/blood-of-the-gods-by-mabel-royce.html
Interesting article by the late Mabel Royce, Copyright 1976
Found at: http://www.labyrinthina.com/sitchen.htm
About a year and a half ago my sister Bonnie and I were discussing some of the unusual characteristics of our family. Bonnie had a problem with infants haemolytic disease.
She has 0 negative blood. She has written a book including this problem called "The Deux" by Venus Thaddeus. One of the questions we asked was why does this haemolytic disease occur?
Why, along with the Rh negative blood does our family have such a high IQ (135-140 average). Why so many psychic experiences? Why this urge to ask "why?" Why the early maturity or the large head and eyes? Why have, we always felt we were "different" from other people. And so many other things to set us apart.
We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions we asked. Why doesn't anyone else ask these same questions? We are not satisfied with the answer "just because". Are there others out there who ask the same questions? Then we heard about the possibility of the ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.
For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings. Who are these visitors? Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?
If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants of these visitors? If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are? Who are the "Children of Israel?" Why was their seed blessed? Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they told to preserve their geneology? Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if they were the only "humans" on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive. This factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous combination of traits inherited from all our ancestors. Nothing more and nothing less.
Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor, their blood would have evolved the same way. Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. It would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime in the ancient past.
All other earthly primates also have this Rh factor. But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative. If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the Rh negatives come from? If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child.
Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.
No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.
Read more »
Thanks to Vatic Master at: http://www.vaticproject.blogspot.com/
