Posted on October 16, 2016 by sundance Today WikiLeaks released another batch of emails from the account of Hillary and Bill Clinton’s long time political fixer John Podesta. – SEE HERE – However, an apoplectic CNN is increasingly alarmed the U.S. electorate would be reading the raw material and making up their own mind. According to Clinton News Nework pundit Chris Cuomo: “All your news are belong to us.”:
…”it’s illegal to possess, ah, these stolen documents, it’s different for the media. So everything you are learning about this, you are learning from us….
WHAT? Oh, my gosh. Quick, join the rebellion. We shall meet at the Old Mill, and read these emails by candlelight, secretly, in the dark of night. We shall create legions of scribes to share the message; and in the tradition of the Sons of Liberty we will make with our defiance such a deafening sound as all media from these days forward are forced to note, even as they despise us in the writing of it. And as we win, we bring forth the scattered free survivors hiding amid the ruins of our great republic; assembled once more… we sing of our deeds in once forbidden songs, and continue tending the flickering flame of individual liberty as it bursts forth again, as it always must, because we are proud and deplorable…
They, all of the media, would essentially prefer us isolated and comfortable only amid the looming shadows cast by their creations. Declaring independence from King George was not brought swimmingly along through the will of the majority; nor was it initially a palatable consideration for the overwhelming signatories of the ultimate document. Ten odd years later, on Monday September 17th, 1787 a positive outcome of the secret constitutional convention -which had been going on for four months- seemed even less likely. Mr. Edmund Randolph of Virginia began the day by predicting that nine of the 13 states would fail to ratify the plan “and confusion must ensue.” Randolph knew the inherent problems with constructing forms of governance. He knew a nation born of freedom would need to be protected from itself. Demonstrating a clear grasp of democracy’s inherent dangers, Randolph reminded his colleagues during the early weeks of the Constitutional Convention that the purpose for which they had gathered was:
“to provide a cure for the evils under which the United States labored; that in tracing these evils to their origin every man had found it in the turbulence and trials of democracy….”
John Adams, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, countered the fears of Randolph and championed the Constitution in his state precisely because it would not create a democracy:
“Democracy never lasts long,” he noted. “It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself.” He insisted, “There was never a democracy that ‘did not commit suicide.’”
On that final Monday, Ben Franklin, now 81-years-old, told the assembly he had something to say. Too weak to deliver the speech himself, he asked fellow Pennsylvanian James Wilson to read it for him. Here are excerpts: “Mr. President, I confess that there are several parts of this constitution which I do not at present approve, but I am not sure I shall never approve them. For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged by better information, or fuller consideration, to change opinions — even on important subjects — which I once thought right but found to be otherwise. “The older I grow, the more apt I am to doubt my own judgment and to pay more respect to the judgment of others. Most men, indeed as well as most sects in religion, think themselves in possession of all truth — and that, wherever others differ from them, it is so far error. “When you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests and their selfish views. From such an assembly, can a perfect production be expected? “Thus I consent, sir, to this constitution. The opinions I have had of its errors, I sacrifice to the public good. “If every one of us, in returning to our constituents, were to report the objections he has had to it and endeavor to gain partisans in support of them, we might prevent its being generally received — and thereby lose all the salutary effects and great advantages. “Much of the strength and efficiency of any government in procuring and securing happiness to the people depends on the general opinion of the goodness of the government, as well as of the wisdom and integrity of its governors. I hope, therefore, that we shall act heartily and unanimously in recommending this constitution. “On the whole, sir, I cannot help expressing a wish that every member of the convention who may still have objections to it would, with me, on this occasion doubt a little of his own infallibility — and to make manifest our unanimity.” For four months, the delegates had been locked in an epic battle over whether our fledgling nation should have a strong federal government. And we have been struggling with those same issues and arguments for the past 230 years. The reason is the same now as it always has been. There are those, who as a natural course of their disposition, wish to rule the lives of others. Division is the tool that enables them to create the fear they need. Fear is the weapon they use to remove opposition. There are now, as there have always been, those who hold a collective view of all governance, and individual liberty and freedom principles run directly in opposition to their progressive goals. Their goals are achieved by destruction of common acceptances, which they view as roadblocks toward the gain of their desires. Fabian Socialists say break the world and “Remould it Closer To The Heart’s Desire”. In modern times the instruction ‘break the world’ can just as easily be applied to break the ‘ties-that-bind’, or more specifically break the very constitution which protects us. Hence, they need you to actually operate against your beliefs of individualism, and they need to continue convincing people to vote against their own individual best interests by voting on behalf of the collective. The true concern of the average person is that their beliefs are insignificant, irrelevant, or in the minority. The fear is based on isolation; that there are not others thinking the same way… that I am alone. This is the concept of fear being used as a weapon. The “concern” carried by most ordinary citizens is exactly the same. And the tool, division, is wielded for the exact same purpose. The methods of the post World War II Fabians are the same methods being deployed in modern America. Only now they are defined by the modern harbinger of radical leftism, Saul Alinsky. Nothing has changed except the people executing the method to control their opposition. Isolate – Ridicule – Marginalize: Through the process of ‘isolating the opposition’ they deploy labels such as whackobirds, jihadists, terrorists, extremists, racists et al. All intending to isolate the common sense patriot from their like-minded association. Through the process of “ridiculing the opposition” they deploy media narratives to diminish the character, integrity, intelligence of the leaders who rise in opposition to the regime. Through the process of “marginalizing the opposition” they deploy strategies to make the larger mass of the electorate believe the opposing leadership is, and will be, ineffective. Thus the attacks against all prior patriots, and now Donald Trump. The goal is to make supporting the opposing leadership *appear* futile. Instill fear. It is EXCEPTIONALLY IMPORTANT that each person teach themselves, and then others, the skill to identify when these strategies are being deployed. It is only when you easily recognize them, from both the regime and from the media, that you can find your own strength and empowerment to push back.
Posts : 2616 Join date : 2012-01-17 Age : 71 Location : NH
Truth can be really difficult to defend against... So it becomes necessary to create an alternate truth, otherwise known as a lie which when repeated often enough somehow begins to become truth... The big problem as I see it is "There are those, who as a natural course of their disposition, wish to rule the lives of others. " they don't seem to understand that people do not need to be ruled over, despite the generations of indoctrination to the contrary. The biggest flaw with these sociopathic rulers is that they cannot control themselves, which is why every Empire that has existed in history has never survived and neither will the 'Banking Empire'.
'Tis better to be thought a fool,than to speak and remove all doubt. Love,Laughter & Prosperity... :Santa 3:
Posted on October 17, 2016 by sundance Today WikiLeaks released another batch of emails from the account of life-long Clinton family ‘fixer’ John Podesta, –AVAILABLE HERE – FYI – The date of the release is 10-17-2016 as noted in the upload/release date. However, there is not an accompanying announcement from WikiLeaks to alert of the release.
Apparently John Podesta, and Karen Finney, were very disappointed the San Bernardino shooters were not white. – SEE HERE –
Hillary Clinton asked Lady de Rothschild “Let me know what penance I owe you” after requesting Tony Blair accompany her on official business, preventing him from attending a Rothschild event scheduled for that same weekend. The Clintons with Sir and Lady de Rothschild at a 2003 party / Credit – dailymail.co.uk
Though the influence of money in politics is well-known, many people are amazed to learn that most of that money comes from a very few individuals – the 1% of the 1% as it were. These individuals comprise the global elite, whose mind-boggling fortunes are often used to buy ‘favors’ and even set policy in governments all over the world, not just the United States. Many of these elites made their fortunes through centuries-old banking dynasties. The most infamous of these are undoubtedly the Rothschild family, who have been the world’s wealthiest family for over 200 years . Indeed, the most well-known Rothschild patriarch, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, once said “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.” The Rothschilds and their international banking cartel, ‘Rothschild & Co ,’ are majority owners of numerous corporations spanning nearly every industry. They are also co-owners of numerous private banks including the International Monetary Fund , which essentially functions as a global loan shark with no government or international oversight, as well as many of the world’s central banks, which are private entities despite their associations with federal governments.
Several politicians, especially those who are the most willing to bend over backwards for wealthy interests, have made their careers by catering to the whims of the Rothschilds and other families like them. In US politics today, there is no better example of this archetype than Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. In fact, less than two months ago, Clinton flew just 20 miles in a private jet to attend a private Rothschild fundraiser in her honor. Yet, this is just one of the latest examples of her intimate relationship to the banking dynasty. In emails from her private server made available to the public by WikiLeaks , Clinton’s close relationship to Lady de Rothschild is evident due to their warm exchanges which include phrases such as “You are the best […] Sweet dreams,” “I remain your loyal adoring pal,” and “Much love.” This is significant as, judging by Clinton’s other emails, her communication style is almost always curt and concise, never approaching the outright declarations of affection found only in her exchanges with Lady de Rothschild. Lady de Rothschild , married into the Rothschild family in 2000 after being introduced to Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, who alone is worth $20 billion , at the 1998 Bilderberg Conference. War criminal Henry Kissinger served as the couple’s “match-maker.” Yet, the most bizarre interaction between Clinton and Lady de Rothschild took place in an email titled “Info for you” (ID#1606) , which was sent while Clinton was serving as US Secretary of State . In the email, Clinton tells Lady de Rothschild that she had to ask Tony Blair (then-Prime Minister of England) to accompany her to Israel due to the Middle East peace negotiations taking place at the time. Blair had previously planned to spend the weekend in Aspen, Colorado with the Rothschilds at an unspecified conference, but accepted Clinton’s invitation. Clinton then says “I hope you all understand. […] Let me know what penance I owe you.” For those who are not familiar with the word, penance is defined as follows : “An act of self-mortification or devotion performed voluntarily to show sorrow for a sin or other wrongdoing.” Does this sound like something Hillary Clinton would normally say? Considering that her former bodyguard once said she could “make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi,” this seems doubtful. More importantly, why would someone as powerful as Secretary of State literally grovel for forgiveness from a private citizen? The circumstance is truly bizarre considering Clinton offers “penance” or asking the Prime Minister of England to decline an invitation to the Rothschilds’ weekend getaway in order to attend high-stakes peace negotiations. This email clearly shows where the real power is in politics as well as where Clinton’s true loyalty lies.
Wikileaks just does not stop. One day after dumping over 3,000 emails in its 13th release, WikiLeaks has just released a new batch of emails from Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. The latest tranche amounts to 1,577 mails, bringing the total released so far to 25,000, or half of the total amount Wikileaks has vowed to release through the election.
I just left the State Dept. where I have been working as a Virtual Fellow. A current A/S told me privately that it is a FACT that more of HRCs emails were preserved through her system than if she had used the State dept.'s. He said that in giving her email records to State in the form she recently did, they now have a much more complete historical record than they otherwise would have had. I asked if he would say it publicly, and he said he believes the press office is working on something.
Incidentally, A/S stands for Assistant Secretary.
[Check original article for updates] _________________________ Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thank you for reading.
Published on Oct 22, 2016 Wikileaks is once more stating the fact that the elections are rigged, taking to Twitter to tell the world that Hillary will steal the election and assume power in November. Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. we all want liberty. Find the free live feed at http://www.infowars.com/watch-alex-jo...
I have problem with this Info Wars video. The woman insists that the "election" is rigged and is going to be stolen, all the while insisting that Hillary will be president; why does she keep calling it an "ELECTION!?"
Posted on October 23, 2016 by sundance WikiLeaks continues releasing batches of emails from the account of life-long political ‘fixer’ John Podesta. Today they released batch #16 bringing the total release to 26,803.
Posted on October 24, 2016 by sundance WikiLeaks continues to release daily batches of emails from the account of Clinton’s life-time fixer John Podesta. Today’s release is batch #17 bringing the total released so far to over 30,000:
Source here . With just days to go until the November 8 presidential election, the final countdown is now on, and Wikileaks continues its ongoing Podesta dump by unveiling another 1400+ emails in the latest Part 21 of its Podesta release, bringing the total emails released so far to exactly 35,594, leaving just 30% of the total dump left to go. As reported last night , speaking via telephone to a conference in Argentina on Wednesday, Julian Assange claimed the ongoing releases had “whipped up a crazed hornet’s nest atmosphere in the Hillary Clinton campaign.” Assange also claimed that the campaign had attempted to hack the WikiLeaks servers. Among the recent batch of released documents was the so-called “Rosetta Stone” of the Clinton Foundation: a confidential memo which laid out how Clinton’s consultancy Teneo was engaging in quid pro quo with corporate “donors “, a leak which has even made the front page of the WSJ. As usual we will go parse through the disclosure and bring you some of the more notable ones. CONTINUE
Podesta Part 23: Wikileaks Releases Another 700 Emails; Total Is Now 36,891 is a story at Zero Hedge. I have been watching Wikileaks, waiting for today's release, but have not seen a notice being tweeted yet by Wikileaks. But, just like one day over a week ago, Wikileaks hasn't put out their notification tweet yet, even though they are there at Wikileaks' site, over 700 new emails added to the Podesta Email cache. Here is the link to go see/read them: http://wlsearch.tk/
In the aftermath of one of the most memorable (c)october shocks in presidential campaign history, and down the final stretch in the presidential race which has just over one week left, Wikileaks continues its ongoing broadside attack against the Clinton campaign with the relentless Podesta dump, by unveiling another 701 emails in the latest, Part 23 of its Podesta release, bringing the total emails released so far to exactly 36,891.