Latest topics
» Crow For Thanksgiving
Today at 11:36 am by PurpleSkyz

» 11/19/2017 -- Large M7.0 (M6.9) Earthquake strikes West Pacific
Today at 11:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» Australia: Fair!
Today at 11:33 am by PurpleSkyz

» Myron C Fagan: The Illuminati and the CFR [1967]
Today at 11:31 am by PurpleSkyz

» Utopian fantasies vs. a better world by Jon Rappoport
Today at 10:33 am by PurpleSkyz

» Breaking, chicken arrested for attacking InfoWars reporter
Today at 10:23 am by terbo56

» UFO News ~ Glowing pink disk over Great Britain plus MORE
Today at 10:16 am by PurpleSkyz

» Fast Moving Meteor-Like Object from Space Captured by ISS
Today at 10:14 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ HUNTING NIBIRU!! CANADA Wapusk plus MORE
Today at 10:02 am by PurpleSkyz

» Shifting into Second Harmonic Universe ~ Lisa Renee
Today at 9:57 am by PurpleSkyz

» Watch: Astonishing Footage Of UFO Breaking Up Chemtrail
Today at 9:54 am by PurpleSkyz

» Where is the Info on the Crash Over the Rothschild Estate???
Today at 9:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Forward-motivators are viewed in “the Heavens”
Today at 9:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» Purple lights in sky follow eyewitness home over Long Island, New York
Today at 9:29 am by PurpleSkyz

» 3800 Cities Water More Contaminated Than Flint Michigan
Today at 1:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» UPDATES ~ Argentine Submarine Goes Missing with 44 Crew Members On Board
Today at 1:23 am by PurpleSkyz

» Did You Know That in 2012 Bill Gates Agreed to Fund Chemtrail Project?
Today at 1:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» Does Astronaut’s Visor Reflection Shows A Mysterious Figure On The Moon?
Today at 1:17 am by PurpleSkyz

» Happy Saturday/Friday Everyone!
Yesterday at 9:44 pm by NanneeRose

» NanneeRose
Yesterday at 9:40 pm by NanneeRose

» Whooooo is Q? ‘Thomas Paine’ Reveals his NSA Insider
Yesterday at 6:42 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Cannabinoids Show Potent Antibacterial Activity Against Six Different Strains Of MRSA
Yesterday at 4:33 pm by PurpleSkyz


CURRENT MOON

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » PEOPLE MAKING AN IMPACT ON THE LEGAL STATUS QUO » SNOOP 4 TRUTH » ROD CLASS & THE "RIGHT TO TRAVEL HOAX" & THE "NO DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIRED HOAX"

ROD CLASS & THE "RIGHT TO TRAVEL HOAX" & THE "NO DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIRED HOAX"

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

snoop4truth


FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afCz8AjvYdY&t=421s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6SGIfO4ug4&t=69s 
THE HOAX I: Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that A PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER’S LICENSE TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE on the grounds that every person has a "RIGHT TO TRAVEL". Thus, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that the "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" is the same thing as the "RIGHT TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE". But, this is not so.

THE TRUTH: The "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" is merely the JUDICIALLY-recognized RIGHT TO LEAVE ONE STATE AND TO ENTER ANOTHER STATE. It has NOTHING to do with "DRIVING" anything. Under the law, there is no such thing as a "RIGHT TO DRIVE" a motor vehicle. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know this.

THE HOAX II: Further, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists point out that under FEDERAL law, A PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE to drive a motor vehicle UNLESS THAT PERSON IS ENGAGED IN "COMMERCE" AMONG ["BETWEEN"] THE "SEVERAL STATES" ("interstate commerce"), a narrow subject governed by FEDERAL law. See Const., Art. 1, Sec. 8 (listing ALL POWERS of Congress).
http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/article-i-section-8 . https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause.

THE TRUTH: But, what Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know is that STATE LAW APPLIES TO THE SAME PERSON AT THE SAME TIME. This is because, under the tenth amendment, STATE LAW GOVERNS THE SUBJECT OF DRIVER'S LICENSES OUTSIDE THE NARROW FEDERAL CONTEXT OF "INTERSTATE COMMERCE" (IN ALL OTHER CONTEXTS).
http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment. And, under STATE law, a person is required to have a driver’s license to drive a motor vehicle WHEN THAT PERSON IS NOT ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE". So, when BOTH FEDERAL law and STATE law are COMBINED AND  APPLIED TO THE SAME PERSON AT THE SAME TIME, A PERSON IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER’S LICENSE TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE IN ALL CONTEXTS, ALL THE TIME, NO MATTER WHAT (whether or not that person is engaged in "interstate commerce"). But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do  not know this.

THE LAW:

1). OVER A CENTURY AGO, THE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT, in the absence of FEDERAL legislation, THE STATES HAD THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE ALL DRIVERS OF ALL MOTOR VEHICLES TO HAVE DRIVER'S LICENSES, WHETHER OR NOT THAT DRIVER WAS ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE".

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13681451034893205402&q=1915++%22and+the+licensing+of+their+drivers%22++%22it+may+require+the+registration%22+%22as+well+as+others%22+%22of+all+motor+vehicles%22+%22in+respect+to+the+operation%22++%22a+state+may+rightfully+prescribe+uniform+regulations%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,60

Since this decision, CONGRESS (in compliance with this decision and in compliance with Art. 1, Sec. 8, clause 3, U.S. Const.) passed FEDERAL legislation regulating drivers WHO WERE ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE. Under the tenth amendment and under this decision, this reserved unto THE STATES the power to regulate drivers WHO WERE NOT ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE".

2). Under the tenth amendment, the STATES have the RIGHT to require driver's licenses of all drivers who are NOT ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE" .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5478545834163197366&q=%22tenth+amendment%22+%22are+reserved+for+the+states%22+%22A+state%22+%22may+require%22+%22the+licensing+of+their+drivers%22+%22belonging+to+the+states%22+&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4613890670558831166&q=%22may+require%22+%22licensing+of+their+drivers%22+%22state+laws+requiring+valid+driver%27s+license%22+%22belonging+to+the+states%22+%22a+state%22+%22states+have+the+right+to+regulate%22+%22by+requiring+that+drivers%22+%22obtain+driver%27s+licenses%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4259598666103911788&q=%22necessity+of+regulation%22++%22may+constitutionally+regulate%22+++%22states%22+%22license+their+drivers%22+%22the+universal+practice+is+to+register+ownership%22+%22uses+of%22+%22public+highways%22+%22the+supreme+court%22+%22did+not+limit+its+holding+to%22+commercial&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

3). THERE IS NO "RIGHT TO DRIVE".

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9780294138406294886&q=%22the+constitution+recognizes+a+right+to+travel%22+%22it+does+not+recognize+a+fundamental+right+to+drive%22+%22right+to+free+movement%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . (NEAR THE END OF THE CASE)

4). "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" DEFINED.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4721017505990988840&q=+%22the+constitutional+right+to+travel+from+one+state+to+another%22+%22Right+to+travel+discussed+in+our+cases%22+%22protects+the+right+of+a+citizen+of+one+state+to+enter+and+to+leave+another+state%22++&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . (SEE BOTH SECTIONS.).

5). The "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" IS NOT ABOUT "DRIVING" ANYTHING.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5478545834163197366&q=%22the+right+to+travel%22+%22is+not+synonymous%22+%22with+the+right+to+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22++%22The+operation+of+a+motor+vehicle%22+%22is+not+a+natural+right%22+%22It+is+a+conditional+privilege%22+&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9621580109864231465&q=%22this+is+not%22+%22what+is+at+issue+here+is+not+his+right+to+travel+interstate,+but+his+right+to+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22+%22Miller+does+not+have+a+fundamental+right+to+drive%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10451209462604692152&q=%22The+right+to+travel%22+%22is+the+right%22+%22to+travel+from+one+state+to+another%22+%22Petitioners+are+free+to+leave+the+state%22+%22although+they+may+not+drive+without+a+drivers+license%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18159286216902234518&q=complying+without+merit+%22right+to+travel%22+%22petitioner+misunderstands%22+%22there+is+no+fundamental+right%22+vehicle++%22nonexistent+right%22+motor+vehicles+license+%22to+operate%22++%22to+drive%22+%22without+a+valid%22+%22he+was+constitutionally+entitled%22+%22petitioner+claims+that%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

6). State requirements for driver's licenses DO NOT VIOLATE THE  "RIGHT TO TRAVEL".

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4613890670558831166&q=%22state+laws+requiring+valid+driver%27s+license+to+operate+a+motor+vehicle+do+not+violate+right+to+travel%22+%22there+is+no+fundamental+right+to+drive%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8872041112923644828&q=%22right+to+travel%22+%22does+not+impermissibly+burden+his%22+%22does+not+implicate%22+%22only+denies+plaintiff+the+ability+to+drive+himself+in+a+car%22+%22right+to+travel%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8886781550786925928&q=%22right+to+travel+has+not+been+infringed+upon+by+the+requirement%22+%22that+an+individual+have+a+valid+driver%27s+license+to+lawfully+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12477576553628312121&q=%22does+not+rise+to+the+level+of+a+violation%22%22do+not+violate%22+%22do+not+implicate%22+%22there+is+no+fundamental+right+to+drive+a+motor+vehicle%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

7). A person may freely exercise their "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" without "DRIVING" ANYTHING by walking, riding a bicycle or horse, or as a "PASSENGER" in an automobile, bus, airplane or helicopter.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5478545834163197366&q=+%22If+he+wishes,+he+may+walk,+ride+a+bicycle+or+horse,+or+travel+as+a+passenger+in+an+automobile,+bus,+airplane+or+helicopter.+He+cannot,+however,+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9621580109864231465&q=+%22the+plaintiff+is+not+being+prevented+from+traveling+interstate+by+public+transportation,+by+common+carrier,+or+in+a+motor+vehicle+driven+by+someone+with+a+license+to+drive+it%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

8). AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES ALWAYS LOSE.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18159286216902234518&q=%22right+to+travel%22+natural++%22another+entity%22+immune+person+foreign+entities+%22American+National%22+corporations+corporate+artificial+entities+sovereign&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9626485208674815070&q=%22dangerous+drivers%22+%22the+operation%22+travelling+ambassador+immunity+traveling+%22in+a+conveyance%22+%22is+a+privilege%22+Diplomatic+%22cannot+be+asserted+unilaterally%22+%22exists+only%22+%22another+state%27s+sovereignty%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8886781550786925928&q=%22Anthony+Troy+Williams%22+%22right+to+travel+has+not+been+infringed+upon%22+%22he+is+not+required+to+have+a+drivers+license+if+he+is+not+traveling+in+commerce%22+%22attorney+in+fact+for+the+legal+fiction%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . Note that this is the same person who stars in the 3 minute video below.

9). WHAT ABOUT CASE LAW THAT AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS CITE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR HOAX? Ex: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MZrB0TRFYI

Amateur legal theorists ONLY CITE case law that says a person has a "RIGHT" to: a). "TRAVEL"; b). "USE THE ROADWAYS"; c). "LOCOMOTION"; d). "PASSAGE"; e). "FREE TRANSIT"; and f). "USE ORDINARY CONVEYANCES". Note that the word, "DRIVE" is conspicuously absent in all of these cases.

But, amateur legal theorists DO NOT CITE case law that actually says that a person has a "RIGHT TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE" (because no such law exists) AND THOSE ARE THE ONLY WORDS THAT MATTER.

3 MINUTE VIDEO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

SNOPES:
http://m.snopes.com/supreme-court-rules-drivers-licenses-unnecessary/


ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.

topspin2


This guy is a tricky tricky man....A citizen in 1900 is not the same as a citizen of 2017. Congress has changed the definition of many of the words...So I for one think that your stance is complete bologna. Probably because you are someone who has a vested interest in misleading the masses. The system is a complete and total fraud...Its a commercial system designed to control and use anything in its path...well....except God....This word seems to garner a bit of attention... AND....just tell the truth is you're signature..You sound like the RV scammer guy...perhaps your one in the same.....


PS..Didnt you mean for this to read  as follows:

Most importantly, the UNITED STATES GOV is a  HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of ILLEGAL HOAXES which they created and peddle to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum