Latest topics
» Are Vaccine Manufacturers Concealing Deaths Caused by Vaccines by Manipulating Post-marketing Data?
Today at 10:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» This Is How They Can ‘Turn Off Your Chip
Today at 10:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» Project Camelot - SIMON PARKES: LATEST NEWS AND COMMENTARY
Today at 12:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» More on the Hiker that dies not too far away from the Solar Observatory, New Mexico
Yesterday at 11:45 pm by PurpleSkyz

» #Q Anon: Q ANON:PANIC IN DC! ROTHSCHILD SKULL ISSUES! EPSTEIN ISLAND! plus more
Yesterday at 9:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» De- Regulating of Human Medicine and Animal Medicine these people are Criminals
Yesterday at 3:18 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Carrying Stones & Digging Holes Radio Show September 15, 2018
Yesterday at 3:08 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» POOFness for SEPT 16: SINGIN' IN THE RAIN - SO LET THE DONATIONS POUR DOWN ON ME!
Yesterday at 1:22 pm by 4-truth

» New Michael Tellinger Some of the Strangest Discoveries Ever Made on Ancient Origins
Yesterday at 9:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» Rock Hunter Discovers Unusual Glowing Florescent Rocks Called “Yooperlites”
Yesterday at 9:37 am by PurpleSkyz

» Unexplained Google Earth discovery in Utah
Yesterday at 9:29 am by PurpleSkyz

» #Q Anon - Q - Pain - Lynch Talking plus more
Yesterday at 9:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ UFOs Sighted Over Toronto, Canada plus MORE
Yesterday at 9:23 am by PurpleSkyz

» BOOM! Trump Declassifies Fisa Documents!
Yesterday at 9:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ WORLD WIDE footages of NIBIRU PLANETX incoming binary system worldwide sighting plus MORE
Yesterday at 9:16 am by PurpleSkyz

» Harvest Moon Rising - The Most Beautiful Full Moon of the Year Coming Next Week
Yesterday at 9:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Spider’s Web: Britain’s Second Empire
Yesterday at 9:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» Flynn's Plea Deal will SHOCK You!!
Yesterday at 12:14 am by Serena1

» A Message To and From Th3 Ḧḭṽḕ Collective
Yesterday at 12:13 am by PurpleSkyz

» Strange Series of Anomalies Stretching Across Pacific Ocean
Yesterday at 12:04 am by PurpleSkyz

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS



You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » MEMBER ADVERTISING & BLOG FORUMS » SNOOP 4 TRUTH » ROD CLASS & THE "RIGHT TO TRAVEL HOAX" & THE "NO DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIRED HOAX"

ROD CLASS & THE "RIGHT TO TRAVEL HOAX" & THE "NO DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIRED HOAX"

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

snoop4truth


FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afCz8AjvYdY&t=421s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6SGIfO4ug4&t=69s 
THE HOAX I: Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that A PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER’S LICENSE TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE on the grounds that every person has a "RIGHT TO TRAVEL". Thus, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that the "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" is the same thing as the "RIGHT TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE". But, this is not so.

THE TRUTH: The "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" is merely the JUDICIALLY-recognized RIGHT TO LEAVE ONE STATE AND TO ENTER ANOTHER STATE. It has NOTHING to do with "DRIVING" anything. Under the law, there is no such thing as a "RIGHT TO DRIVE" a motor vehicle. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know this.

THE HOAX II: Further, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists point out that under FEDERAL law, A PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE to drive a motor vehicle UNLESS THAT PERSON IS ENGAGED IN "COMMERCE" AMONG ["BETWEEN"] THE "SEVERAL STATES" ("interstate commerce"), a narrow subject governed by FEDERAL law. See Const., Art. 1, Sec. 8 (listing ALL POWERS of Congress).
http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/article-i-section-8 . https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause.

THE TRUTH: But, what Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know is that STATE LAW APPLIES TO THE SAME PERSON AT THE SAME TIME. This is because, under the tenth amendment, STATE LAW GOVERNS THE SUBJECT OF DRIVER'S LICENSES OUTSIDE THE NARROW FEDERAL CONTEXT OF "INTERSTATE COMMERCE" (IN ALL OTHER CONTEXTS).
http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment. And, under STATE law, a person is required to have a driver’s license to drive a motor vehicle WHEN THAT PERSON IS NOT ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE". So, when BOTH FEDERAL law and STATE law are COMBINED AND  APPLIED TO THE SAME PERSON AT THE SAME TIME, A PERSON IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER’S LICENSE TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE IN ALL CONTEXTS, ALL THE TIME, NO MATTER WHAT (whether or not that person is engaged in "interstate commerce"). But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do  not know this.

THE LAW:

1). OVER A CENTURY AGO, THE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT, in the absence of FEDERAL legislation, THE STATES HAD THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE ALL DRIVERS OF ALL MOTOR VEHICLES TO HAVE DRIVER'S LICENSES, WHETHER OR NOT THAT DRIVER WAS ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE".

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13681451034893205402&q=1915++%22and+the+licensing+of+their+drivers%22++%22it+may+require+the+registration%22+%22as+well+as+others%22+%22of+all+motor+vehicles%22+%22in+respect+to+the+operation%22++%22a+state+may+rightfully+prescribe+uniform+regulations%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,60

Since this decision, CONGRESS (in compliance with this decision and in compliance with Art. 1, Sec. 8, clause 3, U.S. Const.) passed FEDERAL legislation regulating drivers WHO WERE ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE. Under the tenth amendment and under this decision, this reserved unto THE STATES the power to regulate drivers WHO WERE NOT ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE".

2). Under the tenth amendment, the STATES have the RIGHT to require driver's licenses of all drivers who are NOT ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE" .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5478545834163197366&q=%22tenth+amendment%22+%22are+reserved+for+the+states%22+%22A+state%22+%22may+require%22+%22the+licensing+of+their+drivers%22+%22belonging+to+the+states%22+&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4613890670558831166&q=%22may+require%22+%22licensing+of+their+drivers%22+%22state+laws+requiring+valid+driver%27s+license%22+%22belonging+to+the+states%22+%22a+state%22+%22states+have+the+right+to+regulate%22+%22by+requiring+that+drivers%22+%22obtain+driver%27s+licenses%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4259598666103911788&q=%22necessity+of+regulation%22++%22may+constitutionally+regulate%22+++%22states%22+%22license+their+drivers%22+%22the+universal+practice+is+to+register+ownership%22+%22uses+of%22+%22public+highways%22+%22the+supreme+court%22+%22did+not+limit+its+holding+to%22+commercial&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

3). THERE IS NO "RIGHT TO DRIVE".

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9780294138406294886&q=%22the+constitution+recognizes+a+right+to+travel%22+%22it+does+not+recognize+a+fundamental+right+to+drive%22+%22right+to+free+movement%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . (NEAR THE END OF THE CASE)

4). "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" DEFINED.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4721017505990988840&q=+%22the+constitutional+right+to+travel+from+one+state+to+another%22+%22Right+to+travel+discussed+in+our+cases%22+%22protects+the+right+of+a+citizen+of+one+state+to+enter+and+to+leave+another+state%22++&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . (SEE BOTH SECTIONS.).

5). The "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" IS NOT ABOUT "DRIVING" ANYTHING.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5478545834163197366&q=%22the+right+to+travel%22+%22is+not+synonymous%22+%22with+the+right+to+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22++%22The+operation+of+a+motor+vehicle%22+%22is+not+a+natural+right%22+%22It+is+a+conditional+privilege%22+&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9621580109864231465&q=%22this+is+not%22+%22what+is+at+issue+here+is+not+his+right+to+travel+interstate,+but+his+right+to+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22+%22Miller+does+not+have+a+fundamental+right+to+drive%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10451209462604692152&q=%22The+right+to+travel%22+%22is+the+right%22+%22to+travel+from+one+state+to+another%22+%22Petitioners+are+free+to+leave+the+state%22+%22although+they+may+not+drive+without+a+drivers+license%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18159286216902234518&q=complying+without+merit+%22right+to+travel%22+%22petitioner+misunderstands%22+%22there+is+no+fundamental+right%22+vehicle++%22nonexistent+right%22+motor+vehicles+license+%22to+operate%22++%22to+drive%22+%22without+a+valid%22+%22he+was+constitutionally+entitled%22+%22petitioner+claims+that%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

6). State requirements for driver's licenses DO NOT VIOLATE THE  "RIGHT TO TRAVEL".

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4613890670558831166&q=%22state+laws+requiring+valid+driver%27s+license+to+operate+a+motor+vehicle+do+not+violate+right+to+travel%22+%22there+is+no+fundamental+right+to+drive%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8872041112923644828&q=%22right+to+travel%22+%22does+not+impermissibly+burden+his%22+%22does+not+implicate%22+%22only+denies+plaintiff+the+ability+to+drive+himself+in+a+car%22+%22right+to+travel%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8886781550786925928&q=%22right+to+travel+has+not+been+infringed+upon+by+the+requirement%22+%22that+an+individual+have+a+valid+driver%27s+license+to+lawfully+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12477576553628312121&q=%22does+not+rise+to+the+level+of+a+violation%22%22do+not+violate%22+%22do+not+implicate%22+%22there+is+no+fundamental+right+to+drive+a+motor+vehicle%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

7). A person may freely exercise their "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" without "DRIVING" ANYTHING by walking, riding a bicycle or horse, or as a "PASSENGER" in an automobile, bus, airplane or helicopter.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5478545834163197366&q=+%22If+he+wishes,+he+may+walk,+ride+a+bicycle+or+horse,+or+travel+as+a+passenger+in+an+automobile,+bus,+airplane+or+helicopter.+He+cannot,+however,+operate+a+motor+vehicle%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9621580109864231465&q=+%22the+plaintiff+is+not+being+prevented+from+traveling+interstate+by+public+transportation,+by+common+carrier,+or+in+a+motor+vehicle+driven+by+someone+with+a+license+to+drive+it%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

8). AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES ALWAYS LOSE.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18159286216902234518&q=%22right+to+travel%22+natural++%22another+entity%22+immune+person+foreign+entities+%22American+National%22+corporations+corporate+artificial+entities+sovereign&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9626485208674815070&q=%22dangerous+drivers%22+%22the+operation%22+travelling+ambassador+immunity+traveling+%22in+a+conveyance%22+%22is+a+privilege%22+Diplomatic+%22cannot+be+asserted+unilaterally%22+%22exists+only%22+%22another+state%27s+sovereignty%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8886781550786925928&q=%22Anthony+Troy+Williams%22+%22right+to+travel+has+not+been+infringed+upon%22+%22he+is+not+required+to+have+a+drivers+license+if+he+is+not+traveling+in+commerce%22+%22attorney+in+fact+for+the+legal+fiction%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . Note that this is the same person who stars in the 3 minute video below.

9). WHAT ABOUT CASE LAW THAT AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS CITE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR HOAX? Ex: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MZrB0TRFYI

Amateur legal theorists ONLY CITE case law that says a person has a "RIGHT" to: a). "TRAVEL"; b). "USE THE ROADWAYS"; c). "LOCOMOTION"; d). "PASSAGE"; e). "FREE TRANSIT"; and f). "USE ORDINARY CONVEYANCES". Note that the word, "DRIVE" is conspicuously absent in all of these cases.

But, amateur legal theorists DO NOT CITE case law that actually says that a person has a "RIGHT TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE" (because no such law exists) AND THOSE ARE THE ONLY WORDS THAT MATTER.

3 MINUTE VIDEO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

SNOPES:
http://m.snopes.com/supreme-court-rules-drivers-licenses-unnecessary/


ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.

topspin2


This guy is a tricky tricky man....A citizen in 1900 is not the same as a citizen of 2017. Congress has changed the definition of many of the words...So I for one think that your stance is complete bologna. Probably because you are someone who has a vested interest in misleading the masses. The system is a complete and total fraud...Its a commercial system designed to control and use anything in its path...well....except God....This word seems to garner a bit of attention... AND....just tell the truth is you're signature..You sound like the RV scammer guy...perhaps your one in the same.....


PS..Didnt you mean for this to read  as follows:

Most importantly, the UNITED STATES GOV is a  HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of ILLEGAL HOAXES which they created and peddle to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum